mirror of https://github.com/luongnv89/claude-howto.git synced 2026-08-08 00:08:36 +02:00

Files

T

Luong NGUYENandGitHub b9a973bf32 docs: accuracy pass against Claude Code v2.1.220 (#155 )

Internal accuracy pass against v2.1.220 — no missing upstream features, but broken example code, disagreeing counts, and metadata drift.

Functional fixes: pre-commit.sh now exits 2 so it actually blocks; dependency-check.sh reads file_path from stdin JSON instead of $1; database-mcp.json uses ${DATABASE_URL}; broken fences repaired; three command templates had invalid skill names.

Factual corrections: /fork and /subtask unswapped and /subtask added; /fewer-permission-prompts; permissions.defaultMode; dontAsk/auto unreversed; 31 hook events verified name-by-name; subagent depth 3; skill precedence enterprise > project > personal; /output-style removed not deprecated; permissionDecision gained defer.

Follow-up review fixed defects the pass left behind: zh/vi headers claiming 31 events above 25-name lists, a surviving hardcoded DB credential in the MCP README examples, an unbalanced fence swallowing a metadata footer, and non-canonical tool names. All four translated CATALOG summary tables were recounted so their arithmetic holds.

Full detail in CHANGELOG.md under v2.1.220-r2.

2026-08-04 15:41:12 +07:00

992 B

Raw Blame History

ADR [Number]: [Title]

Status

[Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded]

Context

What is the issue that we're seeing that is motivating this decision or change?

Decision

What is the change that we're proposing and/or doing?

Consequences

What becomes easier or more difficult to do because of this change?

Positive

Benefit 1
Benefit 2

Negative

Drawback 1
Drawback 2

Neutral

Consideration 1
Consideration 2

Alternatives Considered

What other options were considered and why were they not chosen?

Alternative 1

Description and reason for not choosing.

Alternative 2