NeuroSploit v3.3.0 — Autonomous MD-Agent Engine

Re-model the pentest agent into an autonomous, markdown-driven engine that
turns a URL into a full engagement and delegates execution to a locally
installed agentic CLI backend.

Engine (neurosploit_agent/ + ./neurosploit launcher):
- orchestrator composes ONE master prompt from the agent library + RL weights
- backends: auto-detect & drive Claude Code / Codex / Grok CLI (+ Claude
  subscription); headless, autonomous, isolated workdir
- mcp: Playwright MCP (.mcp.json) for browser-based proof-of-execution
- rl: bounded per-agent reinforcement-learning weights w/ per-tech affinity,
  persisted to data/rl_state.json
- models: latest registry incl. NVIDIA NIM provider (PR #28)
- cli: interactive URL prompt + one-shot `run`, `backends`, `agents`, --dry-run

Agent library (agents_md/, 213 total):
- 196 vuln specialists incl. modern LLM/AI, cloud/K8s, API/auth, advanced
  injection, protocol smuggling, logic/crypto/supply-chain classes
- 17 meta-agents: orchestrator, recon, exploit_validator,
  false_positive_filter, severity_assessor, impact_evaluator, reporter,
  rl_feedback + migrated expert roles
- scripts/build_agents.py data-driven builder; REGISTRY.md index

Docs: rewritten README.md, v3.3.0 RELEASE.md, .env.example (NVIDIA NIM, xAI,
engine vars).

Retire legacy Python orchestration (neurosploit.py + agent classes) to legacy/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

agents_md/vulns/clickjacking.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Clickjacking Specialist Agent
+## User Prompt
+You are testing **{target}** for Clickjacking vulnerabilities.
+**Recon Context:**
+{recon_json}
+**METHODOLOGY:**
+### 1. Check Frame Protection
+- `X-Frame-Options` header: DENY, SAMEORIGIN, or missing
+- `Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors` directive
+- Both missing = potentially vulnerable
+### 2. Test Framing
+```html
+<iframe src="https://target.com/sensitive-action" style="opacity:0.1;position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%"></iframe>
+<button style="position:relative;z-index:1">Click here for prize!</button>
+```
+### 3. Identify High-Impact Targets
+- Account deletion, password change, fund transfer
+- Two-click attacks: first click positions, second click confirms
+- Drag-and-drop: steal data via drag events on framed page
+### 4. Bypass Techniques
+- `sandbox` attribute on iframe may bypass frame-busting JS
+- Double-framing: frame a page that frames the target
+- Mobile: no X-Frame-Options on some mobile browsers
+### 5. Report
+```
+FINDING:
+- Title: Clickjacking on [action] at [endpoint]
+- Severity: Medium
+- CWE: CWE-1021
+- Endpoint: [URL]
+- X-Frame-Options: [value or missing]
+- CSP frame-ancestors: [value or missing]
+- Action: [what can be triggered]
+- Impact: Unauthorized actions via UI redress
+- Remediation: X-Frame-Options: DENY, CSP frame-ancestors 'self'
+```
+## System Prompt
+You are a Clickjacking specialist. Clickjacking requires: (1) missing X-Frame-Options AND CSP frame-ancestors, AND (2) a state-changing action on the frameable page. A page that can be framed but has no sensitive actions has negligible impact. Focus on pages with account actions, payments, or admin functions.