chore: regenerate the test type-debt baseline on top of #2994

scripts/typecheck-test-baseline.json

@@ -70,13 +70,7 @@
     "make-pdf/test/e2e/diagram-gate.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"pdftotext\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"pdffonts\" | \"pdfimages\" | \"pdftoppm\"'.": 2,
     "make-pdf/test/e2e/landscape-gate.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"pdfinfo\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"pdffonts\" | \"pdfimages\" | \"pdftoppm\"'.": 2,
     "make-pdf/test/e2e/landscape-gate.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"pdftotext\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"pdffonts\" | \"pdfimages\" | \"pdftoppm\"'.": 3,
-    "test/auto-decide-explanatory-mode.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: string; calls: never[]; assistantMessages: { sessionId: string; text: string; timestamp: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"error\" | \"missing\" | \"ready\"'.": 1,
     "test/auto-decide-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'fact' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-command-prefix-au.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ input: string; signature: string; file: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ input: \"1\\r\"; signature: string; file: string; }'. Types of property 'input' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"1\\r\"'.": 2,
-    "test/autoplan-cropped-command-av.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'unknown' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-cropped-command-av.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ input: string; signature: string; file: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ input: \"1\\r\"; signature: string; file: string; }'. Types of property 'input' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"1\\r\"'.": 2,
-    "test/autoplan-cropped-gate-av.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; kind: string; name: string; input: { questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; }; messageId: string; requestId: string; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"result\" | \"use\"'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-cropped-gate-av.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; source: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; source: \"native\" | \"pre_tool_use\"; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"native\" | \"pre_tool_use\"'.": 2,
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-evidence.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'content' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; } | { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'. Property 'content' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; }'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-evidence.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'id' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { command: string; description: string; }; } | { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; } | { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'. Property 'id' does not exist on type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'.": 2,
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-evidence.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'input' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; } | { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'. Property 'input' does not exist on type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'.": 34,
@@ -84,90 +78,18 @@
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-evidence.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'name' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; } | { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'. Property 'name' does not exist on type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'.": 3,
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-evidence.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { command: string; description: string; }; }[]; }; } | { type: string; session_id: string; message: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type '({ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; }[]; }; } | { type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; })[]'. Type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { command: string; description: string; }; }[]; }; } | { type: string; session_id: string; message: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; }[]; }; } | { type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; }'. Type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: { type: string; text: string; }[]; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: any; }[]; }; } | { type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; }'. Type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: { type: string; text: string; }[]; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ type: string; session_id: string; message: { content: { type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }[]; }; }'. The types of 'message.content' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: { type: string; text: string; }[]; is_error: boolean; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }[]'. Type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: { type: string; text: string; }[]; is_error: boolean; }' is not assignable to type '{ type: string; tool_use_id: string; content: string; is_error: boolean; }'. Types of property 'content' are incompatible. Type '{ type: string; text: string; }[]' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-dual-voice-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'call' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-edit-panel-aj.test.ts\tTS18048\t'event.input' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-edit-queue-am.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'hookSeenIds' does not exist on type '{ source: string; sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; tool: string; file: string; timestamp: string; transcriptPath: string; editDigest: { version: number; beforeSHA256: string; requestSHA256: string; oldLineHashes: string[]; newLineHashes: string[]; }; }'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-final-gate-ao.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; kind: string; name: string; input: { questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; }; messageId: string; requestId: string; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"result\" | \"use\"'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-final-gate-ao.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/b...' is not assignable to type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"error\" | \"missing\" | \"ready\"'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-final-gate-ao.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'f' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 10,
-    "test/autoplan-final-gate-ao.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/autoplan-overwrite-progress-ax.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'events' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 7,
-    "test/autoplan-permission-viewport.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'null' is not assignable to type 'string | undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-permission-viewport.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter '_rows' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/autoplan-permission-viewport.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'deadline' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/autoplan-permission-viewport.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'rows' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-phase-handoff.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"2026-09-16T07:37:49.858Z\" | \"2026-09-16T08:26:23.970Z\"'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-phase-handoff.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"One stale phrase in R1: \\\"production p95 ≤ 300ms over each 48h cohort hold\\\" contradicts row 40 (hold = max(48h, power-based minimum)). Fixing both copies, then regenerating the packet.\" | \"Task JSONL written (11 lines). Now reading `phase-close.md` afresh to close Phase 1.\"'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-phase-handoff.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: \"45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5\" | \"94599121-1626-4188-a553-e68579eeb329\"; timestamp: string; text: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: \"45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5\" | \"94599121-1626-4188-a553-e68579eeb329\"; timestamp: \"2026-09-16T07:37:49.858Z\" | \"2026-09-16T08:26:23.970Z\"; text: \"One stale phrase in R1: \\\"production p95 ≤ 300ms over each 48h cohort hold\\\" contradicts row 40 (hold = max(48h, power-based minimum)). Fixing bot...'. Types of property 'timestamp' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"2026-09-16T07:37:49.858Z\" | \"2026-09-16T08:26:23.970Z\"'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-publication-guard.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'content' does not exist on type 'ClaudeParentPublicEvent'. Property 'content' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"message\"; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; text: string; } & { order: number; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }'.": 1,
     "test/autoplan-publication-guard.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'input' does not exist on type 'ClaudeParentPublicEvent'. Property 'input' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"message\"; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; text: string; } & { order: number; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }'.": 4,
     "test/autoplan-publication-guard.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'isError' does not exist on type 'ClaudeParentPublicEvent'. Property 'isError' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"message\"; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; text: string; } & { order: number; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }'.": 2,
-    "test/autoplan-rendered-batch-at.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ input: string; signature: string; file: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ input: \"1\\r\"; signature: string; file: string; }'. Types of property 'input' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"1\\r\"'.": 2,
     "test/brain-cache-roundtrip.test.ts\tTS2307\tCannot find module '../bin/gstack-brain-cache' or its corresponding type declarations.": 3,
     "test/brain-cache-spec.test.ts\tTS2307\tCannot find module '../bin/gstack-brain-cache' or its corresponding type declarations.": 1,
     "test/brain-cache-spec.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'sort' does not exist on type 'readonly string[]'.": 1,
     "test/cache-concurrent-refresh.test.ts\tTS2307\tCannot find module '../bin/gstack-brain-cache' or its corresponding type declarations.": 3,
     "test/carve-guards-negative.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty 'behavioral' is missing in type '{ skill: string; expectedSections: string[]; requiredReads: string[]; scenario: string; staticInvariants: { mustStayInSkeleton: string[]; mustMoveToSection: string[]; gateAfterStop: string; }; maxSkeletonBytes: number; minUnionBytes: number; mustContain: never[]; }' but required in type 'CarveGuard'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-annotation-aj.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D9 (Issue 9.1) — Should the manual staging replay checklist gain failure-path replays before broad enablement?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-XMrFHU on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Stripe payment webhook handler), Section 9 Deployment.\\nELI10: The existing rollout checklist replays one successful payment in staging and checks the update, the email and the trace. That proves the happy path and nothing else. The failure modes this review fixed (odd user IDs breaking SQL, duplicate deliveries re-sending email, a failing mail provider) would pass that checklist untouched. Adding three short replays to the same checklist makes the manual gate check what the automated tests check, against real staging infrastructure.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: A staging pass gives false confidence and the first punctuated user ID or mail-provider blip in production is the real test.\\nRecommendation: 9A because deployments are not atomic and the checklist is already the documented gate; three extra replays cost minutes per release and catch the exact classes of bugs found here.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=4/10\\nNet: extend the existing gate with the failure paths (A) versus keep the happy-path-only replay (B).\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-XMrFHU on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Payment Processing Integration).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell the agent which slash skill to invoke w...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the test coverage? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-selection>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"Review complete...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\": string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\": string; }'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-d1>\\n\\nELI10: The plan describes two tests but leaves key observable outcomes vague \\u2014 \\\"correct receipt\\\" and \\\"fails clean\\\" don't specify what exactly the test asserts. The three approaches below differ in ho...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-d1>\\n\\nELI10: The plan describes two tests but leaves key observable outcomes vague \\u2014 \\\"correct receipt\\\" and \\\"fails clean\\\" don't specify what exactly the test asserts. The three approaches below differ in ho...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use?\\n\\nProject/branch: Payment Processing Integration on main branch.\\nELI10: The plan describes adding a Stripe webhook handler, but it has three serious problems baked in: it injects user IDs directly into raw SQL (classic SQL injection vulnerability), i...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use?\\n\\nProject/branch: Payment Processing Integration on main branch.\\nELI10: The plan describes adding a Stripe webhook handler, but it has three serious problems baked in: it injects user IDs directly into raw SQL (classic SQL injection vulnerability), i...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-approach-pick.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the processPayment() tests?\\nProject: Payment Processing \\u2014 Test Coverage (main)\\nELI10: The plan calls for 2 unit tests. The question is how precise those tests should be. A loose test says \\u201Cassert a receipt came back\\u201D; a tight test says \\u201Cassert rece...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the processPayment() tests?\\nProject: Payment Processing \\u2014 Test Coverage (main)\\nELI10: The plan calls for 2 unit tests. The question is how precise those tests should be. A loose test says \\u201Cassert a receipt came back\\u201D; a tight test says \\u201Cassert rece...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-assertion-header-am.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-EFiY6H on main, CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works better when the project CLAUDE.md tells the agent which slash skill to run for which kind of request. This is a one-time setup prompt. Note: pla...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-EFiY6H on main, CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works better when the project CLAUDE.md tells the agent which slash skill to run for which kind of request. This is a one-time setup prompt. Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit cannot happen in this session; choosing A records the intent as a follow-up.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild. Without routing, skills must be invoked by name; with it, a stale rule could mis-route once.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews one command instead of a lookup.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to /review without the user remembering names\\n  ✅ Standard gstack setup; identical across projects so nothing bespoke to maintain\\n  ❌ Cannot be written or committed while plan mode is active; lands as a deferred task\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ Zero edits to a fixture repo that may be discarded after this review\\n  ✅ Config flag stops this prompt from appearing again for this project\\n  ❌ Every skill has to be typed by exact name from here on\\nNet: convenience later versus zero churn in a throwaway fixture.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-l.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? gstack-plan-count-7Lu8Et / main branch. ELI10: g...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? gstack-plan-count-7Lu8Et / main branch. ELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude Code which skill to invoke for common tasks (strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, bugs \\u2192 /investigate, etc.). Without routing rules, you have to type...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? gstack-plan-count-7Lu8Et / main branch. ELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude Code which skill to invoke for common tasks (strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, bugs \\u2192 /investigate, etc.). Without routing rules, you have to type the skill name every time. With them, Claude Code routes automatically when the situation fits. Stakes if we pick wrong: minor \\u2014 routing rules are a few lines and easy to remove. Recommendation: A because the project already uses gstack skills and routing pays off immediately. Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score. Pros / cons: A) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (Recommended): \\u2705 Claude Code auto-invokes the right skill based on what you're doing \\u2014 no manual /skill typing needed \\u2705 Skills like /ship and /autoplan benefit from downstream routing when chained \\u274c Adds ~20 lines to CLAUDE.md (trivially reversible). B) Skip \\u2014 invoke skills manually: \\u2705 Zero change to CLAUDE.md \\u2014 one less thing to manage \\u2705 Full control over which skill runs and when \\u274c You type /skill-name every invocation \\u2014 adds friction over time. Net: routing rules are low-cost, high-frequency savings; the only real question is whether you want Claude Code opinionated about which skill fits which task. <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-m.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the test coverage? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-selection>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"Review complete...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-m.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"?: undefined...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed directly to the plan review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-prereq-office-hours>\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"D9 \\u2014 What's the ne...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-m.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-a...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-approach-0cbis>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-mode-0f>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 \\u2014 CEO Review complete. Eng Review is the required shipping gate and hasn't run yet....' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-approach-0cbis>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-o.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Want to run it first? <gstack-qid:ceo-review-prereq-office-hours>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff-o.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan mode, the CLAUDE.md edit + commit will happen after ExitPlanMode.)\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"D8 \\u2014 What's next after this CEO review?\\nProject: Payment Processing \\u2014 Test Coverage (main)\\nELI10: CEO...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan mode, the CLAUDE.md edit + commit will happen after ExitPlanMode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; calls: NativePlanQuestionCall[]; assistantMessages: never[]; planReadyRequests: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'planReadyRequests' are incompatible. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nN...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Takes about 10 minutes. T...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Takes about 10 minutes. That said, this plan is narrowly scoped test coverage (2 unit tests), so the problem statement is already clear from the code.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: /office-hours on a clearly-scoped test plan costs 10 minutes for minimal gain; skipping it on a murkier plan leaves the review shallow.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in p...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in plan mode this will be queued for after ExitPlanMode.)\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"The CEO review is complete (0 critical gaps, 2 spec gaps resolved). Eng Review is the required shipping gate. What's next?\": s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in plan mode this will be queued for after ExitPlanMode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill gets invoked automatically. Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"?: undefined; ... 5 more ...; \"CEO review is CLEAR. Eng review is the required shipping gate \\u2014 run it next?\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill gets invoked automatically. Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straigh...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straight to reviewing the plan as written? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"What\\u2019s the next review step after this CEO review?\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straight to reviewing the plan as written? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | {...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: ({ label: string; description: string; preview: string; } | { preview?: undefined; label: string; description: string; })[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQues...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode for this payment webhook plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 \\u2014 CEO review complete. Eng review is the required shippi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives — it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product — it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Run it first, or skip straight to the standard review?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | {...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for processPayment() test coverage?\\n\\nELI10: The plan specifie...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for processPayment() test coverage?\\n\\nELI10: The plan specifies exactly 2 unit tests: happy path (Stripe succeeds \\u2192 receipt generated) and 502-exhaustion (Stripe 502 \\u2192 retry once \\u2192 clean failure). A third natural scenario exists \\u2014 retry-then-success (St...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for processPayment() test coverage?\\n\\nELI10: The plan specifies exactly 2 unit tests: happy path (Stripe succeeds \\u2192 receipt generated) and 502-exhaustion (Stripe 502 \\u2192 retry once \\u2192 clean failure). A third natural scenario exists \\u2014 retry-then-success (Stripe 502 \\u2192 retry \\u2192 Stripe succeeds \\u2192 correct receipt) \\u2014 which the adapter suite already models but processPayment() has no unit test for. The question is how much test coverage to write while you're in the code.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too narrow leaves the retry-then-success orchestration untested, risking silent regressions on the recovery path. Too wide duplicates adapter-suite coverage without adding new signal.\\n\\nRecommendation: B because it closes the one genuinely missing orchestration scenario for ~10 extra lines, without duplicating adapter-boundary tests.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=7/10, B=9/10, C=10/10 (C has diminishing returns due to 402/429 adapter overlap)\\n\\n<gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nN...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Takes about 10 minutes. T...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Takes about 10 minutes. That said, this plan is narrowly scoped test coverage (2 unit tests), so the problem statement is already clear from the code.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: /office-hours on a clearly-scoped test plan costs 10 minutes for minimal gain; skipping it on a murkier plan leaves the review shallow.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in p...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in plan mode this will be queued for after ExitPlanMode.)\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"The CEO review is complete (0 critical gaps, 2 spec gaps resolved). Eng Review is the required shipping gate. What's next?\": s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them now? (Note: in plan mode this will be queued for after ExitPlanMode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill gets invoked automatically. Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"?: undefined; ... 5 more ...; \"CEO review is CLEAR. Eng review is the required shipping gate \\u2014 run it next?\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill gets invoked automatically. Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straigh...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straight to reviewing the plan as written? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"What\\u2019s the next review step after this CEO review?\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straight to reviewing the plan as written? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D10 \\u2014 Next steps: The CEO Review is complete. Eng Review is the required shipping gate. This plan ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D10 \\u2014 Next steps: The CEO Review is complete. Eng Review is the required shipping gate. This plan now has 5 significant changes (SQL injection fix, IDOR fix, ownership validation, batch query, security tests) \\u2014 all of which the eng review will need to verify for implementation correctness. Run /plan-eng...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D10 \\u2014 Next steps: The CEO Review is complete. Eng Review is the required shipping gate. This plan now has 5 significant changes (SQL injection fix, IDOR fix, ownership validation, batch query, security tests) \\u2014 all of which the eng review will need to verify for implementation correctness. Run /plan-eng-review next? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-next-steps>\\n\\nELI10: The CEO review checks whether the plan is strategically sound and safe. The eng review checks whether the plan is architecturally correct and implementable. Since this CEO review added significant new requirements (especially security fixes), the eng review will check that those new requirements are specified clearly enough for an engineer to implement correctly.\\n\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 4,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives — it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product — it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Run it first, or skip straight to the standard review?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and '\"preview\"' does not exist in type '{ label: string; description?: string | undefined; }'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nN...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\\n\\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Takes about 10 minutes. T...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the test coverage plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-selection>\\n\\nELI10: We need unit tests for processPayment(). The plan names exactly 2 tests. Do we write precisely those 2, or do we also cover adjacent gaps at the processPayment() level that the adapter suite can't catch (nil receipt, zero-amount charge, idempotency)?\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too narrow = we fill the named gap but leave real failure modes untested; too broad = scope creep on what was scoped as a targeted fix.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because the adapter suite already covers the failure taxonomy broadly; the named gap is specific and the plan is correctly scoped. Surface the adjacents as TODOS if needed.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=7/10, B=9/10\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 so the right skill gets invoked automatically. Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md?\": string; ... 5 more ...; \"CEO review is CLEAR. Eng review is the required shipping gate \\u2014 run it next?\"?: undefined; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. Want to run it first?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straigh...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours before the CEO review, or skip straight to reviewing the plan as written? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\": string; ... 7 more ...; \"What\\u2019s the next review step after this CEO review?\"?: undefined; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Which implementation approach should this plan target? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-impl-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Which implementation approach should this plan follow? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-conditional-option-facts.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Should the new handler bypass `WebhookDispatcher` or register through it?\\nProject/branch/tas...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Should the new handler bypass `WebhookDispatcher` or register through it?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Payment Processing Integration) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: Every Stripe webhook enters one front door (the ingress guards), then a dispatcher picks the handler. The p...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Should the new handler bypass `WebhookDispatcher` or register through it?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Payment Processing Integration) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: Every Stripe webhook enters one front door (the ingress guards), then a dispatcher picks the handler. The plan adds a new handler and wires it AROUND the dispatcher for \\\"clean namespace separation\\\". Namespace and routing are different things: the class can live in `Webhooks::` (already approved name) and still be registered with the dispatcher. Two routes into payment handling means two places to keep the flag, event filter and guards in sync, and this fixture cannot tell us whether any guard lives inside the dispatcher.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: if a guard is dispatcher-resident, bypassing silently drops it for paid events; even if not, we carry two routing paths forever.