diff --git a/PROMPTS.md b/PROMPTS.md index a22eace7..50497ecc 100644 --- a/PROMPTS.md +++ b/PROMPTS.md @@ -62149,3 +62149,182 @@ Contributed by [@mellowdrastic@gmail.com](https://github.com/mellowdrastic@gmail +
+Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt + +## Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt + +Contributed by [@thanos0000@gmail.com](https://github.com/thanos0000@gmail.com) + +```md + + + + + +## Goal +Help a candidate objectively evaluate how well a job posting matches their skills, experience, and portfolio, while producing actionable guidance for applications, portfolio alignment, and skill gap mitigation. + +This prompt is designed to be: +- Profession-agnostic +- Shareable +- Resume- and portfolio-aware +- Explicit about assumptions and fallbacks + +--- + +## Pre-Evaluation Checklist (User: please confirm these are provided before proceeding) +- [ ] Step 0: Candidate Priorities customized +- [ ] Step 1: Skills & Experience source (markdown link or pasted content) +- [ ] Step 1a: Key Skills Anchor List (optional but strongly recommended if focusing on specific areas) +- [ ] Step 2: Portfolio links/descriptions (optional but recommended) +- [ ] Job Posting: URL or full text inserted below + +If any are missing, the evaluation may have reduced confidence. + +--- + +## Step 0: Candidate Priorities (Evaluate With These in Mind) + + + +- Highest priority roles or domains: +- Location preference (remote / hybrid / city / region): +- Compensation expectations or constraints: +- Non-negotiables (e.g., on-call, travel, clearance, tech stack): +- Nice-to-haves: + +--- + +## Step 1: Skills & Experience Source (Primary Reference) + +### Preferred: Skills & Experience Markdown File +Provide access to a structured markdown file describing the candidate. + +**Expected sections (recommended, not mandatory):** +- Core Skills (strongest, production-ready) +- Supporting / Secondary Skills +- Tools & Technologies +- Years of Experience / Seniority indicators +- Notable Projects or Achievements +- Certifications / Education (if relevant) + + + + + + + + + +--- + +## Step 1a: Key Skills to Explicitly Evaluate (Anchor List) + + + + + + + +--- + +## Step 2 (Optional but Recommended): Portfolio / Work Samples + + + + + +--- + +## Fallback Rule (Do Not Remove) +If any provided links are broken, empty, or inaccessible, display: + +"⚠️ One or more reference files inaccessible – proceeding with conversation history, attached resumes, and any portfolio details already shared." + +Then continue with available information. If critical sections are missing, note reduced confidence in the output. + +--- + +## Task: Job Fit Evaluation + +Analyze the provided job posting (URL or full text) against: +- Skills & Experience Markdown +- Key Skills Anchor List +- Portfolio (when applicable) +- Candidate Priorities + +### Scoring Instructions +For each section, assign a percentage match calculated as: +- Approximate proportion of listed job requirements / duties / qualifications that are demonstrably met by the candidate’s provided skills, experience, portfolio, and anchor list (e.g., 4 out of 5 key duties align → ~80%). +- Use semantic alignment, not just keyword matching. +- Provide 2–3 concise sentences explaining key alignments and gaps. + +Sections to score: +- Responsibilities / Key Duties +- Required Qualifications / Experience +- Preferred Qualifications (if listed) +- Skills / Technologies / Education / Certifications + +**Default Weighting (unless overridden):** +- Responsibilities: 30% +- Required Qualifications: 30% +- Skills / Technologies: 25% +- Preferred Qualifications: 15% + +Explain any adjustment to weighting if role seniority, domain, or candidate priorities warrant it (e.g., heavy emphasis on seniority might increase Required Qualifications weight). + +--- + +## Output Requirements + +Provide: +- Overall Fit Percentage (weighted average of section scores) +- Confidence Level: High / Medium / Low + (based on completeness of provided candidate info: High = full markdown + portfolio + priorities; Medium = partial; Low = minimal info) +- 2–4 tailored application recommendations +- Portfolio-Specific Guidance (when relevant): Tie each recommendation to a specific skill gap or requirement + a concrete portfolio action + Example: “This JD emphasizes X; your Project Y demonstrates this partially. Expand the case study to highlight Z to close the gap.” + +--- + +## Additional Commentary +Call out any visible: +- Location constraints +- Salary range mismatches +- Remote/hybrid policies +- Clearance, travel, or on-call expectations +- Cultural or structural deal-breakers + +--- + +## Final Summary Table (Use This Exact Format) + +| Section | Match % | Key Alignments & Gaps | Confidence | +|--------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Responsibilities | XX% | | | +| Required Qualifications | XX% | | | +| Preferred Qualifications | XX% | | | +| Skills / Technologies / Edu | XX% | | | +| **Overall Fit** | **XX%** | | **High/Medium/Low** | + +--- + +## Job Posting + + +If the job URL is inaccessible, search LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, or the company’s career page for the current version of the role and note that you did so. + +``` + +
