diff --git a/workflows/FINAL_RELEASE_REVIEW.md b/workflows/FINAL_RELEASE_REVIEW.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 0bd4135..0000000
--- a/workflows/FINAL_RELEASE_REVIEW.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,440 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Final release review - Comprehensive handbook quality audit
----
-
-# Final Release Review: AI LLM Red Team Handbook
-
-Perform a comprehensive, production-ready review of the entire handbook before declaring it ready for public release. This is the final quality gate.
-
-## Review Objectives
-
-Verify that the handbook meets professional publication standards across:
-
-- Technical accuracy and factual correctness
-- Structural coherence and completeness
-- Professional polish and readability
-- Reference validity and citation quality
-- Code example functionality
-- Legal and licensing compliance
-- User experience and accessibility
-
----
-
-## PHASE 1: Structural Integrity
-
-### 1.1 Table of Contents Verification
-
-**Task:** Verify TOC matches actual chapter structure
-
-- [ ] Compare `README.md` TOC against actual chapter files in `/docs/`
-- [ ] Verify all chapter numbers are sequential (1-46)
-- [ ] Confirm all chapter titles match between TOC and file headers
-- [ ] Check that Part groupings (I-VIII) are accurate
-- [ ] Verify page counts or section counts are reasonable
-- [ ] Ensure no orphaned or missing chapters
-
-**Command:**
-
-```bash
-cd /home/e/Desktop/ai-llm-red-team-handbook
-# List all chapter files
-ls -1 docs/Chapter_*.md | sort -V
-# Compare with README TOC
-```
-
-### 1.2 Cross-Reference Validation
-
-**Task:** Verify internal chapter references are valid
-
-- [ ] Search for all chapter references (e.g., "Chapter 14", "see Ch 23")
-- [ ] Verify referenced chapters exist
-- [ ] Check that forward/backward references make logical sense
-- [ ] Validate section number references (e.g., "Section 12.3")
-- [ ] Ensure appendix references are correct
-
-**Search patterns:**
-
-```bash
-# Find chapter references
-rg -i "chapter \d+" docs/
-rg -i "ch \d+" docs/
-rg -i "section \d+\.\d+" docs/
-```
-
-### 1.3 Completeness Check
-
-**Task:** Ensure all promised content exists
-
-- [ ] All chapters from 1-46 present
-- [ ] All appendices referenced in text exist
-- [ ] All "See Appendix X" references valid
-- [ ] Glossary is comprehensive (Appendix A)
-- [ ] Tool repository is complete (Appendix C)
-- [ ] Essential papers list exists (Appendix B)
-- [ ] No "TODO" or "[TBD]" markers remain
-
-**Command:**
-
-```bash
-# Search for incomplete markers
-rg -i "TODO|TBD|FIXME|\[pending\]|\[coming soon\]" docs/
-```
-
----
-
-## PHASE 2: Technical Accuracy
-
-### 2.1 Reference and URL Validation
-
-**Task:** Verify all external links are accessible
-
-- [ ] Test all HTTP/HTTPS URLs (200 status check)
-- [ ] Identify dead links (404, 500 errors)
-- [ ] Check for paywalled content warnings
-- [ ] Verify arXiv paper IDs are valid
-- [ ] Confirm GitHub repository links work
-- [ ] Validate tool installation URLs
-
-**Automated check:**
-
-```bash
-# Extract all URLs
-rg -oP 'https?://[^\s\)]+' docs/ > urls.txt
-# Test URLs (requires custom script or tool like broken-link-checker)
-```
-
-### 2.2 Code Example Verification
-
-**Task:** Ensure code examples are syntactically correct
-
-- [ ] All code blocks have language identifiers (no MD040 violations)
-- [ ] Python code examples are syntactically valid
-- [ ] Bash/shell commands are properly formatted
-- [ ] No placeholder values that should be variables (e.g., actual API keys)
-- [ ] Code examples are self-contained or clearly marked as snippets
-- [ ] Import statements are present where needed
-
-**Spot check approach:**
-
-- Extract Python code blocks from 5 random chapters
-- Run through `python -m py_compile` or `black --check`
-
-### 2.3 Factual Claims Verification
-
-**Task:** Cross-check key factual assertions
-
-**Focus areas:**
-
-- [ ] CVE numbers and dates
-- [ ] Model release dates (GPT-4: March 2023, etc.)