\\nRecommendation: A because the settled class name already gives namespace separation; the dispatcher gives one routing path and one flag location.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=6/10, C=5/10\\nNet: one door with a namespaced handler vs. a second door whose guard coverage we cannot yet prove.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE o...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. This is a one-time, per-project prompt.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a short routing block appended and committed to CLAUDE.md (after plan mode ends, since plan mode blocks edits right now); pick B and nothing changes and the prompt never returns.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ships one command instead of a lookup.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future sessions auto-route requests like 'review this diff' to the right gstack skill\\n  \\u2705 One small committed block; teammates get the same routing when they clone\\n  \\u274c Adds a chore commit to CLAUDE.md that must wait until this plan-mode review finishes\\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as-is with no extra commit on this fixture repo\\n  \\u2705 Prompt is suppressed for this project going forward via routing_declined\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill has to be typed by name for the life of the project\\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mod...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"?: undefined; \"D1 \\u2014 How should the two new processPayment tests be structured?\\nProject/branch/task: main branc...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE o...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. This is a one-time, per-project prompt.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a short routing block appended and committed to CLAUDE.md (after plan mode ends, since plan mode blocks edits right now); pick B and nothing changes and the prompt never returns.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ships one command instead of a lookup.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future sessions auto-route requests like 'review this diff' to the right gstack skill\\n  \\u2705 One small committed block; teammates get the same routing when they clone\\n  \\u274c Adds a chore commit to CLAUDE.md that must wait until this plan-mode review finishes\\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as-is with no extra commit on this fixture repo\\n  \\u2705 Prompt is suppressed for this project going forward via routing_declined\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill has to be typed by name for the life of the project\\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-contract-assertions-ag.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE o...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-hy44HE on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. This is a one-time, per-project prompt.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a short routing block appended and committed to CLAUDE.md (after plan mode ends, since plan mode blocks edits right now); pick B and nothing changes and the prompt never returns.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ships one command instead of a lookup.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future sessions auto-route requests like 'review this diff' to the right gstack skill\\n  \\u2705 One small committed block; teammates get the same routing when they clone\\n  \\u274c Adds a chore commit to CLAUDE.md that must wait until this plan-mode review finishes\\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as-is with no extra commit on this fixture repo\\n  \\u2705 Prompt is suppressed for this project going forward via routing_declined\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill has to be typed by name for the life of the project\\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-question-an.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-tzzxss on main, CEO review of the Stripe payment webhook plan.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which slash skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /sh...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-tzzxss on main, CEO review of the Stripe payment webhook plan.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which slash skill to reach for (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on). This is a one-time onboarding prompt. Note: plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Low either way. Without routing you invoke skills by hand; with it you get an extra section in CLAUDE.md in a fixture repo.\\nRecommendation: B because this repo is a review fixture whose CLAUDE.md is purpose-built for the plan under review, and adding routing rules here adds noise without benefit.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience routing vs keeping a fixture CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-question-an.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-P5mc9W on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which /skill to reach for w...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-P5mc9W on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which /skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without the rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, a short section is appended to CLAUDE.md and committed. Either way the plan review itself is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later reviews and ship steps one sentence away instead of a lookup.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience for future sessions versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched. Note we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the append and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-contract-question-an.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (one-time setup prompt from skill-start). Add them? Note: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\"?: undefined; ... 5 more ...; \"D5 \\u2014 Issue 4: the per-or...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (one-time setup prompt from skill-start). Add them? Note: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-OyYPMX on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short 'Skill routing' section in CLAUDE.md so future requests like 'review this diff' auto-route to the righ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-OyYPMX on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short 'Skill routing' section in CLAUDE.md so future requests like 'review this diff' auto-route to the right skill. This is a one-time setup prompt, unrelated to the plan itself. Plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md right now, so a yes would be applied after plan mode ends.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: none for this review; only affects how readily skills get suggested later.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make skill invocation predictable.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future requests auto-route to the matching gstack skill without guessing names\\n  \\u2705 One short section appended to CLAUDE.md, committed once, never prompted again\\n  \\u274c Adds ~15 lines to CLAUDE.md that some teammates may not use\\nB) No thanks\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as the fixture seeded it, no extra commit\\n  \\u2705 Preference is recorded so this prompt never repeats for this project\\n  \\u274c Skills must be invoked by name manually every time\\nNet: a small convenience trade; no effect on the review.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ....' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. strategy/scope \\u219...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship). Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md? Note: plan mode is active, so if you choose A the edit and commit will be queued until plan mode exits.\"?: ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship). Add them to this project's CLAUDE.md? Note: plan mode is active, so if you choose A the edit and commit will be queued until plan mode exits.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 1.1 Email leg: transaction boundary and failure handling\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-co...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 1.1 Email leg: transaction boundary and failure handling\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rTr6Nq on main, CEO review of the Stripe payment webhook plan (HOLD SCOPE).\\nELI10: After marking the user paid, the handler sends an email in the same request with no error handling, and the plan never says...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 \\u2014 1.1 Email leg: transaction boundary and failure handling\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rTr6Nq on main, CEO review of the Stripe payment webhook plan (HOLD SCOPE).\\nELI10: After marking the user paid, the handler sends an email in the same request with no error handling, and the plan never says whether that email runs inside the database transaction or after it. If inside, a mail outage rolls back the payment and the customer stays \\\"unpaid\\\" until the mail provider recovers. If after, an unhandled mail error becomes an HTTP 500 for a payment that already committed: the ingress fires its \\\"webhook processing failed\\\" alert for a non-failure, and Stripe retries for three days into a dedupe no-op that never resends the email but does degrade endpoint health. Stakes if we pick wrong: paying customers shown as unpaid, or false payment-failure alerts that bury real ones, plus a Stripe endpoint that can be auto-disabled.\\nRecommendation: A because \\\"every error has a name\\\" and \\\"zero silent failures\\\": the mail client's own exception classes get rescued, the failure stays visible through the existing mail failure-rate alert, and the runbook already says retry only the notification.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\\nA) Send after commit; rescue the mail client's named delivery and timeout exception classes (never StandardError); log at warn with event ID, user ID and payment intent ID; return 200 (recommended) (human: ~3h / CC: ~10 min)\\n  \\u2705 Payment commits regardless of mail health; the notification failure is counted by the existing dashboard and on-call alert, which already include caught exceptions\\n  \\u2705 Stripe sees 200 for a committed payment, so no false retry loop and no endpoint-health damage; unit test: mail raises, user is paid, response 200, one warn line\\n  \\u274c A user whose mail fails gets no email until on-call runs the notification retry procedure, exactly as the runbook prescribes today\\nB) Send after commit, let mail exceptions propagate (plan as written, ordering fixed) (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min)\\n  \\u2705 Smallest change: only the transaction boundary is pinned down\\n  \\u2705 Payment still commits before the email is attempted\\n  \\u274c 500 for a committed payment fires the ingress failure alert falsely and Stripe retries into a dedupe no-op for three days\\nC) Do nothing: leave the boundary unspecified and the email leg unhandled\\n  \\u2705 Zero implementation work\\n  \\u2705 Existing alerts still fire on any mail exception\\n  \\u274c Implementer picks the transaction boundary ad hoc; inside-transaction mail failures roll back real payments\\nNet: named rescue with existing visibility versus a false 500 versus leaving a payment-affecting decision to chance.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 9,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1: the success test asserts only that the receipt is truthy. How should it assert the r...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1: the success test asserts only that the receipt is truthy. How should it assert the receipt? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-success-receipt-assertion>\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wK9VSJ on main; PLAN.md test 1 (successful charge), lines 30-32.\\nELI10: The plan says a 1000-cent USD charg...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1: the success test asserts only that the receipt is truthy. How should it assert the receipt? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-success-receipt-assertion>\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wK9VSJ on main; PLAN.md test 1 (successful charge), lines 30-32.\\nELI10: The plan says a 1000-cent USD charge with Stripe id ch_paid must return exactly { chargeId: \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \\\"USD\\\" }. But the planned test only checks that something non-empty came back. A receipt with amountCents 100000, currency \\\"usd\\\", a missing chargeId, or even an empty object {} would pass. The test cannot fail for the regression it exists to catch.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a receipt-shape regression ships green, and the first person to notice is a customer reading a wrong amount on their receipt.\\nRecommendation: 1A because the plan already states the exact expected value, so the test should assert exactly that and nothing weaker (well-tested code is non-negotiable; explicit over clever).\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=6/10, 1C=1/10\\nNet: exact contract enforcement vs a test that documents intent without enforcing it.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 15 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-yfyOvh on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like 'review this diff' or '...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-yfyOvh on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like 'review this diff' or 'ship it' automatically route to the matching skill. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: we are in plan mode right now, so if you choose A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, you invoke each skill by name manually; with routing, future requests auto-route. Either way this review proceeds unchanged.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill suite discoverable in future sessions at zero ongoing cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience for future sessions vs. one extra committed section in CLAUDE.md.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ac.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-OyYPMX on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short 'Skill routing' section in CLAUDE.md so future requests like 'review this diff' auto-route to the righ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-OyYPMX on main, reviewing PLAN.md (payment test coverage) in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short 'Skill routing' section in CLAUDE.md so future requests like 'review this diff' auto-route to the righ...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment tests?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-OyYPMX on main, PLAN.md adds two unit tests to the existing processPayment suite (HOLD SCOPE).\\nELI10: The plan states two exact contracts: a success returns { chargeId: \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \\\"USD\\\" }, and repeated 502s produce exactly two charge attempts, one recorded 100 ms backoff, then PaymentUnavailable. The proposed tests only check 'receipt is truthy' and 'it rejects with PaymentUnavailable'. A test that passes when the receipt has the wrong amount, or when the retry loop makes one or five attempts, is a green checkmark that proves nothing. The factory already exposes the mock call history and the virtual sleeper record, so pinning the exact contract costs a few assertion lines.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a regression in receipt shape or retry count ships with the suite still green, which is the exact silent failure these tests exist to prevent.\\nRecommendation: B because it is the complete version of the plan's own stated scope (well-tested and explicit over minimal) without adding any new behavior; C is an expansion and out of HOLD SCOPE.\\nCompleteness: A=3/10, B=9/10, C=10/10\\nA) As written: truthy receipt, rejects-only (human ~20 min / CC ~3 min)\\n  \\u2705 Smallest possible diff, no new fixtures or helper usage beyond the mock\\n  \\u2705 Matches PLAN.md text exactly, nothing to renegotiate\\n  \\u274c Passes on wrong chargeId, wrong amountCents, wrong currency, 1 or 5 retry attempts, 0 ms backoff\\nB) Contract-pinning: same two tests, exact assertions (recommended) (human ~45 min / CC ~5 min)\\n  \\u2705 Success test deep-equals the receipt, asserts one charge call carrying amountCents=1000/currency=USD, and an empty sleeper record\\n  \\u2705 502 test asserts rejection is a PaymentUnavailable instance, exactly 2 charge calls, exactly one 100 ms sleep, using helpers the factory already exposes\\n  \\u274c Assertions depend on the sleeper record's existing shape, so the implementer must read the factory helper once\\nC) B plus shadow-path tests for nil / zero / non-integer amount (human ~2 h / CC ~15 min)\\n  \\u2705 Full input-shape coverage of processPayment in one PR\\n  \\u2705 Would surface any missing production validation early\\n  \\u274c Adds behaviors PLAN.md does not state and may require production changes; exceeds HOLD SCOPE\\nNet: B pins every invariant the plan already writes down, using only helpers it already names; A leaves those invariants unverified and C changes scope.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, re...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md with /plan-ceo-review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on)...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md with /plan-ceo-review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand each time. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild. Either you get a routing section you did not want in CLAUDE.md, or you keep typing skill names manually.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules cost one CLAUDE.md section and save a manual invocation on every future request.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future requests route to the right gstack skill without you naming it\\n  \\u2705 Standard section, identical across gstack projects, easy to delete later\\n  \\u274c Adds a committed CLAUDE.md edit; in plan mode this lands after the review exits plan mode\\nB) No thanks, invoke manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as seeded in the fixture, no extra commit\\n  \\u2705 Re-enable any time with gstack-config set routing_declined false\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill has to be invoked by name for the life of this project\\nNet: a small committed edit versus manual skill invocation forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-VaZa4U on main, running /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which slash-skill to invoke when you say things like \\...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-VaZa4U on main, running /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which slash-skill to invoke when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing rules you must invoke skills manually; with them, an unwanted section lands in a committed file. Either is trivially reversible.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later skill invocations automatic, and the edit is a small appended section.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNote: plan mode is active, so any CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen only after this review ends and plan mode exits.\\nNet: automatic skill routing versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Stripe payment webhook handler) in HOLD SCOPE mode.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so future requests like \\\"review this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Stripe payment webhook handler) in HOLD SCOPE mode.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so future requests like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" get routed to the right skill automatically. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Because we are in plan mode right now, the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review finishes and plan mode exits, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules, you invoke skills by hand each time; with them, an extra section lands in a checked-in file.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later sessions pick the right skill without manual invocation.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-VaZa4U on main, running /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which slash-skill to invoke when you say things like \\...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count-VaZa4U on main, running /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which slash-skill to invoke when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing rules you must invoke skills manually; with them, an unwanted section lands in a committed file. Either is trivially reversible.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later skill invocations automatic, and the edit is a small appended section.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNote: plan mode is active, so any CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen only after this review ends and plan mode exits.\\nNet: automatic skill routing versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 15 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, re...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md with /plan-ceo-review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on)...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md with /plan-ceo-review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand each time. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild. Either you get a routing section you did not want in CLAUDE.md, or you keep typing skill names manually.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules cost one CLAUDE.md section and save a manual invocation on every future request.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future requests route to the right gstack skill without you naming it\\n  \\u2705 Standard section, identical across gstack projects, easy to delete later\\n  \\u274c Adds a committed CLAUDE.md edit; in plan mode this lands after the review exits plan mode\\nB) No thanks, invoke manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as seeded in the fixture, no extra commit\\n  \\u2705 Re-enable any time with gstack-config set routing_declined false\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill has to be invoked by name for the life of this project\\nNet: a small committed edit versus manual skill invocation forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Stripe payment webhook handler) in HOLD SCOPE mode.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so future requests like \\\"review this...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, reviewing the Stripe payment webhook plan in HOLD SCOPE mode.\\nELI10: gstack can search learnings saved from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. Everything stays local; no data leaves the machine. It helps solo developers most. Skip it if you work on multiple client codebases where mixing lessons between them would be a concern.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; disabling loses reusable patterns.\\nRecommendation: A because this is a local-only lookup and more prior context makes the review sharper.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: broader recall versus strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-mode.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should I use for this test coverage plan? <gstack-qid:ceo-mode-selection>\": string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should I use for this test coverage plan? <gstack-qid:ceo-mode-selection>\": string; }'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-count-s-terminals.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[] |...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Which implementation approach should the processPayment() tests use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-0c-bis-approa...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Which implementation approach should the processPayment() tests use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-0c-bis-approach>\"?: undefined; \"Which review mode for this test-coverage plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-0f-mode>\"?: undefined; \"Section 6, Finding #1: The 502 test says 'fails clean' \\u2014 what does the caller receive? <gstack-...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Which implementation approach should the processPayment() tests use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-0c-bis-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-current-decision-record.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ [x: string]: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rRdsBt on main, starting the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /p...'. Property '\"D3 (ledger R1) — How much of the receipt contract should test 1 assert?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-UniFL6 on main, HOLD SCOPE review of PLAN.md test 1 (successful charge).\\nELI10: The plan documents the exact receipt a 1000-cent USD charge must return: chargeId \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents 1000, currency \\\"USD\\\". But test 1 only checks that *something* came back (truthy). A bug that returns the wrong id, a float amount, or the wrong currency would pass this test. The question is whether the test should pin the values the plan itself spells out.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too weak, and a receipt regression reaches users with CI green; too strict is a one-line literal edit if the receipt shape ever legitimately grows.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan already states every value to the cent, the factory already produces them, and the extra assertion is one line with no new helpers.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\\nNet: an exact receipt pin (one line) vs. a test that cannot fail on the regression it is named for.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-UniFL6 on main, starting the /plan-ceo-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" au...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-current-decision-record.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run /plan-ceo-review in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack has a dozen skills (review, ship, investigate, etc.). A short routing section in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach ...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — How should the new handler be wired into webhook ingress? (ledger row D2)\\nProject/branch/task: Payment Processing Integration plan on `main`, HOLD SCOPE CEO review.\\nELI10: Your app already has a front door for Stripe webhooks, the `WebhookDispatcher`, which routes each event type to its handler and logs the trip. The plan proposes a new handler class but wants to skip that front door and wire it straight from ingress \\\"for clean namespace separation\\\". The namespace win is already banked by the approved class name `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` (PLAN.md:100-103), so the open question is purely routing: one path or two.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: two routing paths means every retained guard (signature, dedup, lock, ownership; PLAN.md:38-39) has to be re-proven on the second path and kept in sync forever; the alternative risk is a dispatcher registration API that doesn't fit and needs a small change.\\nRecommendation: A because it reuses proven routing (Engineering preference: DRY, smallest clear change) and the feature flag then toggles a registration rather than a route.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: hard entry-point boundary vs. one routing path that everything else already trusts.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-current-decision-record.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[] | ({ ...; } | ... 1 mor...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[] | undefined'. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Kkbsjq on main, starting the /plan-ceo-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate, etc). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill t...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 (row R1) — How does the new handler get invoked: through `WebhookDispatcher` or around it?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Kkbsjq on main, HOLD SCOPE review of the Stripe payment handler plan.\\nELI10: Your app already has one front door (`WebhookDispatcher`) that decides which code handles which Stripe event. The plan proposes to give the new payment handler its own side door for \\\"clean namespace separation\\\". But the separation you want already comes from the settled class name `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler`; a side door just means two routing paths to keep in sync. PLAN.md L103 says separate-vs-reuse is still open, so this is a real decision, not a re-litigation.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: with a second path, the feature flag and the handler-identity trace may not sit in front of the bypass, so a rollout or an incident could route or attribute events wrongly and nobody notices until a payment is mis-handled.\\nRecommendation: A because it gives you the app-owned class you approved with one routing path and no re-proving of the guards.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: A keeps one front door and the approved name; B trades that for a self-contained class plus unverified wiring; C removes the class and makes the dispatcher payment-aware.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-current-decision-record.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rRdsBt on main, starting the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /p...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0.1 — Enable cross-project learnings search on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rRdsBt on main, pre-review setup (one-time config).\\nELI10: gstack keeps a local notebook of lessons learned per project. It can also peek into the notebooks of your other projects on this machine to spot patterns that apply here. Nothing leaves your machine either way. This project currently has zero learnings, so today the choice only affects future sessions.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Two-way door; flip it anytime with `gstack-config set cross_project_learnings true|false`.\\nRecommendation: A because for a solo developer more local signal is free; skip only if you juggle separate client codebases.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: broader local pattern recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-current-decision-record.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run /plan-ceo-review in HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: gstack has a dozen skills (review, ship, investigate, etc.). A short routing section in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach ...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — How should the new handler be wired into webhook ingress? (ledger row D2)\\nProject/branch/task: Payment Processing Integration plan on `main`, HOLD SCOPE CEO review.\\nELI10: Your app already has a front door for Stripe webhooks, the `WebhookDispatcher`, which routes each event type to its handler and logs the trip. The plan proposes a new handler class but wants to skip that front door and wire it straight from ingress \\\"for clean namespace separation\\\". The namespace win is already banked by the approved class name `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` (PLAN.md:100-103), so the open question is purely routing: one path or two.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: two routing paths means every retained guard (signature, dedup, lock, ownership; PLAN.md:38-39) has to be re-proven on the second path and kept in sync forever; the alternative risk is a dispatcher registration API that doesn't fit and needs a small change.\\nRecommendation: A because it reuses proven routing (Engineering preference: DRY, smallest clear change) and the feature flag then toggles a registration rather than a route.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: hard entry-point boundary vs. one routing path that everything else already trusts.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-current-omission-ap.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"?: undefined; ... 5 more ...; \"D5 \\u2014 Order load: one query per order inside a two-second DB deadline.\\nProject/branch/...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-declarative-premise-ap.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-YPKqxN on main, CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short \\\"when the user asks X, run skill Y\\\" section in CLAUDE.md so future sessions pick the right review skill automatically. This is a one-t...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-YPKqxN on main, CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short \\\"when the user asks X, run skill Y\\\" section in CLAUDE.md so future sessions pick the right review skill automatically. This is a one-time onboarding prompt. Stakes: without it you type skill names by hand; with it Claude routes for you. Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records your intent and I will apply it once plan mode ends (or you can run it after this review).\\nStakes if we pick wrong: low either way; the setting is reversible with one config command.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later /plan-eng-review and /ship invocations automatic.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience now vs one fewer file touched in this fixture repo. <gstack-qid:gstack-routing-injection>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-expansion-auq.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'is_error' does not exist on type '{ type: string; text: string; } | { type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; }; caller: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'. Property 'is_error' does not exist on type '{ type: string; text: string; }'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-expansion-auq.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2: { request: string; reply: string; }; toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds: { request: string; reply: string; }; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2: { request: string; reply: string; }; toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds: { request: string; reply: string; }; }'.": 5,
