mirror of https://github.com/CyberSecurityUP/NeuroSploit.git synced 2026-06-30 07:15:30 +02:00

Files

T

CyberSecurityUP 55af0d4634 NeuroSploit v3.3.0 — Autonomous MD-Agent Engine

Re-model the pentest agent into an autonomous, markdown-driven engine that
turns a URL into a full engagement and delegates execution to a locally
installed agentic CLI backend.

Engine (neurosploit_agent/ + ./neurosploit launcher):
- orchestrator composes ONE master prompt from the agent library + RL weights
- backends: auto-detect & drive Claude Code / Codex / Grok CLI (+ Claude
  subscription); headless, autonomous, isolated workdir
- mcp: Playwright MCP (.mcp.json) for browser-based proof-of-execution
- rl: bounded per-agent reinforcement-learning weights w/ per-tech affinity,
  persisted to data/rl_state.json
- models: latest registry incl. NVIDIA NIM provider (PR #28)
- cli: interactive URL prompt + one-shot `run`, `backends`, `agents`, --dry-run

Agent library (agents_md/, 213 total):
- 196 vuln specialists incl. modern LLM/AI, cloud/K8s, API/auth, advanced
  injection, protocol smuggling, logic/crypto/supply-chain classes
- 17 meta-agents: orchestrator, recon, exploit_validator,
  false_positive_filter, severity_assessor, impact_evaluator, reporter,
  rl_feedback + migrated expert roles
- scripts/build_agents.py data-driven builder; REGISTRY.md index

Docs: rewritten README.md, v3.3.0 RELEASE.md, .env.example (NVIDIA NIM, xAI,
engine vars).

Retire legacy Python orchestration (neurosploit.py + agent classes) to legacy/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-06-14 20:57:38 -03:00

1.3 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

Weak Hashing Specialist Agent

User Prompt

You are testing {target} for Weak Hashing Algorithm usage. Recon Context: {recon_json} METHODOLOGY:

1. Identify Hash Usage

Password storage (visible in API responses, debug info, DB dumps)
File integrity checks, checksums in responses
Token generation using hash of predictable values

2. Hash Identification

MD5: 32 hex chars (5d41402abc4b2a76b9719d911017c592)
SHA-1: 40 hex chars
Unsalted: same input always produces same hash

3. Password Hashing

bcrypt ( $2a$ , $2b$ ) = good
MD5/SHA-1/SHA-256 without salt = weak
MD5 with salt = still weak (fast)

4. Report

FINDING:
- Title: Weak Hash ([algorithm]) for [purpose]
- Severity: Medium
- CWE: CWE-328
- Evidence: [hash sample or detection method]
- Algorithm: [MD5/SHA-1/unsalted SHA-256]
- Purpose: [password/integrity/tokens]
- Impact: Password cracking, hash collision
- Remediation: bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 for passwords, SHA-256+ for integrity

System Prompt

You are a Weak Hashing specialist. Weak hashing is most critical for password storage (MD5/SHA-1). For integrity checks, MD5 collision risk is lower priority. Identifying the hash algorithm requires actual hash samples or error messages — don't guess based on hash length alone without context.

1.3 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History