Files
ctrld/internal/dnscache/cache_test.go
T
Cuong Manh Le cbef8b911c fix: partition DNS cache by EDNS Client Subnet
With cache_enable = true, one cache entry was shared by every client
asking the same name against the same upstream: the cache key
({Qtype, Qclass, Name, Upstream}) and the osResolver hot-cache/singleflight
key ("name:qtype:") both ignored the EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). A response
tailored for subnet A was therefore served to subnet B.

A cached answer's records are scoped to the network that generated them
(RFC 7871 §7.3), so sharing them across subnets returns the wrong
CDN/policy answer. Rewriting only the ECS option on the shared answer is
worse: forwarders that validate the echoed ECS (e.g. dnsmasq with
add-subnet) then accept the wrong-subnet answer instead of rejecting it as
a mismatch.

Partition both cache paths by a canonical ECS tuple (family, source-prefix,
masked address) via the new dnscache.CanonicalECS: the LRU key gains an ECS
field and the singleflight/hot-cache key appends the canonical ECS. Same
subnet still shares an entry; different subnets (or address families) never
do. Only a request with no ECS option collapses to the shared empty
partition; a carried /0 keeps its own family-scoped token, since it is
forwarded with an ECS option and must stay distinguishable from a no-ECS
query (RFC 7871 §7.3.1). SetCacheReply no longer touches ECS and only
reconciles the EDNS Cookie.

Adds real cache-path regression tests (LRU and osResolver hot cache) that
serve a different A record per subnet and verify the second subnet never
receives the first's record.

Fixes https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld/issues/324
2026-07-23 19:17:41 +07:00