     "test/ceo-finding-fixture.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string | number | string[]' is not assignable to type 'string'. Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
@@ -177,72 +99,36 @@
     "test/ceo-finding-fixture.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ status: 200 | 403 | 503; kind: \"committed\" | \"failed\" | \"forbidden\" | \"unregistered-event\"; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'RequestOutcome'. Type '{ status: 200 | 403 | 503; kind: \"committed\" | \"failed\" | \"forbidden\" | \"unregistered-event\"; }' is not assignable to type '{ status: 503; kind: \"failed\" | \"unregistered-event\"; }'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type '200 | 403 | 503' is not assignable to type '503'. Type '200' is not assignable to type '503'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-finding-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'i' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/ceo-finding-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'label' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; assistantMessages: never[]; planReadyRequests: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]; calls: NativePlanQuestionCall[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'planReadyRequests' are incompatible. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; calls: NativePlanQuestionCall[]; assistantMessages: never[]; planReadyRequests: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'planReadyRequests' are incompatible. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Run /office-hours first, or skip and proceed with standard review?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-ap...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode should we apply to Approach A (Minimal Viable)? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 - Next step: run /plan-eng-review? <gstack-q...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Run /office-hours first, or skip and proceed with standard review?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-handoff-y.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-ap...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode should we apply to Approach A (Minimal Viable)? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 - Next step: run /plan-eng-review? <gstack-q...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'filePath' does not exist on type '{}'.": 4,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 4,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 gstack setup: add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gsta...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 gstack setup: add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-2n1ktg on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\", \\\"scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-2n1ktg on main, PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (~9\\u201311 files, estimate).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch bigger versions and argue for them. Selective means I harden what you wrote and offer add-ons neutrally, one at a time, you pick. Hold means no scope changes, maximum rigor on failure paths and tests. Reduction means I look for what to cut.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Expansion on a small feature bloats it; Hold on a plan with a data-model gap (visibility scope) ships a table you may migrate in six months.\\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because this is an enhancement to an existing system, under 15 files, with one or two adjacent additions worth a yes/no each.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: how much I push on scope vs. how much I push on rigor within the scope you already wrote.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ provenance: { path: string; sha256: string; qualification: string; }; selectionStartedAt: number; continuedCallId: string; transcript: { status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { ...; }[]; }[]; ... 4 more ...; ans...' to type 'CeoHoldPostureReviewInput' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. The types of 'transcript.calls' are incompatible between these types. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 gstack setup: add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gsta...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 gstack setup: add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-2n1ktg on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\", \\\"scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 gstack setup: add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-2n1ktg on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\", \\\"scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\"). Without it you invoke skills by hand every time. Note: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: minor either way; you can flip it later with gstack-config.\\nRecommendation: A because routing is the default gstack setup and costs one committed section.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience later vs. one extra file change in this repo.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-hold-posture-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ revision: string; provenance: { path: string; sha256: string; qualification: string; }; source: { path: string; content: string; }; selectionStartedAt: number; continuedCallId: string; transcript: { status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; ... 6 more ...; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]; assista...' to type 'CeoHoldPostureReviewInput' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. The types of 'transcript.calls' are incompatible between these types. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture on `ma...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, etc.). T...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture on `main`, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, etc.). This is a one-time setup prompt, separate from the plan review itself. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after the review ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, skills only run when you type them by hand; with it, a few extra lines land in CLAUDE.md.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make future sessions pick the right skill without prompting.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a few lines of CLAUDE.md config vs. invoking skills manually forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-incomplete-save-b176.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 (ledger row R1) \\u2014 How deep should Test 1 (successful charge) assert?\\nProject/branch/task: gsta...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 (ledger row R1) \\u2014 How deep should Test 1 (successful charge) assert?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Yvuyqg on main, HOLD SCOPE review of the processPayment coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan writes down the exact receipt the charge must return: { chargeId: \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \\...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 (ledger R1) — What should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rQv537 on main; HOLD SCOPE review of the processPayment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan states the exact receipt a 1000-cent USD charge must return ({ chargeId: \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \\\"USD\\\" }), but test 1 only checks that *something* came back. A bug that returns {} or amountCents as \\\"1000\\\" (a string) or drops currency still passes. The factory already exposes the Stripe mock's call history and the sleeper's record, so checking them costs a few lines and no new helpers.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too weak and the money-path receipt can drift silently; a downstream ledger or invoice reads the wrong amount and the suite stays green.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan already wrote the contract down; asserting it is the whole point of the test and adds ~5 lines in the same file (human: ~15 min / CC: ~1 min).\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\\nNet: same file, same effort tier; the choice is only how much drift the test can detect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-incomplete-save-b176.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; }[] | ({ ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[] | undefined'. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rQv537 on main, starting the /plan-ceo-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so plain requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to the rig...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rQv537 on main, /plan-ceo-review of the payment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: gstack logs small lessons per project (command quirks, pitfalls). It can also search lessons from your other local projects when reviewing this one. Everything stays on this machine; nothing is uploaded. This is a one-time setting.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabled on a machine with multiple client codebases means one client's notes can surface in another's review. Disabled on a solo machine means you re-learn the same pitfalls per project.\\nRecommendation: A because this is a solo review fixture and local-only search has no downside here.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: broader recall vs strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
     "test/ceo-mode-expansion-disposition.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3 — E1: Add project-shared views alongside private views?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, ledger row L1 (ownership scope).\\nELI10: Right now the plan saves a view for one member only. Shared views let the person who builds \\\"Blocked on design, by priority\\\" publish it to the whole project, so nobody else rebuilds it. Same table, one `visibility` column (private | project), creator owns edits, every project member can open it. This is what Linear, Jira, and GitLab all do.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skip it and the stated team-wide pain is only solved per person; adding it later means a schema migration and a permissions retrofit. Add it and you take on a real permissions surface (who can edit/delete a shared view) before the pilot.\\nRecommendation: A because the goal sentence is about the team, and a nullable-owner or visibility column costs almost nothing now and a migration later. (human: ~2 days / CC: ~20 min)\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=6/10\\nNet: one column and one permission rule now vs. a half-solved pain and a migration in six months.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: any; }' but required in type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 E1: Add project-shared views alongside private views?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, ledger row L1 (ownership scope).\\nELI10: Right now the plan saves a view for one member only. Shared views let the person who builds \\\"Blocked on design, by priority\\\" publish it to the whole proj...'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-expansion-disposition.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D4.1 — E1: Shared project views. Add to this plan's scope?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved views, SCOPE EXPANSION, D2 schema approved (visibility column exists).\\nELI10: Today's plan gives each member private views. E1 lets a member publish a view to the whole project (\\\"Blocked\\\", \\\"This sprint\\\"), so the team stops describing filter recipes in chat and starts naming views. Project admins can edit or delete shared views; regular members can only apply them. The schema is already there from D2, so this is endpoints, permissions and a picker section, not a migration. Human ~1.5 days / CC ~45 min. Runs in parallel with the pilot build, does not block it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skipping it leaves the 10x version on the table; adding it brings real permission logic (who may edit a view others rely on) into the first release.\\nRecommendation: Add because it is the single biggest value multiplier and D2 made it cheap; E2 (default view) depends on it.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: team-level value and one permission model now vs. a smaller, purely personal first release.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Shared project views. Add to this plan's scope?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved views, SCOPE EXPANSION, D2 schema approved (visibility column exists).\\nELI10: Today's plan gives each member private views. E1 lets a member publish a view to the whole project (\\\"Blocked\\\", \\\"This sprint\\\")...'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-expansion-disposition.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 E1: Add project-shared views alongside private views?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, ledger row L1 (ownership scope).\\nELI10: Right now the plan saves a view for one member only. Shared views let the person who builds \\\"Blocked on design, by priority\\\" publish it to the whole proj...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 E1: Add project-shared views alongside private views?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, ledger row L1 (ownership scope).\\nELI10: Right now the plan saves a view for one member only. Shared views let the person who builds \\\"Blocked on design, by priority\\\" publish it to the whole proj...'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-expansion-disposition.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Shared project views. Add to this plan's scope?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved views, SCOPE EXPANSION, D2 schema approved (visibility column exists).\\nELI10: Today's plan gives each member private views. E1 lets a member publish a view to the whole project (\\\"Blocked\\\", \\\"This sprint\\\")...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Shared project views. Add to this plan's scope?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved views, SCOPE EXPANSION, D2 schema approved (visibility column exists).\\nELI10: Today's plan gives each member private views. E1 lets a member publish a view to the whole project (\\\"Blocked\\\", \\\"This sprint\\\")...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ [x: string]: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan? (ledger row R1)\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, PLAN.md: saved project views.\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch bigger versions and ask you about each. Selective means I keep your scope,...'. Property '\"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instrumentation, E6 dirty-state Update/Save-as-new, E7 delight pack (rename, duplicate, save nudge, shortcut, empty state, page title). Each is a separate scope call. I can ask one question per item (7 questions, each Add / Defer / Skip / Hold), or first propose a smaller set, or batch them into groups. Dependencies: E2's project default needs E1; E4 cross-member links need E1; E5 is what makes the pilot metric real for everything else.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Per-item gives you full control at the cost of 7 prompts; batching is faster but risks lumping unrelated decisions together.\\nRecommendation: A because every proposal is independently shippable and this mode exists to let you weigh each one.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: decision precision versus prompt count.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instr...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePublicToolEvent[]'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"result\" | \"use\"'.": 5,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: f...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; review...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Store views using the task list's existing filter/sort serialization?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, SCOPE EXPANSION, proposal 1 of 6.\\nELI10: Your task list already turns filters and sort into some encoded shape (usually the URL query string). A saved view should persist exactly that shape, not a new hand-rolled JSON schema. Then saved views, URLs, and shared links all speak one language, and when you add a new filter next quarter, old views keep working without a migration.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Two filter encodings drift apart; every new filter needs a stored-view migration; deep links (E2) and shared views (E3) need translation code.\\nRecommendation: Add because it is the cheapest item here (human ~0.5 d / CC ~15 min) and it is the foundation E2\\u2013E4 stand on.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=5/10, C=3/10, D=n/a\\nNet: one canonical filter language now vs. a second schema you maintain forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instrumentation, E6 dirty-state Update/Save-as-new, E7 delight pack (rename, duplicate, save nudge, shortcut, empty state, page title). Each is a separate scope call. I can ask one question per item (7 questions, each Add / Defer / Skip / Hold), or first propose a smaller set, or batch them into groups. Dependencies: E2's project default needs E1; E4 cross-member links need E1; E5 is what makes the pilot metric real for everything else.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Per-item gives you full control at the cost of 7 prompts; batching is faster but risks lumping unrelated decisions together.\\nRecommendation: A because every proposal is independently shippable and this mode exists to let you weigh each one.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: decision precision versus prompt count.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instr...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Store views using the task list's existing filter/sort serialization?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, SCOPE EXPANSION, proposal 1 of 6.\\nELI10: Your task list already turns filters and sort into some encoded shape (usually the URL query string). A saved view should persist exactly that shape, not a new hand-rolled JSON schema. Then saved views, URLs, and shared links all speak one language, and when you add a new filter next quarter, old views keep working without a migration.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Two filter encodings drift apart; every new filter needs a stored-view migration; deep links (E2) and shared views (E3) need translation code.\\nRecommendation: Add because it is the cheapest item here (human ~0.5 d / CC ~15 min) and it is the foundation E2\\u2013E4 stand on.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=5/10, C=3/10, D=n/a\\nNet: one canonical filter language now vs. a second schema you maintain forever.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS2790\tThe operand of a 'delete' operator must be optional.": 12,
-    "test/ceo-mode-full-ad.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ [x: string]: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan? (ledger row R1)\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, PLAN.md: saved project views.\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch bigger versions and ask you about each. Selective means I keep your scope,...'. Property '\"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instrumentation, E6 dirty-state Update/Save-as-new, E7 delight pack (rename, duplicate, save nudge, shortcut, empty state, page title). Each is a separate scope call. I can ask one question per item (7 questions, each Add / Defer / Skip / Hold), or first propose a smaller set, or batch them into groups. Dependencies: E2's project default needs E1; E4 cross-member links need E1; E5 is what makes the pilot metric real for everything else.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Per-item gives you full control at the cost of 7 prompts; batching is faster but risks lumping unrelated decisions together.\\nRecommendation: A because every proposal is independently shippable and this mode exists to let you weigh each one.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: decision precision versus prompt count.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instr...'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePublicToolEvent[]'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; content?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"result\" | \"use\"'.": 5,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: f...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; review...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Store views using the task list's existing filter/sort serialization?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, SCOPE EXPANSION, proposal 1 of 6.\\nELI10: Your task list already turns filters and sort into some encoded shape (usually the URL query string). A saved view should persist exactly that shape, not a new hand-rolled JSON schema. Then saved views, URLs, and shared links all speak one language, and when you add a new filter next quarter, old views keep working without a migration.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Two filter encodings drift apart; every new filter needs a stored-view migration; deep links (E2) and shared views (E3) need translation code.\\nRecommendation: Add because it is the cheapest item here (human ~0.5 d / CC ~15 min) and it is the foundation E2\\u2013E4 stand on.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=5/10, C=3/10, D=n/a\\nNet: one canonical filter language now vs. a second schema you maintain forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instrumentation, E6 dirty-state Update/Save-as-new, E7 delight pack (rename, duplicate, save nudge, shortcut, empty state, page title). Each is a separate scope call. I can ask one question per item (7 questions, each Add / Defer / Skip / Hold), or first propose a smaller set, or batch them into groups. Dependencies: E2's project default needs E1; E4 cross-member links need E1; E5 is what makes the pilot metric real for everything else.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Per-item gives you full control at the cost of 7 prompts; batching is faster but risks lumping unrelated decisions together.\\nRecommendation: A because every proposal is independently shippable and this mode exists to let you weigh each one.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: decision precision versus prompt count.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3.0 \\u2014 Seven expansion proposals are on the table. How should I walk them?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-w6cXCj on main, saved project views, SCOPE EXPANSION mode.\\nELI10: The proposals are E1 project-shared views, E2 default views, E3 stale-filter handling, E4 URL-addressable views, E5 pilot instr...'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D4.1 \\u2014 E1: Store views using the task list's existing filter/sort serialization?\\nProject/branch/task: main; saved project views plan, SCOPE EXPANSION, proposal 1 of 6.\\nELI10: Your task list already turns filters and sort into some encoded shape (usually the URL query string). A saved view should persist exactly that shape, not a new hand-rolled JSON schema. Then saved views, URLs, and shared links all speak one language, and when you add a new filter next quarter, old views keep working without a migration.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Two filter encodings drift apart; every new filter needs a stored-view migration; deep links (E2) and shared views (E3) need translation code.\\nRecommendation: Add because it is the cheapest item here (human ~0.5 d / CC ~15 min) and it is the foundation E2\\u2013E4 stand on.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=5/10, C=3/10, D=n/a\\nNet: one canonical filter language now vs. a second schema you maintain forever.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS2790\tThe operand of a 'delete' operator must be optional.": 12,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FDFfod on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FDFfod on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...'.": 1,
+    "test/ceo-mode-option.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this plan?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add saved project views\\\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. It decides whether I push you to build a bigger...'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-pending-submit.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: string; calls: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; }[]; assistantMessages: { sessionId: string; text: string; timestamp: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"error\" | \"missing\" | \"ready\"'.": 5,
