Files
deflock-app/test/models/node_profile_test.dart
2026-03-02 12:38:49 -06:00

255 lines
9.4 KiB
Dart

import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:latlong2/latlong.dart';
import 'package:deflockapp/models/node_profile.dart';
import 'package:deflockapp/models/osm_node.dart';
import 'package:deflockapp/state/profile_state.dart';
void main() {
group('NodeProfile', () {
test('toJson/fromJson round-trip preserves all fields', () {
final profile = NodeProfile(
id: 'test-id',
name: 'Test Profile',
tags: const {'man_made': 'surveillance', 'camera:type': 'fixed'},
builtin: true,
requiresDirection: false,
submittable: true,
editable: false,
fov: 90.0,
);
final json = profile.toJson();
final restored = NodeProfile.fromJson(json);
expect(restored.id, equals(profile.id));
expect(restored.name, equals(profile.name));
expect(restored.tags, equals(profile.tags));
expect(restored.builtin, equals(profile.builtin));
expect(restored.requiresDirection, equals(profile.requiresDirection));
expect(restored.submittable, equals(profile.submittable));
expect(restored.editable, equals(profile.editable));
expect(restored.fov, equals(profile.fov));
});
test('getDefaults returns expected profiles', () {
final defaults = NodeProfile.getDefaults();
expect(defaults.length, greaterThanOrEqualTo(10));
final ids = defaults.map((p) => p.id).toSet();
expect(ids, contains('builtin-flock'));
expect(ids, contains('builtin-generic-alpr'));
expect(ids, contains('builtin-motorola'));
expect(ids, contains('builtin-shotspotter'));
});
test('empty tag values exist in default profiles', () {
// Documents that profiles like builtin-flock ship with camera:mount: ''
// This is the root cause of the HTTP 400 bug — the routing service must
// filter these out before sending to the API.
final defaults = NodeProfile.getDefaults();
final flock = defaults.firstWhere((p) => p.id == 'builtin-flock');
expect(flock.tags.containsKey('camera:mount'), isTrue);
expect(flock.tags['camera:mount'], equals(''));
});
test('equality is based on id', () {
final a = NodeProfile(
id: 'same-id',
name: 'Profile A',
tags: const {'tag': 'a'},
);
final b = NodeProfile(
id: 'same-id',
name: 'Profile B',
tags: const {'tag': 'b'},
);
final c = NodeProfile(
id: 'different-id',
name: 'Profile A',
tags: const {'tag': 'a'},
);
expect(a, equals(b));
expect(a.hashCode, equals(b.hashCode));
expect(a, isNot(equals(c)));
});
group('createExistingTagsProfile', () {
test('should NOT assign FOV for nodes with single direction', () {
// This is the core bug fix: nodes with just "direction=90" should not get a default FOV
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '90',
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, isNull, reason: 'Single direction nodes should not get default FOV');
expect(profile.name, equals('<Existing tags>'));
expect(profile.tags, isEmpty, reason: 'Existing tags profile should have empty tags');
});
test('should assign FOV for nodes with range notation', () {
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '55-125', // Range notation = explicit FOV
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, isNotNull, reason: 'Range notation should preserve FOV');
expect(profile.fov, equals(70.0), reason: 'Range 55-125 should calculate to 70 degree FOV');
});
test('should assign FOV for nodes with multiple consistent ranges', () {
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '55-125;235-305', // Two ranges with same FOV
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, equals(70.0), reason: 'Multiple consistent ranges should preserve FOV');
});
test('should NOT assign FOV for mixed single directions and ranges', () {
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '90;180-360', // Mix of single direction and range
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, isNull, reason: 'Mixed notation should not assign FOV');
});
test('should NOT assign FOV for multiple single directions', () {
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '90;180;270', // Multiple single directions
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, isNull, reason: 'Multiple single directions should not get default FOV');
});
test('should handle camera:direction tag', () {
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'camera:direction': '180', // Using camera:direction instead of direction
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'camera',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
expect(profile.fov, isNull, reason: 'Single camera:direction should not get default FOV');
});
test('should fix the specific bug: direction=90 should not become direction=55-125', () {
// This tests the exact bug scenario mentioned in the issue
final node = OsmNode(
id: 123,
coord: const LatLng(37.7749, -122.4194),
tags: {
'direction': '90', // Single direction, should stay as single direction
'man_made': 'surveillance',
'surveillance:type': 'ALPR',
},
);
final profile = NodeProfile.createExistingTagsProfile(node);
// Key fix: profile should NOT have an FOV, so upload won't convert to range notation
expect(profile.fov, isNull, reason: 'direction=90 should not get converted to direction=55-125');
// Verify the node does have directionFovPairs (for rendering), but profile ignores them
expect(node.directionFovPairs, hasLength(1));
expect(node.directionFovPairs.first.centerDegrees, equals(90.0));
expect(node.directionFovPairs.first.fovDegrees, equals(70.0)); // Default FOV for rendering
});
});
group('ProfileState reordering', () {
test('should reorder profiles correctly', () {
final profileState = ProfileState();
// Add some test profiles
final profileA = NodeProfile(id: 'a', name: 'Profile A', tags: const {});
final profileB = NodeProfile(id: 'b', name: 'Profile B', tags: const {});
final profileC = NodeProfile(id: 'c', name: 'Profile C', tags: const {});
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileA);
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileB);
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileC);
// Initial order should be A, B, C
expect(profileState.profiles.map((p) => p.id), equals(['a', 'b', 'c']));
// Move profile at index 0 (A) to index 2 (should become B, C, A)
profileState.reorderProfiles(0, 2);
expect(profileState.profiles.map((p) => p.id), equals(['b', 'c', 'a']));
// Move profile at index 2 (A) to index 1 (should become B, A, C)
profileState.reorderProfiles(2, 1);
expect(profileState.profiles.map((p) => p.id), equals(['b', 'a', 'c']));
});
test('should maintain enabled status after reordering', () {
final profileState = ProfileState();
final profileA = NodeProfile(id: 'a', name: 'Profile A', tags: const {});
final profileB = NodeProfile(id: 'b', name: 'Profile B', tags: const {});
final profileC = NodeProfile(id: 'c', name: 'Profile C', tags: const {});
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileA);
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileB);
profileState.addOrUpdateProfile(profileC);
// Disable profile B
profileState.toggleProfile(profileB, false);
expect(profileState.isEnabled(profileB), isFalse);
// Reorder profiles
profileState.reorderProfiles(0, 2);
// Profile B should still be disabled after reordering
expect(profileState.isEnabled(profileB), isFalse);
expect(profileState.isEnabled(profileA), isTrue);
expect(profileState.isEnabled(profileC), isTrue);
});
});
});
}