CyberSecurityUPandClaude Opus 5 c3a6132153 feat(report): findings that answer where / why / how to fix, with a pasteable PoC ...

A finding is useful only if the reader can find the problem, see why it
matters, fix it, and reproduce it without trusting us. The report answered the
last one badly and the other three not at all: it printed a payload blob and an
evidence blob, and "payload: ' OR 1=1--" tells a developer nothing about WHERE
to look. A PoC script attached as a file is a black box unless you run it.

Findings are now rendered in the order a reader works through them — where the
problem is, what it means, how to fix it, then the proof — in the HTML report,
the Markdown, the Typst/PDF and the web console's finding modal.

The proof is numbered, pasteable steps: baseline request, attack request, how
to read the result, with the real URL and the real payload. They come from the
agent's `repro_steps` when it recorded them, and are derived from the
endpoint/payload/identity pair otherwise, so every finding carries something
runnable. The generated curl redacts Authorization/Cookie/API-key headers — a
report gets shared, and a live session cookie inside one is a new bug. A PoC
script is now offered as an extra artifact that automates the steps, never as
the proof itself.

Technical evidence is the measured difference, not a paraphrase: baseline vs
attack status, size, timing and delta; how many repeats reproduced it; the
controlled marker and whether a browser or a callback observed it; then each
recorded exchange with the headers that decide a class (Location, Set-Cookie,
Access-Control-*, X-Frame-Options, CSP, Retry-After) and a body excerpt.

Finding gains `location` (the parameter/field/flow step, not just the URL) and
`repro_steps`, and the agent contract now asks for them explicitly, along with
impact tied to this app's data and remediation that names the control rather
than saying "sanitise input".

The web console offers the run's PDF when Typst produced one — and only then,
since a dead download button is worse than none.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-13 17:48:14 -03:00

..

report.typ

feat(report): findings that answer where / why / how to fix, with a pasteable PoC

2026-09-13 17:48:14 -03:00