     "test/ceo-mode-prerequisite.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'answeredAt' does not exist on type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; requestedAt: string; answered: boolean; answeredAt: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answers: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-prerequisite.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'answers' does not exist on type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; requestedAt: string; answered: boolean; answeredAt: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answers: { ...; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-mode-prerequisite.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'input' does not exist on type '{ type: string; id: string; name: string; input: { questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; }; caller: { type: string; }; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }'. Property 'input' does not exist on type '{ type: string; content: string; tool_use_id: string; }'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-fields-f359.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D1 — Should the two new tests assert the exact contracts the plan already states, or stay at the truthy / rejects-only depth the plan proposes?\\nProject/branch/task: main — CEO review (HOLD SCOPE) of the processPayment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan writes down exactly what processPayment must return (a receipt with chargeId ch_paid, amountCents 1000, currency USD) and exactly how it must fail on repeated 502s (two attempts, one 100 ms pause, then PaymentUnavailable). Then the tests only check \\\"got something\\\" and \\\"it threw the right error.\\\" A test that checks less than the contract can pass while the contract is broken. The factory already exposes the call history and the sleeper record, so checking the full contract costs no new code.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a receipt with the wrong amount, or a retry loop that retries 0 or 50 times, passes CI and reaches customers' cards.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan's own \\\"Existing behavior retained\\\" section is the acceptance criteria, and HOLD SCOPE keeps stated invariants; A pins every one of them with helpers the plan already lists as in use.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\\nNet: A trades a few minutes of looking up the factory's call-history / sleeper API shape for tests that actually fail when the money or retry contract changes; B and C save that lookup and leave part or all of the contract unpinned.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Should the two new tests assert the exact contracts the plan already states, or stay at the truthy / rejects-only depth the plan proposes?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 CEO review (HOLD SCOPE) of the processPayment test-coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan writes down exactly what processPayment must ret...'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'number' is not assignable to type 'never'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-rev...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-rev...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0.1 \\u2014 Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`; first-run config prompt before the HOLD SCOPE review.\\nELI10: gstack keeps a local log of lessons learned per project. It can also read lessons from your other projects on this machine to spot repeat patterns. Everything stays local; nothing leaves the machine. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination is a concern.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; disabling on a solo machine just means fewer prior-learning hits.\\nRecommendation: Enable because a solo dev benefits from cross-project patterns and this is a sandbox with no other projects to leak from.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: broader prior-learning recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture rep...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to run for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Route the new handler through `WebhookDispatcher` or bypass it?\\nProject/branch/task: Stripe payment handler refactor on `main`; ledger row D1.\\nELI10: Today one shared \\\"dispatcher\\\" decides which handler gets each Stripe event. The plan wants the new `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` to skip that and get its own routing path, for \\\"clean namespace separation\\\". But the separation already comes from the approved class name. Skipping the dispatcher means a second routing path, and the existing feature flag has to be re-wired to it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a bypass leaves two ways events reach handlers; the next event type forks the same way, and rollback wiring lives in two places.\\nRecommendation: A because one dispatch path with the existing flag is less code, less to test, and keeps rollback where it is.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=5/10\\nNet: DRY routing with a small dispatcher touch vs. an untouched dispatcher and a duplicated path.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questionIssuedAt' does not exist on type '{ call: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; }; questionIssuedAt: string; sav...'. Property 'questionIssuedAt' does not exist on type '{ call: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; }; savedPlan: string; successful...'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-rev...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0.1 \\u2014 Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`; first-run config prompt before the HOLD SCOPE review.\\nELI10: gstack keeps a local log of lessons learned per project. It can also read lessons from your other projects on this machine to spot repeat patterns. Everything stays local; nothing leaves the machine. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination is a concern.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; disabling on a solo machine just means fewer prior-learning hits.\\nRecommendation: Enable because a solo dev benefits from cross-project patterns and this is a sandbox with no other projects to leak from.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: broader prior-learning recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, starting the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 (ledger R1) — Should the new handler register through the existing `WebhookDispatcher` or bypass it?\\nProject/branch/task: payment plan review on `main`, HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: Today one module (the dispatcher) decides which handler runs for each Stripe event. The plan wires the new handler straight into the ingress instead, skipping that module, and gives \\\"clean namespace\\\" as the reason. But the namespace is already settled by the approved class name, so the real question is whether we want one routing path or two. The plan itself says this is still open.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: two routing paths means rollout, rollback, and every future Stripe event handler have two precedents to reason about; or, if the dispatcher is a bad fit, we couple a fresh class to legacy plumbing.\\nRecommendation: A because it keeps one routing mechanism, the flag flip becomes a dispatcher table change, and the next handler copies a single pattern.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: one routing path and a bit of coupling vs. zero coupling and a second path to maintain forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 4,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ call: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 (ledger row R1) — What should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: mai...' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ call: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 (ledger R1) — Should the new handler register with the existing `WebhookDispatcher`, or by...'. The types of '[\"call\"][\"answers\"]' are incompatible between these types. Property '\"D2 (ledger R1) — Should the new handler register with the existing `WebhookDispatcher`, or bypass it with its own dispatch path?\\nProject/branch/task: Payment Processing Integration plan on `main`, HOLD SCOPE review, row R1 (Architecture).\\nELI10: Your app already has a front door (`WebhookDispatcher`) that decides which handler runs for a Stripe event. The plan wants the new handler to skip that door and use its own, for \\\"clean namespace separation\\\". But the class name `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` already gives you the namespace. The open question is whether a second door is worth owning, given that the plan's promise that the handler \\\"runs inside the unchanged guards\\\" may depend on going through the first door. There is no code in this repo to verify how the guards are wired, so that is an unknown either way.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a bypass that misses a guard wire-up means an event reaches the handler without dedup/lock/handler-identity tracing, and nobody notices until a duplicate charge email or a missing trace shows up in an incident.\\nRecommendation: A because it is the smaller diff, reuses the proven flag/trace/dispatch path, and the only stated benefit of bypassing is already delivered by the class name.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=6/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Register the new class with the existing WebhookDispatcher (recommended)\\n  ✅ Inherits the dispatch, feature-flag selection and handler-identity tracing the prior handler already proved in production\\n  ✅ Smallest change: one class plus one registration entry; nothing to re-verify about guard ordering\\n  ❌ Keeps a code dependency on the shared dispatcher module (the contracts say it stays available anyway)\\nB) Bypass WebhookDispatcher with a parallel dispatch path (as written)\\n  ✅ Fully independent code path with no coupling to the shared dispatcher\\n  ✅ Namespace separation is explicit at the routing layer, not only in the class name\\n  ❌ Duplicates routing and flag selection; whether ingress guards and trace identity are wired through the dispatcher is unknown, so \\\"runs inside unchanged guards\\\" needs a code audit before it can be trusted\\nNet: one proven door vs. two doors where the second one's safety is unverified; the namespace goal is met either way.\"' is missing in type '{ \"D3 (ledger row R1) \\u2014 What should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: main; HOLD SCOPE review of the two-test processPayment coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan spells out the exact receipt a 1000-cent USD charge must produce: chargeId \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents 1000, currency \\\"USD\\\". The prop...' but required in type '{ \"D2 (ledger R1) \\u2014 Should the new handler register with the existing `WebhookDispatcher`, or bypass it with its own dispatch path?\\nProject/branch/task: Payment Processing Integration plan on `main`, HOLD SCOPE review, row R1 (Architecture).\\nELI10: Your app already has a front door (`WebhookDispatcher`) that ...'.": 11,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, about to run the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /plan-ceo-rev...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D0.1 \\u2014 Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`; first-run config prompt before the HOLD SCOPE review.\\nELI10: gstack keeps a local log of lessons learned per project. It can also read lessons from your other projects on this machine to spot repeat patterns. Everything stays local; nothing leaves the machine. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination is a concern.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Enabling on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; disabling on a solo machine just means fewer prior-learning hits.\\nRecommendation: Enable because a solo dev benefits from cross-project patterns and this is a sandbox with no other projects to leak from.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: broader prior-learning recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, starting the HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 (ledger R1) — Should the new handler register through the existing `WebhookDispatcher` or bypass it?\\nProject/branch/task: payment plan review on `main`, HOLD SCOPE.\\nELI10: Today one module (the dispatcher) decides which handler runs for each Stripe event. The plan wires the new handler straight into the ingress instead, skipping that module, and gives \\\"clean namespace\\\" as the reason. But the namespace is already settled by the approved class name, so the real question is whether we want one routing path or two. The plan itself says this is still open.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: two routing paths means rollout, rollback, and every future Stripe event handler have two precedents to reason about; or, if the dispatcher is a bad fit, we couple a fresh class to legacy plumbing.\\nRecommendation: A because it keeps one routing mechanism, the flag flip becomes a dispatcher table change, and the next handler copies a single pattern.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: one routing path and a bit of coupling vs. zero coupling and a second path to maintain forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Bind `userId` as a query parameter, or keep the raw SQL fragment?\\nProject/branch/task: Payme...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Bind `userId` as a query parameter, or keep the raw SQL fragment?\\nProject/branch/task: Payment Processing Integration plan on `main`, HOLD SCOPE review, ledger row D3.\\nELI10: The user ID arrives from Stripe's event metadata. The signature proves Stripe sent it; it does not prove the string is harmless...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — How deep should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: main, HOLD SCOPE review of the processPayment test-coverage plan (ledger row D1).\\nELI10: The plan says the receipt must be exactly { chargeId: \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents: 1000, currency: \\\"USD\\\" }, but the planned test only checks that *something* came back. A receipt of {} or one with the wrong amount would still pass. The factory already exposes the Stripe call history and the sleeper record, so stronger assertions cost lines, not infrastructure.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a regression that drops currency or mis-copies the amount ships with a green suite, and the customer sees a wrong receipt.\\nRecommendation: C because the plan's own stated goal is coverage of this contract, and C is three assertions using hooks the plan already names (human: ~10 min / CC: ~1 min).\\nCompleteness: A=3/10, B=7/10, C=10/10\\nNet: trading two extra assertion lines against a test that can actually fail when the receipt contract breaks.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture rep...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D0 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-ceo-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to run for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, strategy \\u2192 /...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Route the new handler through `WebhookDispatcher` or bypass it?\\nProject/branch/task: Stripe payment handler refactor on `main`; ledger row D1.\\nELI10: Today one shared \\\"dispatcher\\\" decides which handler gets each Stripe event. The plan wants the new `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` to skip that and get its own routing path, for \\\"clean namespace separation\\\". But the separation already comes from the approved class name. Skipping the dispatcher means a second routing path, and the existing feature flag has to be re-wired to it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a bypass leaves two ways events reach handlers; the next event type forks the same way, and rollback wiring lives in two places.\\nRecommendation: A because one dispatch path with the existing flag is less code, less to test, and keeps rollback where it is.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=5/10\\nNet: DRY routing with a small dispatcher touch vs. an untouched dispatcher and a duplicated path.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 R2 (Section 3, Database access): How does the new handler look up the user from `request.para...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 R2 (Section 3, Database access): How does the new handler look up the user from `request.params.userId`: bound parameter, raw SQL fragment as planned, or raw SQL with manual escaping?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, CEO review (HOLD SCOPE) of the Payment Processing Integration plan.\\nELI10: The handl...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 (ledger R1) \\u2014 How should the new handler be reached: bypass WebhookDispatcher, or register through it?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-zz2c4V on main, CEO review of the Stripe payment handler plan.\\nELI10: Today one dispatcher module decides which code runs for each Stripe event. The plan wants the new payment handler wired in directly beside it for a \\\"clean namespace\\\". You can have the clean namespace either way; the real question is whether Stripe events keep one door into the app or grow a second one.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a second routing path means the flag switch, handler-identity trace, and every future event type get wired twice, and the rollback checklist has two paths to verify.\\nRecommendation: B because it keeps the settled class name and namespace while leaving one routing path that the dispatcher's existing tests already cover.\\nCompleteness: A=6/10, B=9/10, C=5/10\\nNet: one line inside the dispatcher vs a permanent second routing path to maintain.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 What automated test coverage ships with the new handler?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, Paymen...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 What automated test coverage ships with the new handler?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, Payment Processing Integration plan, HOLD SCOPE review, ledger row D4.\\nELI10: The plan says \\\"no tests, the existing integration suite will catch regressions\\\". But the new class sits behind a feature flag the existi...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 (ledger R1) — Should the new handler register with the existing WebhookDispatcher, or bypass it as the plan says?\\nProject/branch/task: PLAN.md on `main`, Architecture section; the plan itself lists this as the one open choice.\\nELI10: Today every Stripe event enters through one front door (the dispatcher) which hands it to a handler. The plan builds a second door straight to the new class so its namespace stays clean. But the clean namespace already comes from the approved class name `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler`; a second door just means two routing paths to keep in sync, and the feature flag and handler-identity trace may need re-wiring for the new door. Caveat: no source is in this repo, so what the dispatcher provides is inferred from the contracts, not read.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: B risks losing flag-based rollback or trace attribution if they live in the dispatcher; A risks a small amount of coupling if the dispatcher turns out to be library-shaped. Both reversible; B is more work to unwind later.\\nRecommendation: A because namespace separation is a naming decision, not a routing decision, and one entry path is what the 12-month ideal looks like.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=6/10, C=5/10\\nNet: one door with an app-owned handler behind it vs. two doors to maintain.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3 (ledger row R1) — What should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: main; HOLD SCOPE review of the two-test processPayment coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan spells out the exact receipt a 1000-cent USD charge must produce: chargeId \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents 1000, currency \\\"USD\\\". The proposed test only checks that *something* came back. If a refactor returned {} or copied the wrong amount, that test stays green. Asserting the full receipt is the same test, same file, one more line.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: with truthy-only, a receipt-shape regression in payment code ships with a passing suite; customers see wrong amounts or missing charge ids on receipts.\\nRecommendation: A because the factory already exposes the mock call history, so checking both the receipt and the single outbound charge call costs one extra assertion and closes the loop on what was sent to Stripe.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=8/10, C=2/10\\nNet: same scope, same test; the only trade is whether the test can actually fail.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D3 (ledger row R1) \\u2014 What should the successful-charge test assert?\\nProject/branch/task: main; HOLD SCOPE review of the two-test processPayment coverage plan.\\nELI10: The plan spells out the exact receipt a 1000-cent USD charge must produce: chargeId \\\"ch_paid\\\", amountCents 1000, currency \\\"USD\\\". The prop...'.": 2,
-    "test/ceo-native-ledger-replay.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-parenthesized-issue-ah.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 (Issue 1) \\u2014 What should the handler do when the notification email fails after the payment upda...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 (Issue 1) \\u2014 What should the handler do when the notification email fails after the payment update commits?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-q8859d on main, PLAN.md \\\"Webhook fan-out\\\": update + email inline, no error handling on the email leg.\\nELI10: The database write says \\\"this user paid\\\" and ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 (Issue 1) \\u2014 What should the handler do when the notification email fails after the payment update commits?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-q8859d on main, PLAN.md \\\"Webhook fan-out\\\": update + email inline, no error handling on the email leg.\\nELI10: The database write says \\\"this user paid\\\" and commits. Then the email call throws. Today that exception turns into a 500, which tells Stripe \\\"try again\\\". But the payment is already saved, so the retry either gets swallowed by the dedup guard (no email ever goes out) or re-runs the handler and can send a second email. Stripe's failed-webhook alert fires for a payment that actually succeeded, which the runbook says must never trigger a blind replay.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: paid users get zero or two receipts, on-call gets paged for successful payments, and a permanently rejected address retries for 72 hours.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the only option where a committed payment returns 200 and the failure is still fully visible through the mail client's existing metric, alert and runbook. Maps to your preference: every error has a name, zero silent failures.\\nCompleteness: 1A=9/10, 1B=4/10, 1C=2/10\\nPros / cons:\\n1A) Order: commit update -> record dedup completion -> send email. Rescue only the mail client's named classes (MailDeliveryError, MailTimeoutError, MailRejectedError). Log at error with event ID, user ID, payment intent ID, exception class. Return 200. If the existing notification retry procedure has a programmatic entry point, call it in the rescue; otherwise the logged correlation feeds the runbook. Tests: one per rescued class asserting 200, update persisted, error log emitted; one asserting DB errors still propagate as 500. (recommended) (human ~3h / CC ~15 min)\\n  \\u2705 Committed payments never report failure to Stripe, so no false retries or alert noise\\n  \\u2705 Named rescues only; DB failures keep their retry-via-500 contract untouched\\n  \\u2705 Failure remains visible via the mail client's failure-rate metric, alert, and correlated trace\\n  \\u274c Adds a rescue block and ordering rule the implementer must get right; needs the tests listed\\n1B) Keep no rescue, but move the email after commit and dedup record so a retry cannot double-send (human ~30 min / CC ~5 min)\\n  \\u2705 Tiny change; no new rescue code in the handler\\n  \\u2705 Double email is prevented because the retry hits the dedup guard\\n  \\u274c A mail failure still returns 500 and pages on-call for a successful payment; the retry acks 200 and the notification is silently never sent\\n1C) Do nothing; keep the plan as written (human 0 / CC 0)\\n  \\u2705 No implementation work\\n  \\u2705 Behavior is at least consistent with the prior handler if it did the same\\n  \\u274c Ordering is unspecified, so a mail outage can either roll back a real payment or send duplicate emails, and every mail failure looks like a webhook failure\\nNet: a rescue with a name and a 200, versus letting Stripe retry a payment that already committed. <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-email-leg-rescue>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-payment-findings.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-g23bps on main, one-time gstack setup prompt before the CEO review starts.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investiga...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Enable cross-project learnings search on this machine?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-g23bps on main, one-time gstack config before the review's Prior Learnings step.\\nELI10: gstack records small lessons from past sessions (project quirks, pitfalls). It can search lessons from your other local projects too, to spot patterns that apply here. Everything stays on this machine; nothing is uploaded. Solo developers usually want this; consultants juggling client codebases usually don't.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: enable it on a multi-client machine and a lesson from one client's repo could color advice on another's; disable it and each project learns from scratch.\\nRecommendation: Enable because this is a local, read-only search and the fixture has zero learnings of its own to draw from.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: broader pattern matching vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-payment-findings.test.ts\tTS2532\tObject is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-plan-mode-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'attempt' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-prerequisite-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FDFfod on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FDFfod on main, reviewing PLAN.md (saved project views).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review, et...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-section-declarative-ar.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-kjptoZ on main, one-time gstack onboarding before the CEO review.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short section in CLAUDE.md that maps request types (bugs, strategy, shipping) to its skills so future sessions rout...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-kjptoZ on main, one-time gstack onboarding before the CEO review.\\nELI10: gstack wants a short section in CLAUDE.md that maps request types (bugs, strategy, shipping) to its skills so future sessions route automatically. Without it you invoke skills by name every time. Because we are in plan mode, a Yes here is recorded now and the edit plus commit happen after plan mode ends.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Minor either way. Yes adds ~15 lines to a fixture CLAUDE.md; No means manual skill invocation, re-enableable any time.\\nRecommendation: A because it is the gstack default and costs nothing beyond a small committed section.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future sessions auto-route to the right skill without you naming it each time\\n  \\u2705 One-time prompt; never asked again for this project once answered\\n  \\u274c Adds a committed section to a review-fixture CLAUDE.md that may not need it\\nB) No thanks, invoke manually\\n  \\u2705 Keeps the fixture CLAUDE.md untouched and the git history minimal\\n  \\u2705 Re-enable later with a single gstack-config command\\n  \\u274c Every gstack skill needs an explicit slash command in future sessions\\nNet: Convenience for future sessions versus keeping a test fixture pristine.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-section-loading-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'text' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-section-ordering-aq.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (one-time setup prompt fro...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (one-time setup prompt from skill-start). Should I add them? Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"D8 \\u2014 Section 7 (Performance), is...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (one-time setup prompt from skill-start). Should I add them? Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-sequence-aq.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{}' is not assignable to type '{ \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\", \\\"Bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\"). Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records it as a post-review follow-up rather than editing imm...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-sequence-aq.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Stra...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\", \\\"Bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\"). Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records it as a post-review follow-up rather than editing imm...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — How should the new handler be wired: through WebhookDispatcher, beside it, or by modifying the prior handler?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md \\\"Payment Processing Integration\\\"; the plan itself marks this open (\\\"whether to add a separate implementation or reuse WebhookDispatcher remains open\\\").\\nELI10: Stripe tells your server \\\"this payment succeeded.\\\" Something routes that message to the code that marks the user paid and emails a receipt. You already have a router (WebhookDispatcher) and a set of safety checks (signature, dedup, per-user lock, ownership) that the plan says the new handler \\\"runs inside.\\\" The plan also says the new handler bypasses the router for namespace separation. Both statements only hold if every check sits upstream of the router, which the plan never establishes.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: the new handler either runs without the dedup/lock guarantees the whole plan leans on, or you maintain two routing paths and two rollback paths forever.\\nRecommendation: B because the approved `Webhooks::` name already delivers the namespace separation, and dispatcher registration is the only wiring where \\\"runs inside unchanged guards\\\" is true by construction rather than by re-proof.\\nCompleteness: A=5/10, B=9/10, C=5/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Modify the prior handler in place, no new class (human: ~4h / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ✅ Smallest possible diff: one existing file changes, no registration edit\\n  ✅ Single routing path, zero chance of a second path drifting from the first\\n  ❌ Breaks the retained rollback: the flag cannot switch back to \\\"the prior handler\\\" once it is rewritten; rollback becomes a code revert\\n  ❌ Outcome traces lose the prior/new handler identity the plan relies on for rollout attribution\\nB) New Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler registered through WebhookDispatcher (recommended) (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Signature, dedup, per-user lock, ownership and unknown-user guards apply by construction; nothing to re-prove\\n  ✅ Feature flag flips the dispatcher target between prior and new handler, so the documented rollback stays valid as written\\n  ❌ Requires one edit to the dispatcher's registration table instead of leaving it untouched\\nC) New class wired directly into ingress, bypassing WebhookDispatcher, plan as written (human: ~2 days / CC: ~40 min)\\n  ✅ Dispatcher code stays untouched; the handler is fully self-contained\\n  ✅ Matches the plan's literal \\\"clean namespace separation\\\" wording\\n  ❌ Second routing path: every retained guard must be re-verified on the bypass route, and the flag/rollback path must be rebuilt for it\\n  ❌ Plan does not say where the dispatcher sits relative to the event guard and lock, so \\\"runs inside unchanged guards\\\" is unproven on this path\\nNet: one line in the dispatcher's registration table versus re-proving every retained guarantee on a second route.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-sequence-aq.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D2 — In what order does the handler run lookup, orders load, user update, and receipt send, and where does the DB transaction end?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md; the plan lists the steps (\\\"hits the database for the user, then fetches each order\\\", \\\"update the user record AND fire a notification email\\\") but never fixes the order or the commit point.\\nELI10: The handler does four things. If the payment update is committed before the slow parts (loading orders, the up-to-1-second email call), a slow or failing email can never undo or delay marking the user paid. If everything sits in one transaction, an email timeout rolls back a payment Stripe already collected. If the order is left to the implementer, the orders load can eat the 2-second DB budget before the update even runs.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a user who paid stays unpaid until Stripe's retry schedule catches up, or the DB connection pool is held hostage to the mail provider's latency.\\nRecommendation: A because the retained dedup guard already keys completion on the DB commit, and the runbook's \\\"never replay the payment blindly\\\" rule only works if the payment commit is independent of the notification leg. Maps to \\\"explicit over clever\\\" and \\\"plan for partial states.\\\"\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=6/10, C=4/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) lookup + update in one transaction, commit, then single orders query, then receipt; all under the per-user lock (recommended) (human: ~2h / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ✅ Payment commit never waits behind the orders load or the 1s mail deadline; DB connection released before the mail call\\n  ✅ If orders load or mail fails after commit, a Stripe retry re-runs an idempotent update and the mail idempotency key prevents a second receipt\\n  ❌ Two DB round trips (transaction, then orders) instead of one; the orders query result is a snapshot taken after the payment commit\\nB) One transaction around lookup, orders, update and email; commit after the send (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min)\\n  ✅ Single transaction, simplest mental model for the implementer\\n  ✅ Receipt and payment status always agree at commit time\\n  ❌ A MailTimeout rolls back a payment Stripe already succeeded on; user stays unpaid until retry, violating the runbook's separation of payment and notification\\n  ❌ DB transaction and connection held for up to 1s of mail latency on every webhook, multiplying pool pressure under load\\nC) Leave order as sketched (lookup, orders loop, update, email) with no explicit transaction boundary (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min)\\n  ✅ No decision to make now; matches the plan text literally\\n  ✅ Zero additional design in the plan document\\n  ❌ A user with many orders can exhaust the 2s DB deadline before the update runs, so the payment is never marked and every Stripe retry fails the same way\\n  ❌ Implementer decides commit semantics ad hoc; the dedup guard's \\\"after commit\\\" contract has no defined commit to key on\\nNet: two explicit DB round trips versus coupling the payment commit to the mail provider or leaving the commit point undefined.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\", \\\"Bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\"). Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records it as a post-review follow-up rather than editing imm...'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-sequence-aq.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\", \\\"Bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\"). Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records it as a post-review follow-up rather than editing imm...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"gstack setup: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules (e.g. \\\"Strategy/scope \\u2192 /plan-ceo-review\\\", \\\"Bugs \\u2192 /investigate\\\"). Note: plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md or committing right now, so choosing A records it as a post-review follow-up rather than editing imm...'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-split-collection.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' is not assignable to type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: NativePlanQuestionCall; }[]'. Type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint' is not assignable to type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: NativePlanQuestionCall; }'. Types of property 'nativeCall' are incompatible. Type 'NativePlanQuestionCall | undefined' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-split-collection.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-split-collection.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ transcript: { status: 'ready'; calls: NativePlanQuestionCall[]; assistantMessages: never[]; }; fingerprints: AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ transcript: PlanCountTranscript; fingerprints: { signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: NativePlanQuestionCall; }[]; }'. Types of property 'fingerprints' are incompatible. Type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' is not assignable to type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: NativePlanQuestionCall; }[]'. Type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint' is not assignable to type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: NativePlanQuestionCall; }'. Types of property 'nativeCall' are incompatible. Type 'NativePlanQuestionCall | undefined' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'.": 3,