-- [ ] Company names and acquisitions
-- [ ] Conference names and dates
-- [ ] OWASP Top 10 LLM items (verify against official list)
-- [ ] MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs
-- [ ] Legal frameworks (CFAA, GDPR dates/provisions)
-- [ ] Salary ranges (verify against levels.fyi for 2025/2026)
-
-**Sample verification:**
-
-- Pick 3 chapters at random
-- Verify 5 factual claims per chapter against authoritative sources
-
-### 2.4 Research Paper Citations
-
-**Task:** Validate research citations
-
-- [ ] All arXiv links use correct format: `https://arxiv.org/abs/XXXX.XXXXX`
-- [ ] Paper titles match actual paper titles (no typos)
-- [ ] Author names are correct (especially for major papers)
-- [ ] Publication venues are accurate (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, etc.)
-- [ ] Year of publication is correct
-- [ ] No hallucinated papers (all citations are real)
-
-**Spot check:**
-
-- Verify all papers in Appendix B (Essential Papers)
-- Randomly verify 10 in-text citations
-
----
-
-## PHASE 3: Formatting and Style
-
-### 3.1 Markdown Linting
-
-**Task:** Ensure markdown follows standards
-
-- [ ] Run `markdownlint` on all chapter files
-- [ ] Fix all MD violations (MD036, MD040, MD024, MD025, etc.)
-- [ ] Verify heading hierarchy is logical (no H1 → H4 jumps)
-- [ ] Ensure consistent list formatting
-- [ ] Check for proper code fence formatting
-
-**Command:**
-
-```bash
-# Run markdownlint
-markdownlint docs/*.md
-# Or if config exists:
-markdownlint -c .markdownlint.json docs/
-```
-
-### 3.2 Style Consistency
-
-**Task:** Verify consistent terminology and formatting
-
-- [ ] Consistent terminology ("LLM" vs "large language model" - establish pattern)
-- [ ] Consistent code formatting (backticks for inline code: `model`, `API`, etc.)
-- [ ] Consistent heading capitalization (Title Case vs Sentence case)
-- [ ] Consistent bold/italic usage
-- [ ] Consistent abbreviation usage (first use expanded, then abbreviated)
-- [ ] Date format consistency (ISO 8601 preferred)
-
-**Pattern checks:**
-
-```bash
-# Check for inconsistent patterns
-rg "large language model" docs/ | wc -l
-rg "LLM" docs/ | wc -l
-# Establish which is primary and which is acceptable
-```
-
-### 3.3 Grammar and Spelling
-
-**Task:** Professional proofreading
-
-- [ ] Run spell checker on all chapters
-- [ ] Review for common typos
-- [ ] Check for repeated words ("the the", "and and")
-- [ ] Verify technical terms are spelled correctly
-- [ ] British vs American English consistency (choose one)
-
-**Tools:**
-
-```bash
-# Use aspell or similar
-for file in docs/Chapter_*.md; do
-  aspell list < "$file" | sort -u > "${file}.spelling"
-done
-```
-
-### 3.4 Visual Elements
-
-**Task:** Verify diagrams and visual aids
-
-- [ ] All referenced images exist in correct paths
-- [ ] Mermaid diagrams render correctly
-- [ ] Tables are properly formatted
-- [ ] Alt text present for accessibility
-- [ ] Consistent image naming convention
-
----
-
-## PHASE 4: User Experience
-
-### 4.1 Readability Assessment
-
-**Task:** Ensure handbook is accessible to target audience
-
-- [ ] Chapter introductions clearly state objectives
-- [ ] Technical jargon is defined on first use
-- [ ] Examples support explanations effectively
-- [ ] Transitions between sections are smooth
-- [ ] Summary sections recap key points
-- [ ] No unnecessary verbosity
-
-**Spot check:**
-
-- Read introductions of all chapters (1-46)
-- Verify each has "What you'll learn" or similar framing
-
-### 4.2 Progressive Complexity
-
-**Task:** Verify logical learning progression
-
-- [ ] Early chapters (1-11) are foundational
-- [ ] Middle chapters (12-30) build on fundamentals
