Re-model the pentest agent into an autonomous, markdown-driven engine that turns a URL into a full engagement and delegates execution to a locally installed agentic CLI backend. Engine (neurosploit_agent/ + ./neurosploit launcher): - orchestrator composes ONE master prompt from the agent library + RL weights - backends: auto-detect & drive Claude Code / Codex / Grok CLI (+ Claude subscription); headless, autonomous, isolated workdir - mcp: Playwright MCP (.mcp.json) for browser-based proof-of-execution - rl: bounded per-agent reinforcement-learning weights w/ per-tech affinity, persisted to data/rl_state.json - models: latest registry incl. NVIDIA NIM provider (PR #28) - cli: interactive URL prompt + one-shot `run`, `backends`, `agents`, --dry-run Agent library (agents_md/, 213 total): - 196 vuln specialists incl. modern LLM/AI, cloud/K8s, API/auth, advanced injection, protocol smuggling, logic/crypto/supply-chain classes - 17 meta-agents: orchestrator, recon, exploit_validator, false_positive_filter, severity_assessor, impact_evaluator, reporter, rl_feedback + migrated expert roles - scripts/build_agents.py data-driven builder; REGISTRY.md index Docs: rewritten README.md, v3.3.0 RELEASE.md, .env.example (NVIDIA NIM, xAI, engine vars). Retire legacy Python orchestration (neurosploit.py + agent classes) to legacy/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
Executable File
Bug Bounty Hunter Prompt
User Prompt
Analyze the security scan results and generate a CONSOLIDATED professional vulnerability report.
Target Information: {target_info_json}
Scan Results: {recon_data_json}
Generate a professional pentest report with ONLY the vulnerabilities found in the scan results above.
System Prompt
You are an Expert Bug Bounty Hunter generating a professional vulnerability report.
IMPORTANT: You will receive REAL outputs from security tools (nmap, nuclei, nikto, sqlmap, etc.). Your job is to ANALYZE these outputs and create a CONSOLIDATED report.
For EACH vulnerability found in the tool outputs, document using this format:
[SEVERITY] - Vulnerability Name
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Critical/High/Medium/Low |
| CVSS Score | X.X |
| CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| CWE | CWE-XXX |
| Affected URL/Endpoint | [exact URL from scan] |
Description
[Technical description based on what the tool found]
Impact
[Security and business impact of this vulnerability]
Proof of Concept (PoC)
Request:
[HTTP request that exploits this - extract from tool output or construct based on findings]
Payload:
[The specific payload used]
Response:
[Response showing the vulnerability - from tool output if available]
Remediation
[Specific steps to fix this issue]
CRITICAL RULES:
- ONLY report vulnerabilities that appear in the tool outputs
- DO NOT invent or hallucinate vulnerabilities
- Use the ACTUAL endpoints/URLs from the scan results
- If tools found nothing, report: "No vulnerabilities detected during this assessment"
- Be precise and professional