     "test/ceo-split-collection.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this scope decision?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which review mode should govern this scope decision?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-sIEkYl on main, deciding which of 5 chat integrations ship this quarter.\\nELI10: Review mode sets my posture for the rest of the session. The plan's own goal is to shrink 5 candidates to 2-3, so the natural fit ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Which review mode should govern this scope decision?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-sIEkYl on main, deciding which of 5 chat integrations ship this quarter.\\nELI10: Review mode sets my posture for the rest of the session. The plan's own goal is to shrink 5 candidates to 2-3, so the natural fit is a mode built around deciding what NOT to do. Expansion modes would instead have me pitch extra ideas on top of the five, which is the opposite of the constraint you gave.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: an expansion mode adds noise to a decision that is about subtraction; a hold mode skips the cut/defer analysis you asked for.\\nRecommendation: SCOPE REDUCTION because the plan's stated goal is a bandwidth-capped cut from 5 to 2-3, and all 5 built is an estimated 20-30 files (>15 threshold).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ceo-split-question-policy.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 4,
     "test/ceo-split-question-policy.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1.1 \\u2014 E1: Include the Slack DM bot for incident alerts this quarter?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1.1 \\u2014 E1: Include the Slack DM bot for incident alerts this quarter?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rFjNLS @ main, choosing 2-3 of 5 chat integrations for the quarter.\\nELI10: Slack is where 40% of your customers asked to get incident alerts, and you already have a working Slack login flow to build...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1.1 — E1: Include the Slack DM bot for incident alerts this quarter?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-rFjNLS @ main, choosing 2-3 of 5 chat integrations for the quarter.\\nELI10: Slack is where 40% of your customers asked to get incident alerts, and you already have a working Slack login flow to build on, so this is the cheapest way to make the most people happy. It takes one of your 2-3 slots (this would be slot 1 of 3). Saying no here means the single biggest customer request waits another quarter.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Defer or cut and the top Q2 survey request ships late while a Slack-native competitor becomes the default; include and you spend ~2 weeks on the safest bet on the board.\\nRecommendation: A) Include because it is the highest-demand candidate at the second-lowest cost with the only stated code reuse.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: 40% of demand for ~2 weeks with reusable auth is the strongest ratio on the list; the only reason to say no is if you want all three slots for revenue bets.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-test-subject-ao.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-QjuRwH on main; one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to the right skill auto...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-QjuRwH on main; one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to the right skill automatically. This repo's CLAUDE.md is a review fixture. Plan mode forbids editing it right now, so if you choose A the append and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by name; with them on a fixture file you add a section nobody may read.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are the default gstack setup and cost nothing at runtime.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nA) Add routing rules (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future sessions in this repo route to the right skill without typing names\\n  \\u2705 Matches the standard gstack project setup used everywhere else\\n  \\u274c Cannot be written in plan mode; deferred until after this review finishes\\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 Keeps the fixture CLAUDE.md untouched and the review scope pure\\n  \\u2705 One config write now, no deferred git commit to remember\\n  \\u274c Every future skill run here needs an explicit slash command\\nNet: convenience later versus an untouched fixture now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/ceo-transaction-contract-ar.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-DThKI5 on main, about to run a HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a short block of routing rules that tells Claude which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-DThKI5 on main, about to run a HOLD SCOPE CEO review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a short block of routing rules that tells Claude which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\". Appending it to CLAUDE.md means future sessions route to the right skill without you typing slash commands. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: without rules you invoke skills by hand every time; with them, CLAUDE.md gains ~15 lines and a commit. Both are reversible.\\nRecommendation: A because it removes a recurring manual step and the edit is small and easy to revert.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNote on plan mode: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after the review, once plan mode exits.\\nNet: a small durable convenience now versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/ci-paid-coordination.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Type 'Step | undefined' is not assignable to type 'Step'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'Step'.": 1,
     "test/claude-code-runner.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '__promisify__' is missing in type '(callback: any, delay: any, ...args: any[]) => Timeout' but required in type 'typeof setTimeout'.": 1,
     "test/claude-code-runner.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'callback' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
@@ -260,89 +146,16 @@
     "test/cso-scanner-executor.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'unknown' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"gitleaks\" | \"osv\" | \"schemathesis\" | \"semgrep\" | \"trivy\" | \"zizmor\"'.": 9,
     "test/cso-scanner-executor.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. The type 'readonly [\"gitleaks\", \"osv\", \"semgrep\", \"zizmor\", \"trivy\", \"schemathesis\"]' is 'readonly' and cannot be assigned to the mutable type 'unknown[]'.": 2,
     "test/design-catalog.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"quality\" | \"slop\"'.": 1,
-    "test/design-completion-handoff-scored.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: 'ready'; calls: NativePlanQuestionCall[]; assistantMessages: never[]; planReadyRequests: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'planReadyRequests' are incompatible. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 5,
     "test/design-completion-handoff-scored.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Visual Hierarchy: The plan lists this gap but has no fix. The Save button renders with th...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Visual Hierarchy: The plan lists this gap but has no fix. The Save button renders with the same size, weight, and color as Reset, Cancel, and Export. DESIGN.md already specifies the remedy: Save gets #1d4ed8 fill with white text; the other three are ghost neutral buttons. Should I add this fix speci...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 \\u2014 Visual Hierarchy: The plan lists this gap but has no fix. The Save button renders with the same size, weight, and color as Reset, Cancel, and Export. DESIGN.md already specifies the remedy: Save gets #1d4ed8 fill with white text; the other three are ghost neutral buttons. Should I add this fix specification to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-gap1-visual-hierarchy>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-completion-handoff-scored.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | C...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"Design review complete (...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/design-completion-handoff-scored.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path specification: what does the user's eye land on first, second, third? The Visual Hierarchy gap identifies that Save is indistinguishable from other buttons, but names it as a styling problem rather than an IA pr...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path specification: what does the user's eye land on first, second, third? The Visual Hierarchy gap identifies that Save is indistinguishable from other buttons, but names it as a styling problem rather than an IA problem \\u2014 the primary action is missing from the visual hierarchy. Should I add a scan path description to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-scan-path>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-completion-handoff-u.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 2/3/5: The plan identifies that saving takes 2-5 seconds with no feedback (frozen page)....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 2/3/5: The plan identifies that saving takes 2-5 seconds with no feedback (frozen page). DESIGN.MD fully specifies the fix: inline spinner beside \\\"Saving\\u2026\\\" inside the disabled Save button, aria-busy=true, reduced-motion support. The plan names this as a gap but adds no implementation task. S...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Pass 2/3/5: The plan identifies that saving takes 2-5 seconds with no feedback (frozen page). DESIGN.MD fully specifies the fix: inline spinner beside \\\"Saving\\u2026\\\" inside the disabled Save button, aria-busy=true, reduced-motion support. The plan names this as a gap but adds no implementation task. Should we add it? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-save-spinner>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-completion-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Information Architecture): specify Save button visual prominence in the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-pass1-save-prominence>\"?: undefined; ... 9 more ...; \"D12 \\u2014 Next steps: d...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D4 — Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which button is the one they came for, and the destructive Reset looks as safe as Save. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled blue button and the other three are quiet ghost buttons. This is a documented gap; it still needs your approval before it becomes a task.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at every visit, and some hit Reset or Cancel when they meant Save.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it applies the exact approved token and removes the guesswork with zero new design.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\\nPrinciple: Hierarchy as service. What should the user see first? Save.\\nNet: a one-token fix that resolves the biggest first-impression problem versus deferring it.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: any; }' but required in type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which butto...'.": 2,
-    "test/design-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D4 — Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which button is the one they came for, and the destructive Reset looks as safe as Save. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled blue button and the other three are quiet ghost buttons. This is a documented gap; it still needs your approval before it becomes a task.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at every visit, and some hit Reset or Cancel when they meant Save.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it applies the exact approved token and removes the guesswork with zero new design.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\\nPrinciple: Hierarchy as service. What should the user see first? Save.\\nNet: a one-token fix that resolves the biggest first-impression problem versus deferring it.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which butto...'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which butto...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1 (G1, Visual Hierarchy): how should the plan fix the four identical header buttons?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; account-settings form plan, action group Save | Reset | Cancel | Export.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look the same, so nothing tells the user which butto...'.": 2,
-    "test/design-count-current-pass.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; one-time gstack onboarding prompt fired by skill-start.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so plain requests like \\\"review this dif...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; one-time gstack onboarding prompt fired by skill-start.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so plain requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to the right skill automatically instead of you typing slash commands. This is a small appended section, committed once. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A I will append and commit it only after this review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and dislike it, delete a 15-line section; pick B and skills only run when you invoke them by name.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill set discoverable with zero ongoing cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the settings-page plan fixture; one-time gstack onboarding before the design review.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the agent which slash skill matches which kind of request (bugs \\u219...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the settings-page plan fixture; one-time gstack onboarding before the design review.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the agent which slash skill matches which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on). Without it you invoke each skill by hand. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Wrong pick means either an unwanted CLAUDE.md section, or repeatedly typing skill names manually. Both are easy to reverse.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules save typing and make the review pipeline discoverable; note that plan mode blocks file edits, so the CLAUDE.md append and commit would happen after plan mode ends.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the ass...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the assistant which /skill to run when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get an extra ~15-line section in CLAUDE.md; pick B and you invoke skills by name manually.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes the skills discoverable with zero ongoing cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md exactly as it is.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits the...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits their edits. Users scan, they don't read; the button they want should be the one their eye lands on. DESIGN.md already names the treatment: Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8, white text, ~6.7:1 contrast), the other three are neutral ghosts.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users mis-tap Reset or Cancel next to Save and get a discard dialog instead of a save; on mobile the full-width Save row loses its meaning if it isn't visually primary.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token and reuses the existing Button primary variant with no new styling.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=6/10, 1C=3/10\\nPrinciple: Hierarchy as service — what the user sees first should be what they came to do.\\nNet: 1A costs nothing and fixes the header's only hierarchy problem; 1B and 1C keep the ambiguity in some form.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-r...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that when you say \\\"review this design\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" the right skill fire...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that when you say \\\"review this design\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" the right skill fires without you naming it. This is a one-time onboarding prompt for this project. Since we're in plan mode, if you pick A I'll append the section and commit only after the review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick B and you invoke skills by hand forever (re-enable is one config command); pick A and CLAUDE.md gains ~15 lines.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill set discoverable at no runtime cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. a small addition to a checked-in file.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-lvkT4r on main, running /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-lvkT4r on main, running /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, etc.). This is a one-time setup prompt. Note: we're in plan mode, so if you pick A the append + commit happens after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: without routing, skills only run when you invoke them by name; with it, CLAUDE.md gains a ~15-line section.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make skills fire on intent rather than memorized slash commands.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a small CLAUDE.md addition vs. manual skill invocation forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /invest...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, etc.). This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit are deferred until plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: without routing rules you invoke skills manually every time; with them, the wrong skill can occasionally auto-fire on an ambiguous request.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill set discoverable with near-zero cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /invest...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, etc.). This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit are deferred until plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: without routing rules you invoke skills manually every time; with them, the wrong skill can occasionally auto-fire on an ambiguous request.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill set discoverable with near-zero cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the ass...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the assistant which /skill to run when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get an extra ~15-line section in CLAUDE.md; pick B and you invoke skills by name manually.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes the skills discoverable with zero ongoing cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md exactly as it is.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-8525.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits the...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits their edits. Users scan, they don't read; the button they want should be the one their eye lands on. DESIGN.md already names the treatment: Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8, white text, ~6.7:1 contrast), the other three are neutral ghosts.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users mis-tap Reset or Cancel next to Save and get a discard dialog instead of a save; on mobile the full-width Save row loses its meaning if it isn't visually primary.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token and reuses the existing Button primary variant with no new styling.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=6/10, 1C=3/10\\nPrinciple: Hierarchy as service — what the user sees first should be what they came to do.\\nNet: 1A costs nothing and fixes the header's only hierarchy problem; 1B and 1C keep the ambiguity in some form.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-issue-fields.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-issue-fields.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 design review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign) against DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: I've rated the plan 6/10 on design completeness. Its accepted behavior is thorough, but it lists five places where the proposed for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 design review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign) against DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: I've rated the plan 6/10 on design completeness. Its accepted behavior is thorough, but it lists five places where the proposed form breaks DESIGN.md (Save looks like every other button, three different section gaps, error text at ~3:1 contrast, three label sizes, a 2-5 second Save with no spinner) and leaves them undecided. The review walks 7 passes (info architecture, states, journey, AI-slop, design-system alignment, responsive/a11y, open decisions) and asks you one question per gap. Mockups and outside voices are skipped per your request.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: narrowing focus means some of the five known violations ship unresolved; the implementer picks tokens by guess.\\nRecommendation: A because you asked for all seven and every one of the five gaps maps to a different pass.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) All 7 passes, all five gaps plus any new findings (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Every DESIGN.md violation gets its own decision and a verification step in the plan\\n  \\u2705 State table and journey storyboard get written so the implementer builds from a spec\\n  \\u274c Roughly six to eight individual questions before the review report is done\\nB) Only the five listed gaps (Passes 1, 2, 4, 5); skip journey, responsive, decisions\\n  \\u2705 Faster: resolves exactly what PLAN.md already flagged and nothing more\\n  \\u2705 Fewer questions if you trust the accepted-behavior section as-is\\n  \\u274c Misses gaps the plan didn't self-report, like how status text plus Retry lay out at 320px\\nNet: full coverage costs a few extra questions; partial coverage trusts a plan that already self-reports five violations.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-issue-fields.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 15 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 15 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, shipping \\u2192 /ship, and so on). This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Nothing about today's design review depends on it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a small appended section in CLAUDE.md (committed after plan mode ends); pick B and skills stay manual-invoke only, re-enableable later via gstack-config.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skills discoverable without memorizing names.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future requests auto-route to the right skill without you naming it each time\\n  \\u2705 One small appended section, committed separately; easy to revert or edit\\n  \\u274c Adds a project file change unrelated to the settings-page plan under review\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 Keeps CLAUDE.md untouched; this fixture repo stays exactly as seeded\\n  \\u2705 Re-enable any time with gstack-config set routing_declined false\\n  \\u274c You have to remember and type skill names yourself going forward\\nNet: convenience for future sessions vs. keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-native-issue-fields.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them?\"?: undefined; ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them?\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Review all 7 dimensions, or focus?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Account settings form).\\nELI10: I rated the plan 6/10 on design completeness. The biggest gaps are th...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/design-count-native-issue-fields.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, shipping \\u2192 /ship, and so on). This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Nothing about today's design review depends on it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get a small appended section in CLAUDE.md (committed after plan mode ends); pick B and skills stay manual-invoke only, re-enableable later via gstack-config.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skills discoverable without memorizing names.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Future requests auto-route to the right skill without you naming it each time\\n  \\u2705 One small appended section, committed separately; easy to revert or edit\\n  \\u274c Adds a project file change unrelated to the settings-page plan under review\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 Keeps CLAUDE.md untouched; this fixture repo stays exactly as seeded\\n  \\u2705 Re-enable any time with gstack-config set routing_declined false\\n  \\u274c You have to remember and type skill names yourself going forward\\nNet: convenience for future sessions vs. keeping this repo's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS18048\t'o.description' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Gap 1 of 8 \\u2014 Save button visual hierarchy: apply DESIGN.md primary button style?\"?: undefined; ......' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Gap 1 of 8 \\u2014 Save button visual hierarchy: apply DESIGN.md primary button style?\"?: undefined; \"Gap 2 of 8 \\u2014 Spacing: standardize to DESIGN.md 8px-base scale?\"?: undefined; ... 5 more ...; \"Gap 8 of 8 \\u2014 InlineStatus during validation: specify it reads 'Unsaved changes'?\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Gap 1 of 8 \\u2014 Save button visual hierarchy: apply DESIGN.md primary button style?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | C...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"Design review complete (...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Information Architecture): specify Save button visual prominence in the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-pass1-save-prominence>\"?: undefined; \"D3 \\u2014 Pass 2 (Interaction States): a...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable cross-project search? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path specification: what does the user's eye land on first, second, third? The Visual Hierarchy gap identifies that Save is indistinguishable from other buttons, but names it as a styling problem rather than an IA pr...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 (Info Architecture) \\u2014 7/10. The plan has DOM order and heading structure, but no scan path specification: what does the user's eye land on first, second, third? The Visual Hierarchy gap identifies that Save is indistinguishable from other buttons, but names it as a styling problem rather than an IA problem \\u2014 the primary action is missing from the visual hierarchy. Should I add a scan path description to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-scan-path>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run outside design voices before the review passes? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-outside-vo...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run outside design voices before the review passes? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-outside-voices>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 2: Export pending state is not specified in the plan. What should the user see while the JSON download is being prepared? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-export-pending>\"?: und...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Run outside design voices before the review passes? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-outside-voices>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 (Information Architecture) \\u2014 Finding 1: The action group has no visual hierarchy. Save, Res...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 (Information Architecture) \\u2014 Finding 1: The action group has no visual hierarchy. Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export are all styled the same. Users must pause to identify the primary action \\u2014 a hierarchy failure at the most critical part of the page. DESIGN.MD already specifies the fix. Apply it to ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 (Information Architecture) \\u2014 Finding 1: The action group has no visual hierarchy. Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export are all styled the same. Users must pause to identify the primary action \\u2014 a hierarchy failure at the most critical part of the page. DESIGN.MD already specifies the fix. Apply it to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-save-button-primary>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; requestedAt: string; answers: { ...; }; failed: boolean; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ....' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; requestedAt: string; answers: { ...; }; failed: boolean; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { .....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; requestedAt: string; answers: { \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might ap...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply to this settings-page review. This stays local \\u2014 no data leaves your machine. Recommended for solo developers; skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern. Whi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply to this settings-page review. This stays local — no data leaves your machine. Recommended for solo developers; skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern. Which do you prefer? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | C...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"Design review complete (...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Pass 1 \\u2014 Information Architecture: The IA section specifies the visual DOM order (Save | Reset | Cancel | Export) but doesn't record action priority. Should I add an explicit P1/P2 hierarchy line to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-design-review-ia-hierarchy>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-count-review.test.ts\tTS2532\tObject is possibly 'undefined'.": 5,