+ diff --git a/prompts.csv b/prompts.csv index 89806d2e..f9de3280 100644 --- a/prompts.csv +++ b/prompts.csv @@ -47953,3 +47953,170 @@ Abandoned Wife,"{ }, ""artistic_intent"": ""Capture the silent narrative of a private moment after a significant encounter. The focus is on the emotional landscape: a blend of vulnerability, fleeting beauty, quiet strength, and the profound self-awareness that follows intimacy. It's a portrait of an inner turning point."" }",FALSE,STRUCTURED,mellowdrastic@gmail.com +Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt," + + + + +## Goal +Help a candidate objectively evaluate how well a job posting matches their skills, experience, and portfolio, while producing actionable guidance for applications, portfolio alignment, and skill gap mitigation. + +This prompt is designed to be: +- Profession-agnostic +- Shareable +- Resume- and portfolio-aware +- Explicit about assumptions and fallbacks + +--- + +## Pre-Evaluation Checklist (User: please confirm these are provided before proceeding) +- [ ] Step 0: Candidate Priorities customized +- [ ] Step 1: Skills & Experience source (markdown link or pasted content) +- [ ] Step 1a: Key Skills Anchor List (optional but strongly recommended if focusing on specific areas) +- [ ] Step 2: Portfolio links/descriptions (optional but recommended) +- [ ] Job Posting: URL or full text inserted below + +If any are missing, the evaluation may have reduced confidence. + +--- + +## Step 0: Candidate Priorities (Evaluate With These in Mind) + + + +- Highest priority roles or domains: +- Location preference (remote / hybrid / city / region): +- Compensation expectations or constraints: +- Non-negotiables (e.g., on-call, travel, clearance, tech stack): +- Nice-to-haves: + +--- + +## Step 1: Skills & Experience Source (Primary Reference) + +### Preferred: Skills & Experience Markdown File +Provide access to a structured markdown file describing the candidate. + +**Expected sections (recommended, not mandatory):** +- Core Skills (strongest, production-ready) +- Supporting / Secondary Skills +- Tools & Technologies +- Years of Experience / Seniority indicators +- Notable Projects or Achievements +- Certifications / Education (if relevant) + + + + + + + + + +--- + +## Step 1a: Key Skills to Explicitly Evaluate (Anchor List) + + + + + + + +--- + +## Step 2 (Optional but Recommended): Portfolio / Work Samples + + + + + +--- + +## Fallback Rule (Do Not Remove) +If any provided links are broken, empty, or inaccessible, display: + +""⚠️ One or more reference files inaccessible – proceeding with conversation history, attached resumes, and any portfolio details already shared."" + +Then continue with available information. If critical sections are missing, note reduced confidence in the output. + +--- + +## Task: Job Fit Evaluation + +Analyze the provided job posting (URL or full text) against: +- Skills & Experience Markdown +- Key Skills Anchor List +- Portfolio (when applicable) +- Candidate Priorities + +### Scoring Instructions +For each section, assign a percentage match calculated as: +- Approximate proportion of listed job requirements / duties / qualifications that are demonstrably met by the candidate’s provided skills, experience, portfolio, and anchor list (e.g., 4 out of 5 key duties align → ~80%). +- Use semantic alignment, not just keyword matching. +- Provide 2–3 concise sentences explaining key alignments and gaps. + +Sections to score: +- Responsibilities / Key Duties +- Required Qualifications / Experience +- Preferred Qualifications (if listed) +- Skills / Technologies / Education / Certifications + +**Default Weighting (unless overridden):** +- Responsibilities: 30% +- Required Qualifications: 30% +- Skills / Technologies: 25% +- Preferred Qualifications: 15% + +Explain any adjustment to weighting if role seniority, domain, or candidate priorities warrant it (e.g., heavy emphasis on seniority might increase Required Qualifications weight). + +--- + +## Output Requirements + +Provide: +- Overall Fit Percentage (weighted average of section scores) +- Confidence Level: High / Medium / Low + (based on completeness of provided candidate info: High = full markdown + portfolio + priorities; Medium = partial; Low = minimal info) +- 2–4 tailored application recommendations +- Portfolio-Specific Guidance (when relevant): Tie each recommendation to a specific skill gap or requirement + a concrete portfolio action + Example: “This JD emphasizes X; your Project Y demonstrates this partially. Expand the case study to highlight Z to close the gap.” + +--- + +## Additional Commentary +Call out any visible: +- Location constraints +- Salary range mismatches +- Remote/hybrid policies +- Clearance, travel, or on-call expectations +- Cultural or structural deal-breakers + +--- + +## Final Summary Table (Use This Exact Format) + +| Section | Match % | Key Alignments & Gaps | Confidence | +|--------------------------------|---------|----------------------------------------------------|------------| +| Responsibilities | XX% | | | +| Required Qualifications | XX% | | | +| Preferred Qualifications | XX% | | | +| Skills / Technologies / Edu | XX% | | | +| **Overall Fit** | **XX%** | | **High/Medium/Low** | + +--- + +## Job Posting + + +If the job URL is inaccessible, search LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, or the company’s career page for the current version of the role and note that you did so. +",FALSE,TEXT,thanos0000@gmail.com