-- [ ] Advanced chapters (31-46) require earlier knowledge
-- [ ] Prerequisites are clearly stated
-- [ ] No circular dependencies (Ch 10 requires Ch 15, Ch 15 requires Ch 10)
-
-### 4.3 Practical Utility
-
-**Task:** Ensure actionable content
-
-- [ ] Each attack chapter has working examples
-- [ ] Defense chapters provide implementable controls
-- [ ] Tool recommendations are current (2025/2026)
-- [ ] Commands are copy-paste ready (or clearly marked as templates)
-- [ ] Real-world case studies are relevant and recent
-
----
-
-## PHASE 5: Legal and Compliance
-
-### 5.1 Licensing Verification
-
-**Task:** Confirm legal compliance
-
-- [ ] LICENSE file present (CC BY-SA 4.0)
-- [ ] License notice in README
-- [ ] Attribution for third-party content
-- [ ] No proprietary code without permission
-- [ ] No copyrighted images without rights
-- [ ] Disclaimer about educational use only
-
-### 5.2 Ethical Guidelines
-
-**Task:** Verify responsible disclosure framing
-
-- [ ] Ethical considerations prominently featured
-- [ ] Warning about unauthorized testing
-- [ ] Rules of engagement emphasized
-- [ ] Legal compliance sections accurate
-- [ ] No encouragement of illegal activity
-- [ ] Bug bounty best practices included
-
-### 5.3 Privacy and Safety
-
-**Task:** Ensure no sensitive information
-
-- [ ] No actual API keys or credentials
-- [ ] No real PII in examples
-- [ ] No specific attack targets (except in historical case studies)
-- [ ] Anonymization in case studies
-- [ ] No instructions for creating weapons/harm
-
----
-
-## PHASE 6: Final Polish
-
-### 6.1 Metadata and Versioning
-
-**Task:** Update version information
-
-- [ ] Version number updated (e.g., "Version 1.0 | Gold Master | January 2026")
-- [ ] Release date accurate
-- [ ] Contributors acknowledged
-- [ ] Changelog updated (if exists)
-- [ ] Git tags applied for release
-
-### 6.2 README Quality
-
-**Task:** Ensure README is professional
-
-- [ ] Clear value proposition
-- [ ] Table of contents is accurate
-- [ ] Installation/setup instructions (if applicable)
-- [ ] Contribution guidelines clear
-- [ ] Contact information current
-- [ ] Badges/shields (if desired: license, version, stars)
-- [ ] Screenshot or compelling visual
-
-### 6.3 Performance Check
-
-**Task:** Verify handbook is usable
-
-- [ ] Total file size reasonable for Git distribution
-- [ ] Large files (if any) use Git LFS
-- [ ] No corrupted files
-- [ ] Consistent encoding (UTF-8)
-- [ ] Line endings consistent (LF preferred)
-
-**Commands:**
-
-```bash
-# Check file sizes
-du -sh docs/*
-# Check encoding
-file docs/*.md
-```
-
----
-
-## PHASE 7: Smoke Tests
-
-### 7.1 End-to-End Reader Journey
-
-**Task:** Simulate new user experience
-
-- [ ] Clone fresh repo
-- [ ] Read README start to finish
-- [ ] Open Chapter 1 and verify it's accessible
-- [ ] Jump to Chapter 25 (middle) and verify references work
-- [ ] Open Chapter 46 and verify conclusion is satisfying
-- [ ] Click 5 random external links
-- [ ] Test 1 code example from a random chapter
-
-### 7.2 Multiple Format Verification
-
-**Task:** Test different viewing contexts
-
-- [ ] Render in GitHub web interface
-- [ ] Render in local Markdown viewer (Obsidian, Typora, VS Code)
-- [ ] Export to PDF (if supported) and verify formatting
-- [ ] Mobile viewing (if applicable)
-
----
-
-## FINAL CHECKLIST: Release Readiness
-
-### Critical (Must-Fix Before Release)
-
-- [ ] No broken internal links
-- [ ] No TODO/TBD markers
-- [ ] All chapters 1-46 present
-- [ ] No MD linting errors
-- [ ] License file present
-- [ ] Ethical disclaimers in place
-- [ ] Version number updated
-- [ ] No credentials/API keys in code
-
-### High Priority (Should-Fix)
-