     "test/design-detect-contract.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"DESIGN_DETECTOR_HINT\" | \"DESIGN_DETECTOR_INSTALL_OFFER\" | \"DESIGN_DETECT_INTERNAL_ERROR\" | \"DESIGN_MD_BACKUP\" | \"DESIGN_MD_CONVERT_REFUSED\" | \"DESIGN_MD_EDIT_REFUSED\" | ... 36 more ... | \"PROBE_STEP\"'.": 1,
-    "test/design-first-issue-ai.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not assignable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-XQbt40 on main, one-time gstack onboarding before the PLAN.md design review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so plain requests like \\\"review this diff...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Enable cross-project learnings search for gstack?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-XQbt40 on main, one-time gstack setting before the PLAN.md design passes.\\nELI10: gstack records small lessons after each session (project quirks, pitfalls). This setting decides whether reviews in this repo may also search lessons saved from your other projects on this machine. Everything stays local; no data leaves the machine. It helps solo developers reuse patterns; it is a concern if you work across client codebases that must not cross-contaminate.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Either you miss reusable lessons from other repos, or a lesson from one client's codebase surfaces while reviewing another's.\\nRecommendation: A because this is a single-developer sandbox with no client separation concern.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: broader recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/design-primary-assignment-ao.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; }' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the only filled primary action in the header?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, Pass 1 (Information Architecture) of the Settings page design review.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read four labe...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Issue 1: Make Save the only filled primary action in the header?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, Pass 1 (Information Architecture) of the Settings page design review.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export all look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read four labels to find the one that finishes their task. Pressing the wrong one is not harmless: Reset and Cancel both throw away edits (behind a dialog). DESIGN.md already says Save is the single filled #1d4ed8 button and the other three are neutral ghost buttons. Principle: Hierarchy as service and Krug's satisficing, the right choice should be the most visible one.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at every save or mis-tap Reset/Cancel on mobile; the form reads as assembled rather than designed.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it applies the existing DESIGN.md tokens with no new component work.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=6/10, 1C=3/10\\nNet: one styling change on the existing Button component versus leaving the primary action undiscoverable.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/design-primary-emphasis-av.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '(({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[][]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, design → /plan-design-review, etc.). Without the rules you invoke skills by hand each time. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and CLAUDE.md gains a short routing section (plan mode: the edit and commit are deferred until you leave plan mode); pick B and you keep invoking skills manually, re-enable later via gstack-config.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules save a manual invocation on every future request, at the cost of ~15 lines in CLAUDE.md.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md untouched. <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-primary-group-as.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-xG5e2f o...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-xG5e2f on main, reviewing PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to invoke for which request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship). Without it you invoke ski...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-xG5e2f on main, reviewing PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to invoke for which request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship). Without it you invoke skills by hand each time. Plan mode forbids editing CLAUDE.md now, so option A would be applied after this review exits plan mode.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild; you lose auto-routing or gain a section you did not want in a fixture repo.\\nRecommendation: A because routing is free once written and removable in one edit.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience later vs a tidier CLAUDE.md now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-primary-group-as.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so future requests like \\\"review this design\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" get...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-design-review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\\nELI10: gstack works best when the project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so future requests like \\\"review this design\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" get routed to the matching skill automatically. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after the review finishes and plan mode exits, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Picking A on a throwaway fixture repo adds a commit you may not want; picking B means you invoke skills manually here (re-enable anytime via gstack-config).\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make later skill invocations automatic, and the append is small and reversible.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a small convenience commit versus keeping this repo untouched beyond the plan review.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-primary-header-aq.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs go to /investigate, ship goes to /ship, and so on)....' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs go to /investigate, ship goes to /ship, and so on). Without those rules you invoke each skill by hand. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and CLAUDE.md gains a short routing section (committed once); pick B and skills are manual until you flip the config back.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes later reviews and ship steps trigger without remembering skill names.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests like \\\"review this diff\\\" route to the matching gstack skill automatically\\n  ✅ One small, reviewable section appended to CLAUDE.md; easy to edit or remove later\\n  ❌ Touches a checked-in file and adds a commit; in plan mode this is deferred until you exit plan mode\\nB) No thanks, invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing is committed on your behalf\\n  ✅ Re-enable any time with a single gstack-config command\\n  ❌ You must remember and type each /skill name yourself for every task\\nNet: automatic skill routing vs. an untouched CLAUDE.md.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-primary-treatment-ao.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; }' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visually primary action in the header?\\nProject/branch/task: main, /plan-design-review Pass 1 (Information Architecture) on the settings form plan.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export all look identical. A user scanning the header cannot tell which button finishes th...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visually primary action in the header?\\nProject/branch/task: main, /plan-design-review Pass 1 (Information Architecture) on the settings form plan.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export all look identical. A user scanning the header cannot tell which button finishes their task, and Reset and Cancel look just as inviting as Save even though they discard work. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled button and the other three are quiet ghost buttons.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at the header or hit a destructive action by mistake; the page reads as assembled rather than designed.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it applies the exact existing DESIGN.md token, adds no new component, and fixes the hierarchy the plan itself flags. Principle: Hierarchy as service.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\\nNet: apply the approved token now vs a weaker visual cue vs shipping four look-alike buttons.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/design-scope-declaration-ak.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; args: string; } | { skill: string; }'. Property 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; }'.": 3,
-    "test/design-ui-scope.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Run outside design voices before the detailed review?\\nProject/branch/task: main, reviewing P...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Run outside design voices before the detailed review?\\nProject/branch/task: main, reviewing PLAN.md (User Dashboard Page); mockups unavailable (no OpenAI key), so this is the remaining independent-perspective step.\\nELI10: Before I do the 7-pass review myself, I can pull in two independent reviewers: Co...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 — Run outside design voices before the detailed review?\\nProject/branch/task: main, reviewing PLAN.md (User Dashboard Page); mockups unavailable (no OpenAI key), so this is the remaining independent-perspective step.\\nELI10: Before I do the 7-pass review myself, I can pull in two independent reviewers: Codex (OpenAI's CLI) grades the plan against a set of design hard rules and litmus checks, and a fresh Claude subagent that has seen none of my notes does an independent completeness review. Their findings get folded into the passes so I'm not the only opinion in the room.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skip it and the review is single-voice; run it and it costs a couple of minutes, and Codex may be unavailable in this environment (then only the Claude subagent runs, tagged single-model).\\nRecommendation: A because greenfield UI with no design system benefits most from a second and third set of eyes on hierarchy and missing states.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/design-ui-scope.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, reviewing PLAN.md (Us...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, reviewing PLAN.md (User Dashboard Page).\\nELI10: I've rated the plan 4/10 on design completeness. The biggest gaps are: no content hierarchy (which panel wins after login?), undesigned first-time-user empty state (a new user lands o...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, reviewing PLAN.md (User Dashboard Page).\\nELI10: I've rated the plan 4/10 on design completeness. The biggest gaps are: no content hierarchy (which panel wins after login?), undesigned first-time-user empty state (a new user lands on three empty boxes), and no tokens (fonts, spacing, colors are all TBD with no DESIGN.md). Next I'll generate visual mockups with the gstack designer, then walk the 7 review passes (Interaction States, AI Slop Risk, Information Architecture, User Journey, Responsive, Accessibility, Specificity), asking you a decision per gap.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a narrow focus is faster but leaves the skipped dimensions at their current ~3/10 and the implementer guesses; the full pass takes longer but every gap gets an explicit decision.\\nRecommendation: A because with no DESIGN.md and a greenfield page, every dimension is under-specified; skipping any leaves guesswork in the plan.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=4/10\\nNet: full rigor now vs. speed now and rework later.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-ac-accounting.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-4dncQn on main, running /plan-devex-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, e...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-4dncQn on main, running /plan-devex-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the agent which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, etc.). This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Stakes: without it, you invoke skills by hand every time; with it, the agent routes automatically. Note: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode exits, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way; you can flip it later with gstack-config.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules cost one CLAUDE.md section and remove repeated manual skill invocation.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: automatic skill routing vs. a fully manual, minimal CLAUDE.md.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall | undefined'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience t...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the literal README path: install succeeds, but running `python examples/first_eval.py` immediately fails with FileNotFoundError because that file is absent from the package. The demo fallback then...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"DX review is complete. Five issues found and resolved (7 implementation tasks, all P1). TTHW drops from 6 min to ~1 min (champion tier). What next?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: ({ label: string; description: string; preview: string; } | { preview?: undefined; label: string; description: string; })[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQues...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <2 min TTHW target?\\n\\nELI10: The agreed onboarding target is under 2 minutes (from benchmarks.md). Today `python -m evalkit.demo` blocks for 5 minutes waiting for a CI check, giving a measured TTHW of 6 minutes \\u2014 Red Flag t...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <2 min TTHW target?\\n\\nELI10: The agreed onboarding target is under 2 minutes (from benchmarks.md). Today `python -m evalkit.demo` blocks for 5 minutes waiting for a CI check, giving a measured TTHW of 6 minutes \\u2014 Red Flag tier vs. Competitor A's 2 minutes. The SDK already ships mock transport and offline sample data (documented as working in current-contracts.md). Using those for the demo path would bring demo TTHW to roughly 30\\u201360 seconds \\u2014 Champion tier \\u2014 with zero new infrastructure. Real evaluations (non-demo code paths) keep the full CI gate.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Retaining the CI gate on the demo means the TTHW target is mathematically unreachable. An ML engineer who runs the demo in a 5-minute evaluation window hits the wait and moves on to a competitor.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because the mock transport already exists, the fix is confined to demo.py, and it's the only way to meet the agreed <2 min target.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=4/10\\n\\n<gstack-qid:devex-demo-ci-bypass>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No valida...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No validation feedback \\u2014 unclear if key is correct.\\nT+1:15  Runs `python examples/first_eval.py` per README. Gets: FileNotFoundError.\\nT+1:30  Searches package contents. No examples/ directory. README was wrong.\\nT+2:00  Eventually finds `python -m evalkit.demo` (not in primary README quickstart).\\nT+2:15  Runs demo. Hangs. No output, no progress, no ETA.\\nT+7:15  Five minutes later: first score prints. 6 minutes total.\\nT+7:20  Tries run_eval() then run_batch(). Notices reversed arg order.\\n\\nFinal state: Got a result, filed 3 mental complaints, not recommending to teammates yet.\\n\\nDoes this match the actual experience?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I trac...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I traced from README.md and the docs. The persona: Python ML engineer who just heard about EvalKit and wants to verify it works locally before integrating it into their team's CI pipeline.\\n\\n> T+0:00 \\u2014 I open th...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I traced from README.md and the docs. The persona: Python ML engineer who just heard about EvalKit and wants to verify it works locally before integrating it into their team's CI pipeline.\\n\\n> T+0:00 \\u2014 I open the README. \\\"Install with python -m pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1, set EVALKIT_API_KEY, then follow the quickstart's command: python examples/first_eval.py.\\\" Three steps. Looks easy.\\n>\\n> T+1:00 \\u2014 pip install succeeds. I set the key. I run the README's quickstart command: python examples/first_eval.py. I get an error. The file doesn't exist \\u2014 it's not in the installed package and there's no examples/ directory anywhere.\\n>\\n> T+2:00 \\u2014 I dig into the README more carefully and find python -m evalkit.demo mentioned as an alternative. I try that.\\n>\\n> T+2:30 \\u2014 The demo starts. It prints: \\\"Waiting for CI check: 0s elapsed of 300s\\\". 300 seconds. Five minutes. I'm on my laptop doing a local trial. No one told me a remote CI check was part of the deal.\\n>\\n> T+7:30 \\u2014 The CI check finishes. I see the demo scores. The output looks good. But I've just spent seven and a half minutes on a \\\"quick start\\\" that started with a missing-file error and a five-minute surprise wait.\\n\\nDoes this match reality? Where am I wrong? <gstack-qid:devex-review-empathy-narrative>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match the real developer experience?\\n\\nI traced the actual getti...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match the real developer experience?\\n\\nI traced the actual getting-started path from your README and docs. Here's what I think an ML engineer experiences today:\\n\\n**T+0:00** \\u2014 Installs `evalkit==2.0.0b1`. Two seconds, clean.\\n**T+0:30** \\u2014 README says run `python e...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Does this empathy narrative match the real developer experience?\\n\\nI traced the actual getting-started path from your README and docs. Here's what I think an ML engineer experiences today:\\n\\n**T+0:00** — Installs `evalkit==2.0.0b1`. Two seconds, clean.\\n**T+0:30** — README says run `python examples/first_eval.py`. Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY (README doesn't say how to get one). Runs the command. **FileNotFoundError** — `examples/first_eval.py` is listed in the README quickstart but absent from the published package (confirmed in docs/package-contents.txt).\\n**T+3:15** — Finds the demo module lower in the README. Runs `python -m evalkit.demo`. Gets stderr progress lines every 30s for 5 full minutes.\\n**T+8:00** — Finally sees scores. Total elapsed: ~8 minutes, including API key acquisition time.\\n\\nThis is significantly above the <2-minute target. The mandatory CI gate on the demo is the primary driver, and the broken README quickstart adds immediate friction at first contact.\\n\\nDoes this trace match reality? Where am I wrong? <gstack-qid:devex-empathy-narrative-confirm>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit==2.0.0b1, set EVALKIT_API_KEY. The README says to run\\n> `python examples/first_eval.py`. I try it:\\n>\\n> ```\\n> python: can't open file 'examples/first_eval.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory\\n> ```\\n>\\n> The file is not in the published package (confirmed: docs/package-contents.txt).\\n> After some confusion I find the demo command. I run `python -m evalkit.demo`.\\n> For five minutes I watch: \\\"Waiting for CI check: 90s elapsed of 300s...\\\".\\n> No explanation of why this check runs locally. Then: scores appear.\\n> Total time: 6-7 min. First command failed. I'm not confident in this tool.\\n\\nI found 5 friction points. Settled decisions (persona, DX POLISH mode, terminal demo, benchmark) are not re-litigated \\u2014 I'll go straight to the issues. <gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-empathy-confirm>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: ({ label: string; description: string; preview: string; } | { preview?: undefined; label: string; description: string; })[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQues...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The README quickstart points to a file that doesn't ship in the package. Should we fix the quickstart path in the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-quickstart-missing-file>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The benchmarks set a <2 min TTHW target, but the mandatory ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The README quickstart points to a file that doesn't ship in the package. Should we fix the quickstart path in the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-quickstart-missing-file>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: ({ label: string; description: string; preview: string; } | { preview?: undefined; label: string; description: string; })[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQues...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <2 min TTHW target?\\n\\nELI10: The agreed onboarding target is under 2 minutes (from benchmarks.md). Today `python -m evalkit.demo` blocks for 5 minutes waiting for a CI check, giving a measured TTHW of 6 minutes \\u2014 Red Flag t...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <2 min TTHW target?\\n\\nELI10: The agreed onboarding target is under 2 minutes (from benchmarks.md). Today `python -m evalkit.demo` blocks for 5 minutes waiting for a CI check, giving a measured TTHW of 6 minutes \\u2014 Red Flag tier vs. Competitor A's 2 minutes. The SDK already ships mock transport and offline sample data (documented as working in current-contracts.md). Using those for the demo path would bring demo TTHW to roughly 30\\u201360 seconds \\u2014 Champion tier \\u2014 with zero new infrastructure. Real evaluations (non-demo code paths) keep the full CI gate.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Retaining the CI gate on the demo means the TTHW target is mathematically unreachable. An ML engineer who runs the demo in a 5-minute evaluation window hits the wait and moves on to a competitor.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because the mock transport already exists, the fix is confined to demo.py, and it's the only way to meet the agreed <2 min target.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=4/10\\n\\n<gstack-qid:devex-demo-ci-bypass>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit==2.0.0b1, set EVALKIT_API_KEY. The README says to run\\n> `python examples/first_eval.py`. I try it:\\n>\\n> ```\\n> python: can't open file 'examples/first_eval.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory\\n> ```\\n>\\n> The file is not in the published package (confirmed: docs/package-contents.txt).\\n> After some confusion I find the demo command. I run `python -m evalkit.demo`.\\n> For five minutes I watch: \\\"Waiting for CI check: 90s elapsed of 300s...\\\".\\n> No explanation of why this check runs locally. Then: scores appear.\\n> Total time: 6-7 min. First command failed. I'm not confident in this tool.\\n\\nI found 5 friction points. Settled decisions (persona, DX POLISH mode, terminal demo, benchmark) are not re-litigated \\u2014 I'll go straight to the issues. <gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-empathy-confirm>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The agreed <2 min TTHW target is mathematically impossible with the...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The agreed <2 min TTHW target is mathematically impossible with the retained 5-min CI block. Which resolution belongs in the plan? <gstack-qid:devex-d1-tthw-contradiction>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1+4 (Getting Started + Docs): The README tells developers to run `python exa...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The agreed <2 min TTHW target is mathematically impossible with the retained 5-min CI block. Which resolution belongs in the plan? <gstack-qid:devex-d1-tthw-contradiction>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and '[question]' does not exist in type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the literal README path: install succeeds, but running `python examples/first_eval.py` immediately fails with FileNotFoundError because that file is absent from the package. The demo fallback then...'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"DX review is complete. Five issues found and resolved (7 implementation tasks, all P1). TTHW drops from 6 min to ~1 min (champion tier). What next?\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the literal README path: install succeeds, but running `python examples/first_eval.py` immediately fails with FileNotFoundError because that file is absent from the package. The demo fallback then...'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '(fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint, priorCalls?: readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]) => boolean' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: AskUserQuestionFingerprint, index: number, array: AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]) => unknown'. Types of parameters 'priorCalls' and 'index' are incompatible. Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'.": 3,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 EvalKit demo command: should it bypass the mandatory CI check to reach the <2 min TTHW target?\\n\\nELI10: The agreed onboarding target is under 2 minutes (from benchmarks.md). Today `python -m evalkit.demo` blocks for 5 minutes waiting for a CI check, giving a measured TTHW of 6 minutes \\u2014 Red Flag t...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Broken README quickstart: remove the reference to examples/first_eval.py?\\n\\nELI10: The README tells developers to run `python examples/first_eval.py` as the quickstart. That file does not exist in the published package or the examples archive (confirmed in docs/package-contents.txt). Every developer who follows the README literally hits `No such file or directory` on their first try. The demo command (`python -m evalkit.demo`) is the real onboarding path and works correctly. The README reference to examples/first_eval.py is an orphaned pointer that should be removed.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Keeping the broken reference means the first thing an ML engineer does after `pip install` is hit a Python error. First impressions are irreversible \\u2014 they close the tab.\\n\\nRecommendation: A (remove the reference) because the demo command is the settled onboarding path and there is nothing to add the missing file to.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=5/10\\n\\n<gstack-qid:devex-readme-quickstart-fix>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona:...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Friction point 1: `examples/first_eval.py` is referenced in README but doesn't exist in the published package.\\n\\nPlan file: README.md line 11: \\\"follow the quickstart's command: `python examples/first_eval.py`\\\"\\nEvidence: docs/package-contents.txt explicitly states: \\\"The quickstart references examples/first_eval.py, but that file is absent from both the published package and the release examples archive.\\\"\\n\\nYour ML engineer developer hits a FileNotFoundError on their very first command. This violates DX First Principle #1 (Zero friction at T0) and is the most visible broken contract in the release. The terminal demo (`python -m evalkit.demo`) is already in the package and works \\u2014 it just needs to be the primary getting-started command.\\n\\nRecommendation: A \\u2014 update README to point to `python -m evalkit.demo` as the canonical first command. It's already documented as the chosen delivery vehicle; the README just hasn't been updated to match.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=7/10, C=2/10 <gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-fp1-missing-quickstart>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The agreed <2 min TTHW target is mathematically impossible with the retained 5-min CI block. Which resolution belongs in the plan? <gstack-qid:devex-d1-tthw-contradiction>\": string; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1+4 (Getting Started + Docs): The README tells developers to run `python example...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Pass 1 (Getting Started): The agreed <2 min TTHW target is mathematically impossible with the retained 5-min CI block. Which resolution belongs in the plan? <gstack-qid:devex-d1-tthw-contradiction>\": string; \"D2 \\u2014 Pass 1+4 (Getting Started + Docs): The README tells developers to run `python example...'