* feat: Complete migration from Prefect to Temporal BREAKING CHANGE: Replaces Prefect workflow orchestration with Temporal ## Major Changes - Replace Prefect with Temporal for workflow orchestration - Implement vertical worker architecture (rust, android) - Replace Docker registry with MinIO for unified storage - Refactor activities to be co-located with workflows - Update all API endpoints for Temporal compatibility ## Infrastructure - New: docker-compose.temporal.yaml (Temporal + MinIO + workers) - New: workers/ directory with rust and android vertical workers - New: backend/src/temporal/ (manager, discovery) - New: backend/src/storage/ (S3-cached storage with MinIO) - New: backend/toolbox/common/ (shared storage activities) - Deleted: docker-compose.yaml (old Prefect setup) - Deleted: backend/src/core/prefect_manager.py - Deleted: backend/src/services/prefect_stats_monitor.py - Deleted: Docker registry and insecure-registries requirement ## Workflows - Migrated: security_assessment workflow to Temporal - New: rust_test workflow (example/test workflow) - Deleted: secret_detection_scan (Prefect-based, to be reimplemented) - Activities now co-located with workflows for independent testing ## API Changes - Updated: backend/src/api/workflows.py (Temporal submission) - Updated: backend/src/api/runs.py (Temporal status/results) - Updated: backend/src/main.py (727 lines, TemporalManager integration) - Updated: All 16 MCP tools to use TemporalManager ## Testing - ✅ All services healthy (Temporal, PostgreSQL, MinIO, workers, backend) - ✅ All API endpoints functional - ✅ End-to-end workflow test passed (72 findings from vulnerable_app) - ✅ MinIO storage integration working (target upload/download, results) - ✅ Worker activity discovery working (6 activities registered) - ✅ Tarball extraction working - ✅ SARIF report generation working ## Documentation - ARCHITECTURE.md: Complete Temporal architecture documentation - QUICKSTART_TEMPORAL.md: Getting started guide - MIGRATION_DECISION.md: Why we chose Temporal over Prefect - IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md: Migration progress tracking - workers/README.md: Worker development guide ## Dependencies - Added: temporalio>=1.6.0 - Added: boto3>=1.34.0 (MinIO S3 client) - Removed: prefect>=3.4.18 * feat: Add Python fuzzing vertical with Atheris integration This commit implements a complete Python fuzzing workflow using Atheris: ## Python Worker (workers/python/) - Dockerfile with Python 3.11, Atheris, and build tools - Generic worker.py for dynamic workflow discovery - requirements.txt with temporalio, boto3, atheris dependencies - Added to docker-compose.temporal.yaml with dedicated cache volume ## AtherisFuzzer Module (backend/toolbox/modules/fuzzer/) - Reusable module extending BaseModule - Auto-discovers fuzz targets (fuzz_*.py, *_fuzz.py, fuzz_target.py) - Recursive search to find targets in nested directories - Dynamically loads TestOneInput() function - Configurable max_iterations and timeout - Real-time stats callback support for live monitoring - Returns findings as ModuleFinding objects ## Atheris Fuzzing Workflow (backend/toolbox/workflows/atheris_fuzzing/) - Temporal workflow for orchestrating fuzzing - Downloads user code from MinIO - Executes AtherisFuzzer module - Uploads results to MinIO - Cleans up cache after execution - metadata.yaml with vertical: python for routing ## Test Project (test_projects/python_fuzz_waterfall/) - Demonstrates stateful waterfall vulnerability - main.py with check_secret() that leaks progress - fuzz_target.py with Atheris TestOneInput() harness - Complete README with usage instructions ## Backend Fixes - Fixed parameter merging in REST API endpoints (workflows.py) - Changed workflow parameter passing from positional args to kwargs (manager.py) - Default parameters now properly merged with user parameters ## Testing ✅ Worker discovered AtherisFuzzingWorkflow ✅ Workflow executed end-to-end successfully ✅ Fuzz target auto-discovered in nested directories ✅ Atheris ran 100,000 iterations ✅ Results uploaded and cache cleaned * chore: Complete Temporal migration with updated CLI/SDK/docs This commit includes all remaining Temporal migration changes: ## CLI Updates (cli/) - Updated workflow execution commands for Temporal - Enhanced error handling and exceptions - Updated dependencies in uv.lock ## SDK Updates (sdk/) - Client methods updated for Temporal workflows - Updated models for new workflow execution - Updated dependencies in uv.lock ## Documentation Updates (docs/) - Architecture documentation for Temporal - Workflow concept documentation - Resource management documentation (new) - Debugging guide (new) - Updated tutorials and how-to guides - Troubleshooting updates ## README Updates - Main README with Temporal instructions - Backend README - CLI README - SDK README ## Other - Updated IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md - Removed old vulnerable_app.tar.gz These changes complete the Temporal migration and ensure the CLI/SDK work correctly with the new backend. * fix: Use positional args instead of kwargs for Temporal workflows The Temporal Python SDK's start_workflow() method doesn't accept a 'kwargs' parameter. Workflows must receive parameters as positional arguments via the 'args' parameter. Changed from: args=workflow_args # Positional arguments This fixes the error: TypeError: Client.start_workflow() got an unexpected keyword argument 'kwargs' Workflows now correctly receive parameters in order: - security_assessment: [target_id, scanner_config, analyzer_config, reporter_config] - atheris_fuzzing: [target_id, target_file, max_iterations, timeout_seconds] - rust_test: [target_id, test_message] * fix: Filter metadata-only parameters from workflow arguments SecurityAssessmentWorkflow was receiving 7 arguments instead of 2-5. The issue was that target_path and volume_mode from default_parameters were being passed to the workflow, when they should only be used by the system for configuration. Now filters out metadata-only parameters (target_path, volume_mode) before passing arguments to workflow execution. * refactor: Remove Prefect leftovers and volume mounting legacy Complete cleanup of Prefect migration artifacts: Backend: - Delete registry.py and workflow_discovery.py (Prefect-specific files) - Remove Docker validation from setup.py (no longer needed) - Remove ResourceLimits and VolumeMount models - Remove target_path and volume_mode from WorkflowSubmission - Remove supported_volume_modes from API and discovery - Clean up metadata.yaml files (remove volume/path fields) - Simplify parameter filtering in manager.py SDK: - Remove volume_mode parameter from client methods - Remove ResourceLimits and VolumeMount models - Remove Prefect error patterns from docker_logs.py - Clean up WorkflowSubmission and WorkflowMetadata models CLI: - Remove Volume Modes display from workflow info All removed features are Prefect-specific or Docker volume mounting artifacts. Temporal workflows use MinIO storage exclusively. * feat: Add comprehensive test suite and benchmark infrastructure - Add 68 unit tests for fuzzer, scanner, and analyzer modules - Implement pytest-based test infrastructure with fixtures - Add 6 performance benchmarks with category-specific thresholds - Configure GitHub Actions for automated testing and benchmarking - Add test and benchmark documentation Test coverage: - AtherisFuzzer: 8 tests - CargoFuzzer: 14 tests - FileScanner: 22 tests - SecurityAnalyzer: 24 tests All tests passing (68/68) All benchmarks passing (6/6) * fix: Resolve all ruff linting violations across codebase Fixed 27 ruff violations in 12 files: - Removed unused imports (Depends, Dict, Any, Optional, etc.) - Fixed undefined workflow_info variable in workflows.py - Removed dead code with undefined variables in atheris_fuzzer.py - Changed f-string to regular string where no placeholders used All files now pass ruff checks for CI/CD compliance. * fix: Configure CI for unit tests only - Renamed docker-compose.temporal.yaml → docker-compose.yml for CI compatibility - Commented out integration-tests job (no integration tests yet) - Updated test-summary to only depend on lint and unit-tests CI will now run successfully with 68 unit tests. Integration tests can be added later. * feat: Add CI/CD integration with ephemeral deployment model Implements comprehensive CI/CD support for FuzzForge with on-demand worker management: **Worker Management (v0.7.0)** - Add WorkerManager for automatic worker lifecycle control - Auto-start workers from stopped state when workflows execute - Auto-stop workers after workflow completion - Health checks and startup timeout handling (90s default) **CI/CD Features** - `--fail-on` flag: Fail builds based on SARIF severity levels (error/warning/note/info) - `--export-sarif` flag: Export findings in SARIF 2.1.0 format - `--auto-start`/`--auto-stop` flags: Control worker lifecycle - Exit code propagation: Returns 1 on blocking findings, 0 on success **Exit Code Fix** - Add `except typer.Exit: raise` handlers at 3 critical locations - Move worker cleanup to finally block for guaranteed execution - Exit codes now propagate correctly even when build fails **CI Scripts & Examples** - ci-start.sh: Start FuzzForge services with health checks - ci-stop.sh: Clean shutdown with volume preservation option - GitHub Actions workflow example (security-scan.yml) - GitLab CI pipeline example (.gitlab-ci.example.yml) - docker-compose.ci.yml: CI-optimized compose file with profiles **OSS-Fuzz Integration** - New ossfuzz_campaign workflow for running OSS-Fuzz projects - OSS-Fuzz worker with Docker-in-Docker support - Configurable campaign duration and project selection **Documentation** - Comprehensive CI/CD integration guide (docs/how-to/cicd-integration.md) - Updated architecture docs with worker lifecycle details - Updated workspace isolation documentation - CLI README with worker management examples **SDK Enhancements** - Add get_workflow_worker_info() endpoint - Worker vertical metadata in workflow responses **Testing** - All workflows tested: security_assessment, atheris_fuzzing, secret_detection, cargo_fuzzing - All monitoring commands tested: stats, crashes, status, finding - Full CI pipeline simulation verified - Exit codes verified for success/failure scenarios Ephemeral CI/CD model: ~3-4GB RAM, ~60-90s startup, runs entirely in CI containers. * fix: Resolve ruff linting violations in CI/CD code - Remove unused variables (run_id, defaults, result) - Remove unused imports - Fix f-string without placeholders All CI/CD integration files now pass ruff checks.
FuzzForge Vulnerable Test Project
This directory contains a comprehensive vulnerable test application designed to validate FuzzForge's security workflows. The project contains multiple categories of security vulnerabilities to test both the security_assessment and secret_detection_scan workflows.
Test Project Overview
Vulnerable Application (vulnerable_app/)
Purpose: Comprehensive vulnerable application for testing security workflows
Supported Workflows:
security_assessment- General security scanning and analysissecret_detection_scan- Detection of secrets, credentials, and sensitive data
Vulnerabilities Included:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Command injection
- Hardcoded secrets and credentials
- Path traversal vulnerabilities
- Weak cryptographic functions
- Server-side template injection (SSTI)
- Pickle deserialization attacks
- CSRF missing protection
- Information disclosure
- API keys and tokens
- Database connection strings
- Private keys and certificates
Files:
- Multiple source code files with various vulnerability types
- Configuration files with embedded secrets
- Dependencies with known vulnerabilities
Expected Detections: 30+ findings across both security assessment and secret detection workflows
Usage Instructions
Testing with FuzzForge Workflows
The vulnerable application can be tested with both essential workflows:
# Test security assessment workflow
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/workflows/security_assessment/submit \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"target_path": "/path/to/test_projects/vulnerable_app",
"volume_mode": "ro"
}'
# Test secret detection workflow
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/workflows/secret_detection_scan/submit \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"target_path": "/path/to/test_projects/vulnerable_app",
"volume_mode": "ro"
}'
Expected Results
Each workflow should produce SARIF-formatted results with:
- High-severity findings for critical vulnerabilities
- Medium-severity findings for moderate risks
- Detailed descriptions and remediation guidance
- Code flow information where applicable
Validation Criteria
A successful test should detect:
- Security Assessment: At least 20 various security vulnerabilities
- Secret Detection: At least 10 different types of secrets and credentials
Security Notice
⚠️ WARNING: This project contains intentional security vulnerabilities and should NEVER be deployed in production environments or exposed to public networks. It is designed solely for security testing and validation purposes.
File Structure
test_projects/
├── README.md
└── vulnerable_app/
├── [Multiple vulnerable source files]
├── [Configuration files with secrets]
└── [Dependencies with known issues]