-- [ ] No dead external links (or marked as archived)
-- [ ] Code examples syntactically valid
-- [ ] Factual claims verified (spot check)
-- [ ] Research citations accurate (spot check)
-- [ ] Consistent terminology
-- [ ] Professional grammar/spelling
-
-### Nice-to-Have (Polish)
-
-- [ ] All external links tested (100% coverage)
-- [ ] Salary data current (2025/2026)
-- [ ] Tool versions updated
-- [ ] Mermaid diagrams render beautifully
-- [ ] Consistent heading capitalization
-- [ ] Mobile-friendly formatting
-
----
-
-## SIGN-OFF
-
-Once all critical and high-priority items are addressed:
-
-**Release Approval:**
-
-- [ ] Technical Reviewer: **\*\*\*\***\_**\*\*\*\*** Date: **\_\_\_**
-- [ ] Editor (Style/Grammar): **\*\***\_**\*\*** Date: **\_\_\_**
-- [ ] Legal/Compliance: **\*\*\*\***\_\_**\*\*\*\*** Date: **\_\_\_**
-- [ ] Final Approver: **\*\*\*\***\_\_\_\_**\*\*\*\*** Date: **\_\_\_**
-
-**Release Actions:**
-
-1. Create release tag: `git tag -a v1.0-gold-master -m "AI LLM Red Team Handbook - Gold Master Release"`
-2. Push tag: `git push origin v1.0-gold-master`
-3. Create GitHub Release with release notes
-4. Update README badge to "Released" status
-5. Announce on social media, communities
-6. Archive "review" branch if exists
-
----
-
-**Handbook is READY FOR RELEASE when:**
-
-- All critical items checked
-- 90%+ of high-priority items checked
-- At least 2 reviewers have signed off
-- Git tag applied and pushed
-
-**Final Advisory:** This is a living document. Post-release issues should be tracked as GitHub Issues, not blockers. Perfect is the enemy of shipped. ✨
diff --git a/workflows/audit-fix-humanize-chapter-v2.md b/workflows/audit-fix-humanize-chapter-v2.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 73078b5..0000000
--- a/workflows/audit-fix-humanize-chapter-v2.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,192 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Optimized audit, fix, and humanize workflow (v2.0)
----
-
-# Audit-Fix-Humanize Workflow v2.0 (Optimized)
-
-**Performance**: 51% faster | **Reliability**: 98% success | **Fully Automated**
-
-## Quick Start
-
-```bash
-python workflows/scripts/process_chapter.py Chapter_XX.md
-```
-
-## Phase 1: Parallel Technical Audit
-
-// turbo-all
-
-```text
-You are a technical document auditor. Perform verification with these optimizations:
-
-PARALLEL PROCESSING:
-- Verify all URLs concurrently (max 10 parallel)
-- Use cached responses (24-hour TTL)
-- Timeout requests at 30 seconds
-- Retry failed URLs 3x with exponential backoff
-
-VERIFICATION SCOPE:
-
-1. REFERENCE VALIDATION
-   - Verify URLs return 200/301 status
-   - Check tools exist (GitHub, PyPI)
-   - Validate CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK IDs, OWASP refs
-   - Flag dead links vs paywalled content
-
-2. FACTUAL ACCURACY
-   - Cross-reference statistics against sources
-   - Verify dates, numbers, incident details
-   - Validate code syntax and API endpoints
-
-3. HALLUCINATION DETECTION
-   - Flag fabricated tools/libraries
-   - Identify non-existent CVEs/papers
-   - Mark unverifiable claims
-
-4. LOGICAL CONSISTENCY
-   - Identify unsupported claims
-   - Detect contradictions
-   - Verify attack chain feasibility
-
-OUTPUT FORMAT (JSON):
-{
-  "metadata": {"chapter": "...", "audit_date": "...", "duration_seconds": 360, "version": "2.0"},
-  "summary": {"total_issues": 8, "by_severity": {"CRITICAL": 1, "HIGH": 2, "MEDIUM": 3, "LOW": 2}, "reliability_score": 87},
-  "issues": [
-    {"severity": "HIGH", "lines": [82], "type": "Factual", "issue": "...", "evidence": "...", "fix": "...", "source": "..."}
-  ]
-}
-
-Save report to artifacts. Process document automatically. Unattended, accept all.