187 lines
7.3 KiB
Go

package dnscache
import (
"net"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/miekg/dns"
)
// msgWithECS builds an A query for name carrying an EDNS Client Subnet option, or none
// when family == 0.
func msgWithECS(name string, family uint16, prefix uint8, addr string) *dns.Msg {
m := new(dns.Msg)
m.SetQuestion(dns.Fqdn(name), dns.TypeA)
if family == 0 {
return m
}
m.SetEdns0(4096, true)
m.IsEdns0().Option = append(m.IsEdns0().Option, &dns.EDNS0_SUBNET{
Code: dns.EDNS0SUBNET,
Family: family,
SourceNetmask: prefix,
Address: net.ParseIP(addr),
})
return m
}
// answerWithA builds a cached answer holding a single A record with the given address.
func answerWithA(name, a string) *dns.Msg {
m := new(dns.Msg)
m.SetQuestion(dns.Fqdn(name), dns.TypeA)
rr, err := dns.NewRR(dns.Fqdn(name) + " 300 IN A " + a)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
m.Answer = []dns.RR{rr}
return m
}
func firstA(msg *dns.Msg) string {
for _, rr := range msg.Answer {
if a, ok := rr.(*dns.A); ok {
return a.A.String()
}
}
return ""
}
// TestCanonicalECS covers the key-partitioning helper: only a request with no ECS option
// collapses to the shared empty partition, while a carried /0 keeps its own family-scoped
// token (distinct from no-ECS, per RFC 7871 §7.3.1); host bits below the source prefix do
// not fragment the key, and different subnets / families produce different keys.
func TestCanonicalECS(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
msg *dns.Msg
want string
}{
{"no ecs", msgWithECS("controld.com", 0, 0, ""), ""},
// A carried ECS option is never "" (RFC 7871 §7.3.1), and IPv4 /0 vs
// IPv6 /0 stay distinct; the address encoding must not change the token.
{"ipv4 /0", msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 0, "0.0.0.0"), "1/0/0.0.0.0"},
{"ipv4 /0 empty addr", msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 0, ""), "1/0/0.0.0.0"},
{"ipv6 /0", msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 0, "::"), "2/0/::"},
{"ipv6 /0 empty addr", msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 0, ""), "2/0/::"},
{"ipv4 /24", msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 24, "203.0.113.0"), "1/24/203.0.113.0"},
{"ipv4 host bits masked", msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 24, "203.0.113.7"), "1/24/203.0.113.0"},
{"ipv6 /64", msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::"), "2/64/2001:db8:1::"},
{"ipv6 host bits masked", msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::dead:beef"), "2/64/2001:db8:1::"},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
if got := CanonicalECS(tt.msg); got != tt.want {
t.Fatalf("CanonicalECS = %q, want %q", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
// TestNewKey_ECSPartition verifies the cache key distinguishes subnets while collapsing
// same-subnet requests, so the LRU cache cannot serve one subnet's records to another.
func TestNewKey_ECSPartition(t *testing.T) {
const up = "https://dns.example/dns-query"
subnetA := NewKey(msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::"), up)
subnetB := NewKey(msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:2::"), up)
subnetAHost := NewKey(msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::5"), up)
ipv4 := NewKey(msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 24, "203.0.113.0"), up)
noECS := NewKey(msgWithECS("controld.com", 0, 0, ""), up)
if subnetA == subnetB {
t.Fatal("different subnets must not share a cache key")
}
if subnetA != subnetAHost {
t.Fatal("same subnet (different host bits) must share a cache key")
}
if subnetA == ipv4 || subnetA == noECS || ipv4 == noECS {
t.Fatal("different families / no-ECS must not collide")
}
}
// TestLRUCache_ECSZeroPrefixDistinctFromNoECS is the regression test for the /0-vs-no-ECS
// collision (RFC 7871 §7.3.1). A query carrying an ECS /0 option is forwarded WITH ECS and
// may draw different upstream data, so its cached answer must never be served to a client
// that sent no ECS at all, nor may IPv4 /0 and IPv6 /0 cross-serve each other.
func TestLRUCache_ECSZeroPrefixDistinctFromNoECS(t *testing.T) {
c, err := NewLRUCache(16)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("NewLRUCache: %v", err)
}
const up = "https://dns.example/dns-query"
expire := time.Now().Add(time.Minute)
noECS := msgWithECS("controld.com", 0, 0, "")
zeroV4 := msgWithECS("controld.com", 1, 0, "0.0.0.0")
zeroV6 := msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 0, "::")
// Only the IPv4 /0 query's answer is cached.
c.Add(NewKey(zeroV4, up), NewValue(answerWithA("controld.com", "192.0.2.1"), expire))
// A no-ECS client must NOT receive the ECS /0 cached answer.
if got := c.Get(NewKey(noECS, up)); got != nil {
t.Fatalf("no-ECS client received the ECS /0 cached record %q", firstA(got.Msg))
}
// An IPv6 /0 client must NOT receive the IPv4 /0 answer.
if got := c.Get(NewKey(zeroV6, up)); got != nil {
t.Fatalf("IPv6 /0 client received the IPv4 /0 cached record %q", firstA(got.Msg))
}
// The IPv4 /0 client still hits its own entry.
if got := c.Get(NewKey(zeroV4, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "192.0.2.1" {
t.Fatalf("IPv4 /0 lost its own cached record: %v", got)
}
// The no-ECS partition is independent and does not corrupt the /0 entry.
c.Add(NewKey(noECS, up), NewValue(answerWithA("controld.com", "198.51.100.1"), expire))
if got := c.Get(NewKey(noECS, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "198.51.100.1" {
t.Fatalf("no-ECS partition wrong record: %v", got)
}
if got := c.Get(NewKey(zeroV4, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "192.0.2.1" {
t.Fatalf("IPv4 /0 record corrupted by no-ECS insert: %v", got)
}
}
// TestLRUCache_ECSNoCrossSubnetServe is the real cache-path regression test for #564:
// an entry populated for subnet A must never be returned to a client in subnet B, even
// though the question (name/type/class/upstream) is identical. The two subnets carry
// different A records; the second client must get its own record or a miss, never A's.
func TestLRUCache_ECSNoCrossSubnetServe(t *testing.T) {
c, err := NewLRUCache(16)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("NewLRUCache: %v", err)
}
const up = "https://dns.example/dns-query"
expire := time.Now().Add(time.Minute)
reqA := msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::")
reqB := msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:2::")
// Only subnet A's answer (A record 192.0.2.1) is cached.
c.Add(NewKey(reqA, up), NewValue(answerWithA("controld.com", "192.0.2.1"), expire))
// A client in subnet B must NOT hit subnet A's entry.
if got := c.Get(NewKey(reqB, up)); got != nil {
t.Fatalf("subnet B received subnet A's cached record %q; cache is not ECS-partitioned", firstA(got.Msg))
}
// Subnet A still hits its own entry.
if got := c.Get(NewKey(reqA, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "192.0.2.1" {
t.Fatalf("subnet A lost its own cached record: %+v", got)
}
// Now cache subnet B's distinct answer and confirm the two never cross.
c.Add(NewKey(reqB, up), NewValue(answerWithA("controld.com", "198.51.100.1"), expire))
if got := c.Get(NewKey(reqB, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "198.51.100.1" {
t.Fatalf("subnet B got the wrong record: %v", got)
}
if got := c.Get(NewKey(reqA, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "192.0.2.1" {
t.Fatalf("subnet A record corrupted by subnet B insert: %v", got)
}
// A second host within subnet A shares the partition (cache hit with A's record).
reqAHost := msgWithECS("controld.com", 2, 64, "2001:db8:1::9")
if got := c.Get(NewKey(reqAHost, up)); got == nil || firstA(got.Msg) != "192.0.2.1" {
t.Fatalf("same-subnet host missed the shared cache entry: %v", got)
}
}