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-empathy-ab.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable or keep project-scoped?\\n\\ngstack can search learnings from y...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Cross-project learnings: enable or keep project-scoped?\\n\\ngstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here (e.g., a recurring auth-error pattern caught in a prior SDK review). This stays fully local \\u2014 no data leaves the machine.\\n\\nRecomme...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Cross-project learnings: enable or keep project-scoped?\\n\\ngstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here (e.g., a recurring auth-error pattern caught in a prior SDK review). This stays fully local — no data leaves the machine.\\n\\nRecommendation: A — enable, because solo ML engineers benefit from cross-project pattern matching (e.g., the CI-gate anti-pattern appears across multiple SDK projects). Completeness: A=9/10, B=7/10.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/devex-finding-fixture.test.ts\tTS2532\tObject is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-output-o.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ id: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Should gstack add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\": string; ... 10 more ...; \"TODO candidate: Exempt python -m ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ id: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Should gstack add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\": string; ... 10 more ...; \"TODO candidate: Exempt python -m e...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ id: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Should gstack add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"?: undefined; ... 10 more ...; \"TODO candidate: Exempt python ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Should gstack add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"?: undefined; \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that apply here. This stays local \\u2014 no data leaves your machine. Enable cross-project learnings?\"?: undefined; ... 9 more ...; \"TODO candidat...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Should gstack add skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/devex-peer-comparison-calibration.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-reconfirmation-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Should I add them? (Note:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Should I add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review completes and plan mode exits.)\"?: undefined; ... 11 more ...; \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: an explicit escape hatch for the fi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Should I add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review completes and plan mode exits.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Quickstart points at examples/first_eval.py, which is not shipped\\nProject/branch/task: EvalK...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Quickstart points at examples/first_eval.py, which is not shipped\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta (main), DX POLISH review, journey stage Hello World.\\nELI10: README.md line 11 tells the developer to run `python examples/first_eval.py`. docs/package-contents.txt confirms that file is in neither t...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Quickstart points at examples/first_eval.py, which is not shipped\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta (main), DX POLISH review, journey stage Hello World.\\nELI10: README.md line 11 tells the developer to run `python examples/first_eval.py`. docs/package-contents.txt confirms that file is in neither the published wheel nor the examples archive. Your ML engineer hits \\\"No such file or directory\\\" at about T+0:30, on the very first command after install, and wonders whether the install is broken. The working demo, `python -m evalkit.demo`, is further down the page.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: The first thing the persona runs fails. That is the minute-two abandonment moment, and it hides the demo that actually works.\\nRecommendation: A because the demo module already ships and works; pointing the quickstart at it fixes the dead command with a docs edit and gives one golden path. Principle: zero friction at T0.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=8/10, C=3/10\\nA) Make `python -m evalkit.demo` the quickstart command and drop the first_eval.py reference (recommended) (human: ~30 min / CC: ~3 min)\\n  \\u2705 Every command in the quickstart runs against the shipped 2.0.0b1 package as published\\n  \\u2705 One golden path: install, demo, then live eval, no \\\"choose your own adventure\\\"\\n  \\u274c Loses the named example file some readers expect to open and edit locally\\nB) Ship examples/first_eval.py in the package and archive so the current command works (human: ~2 h / CC: ~15 min)\\n  \\u2705 Keeps the quickstart text as written and gives an editable script to start from\\n  \\u2705 Provides a real-usage sample beyond the fixed demo output\\n  \\u274c Two first-run paths compete on the same page, and a second file must stay in sync with demo.py\\nC) Keep the reference and add a note that the file is coming later (human: ~10 min / CC: ~1 min)\\n  \\u2705 Smallest possible edit before the beta ships\\n  \\u2705 Signals the intended example so early users know what to expect\\n  \\u274c The first quickstart command still fails for every developer in the beta\\nNet: repair the dead command by pointing at what ships versus shipping what the text promises.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the mandatory 5-minute remote CI check blocks the first local resu...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the mandatory 5-minute remote CI check blocks the first local result, including the keyless demo. Fix it in the plan?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main; tracing python -m evalkit.demo against the settled under-2-minute target.\\nELI10: docs/current-contracts...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 — Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the mandatory 5-minute remote CI check blocks the first local result, including the keyless demo. Fix it in the plan?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main; tracing python -m evalkit.demo against the settled under-2-minute target.\\nELI10: docs/current-contracts.md lines 3-5 say every first local evaluation must pass a remote CI check and blocks for five minutes, with no skip flag or offline path. README.md lines 17-23 confirm the keyless demo waits too. docs/benchmarks.md measured EvalKit at 6 minutes, 5 of which is this wait, against peers at 2 to 4 minutes and an agreed target under 2 minutes. The demo uses a mock transport and bundled data, so the check verifies a sample-project binding the developer does not own. The ML engineer wanted a local number before touching CI, and instead the SDK forces CI on them at minute one.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: The 6-minute TTHW is the Needs Work tier and the target is mathematically unreachable while the gate stays. Developers alt-tab during the wait and many do not come back.\\nRecommendation: A because it is the only option that hits the settled target, and the progress and timeout messages already in the contract stay useful on the live path. Violates Zero friction at T0 and Decide for me, let me override.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=5/10, D=2/10\\nA) Move the CI check off the local and demo path; it runs on the first live keyed evaluation or via an explicit verify command (recommended) (human: ~3 days / CC: ~30 min)\\n  ✅ Demo and first local eval return in seconds; TTHW drops from 6 min to about 1 min, under target\\n  ✅ The check still guards production use where the sample-project binding actually matters\\n  ❌ Changes a documented first-run contract; needs a changelog entry and a docs update\\nB) Keep the gate but make it non-blocking: print local results immediately, run the check in the background, report its outcome (human: ~3 days / CC: ~30 min)\\n  ✅ Developer sees scores at once while the binding still gets verified on every first run\\n  ✅ Preserves the existing progress and timeout messaging almost unchanged\\n  ❌ Background failure after success is confusing, and CI runners may exit before the check finishes\\nC) Add an opt-out flag or offline mode, default stays blocking (human: ~1 day / CC: ~15 min)\\n  ✅ Small change to the contract and easy to document in the quickstart\\n  ✅ Gives the noninteractive CI mode a clean way to skip a check it does not need\\n  ❌ Default path still misses the target; the developer has to know the flag exists to escape\\nD) Acceptable friction, keep the mandatory wait\\n  ✅ Zero implementation cost and no contract change in the beta\\n  ✅ Nothing to re-test in the first-run code path\\n  ❌ Locks in a 6-minute TTHW and abanLine truncated
-    "test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the quickstart command points at a file that does not ship\\nProjec...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the quickstart command points at a file that does not ship\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main; first-run path after pip install.\\nELI10: README.md line 11 tells the developer to run `python examples/first_eval.py`. docs/package-contents.txt shows the publish...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 — Journey stage HELLO WORLD: the quickstart command points at a file that does not ship\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main; first-run path after pip install.\\nELI10: README.md line 11 tells the developer to run `python examples/first_eval.py`. docs/package-contents.txt shows the published wheel contains evalkit/__init__.py, client.py, demo.py, sample_responses.json and README.md. There is no examples/ directory in the package or the examples archive. The very first command in the quickstart fails with 'No such file or directory'. The working demo, `python -m evalkit.demo`, is three paragraphs lower.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: the first command a developer types fails, and the README loses credibility before the SDK has shown a single score. That's a minute-one abandon.\\nRecommendation: A because the demo module is already shipped, tested, and is the approved delivery vehicle. One golden path beats two; a broken second path is worse than none.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=8/10, C=4/10, D=1/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Make `python -m evalkit.demo` the quickstart command; delete the examples/first_eval.py reference (recommended)\\n  ✅ Every command in the quickstart runs against the published package inventory as it exists today\\n  ✅ Single golden path; the approved terminal demo becomes the first thing the developer types (human: ~1 hour / CC: ~2 min)\\n  ❌ Loses a copy-pasteable script the developer can open and edit as a starting point for their own eval\\nB) Ship examples/first_eval.py in the package and archive so the current README command works\\n  ✅ Gives the developer an editable file that mirrors what they will write for their own dataset\\n  ✅ Keeps the existing README wording and any external links to it intact\\n  ❌ Two first-run paths (script plus demo module) means two things to keep working; package data inclusion is easy to regress (human: ~half day / CC: ~15 min)\\nC) Keep the reference but tell developers to download the example from the repo first\\n  ✅ No package change; ships this week\\n  ✅ Repo example can evolve independently of the wheel\\n  ❌ Adds a clone-or-download step before hello world, which is the opposite of the under-2-minute target\\nD) Acceptable friction, skip\\n  ✅ Zero work\\n  ✅ Developers who read the whole README find the demo anyway\\n  ❌ First quickstart command fails; this alone can cost the majority of first-time developers\\nNet: I'm trading an editable starter file against a quickstart whose first command is guaranteed to run.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[] | ({ ...; } | ... 1 mor...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D5 \\u2014 What should the developer see when their API key is rejected?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit S...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D5 \\u2014 What should the developer see when their API key is rejected?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on `main`; Debug stage, contract E3 (docs/api.md:11-13).\\nELI10: The first thing a developer does after the demo is paste a key. If they paste it wrong, or it was revoked, they get `AuthError(\\\"re...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D5 — What should the developer see when their API key is rejected?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on `main`; Debug stage, contract E3 (docs/api.md:11-13).\\nELI10: The first thing a developer does after the demo is paste a key. If they paste it wrong, or it was revoked, they get `AuthError(\\\"request failed\\\")`. That could mean network, server, anything. They will go check their Wi-Fi before they check the key. Every other EvalKit error already says problem, cause and fix (current-contracts.md:21-23); this is the single exception, and it sits exactly at the moment of first real usage. The key creation page and its revoke/rotate controls already exist (README.md:25-28), so the fix text has a real destination.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: A developer with a bad key burns 10-20 minutes debugging the wrong layer at the exact step where they decide whether to keep going.\\nRecommendation: A because it brings AuthError up to the contract every other error already meets, and the destination URL already exists.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=5/10, C=1/10\\nA) Full problem + cause + fix, with a stable code (recommended)\\n  ✅ e.g. `AuthError: API key rejected (EVALKIT_AUTH_INVALID_KEY). Cause: EVALKIT_API_KEY is missing, invalid, or revoked. Fix: create or rotate a key at https://console.evalkit.example/settings/api-keys and export EVALKIT_API_KEY.` Key value never echoed.\\n  ✅ Distinguishes missing / invalid / revoked when the API reports distinct statuses; `code` attribute lets CI scripts branch on it\\n  ❌ Touches an explicitly retained message; needs a test per variant and a docs entry alongside EVALKIT_CI_TIMEOUT\\nB) Append the console URL to the existing message\\n  ✅ One-line change; developer at least learns where keys live\\n  ✅ No new error code or attribute to document\\n  ❌ Still no cause; \\\"request failed\\\" still reads as a network problem\\nC) Keep `AuthError(\\\"request failed\\\")` as planned\\n  ✅ No change to retained behavior\\n  ❌ Only error in the SDK that violates its own error contract, at the highest-stakes step\\nNet: trading a small error-class change against the one moment a confused developer walks away.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-seed-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Journey stage DISCOVER/INSTALL: the README quickstart points at a file that isn't shipped. Wh...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Journey stage DISCOVER/INSTALL: the README quickstart points at a file that isn't shipped. Which remedy?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main, DX POLISH.\\nEvidence: README.md line 11 says \\\"follow the quickstart's command: `python examples/first_eval.py`\\\". docs/package-contents.txt lin...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 — Journey stage DISCOVER/INSTALL: the README quickstart points at a file that isn't shipped. Which remedy?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish on main, DX POLISH.\\nEvidence: README.md line 11 says \\\"follow the quickstart's command: `python examples/first_eval.py`\\\". docs/package-contents.txt lines 8-9: that file \\\"is absent from both the published package and the release examples archive\\\". The working command, `python -m evalkit.demo`, appears three lines later and IS shipped (package-contents.txt lines 4-5, 10).\\nELI10: The very first command the developer copies fails with a file-not-found. That is a T0 failure on the settled persona's first minute. The fix is either point the README at the command that exists, or ship the file the README promises.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Ship as-is and every fresh install opens with `python: can't open file 'examples/first_eval.py'`.\\nRecommendation: A because the demo is the approved delivery vehicle and already works; shipping a second quickstart script adds a parallel path to maintain and both paths hit the same CI gate.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=8/10\\nA) Make `python -m evalkit.demo` the quickstart command; drop the `first_eval.py` reference (recommended)\\n  ✅ Zero packaging change; README edit plus a release-checklist check that every README command resolves in the built wheel\\n  ✅ One first-run path, the one the benchmark study and README already call the chosen experience\\n  ❌ Developers who want a from-scratch script (not a module) get no shipped example until later\\nB) Ship `examples/first_eval.py` in the wheel and examples archive, and keep both commands\\n  ✅ README becomes true without editing it; developers get an editable starting script\\n  ✅ Gives a real-code template for the `run_eval` call, not just a canned demo\\n  ❌ Two first-run paths to keep in sync; adds a packaging item to the beta (human: ~half day / CC: ~10 min)\\nC) Rewrite the README to name only the demo, and add a one-line note that an example script is coming\\n  ✅ Honest about the gap and sets expectations\\n  ❌ \\\"Coming soon\\\" in a quickstart reads as unfinished to a chef-for-chefs audience\\nNet: one true command now, versus a second shipped artifact.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/devex-setup-remedy-o.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehicle are all pre-decided.\\n\\nShould I run /office-hours first, or proceed with the existing docs as context?\\n\\n<gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-prereq-skill>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/docsync-command-grammar.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ transcript: any[]; resultLine: any | null; turnCount: number; toolCallCount: number; toolCalls: Array<{ tool: string; input: any; output: string; }>; exitReason: string; }' to type 'SkillTestResult' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ transcript: any[]; resultLine: any | null; turnCount: number; toolCallCount: number; toolCalls: Array<{ tool: string; input: any; output: string; }>; exitReason: string; }' is missing the following properties from type 'SkillTestResult': browseErrors, duration, output, costEstimate, and 3 more.": 1,
     "test/docsync-fault-interface.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ paths: string; task_id?: undefined; audit_id?: undefined; } | { paths?: undefined; task_id: string; audit_id?: undefined; } | { paths?: undefined; task_id?: undefined; audit_id: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ paths: string; task_id?: undefined; audit_id?: undefined; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property 'task_id' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/docsync-fault-interface.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'event' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/dx-asserted-defect-as.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (One-time promp...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (One-time prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D5 \\u2014 v2 removes Client.evaluate() immediately with no...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (One-time prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/dx-asserted-defect-as.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-ig4gtr on main, starting /plan-devex-review of PLAN.md (EvalKit SDK beta polish).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investiga...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-ig4gtr on main, starting /plan-devex-review of PLAN.md (EvalKit SDK beta polish).\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on). This is a one-time setup prompt from the skill preamble, unrelated to the review itself. Note: we are in plan mode, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after the review finishes and plan mode exits, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Low. Without routing rules you invoke skills by name manually; with them, Claude auto-routes. Either is reversible with one config command.\\nRecommendation: A because auto-routing removes a step every time you ask for a review, fix, or ship.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" route to the right gstack skill automatically\\n  ✅ One short section appended to CLAUDE.md, committed as its own chore commit\\n  ❌ Cannot be applied during plan mode; it lands after this review completes, and this repo is a review fixture so the benefit here is small\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ Keeps the fixture CLAUDE.md untouched, no extra commit in this repo\\n  ✅ Recorded once so this prompt never appears again for this project\\n  ❌ You type /skill-name yourself every time instead of Claude routing for you\\nNet: convenience later versus keeping a fixture repo clean.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/dx-declarative-stage-ar.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mod...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"D9 \\u2014 TODO: schedule removal of the Client.evaluate() alias in 3.0\\nProje...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after this review exits plan mode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/dx-manual-handoff-ao.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: \"ready\"; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the 2.0 changelog. Track it?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish, branch main, TODOS.md pass after the eight review passes.\\nELI10: D7 keeps `Client.evaluate()` as a warning alias so v1 scripts don't brea...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the 2.0 changelog. Track it?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish, branch main, TODOS.md pass after the eight review passes.\\nELI10: D7 keeps `Client.evaluate()` as a warning alias so v1 scripts don't break on 2.0. Aliases are only kind if they eventually go away; otherwise the API carries two names forever and the deprecation warning becomes noise. What: delete the alias and its warning at the stated version (2.1 or 3.0). Why: one public name per action. Pros: clean surface, warning stays meaningful. Cons: any straggler still on the old name breaks then, which is the point of the notice period. Context: alias lives in evalkit/client.py; migration guide and codemod from D7 are the remediation path. Depends on: D7 landing in 2.0.0b1 and the changelog naming the removal version.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without a tracked item, the alias quietly becomes permanent and the deprecation warning lies.\\nRecommendation: A because the removal is a promise made in the 2.0 changelog, and a TODO is how the promise survives three months.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: record the follow-through now, or rely on someone remembering at 2.1.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/dx-selected-navigation-ap.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D14 \\u2014 TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command or codemod) for the 1.x to...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D14 \\u2014 TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command or codemod) for the 1.x to 2.0 migration?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, /plan-devex-review of the EvalKit beta plan, TODOS.md step.\\nELI10: D8 keeps Client.evaluate() as a deprecated alias and adds a Migrating from 1.x...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D15 — DX review complete. What next?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, /plan-devex-review of the EvalKit beta plan is finished; plan written to gstack-test-plan-devex.md.\\nELI10: The DX review is done: overall DX 5/10 to 8/10, TTHW from 6 minutes to an estimated under 1 minute once the CI gate leaves the demo path, fourteen decisions recorded, twelve implementation tasks. The review readiness dashboard shows the DX review clean, the outside voice disabled by config, and no engineering review yet. Engineering review is the one gate that normally blocks shipping, and this plan changes runtime behavior (CI gate, signatures, error classes, alias), so it is the natural next check. After implementation, /devex-review on the live package is the boomerang that measures whether the under-2-minute target was actually hit.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: low; this only routes what happens after this session. You said you will handle subsequent reviews manually.\\nRecommendation: D because you stated in PLAN.md that you will handle subsequent reviews manually; the eng-review recommendation stands and is recorded in the report's verdict.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Run /plan-eng-review next (required gate)\\n  ✅ Validates the runtime changes (T3 CI gate move, T5 signatures, T6 error classes, T7 alias) architecturally before build\\n  ✅ Clears the only review that gates shipping under current config\\n  ❌ Another interactive session now, which you said you would run yourself\\nB) Ready to implement; run /devex-review after shipping\\n  ✅ Moves straight to the twelve tasks with a concrete boomerang measurement planned\\n  ✅ The under-2-minute target gets verified against the real package\\n  ❌ Skips the eng gate for now; the dashboard stays NOT CLEARED until it runs\\nC) Skip, I'll handle next steps manually (recommended)\\n  ✅ Matches your stated intent to run later reviews yourself\\n  ✅ Nothing else is launched from this session; the plan and report are complete\\n  ❌ Eng review remains outstanding until you start it\\nNet: chain into eng review now, go build with a boomerang check, or stop here as you asked.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/dx-selected-navigation-ap.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: \"ready\"; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D14 \\u2014 TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D14 \\u2014 TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command or codemod) for the 1.x to...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D14 \\u2014 TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command or codemod) for the 1.x to 2.0 migration?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, /plan-devex-review of the EvalKit beta plan, TODOS.md step.\\nELI10: D8 keeps Client.evaluate() as a deprecated alias and adds a Migrating from 1.x...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D14 — TODO candidate 2 of 2: add an automated rewrite (one-line command or codemod) for the 1.x to 2.0 migration?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count on main, /plan-devex-review of the EvalKit beta plan, TODOS.md step.\\nELI10: D8 keeps Client.evaluate() as a deprecated alias and adds a Migrating from 1.x section. D6 changes run_eval/run_batch to one positional argument plus keyword-only evaluator. Both are mechanical edits. The hall-of-fame bar (Next.js, AG Grid) is a codemod per breaking release. For two renames a full codemod is heavy, but a documented one-liner (a sed or ruff/libcst snippet in the Migrating section) gets most of the value for a fraction of the cost.\\nWhat: add a tested rewrite snippet to the Migrating from 1.x section covering evaluate() -> run() and positional -> keyword evaluator; optionally grow it into python -m evalkit.migrate before 3.0 removes the alias.\\nWhy: teams with many v1 scripts otherwise hand-edit each one; the deprecation warning tells them what, not how fast.\\nPros: upgrades become one command; sets the precedent before 3.0, when the alias is removed and the codemod becomes necessary.\\nCons: a regex rewrite can miss dynamic calls; a libcst codemod is a new dev dependency and test surface.\\nContext: docs/api.md lines 15-18 describe the rename; D6 and D8 in this plan define the final shapes.\\nDepends on: D6 and D8 landing; the 3.0 removal date.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: low for the beta; higher at 3.0 when the alias disappears.\\nRecommendation: A because the alias makes it non-urgent now, but 3.0 needs it, and recording it with the trigger avoids a scramble later.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add to TODOS.md (recommended) (human: ~1 day / CC: ~30 min when built)\\n  ✅ Schedules the codemod against the concrete trigger: alias removal in 3.0\\n  ✅ Keeps the beta focused; the snippet can be added to docs any time before then\\n  ❌ v1 teams upgrading to 2.0 hand-edit their scripts for now, guided only by the warning\\nB) Skip\\n  ✅ Two renames may never justify a codemod; the alias covers 2.x entirely\\n  ✅ No new dependency or test surface\\n  ❌ 3.0 arrives with no migration tooling and the removal is felt as a hard break\\nC) Build it now: put the tested one-line sed/ruff snippet into the Migrating section in this release\\n  ✅ Cheapest possible form lands with the beta; developers upgrade in one command\\n  ✅ No dependency; a snippet in docs plus a test that runs it against a fixture\\n  ❌ Adds a docs-and-test item to a release already carrying five contract repairs\\nNet: track the migration tooling for 3.0, drop it, or ship the one-liner now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-annotated-cache-au.test.ts\tTS18048\t'c.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
     "test/eng-batching-native-replay.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixt...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you get the right workflow without naming it. Without them you invoke skills by hand every time.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way. Skipping means more manual /skill typing; adding means one extra section in a committed file (deferred until plan mode ends, since edits are frozen right now).\\nRecommendation: A because the rules are a small, reversible addition and remove repeated friction.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a few lines of committed config versus remembering skill names yourself.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-batching-native-replay.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count fixture, branch main, starting /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count fixture, branch main, starting /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, ship \\u2192 /ship, etc.). Without it, you invoke skills by hand each time. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Minor either way. Adding it means one more section in CLAUDE.md; skipping it means manual skill invocation.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make later sessions pick the right skill automatically. Note: plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md append + commit would happen after plan mode exits, not now.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: automatic skill routing vs. zero changes to CLAUDE.md.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-batching-native-replay.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 24 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 24 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixt...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you get the right workflow without naming it. Without them you invoke skills by hand every time.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way. Skipping means more manual /skill typing; adding means one extra section in a committed file (deferred until plan mode ends, since edits are frozen right now).\\nRecommendation: A because the rules are a small, reversible addition and remove repeated friction.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a few lines of committed config versus remembering skill names yourself.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