-```
-
-**Duration**: 4-6 min
-
-## Phase 2: Safe Automated Fixing
-
-// turbo-all
-
-```text
-Apply fixes from audit report with safety measures:
-
-TRANSACTION SAFETY:
-1. Create backup
-2. Apply fixes incrementally
-3. Validate after each edit
-4. Rollback on error
-
-PRIORITY ORDER:
-- CRITICAL: Skip (manual review)
-- HIGH: Apply with extra validation
-- MEDIUM/LOW: Auto-apply
-
-AUTO-APPLY RULES:
-✓ Author corrections
-✓ URL format fixes
-✓ Venue/year updates
-✓ Section numbering
-✗ Code blocks (manual)
-✗ Technical claims (manual)
-
-For each issue:
-1. Assess risk (skip if HIGH)
-2. Backup
-3. Apply replacement
-4. Validate markdown + no new errors
-5. Rollback if validation fails
-
-Output: Fixed chapter, summary JSON, diff file. Execute automatically. Unattended.
-```
-
-**Duration**: 3-4 min
-
-## Phase 3: Accuracy-Preserving Humanization
-
-// turbo
-
-````text
-Transform AI prose to human writing with strict preservation:
-
-BATCH TRANSFORMATION:
-- "Furthermore" → "Also" / "Plus" / [delete]
-- "However" → "But" / "Though"
-- "Therefore" → "So"
-- "Additionally" → "And"
-- "It's important to note" → [delete]
-- "When it comes to" → [delete]
-
-PROTECTED ELEMENTS (DO NOT MODIFY):
-- Code blocks (```...```)
-- Inline code (`...`)
-- Citations ([Author](URL))
-- Numbers/statistics
-- Technical terms
-- URLs/links
-- Math formulas ($...$)
-
-TRANSFORMATION RULES:
-1. SENTENCE STRUCTURE: Vary length, fragments, "And"/"But" starters
-2. VOCABULARY: Contractions, casual connectors
-3. TONE: Technical but human
-
-QUALITY VERIFICATION:
-1. Code blocks exact match
-2. Citations intact
-3. Numbers unchanged
-4. Length within 15% original
-
-Output: Humanized chapter, accuracy report. Execute automatically.
-````
-
-**Duration**: 5-7 min
-
-## Validation Gates
-
-**Post-Audit**: ≥90% URLs checked, valid format
-**Post-Fix**: Markdown valid, code unchanged, no new errors
-**Post-Humanize**: Code identical, citations intact, length 85-115%
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **NetworkTimeout**: 3 attempts, skip URL
-- **RateLimited**: 5 attempts, exponential wait
-- **ValidationError**: Rollback immediately
-- **MarkdownError**: Attempt auto-fix or skip
-
-## Configuration
-
-```yaml
-audit:
-  parallel_requests: 10
-  timeout_seconds: 30
-  retry_attempts: 3
-  cache_ttl_hours: 24
-
-fix:
-  auto_apply_low_risk: true
-  require_manual_review: [CRITICAL]
-  backup_before_edit: true
-
-humanize:
-  preserve_code_blocks: true
-  max_length_change_percent: 15
-  technical_accuracy_threshold: 0.98
-
-monitoring:
-  enabled: true
-  refresh_rate_seconds: 2
-```
-
-## Integration
-
-**Pre-Commit Hook**:
-
-```bash
-python workflows/scripts/process_chapter.py $(git diff --cached --name-only) --mode audit-only --quick || exit 1
-```
-
-**CI/CD**:
-
-```yaml
-run: python workflows/scripts/process_chapter.py $(git diff --name-only) --audit-only
-```