@@ -350,117 +163,31 @@
     "test/eng-batching-saved-ledger.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixt...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack fixture repo on `main`, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules tell the assistant which /skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this diff\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you get the right workflow without naming it. Without them you invoke skills by hand every time.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way. Skipping means more manual /skill typing; adding means one extra section in a committed file (deferred until plan mode ends, since edits are frozen right now).\\nRecommendation: A because the rules are a small, reversible addition and remove repeated friction.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a few lines of committed config versus remembering skill names yourself.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-batching-saved-ledger.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/eng-batching-saved-ledger.test.ts\tTS7023\t''absent current report'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts\tTS18048\t'option.description' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-binding-retry-z.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend r...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend reducing scope, or accept the plan as-is and review it at full size? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-check>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D6 \\u2014 TODO: Should we capture a cross-tenant E2E integration test (real ID...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend reducing scope, or accept the plan as-is and review it at full size? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-check>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/eng-binding-z.test.ts\tTS18048\t'option.description' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-binding-z.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce scope or proceed as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-challenge>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D6 \\u2014 TODOS: Add IDP call timeout protection to TODOS.md? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-todo-idp-timeout>\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce scope or proceed as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-challenge>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/eng-cache-brief-am.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class inventory before building?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan review, Step 0 scope challenge.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes (AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, RequestPolicy), and three of them are ways of holding the same cached toke...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class inventory before building?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan review, Step 0 scope challenge.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes (AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, RequestPolicy), and three of them are ways of holding the same cached tokens the existing adapter already holds. Every extra class is a place for bugs to hide and a thing the next engineer must learn. The question is whether the two real services can use the existing cache adapter directly through a narrow interface.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-reduce and you re-add a class mid-build; under-reduce and you maintain three caches and 12 files for a change whose goal is not yet written down.\\nRecommendation: A because the AuthCache facade adds no rule or serialization (PLAN.md:11-13) and TokenStore has no stated responsibility.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a possible re-add later versus three overlapping abstractions now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\"?: undefined; ... 10 more ...; \"...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-ad-v2.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the auth-refactor plan fixture, one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, archite...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the auth-refactor plan fixture, one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, architecture \\u2192 /plan-eng-review, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by name every time. This only asks once per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Low either way. Declining means manual skill invocation; accepting adds a short section to CLAUDE.md and a commit (deferred until plan mode ends, since edits are frozen right now).\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make the skills fire when they should.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Skills auto-route from natural requests like 'review this architecture' without naming them\\n  \\u2705 Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from the committed file\\n  \\u274c Adds a section to CLAUDE.md and a commit; in plan mode this write is deferred until the review completes\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays untouched and no extra commit lands on main\\n  \\u2705 Full control over when each skill runs; nothing fires proactively\\n  \\u274c You must remember and type each skill name; the prompt never reappears for this project\\nNet: A trades one small committed file section for skills that route themselves.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-owned-outcomes.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D11 \\u2014 Next step after this eng review?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: The engineering review is complete and cleared. The plan has no user-interface work, so a design review adds nothing, and it is a behavior-neutral backend refactor, so a CEO/scope review is optional and not needed. The only remaining choice is navigation: proceed to implementation in the order the plan specifies (T1/T2/T3 in parallel, then T4 \\u2192 T5 \\u2192 T6, then T7 last), or pause here.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: None that is hard to undo; this question approves no implementation change, only what happens next.\\nRecommendation: A because all reviews relevant to this plan are complete and every decision is answered.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Ready to implement, run /ship when done (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 All ten decisions answered; task list T1\\u2013T9 and lane order are in the reviewed plan\\n  \\u2705 Nothing else gates shipping; Eng Review is the only required tier\\n  \\u274c Routing rules (D1) and TODOS.md (D10) still need writing once plan mode exits\\nB) Pause here, no further action this session\\n  \\u2705 Leaves the reviewed plan and artifacts saved for a later session\\n  \\u2705 No further prompts\\n  \\u274c Deferred D1/D10 writes stay pending until someone returns\\nNet: navigation only; the reviewed plan is saved either way.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'preview' does not exist on type '{ label: string; description: string; }'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion[]'. Type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter '_fp' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'active' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''answered'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''different options'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''failed'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''missing native'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''missing session'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''wrong indices'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''wrong signature'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t''wrong tab'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t'label' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7023\t'preview' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/eng-count-question-policy.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the legacyAuthFlow() rewrite inside this refactor PR, or defer it?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises no product behavior change, yet it also rewrites legacyAuthFlow(), the code path that logs tenants in today, and...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the legacyAuthFlow() rewrite inside this refactor PR, or defer it?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises no product behavior change, yet it also rewrites legacyAuthFlow(), the code path that logs tenants in today, and...'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-current-native-seeds.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; this is a one-time gstack setup prompt before the review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate, etc.). Routing rules in CLAUDE.md...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; this is a one-time gstack setup prompt before the review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate, etc.). Routing rules in CLAUDE.md tell the assistant which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"fix this bug\\\", so you don't have to remember the names. Without them you invoke skills by hand.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Low either way. Choosing A adds a short section to CLAUDE.md and a commit; choosing B means manual skill invocation until re-enabled.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes skills discoverable with zero ongoing cost, and it's a one-line config flip to undo.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience now vs. keeping CLAUDE.md untouched. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit will be deferred until we leave plan mode.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-declared-regression-ai.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Complexity check triggered: 4 new classes across 12 files. Reduce s...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Complexity check triggered: 4 new classes across 12 files. Reduce scope or proceed as-is?\\nPr...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Complexity check triggered: 4 new classes across 12 files. Reduce scope or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Step 0 scope gate.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes (TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy) plus AuthBroker, touching 12 file...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 \\u2014 Complexity check triggered: 4 new classes across 12 files. Reduce scope or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Step 0 scope gate.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes (TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy) plus AuthBroker, touching 12 files (PLAN.md:35-36). The existing cache adapter already stores tokens keyed by tenant, evicts, and invalidates (PLAN.md:7-13), so TokenStore looks like a second token store next to the first. RequestPolicy has no stated behavior beyond a policy decision, which is usually typed config plus one pure function, not a class. Every extra class is a second place a 3am on-call engineer has to look when a tenant's token is stale.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-build means two token stores that can disagree on validity; under-build means we cut a class that had a real reason to exist that the plan did not state.\\nRecommendation: A because the adapter already owns token storage and the plan gives TokenStore and RequestPolicy no responsibility that justifies a class; AuthBroker, SessionMint, and AuthCache-as-injected-seam carry the actual goal.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: fewer moving parts and one source of truth for tokens vs keeping the plan's original decomposition.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-declared-regression-ai.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Reduce scope to the classes the plan actually motivates, or proceed...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Reduce scope to the classes the plan actually motivates, or proceed with all 4 new classes ac...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Reduce scope to the classes the plan actually motivates, or proceed with all 4 new classes across 12 files?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Step 0 complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes but only explains two of them. AuthBroker and SessionMint are the new...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 \\u2014 Reduce scope to the classes the plan actually motivates, or proceed with all 4 new classes across 12 files?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, Step 0 complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes but only explains two of them. AuthBroker and SessionMint are the new services, and AuthCache is a thin wrapper over a cache adapter you already have. TokenStore and RequestPolicy appear only in the file-count line (PLAN.md:35) with no job described. Every unexplained class is surface area that has to be tested, reviewed, and kept in sync with the existing adapter. The question is whether to build all four now or land the two motivated ones plus the facade and add the rest when a concrete need shows up.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Overbuild and you carry two classes nobody can explain in code review, with a real chance TokenStore duplicates the adapter's tenant-keyed storage. Underbuild and you come back for a second PR if TokenStore or RequestPolicy turn out to be load-bearing.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan text gives TokenStore and RequestPolicy zero responsibilities, and the existing adapter already owns token storage and invalidation. Fewer moving parts, same stated goal, and the eng preference for engineered-enough over premature abstraction.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=6/10\\nNet: three classes you can defend in review versus four where two are speculative.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-declared-suite-ak.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope challenge: reduce to two new services on the existing ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope challenge: reduce to two new services on the existing adapter, or proceed with a...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope challenge: reduce to two new services on the existing adapter, or proceed with all five new types?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-EN8bNx on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: The plan adds AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, and RequestPolicy across 12 fi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 — Step 0 scope challenge: reduce to two new services on the existing adapter, or proceed with all five new types?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-EN8bNx on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: The plan adds AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, and RequestPolicy across 12 files (PLAN.md:19, :35-36). But PLAN.md:11-13 says AuthCache is only a facade over the existing cache adapter, which stays unchanged with one backing cache and its own tests. That means at least one new class exists to wrap something that already works. TokenStore and RequestPolicy are named but never described, so nobody can say what problem they solve. Every extra class here is another mutable surface in the auth path, the one place where a bug means users get logged out or, worse, see another tenant's session.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too big means five new types to review, test, and keep coherent in the hottest security path. Too small means we defer a class the core goal actually needs and rebuild it in a follow-up.\\nRecommendation: A because AuthBroker and SessionMint carry the real behavior; the existing adapter (PLAN.md:7-13) already keys by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version and already invalidates on logout/revocation/suspension, so it can be injected directly [Layer 1: reuse what is a few files over]. TokenStore and RequestPolicy get a one-line justification each or move to NOT in scope.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=9/10, C=7/10 (coverage of the stated goal is equal for A and B; C defers pieces without deciding).\\nNet: fewer moving parts in the auth path versus keeping every named class in case it turns out to be needed.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-error-flow-seed.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/bran...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks to the identity provider: five calls fired at once instead of one after another. That is a behavior change (different timing, five times the burst load on the IDP, different error ordering). Mixing it into a structure-only refactor means if something breaks in production you cannot tell which change caused it, and you cannot roll back one without the other.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a latency regression or IDP rate-limit outage gets blamed on the refactor and the whole thing gets reverted; split = one extra small PR.\\nRecommendation: A because structural and behavioral changes should land separately (Beck), and the Performance review will show caching issuer metadata is the real fix, so the parallelization design may change anyway.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer parallelization to a follow-up PR (recommended) (human: ~0 now / CC: ~0 now)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays a pure structural change; a bisect points at exactly one cause if auth breaks\\n  ✅ Lets the Performance review pick the right fix (cache discovery/JWKS) instead of committing to Promise.all now\\n  ❌ Users keep the 5x sequential latency for one more release cycle\\nB) Keep parallelization in this PR as a separate commit\\n  ✅ Latency win ships now, in the same review cycle (human: ~1 day incl. load test / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Separate commit still gives some bisectability within the branch\\n  ❌ Refactor branch now carries a runtime-behavior change and needs IDP load/rate-limit verification before merge\\n  ❌ If the calls are not actually independent (discovery → JWKS → verify usually chain), the \\\"trivial\\\" Promise.all is wrong and the refactor PR stalls on it\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can trust and revert in isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-error-flow-seed.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without ch...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without changing what users experience, but it introduces five new classes across twelve files. Two of those classes look like they do not earn a class: RequestPolicy is described by the plan itself as stateless with no side effects (that is a function), and TokenStore is never described while AuthCache already wraps the one backing cache. Every extra class is another seam a tired engineer has to trace at 3am when a tenant cannot log in.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many classes and the refactor ships with duplicated cache-like surfaces (TokenStore vs AuthCache) and a class-shaped wrapper around one pure decision; too few and a genuinely distinct responsibility (if TokenStore has one) gets crammed into AuthCache and re-split later.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan's own description of RequestPolicy (PLAN.md:12-13) is the definition of a pure function, and TokenStore has no stated responsibility distinct from AuthCache (PLAN.md:20-21, 45).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nThis chooses structure only. Contracts stay fixed (PLAN.md:16-22); the shared mutable AuthCache, the nested try/catch, the regression coverage and the Promise.all change are separate remedies asked later, not decided here.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) 3 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function; TokenStore folded into AuthCache (recommended)\\n  ✅ One cache-facing surface instead of two, so invalidation on logout/revocation/suspension has one place to be right\\n  ✅ Access decision is a pure `decideAccess(claims, ctx)` function: trivially unit-testable, no lifecycle, no mocks\\n  ❌ If TokenStore turns out to own something the adapter does not (e.g. refresh-token persistence), you rediscover it mid-implementation and re-split\\nB) 4 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function\\n  ✅ Keeps TokenStore's seam available in case it holds a responsibility the plan did not write down\\n  ✅ Still removes the class wrapper around a stateless decision, the clearest over-abstraction in the plan\\n  ❌ Two token-holding abstractions remain in one refactor with no written contract distinguishing them; DRY risk is real\\nC) Original arrangement: all 5 classes as written (AuthBroker, TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy)\\n  ✅ Matches the author's mental model exactly; no re-planning cost before implementation starts\\n  ✅ RequestPolicy as a class leaves room to grow if policy is expected to gain state or dependencies later\\n  ❌ Five new seams for a refactor whose stated goal is no behavior change; two of them are unjustified by the plan text\\nNet: trading a small chance of re-splitting TokenStore against carrying two undescribed or unnecessary abstractions into a security-sensitive codepath.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 4,
-    "test/eng-error-flow-seed.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | undefined' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/bran...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks to the identity provider: five calls fired at once instead of one after another. That is a behavior change (different timing, five times the burst load on the IDP, different error ordering). Mixing it into a structure-only refactor means if something breaks in production you cannot tell which change caused it, and you cannot roll back one without the other.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a latency regression or IDP rate-limit outage gets blamed on the refactor and the whole thing gets reverted; split = one extra small PR.\\nRecommendation: A because structural and behavioral changes should land separately (Beck), and the Performance review will show caching issuer metadata is the real fix, so the parallelization design may change anyway.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer parallelization to a follow-up PR (recommended) (human: ~0 now / CC: ~0 now)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays a pure structural change; a bisect points at exactly one cause if auth breaks\\n  ✅ Lets the Performance review pick the right fix (cache discovery/JWKS) instead of committing to Promise.all now\\n  ❌ Users keep the 5x sequential latency for one more release cycle\\nB) Keep parallelization in this PR as a separate commit\\n  ✅ Latency win ships now, in the same review cycle (human: ~1 day incl. load test / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Separate commit still gives some bisectability within the branch\\n  ❌ Refactor branch now carries a runtime-behavior change and needs IDP load/rate-limit verification before merge\\n  ❌ If the calls are not actually independent (discovery → JWKS → verify usually chain), the \\\"trivial\\\" Promise.all is wrong and the refactor PR stalls on it\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can trust and revert in isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-error-flow-seed.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without ch...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without changing what users experience, but it introduces five new classes across twelve files. Two of those classes look like they do not earn a class: RequestPolicy is described by the plan itself as stateless with no side effects (that is a function), and TokenStore is never described while AuthCache already wraps the one backing cache. Every extra class is another seam a tired engineer has to trace at 3am when a tenant cannot log in.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many classes and the refactor ships with duplicated cache-like surfaces (TokenStore vs AuthCache) and a class-shaped wrapper around one pure decision; too few and a genuinely distinct responsibility (if TokenStore has one) gets crammed into AuthCache and re-split later.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan's own description of RequestPolicy (PLAN.md:12-13) is the definition of a pure function, and TokenStore has no stated responsibility distinct from AuthCache (PLAN.md:20-21, 45).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nThis chooses structure only. Contracts stay fixed (PLAN.md:16-22); the shared mutable AuthCache, the nested try/catch, the regression coverage and the Promise.all change are separate remedies asked later, not decided here.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) 3 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function; TokenStore folded into AuthCache (recommended)\\n  ✅ One cache-facing surface instead of two, so invalidation on logout/revocation/suspension has one place to be right\\n  ✅ Access decision is a pure `decideAccess(claims, ctx)` function: trivially unit-testable, no lifecycle, no mocks\\n  ❌ If TokenStore turns out to own something the adapter does not (e.g. refresh-token persistence), you rediscover it mid-implementation and re-split\\nB) 4 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function\\n  ✅ Keeps TokenStore's seam available in case it holds a responsibility the plan did not write down\\n  ✅ Still removes the class wrapper around a stateless decision, the clearest over-abstraction in the plan\\n  ❌ Two token-holding abstractions remain in one refactor with no written contract distinguishing them; DRY risk is real\\nC) Original arrangement: all 5 classes as written (AuthBroker, TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy)\\n  ✅ Matches the author's mental model exactly; no re-planning cost before implementation starts\\n  ✅ RequestPolicy as a class leaves room to grow if policy is expected to gain state or dependencies later\\n  ❌ Five new seams for a refactor whose stated goal is no behavior change; two of them are unjustified by the plan text\\nNet: trading a small chance of re-splitting TokenStore against carrying two undescribed or unnecessary abstractions into a security-sensitive codepath.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-golden-master-al.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Enable cross-project learnings? Project/branch/task: main, Multi-te...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Enable cross-project learnings? Project/branch/task: main, Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan. E...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Enable cross-project learnings? Project/branch/task: main, Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan. ELI10: gstack can search learnings saved from your other projects on this machine to spot patterns that apply here. Nothing leaves the machine. Stakes if we pick wrong: enabling on a machine with multiple client ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Enable cross-project learnings? Project/branch/task: main, Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan. ELI10: gstack can search learnings saved from your other projects on this machine to spot patterns that apply here. Nothing leaves the machine. Stakes if we pick wrong: enabling on a machine with multiple client codebases could mix contexts; disabling loses reusable pitfalls. Recommendation: A because this is a local, solo-style environment with no client separation signals. Note: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-golden-parity-an.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Complexity check fired: 12 files, 4 new classes. Reduce to the two classes that carry the fea...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Complexity check fired: 12 files, 4 new classes. Reduce to the two classes that carry the feature, or proceed as planned?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-vtSmzJ on main, Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md:34-36).\\nELI10: The plan adds four classes, but only AuthBroker and SessionMint do anythin...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 \\u2014 Issue 1: two services mutate one shared cache with no serialized writes. How should cache ownership work?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-vtSmzJ on main, Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md:10, 19-20).\\nELI10: AuthBroker and SessionMint both write into the same tenant-keyed cache, and the plan says nothing orders those writes. Realistic production failure: a tenant gets suspended, the invalidation hook clears its entries, and a SessionMint write that started a few milliseconds earlier lands after the clear. That suspended tenant now has a live cached session until the TTL expires. Nobody sees an error; the cache just quietly re-admits them. A module-level global also means every test shares state and you cannot construct a service with a fake cache.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Silent re-admission of a suspended or revoked tenant, plus test suites that pass or fail depending on run order.\\nRecommendation: A because one writer plus a version check turns a silent race into an explicit, testable rule, and injection is the standard fix for module-level mutable state [Layer 1]. Maps to explicit over clever.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-initial-selector-043a.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, one-time gstack setup before the eng review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 a short table telling Claude ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, one-time gstack setup before the eng review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules \\u2014 a short table telling Claude which /skill to invoke for which kind of request (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, architecture \\u2192 /plan-eng-review, etc.). Without it you type skill names by hand each time. This is a setup question only; it approves nothing about the auth refactor plan.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Minor either way \\u2014 missed auto-routing, or an extra section in CLAUDE.md you did not want. Plan mode is active, so any CLAUDE.md write and commit would happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nRecommendation: A because the routing table is small, boring, and saves a manual skill lookup on every future request.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md exactly as it is.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-initial-selector-043a.test.ts\tTS2554\tExpected 3 arguments, but got 2.": 3,
-    "test/eng-injected-export-aq.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/tas...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + TokenStore + SessionMint + AuthCache + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new building blocks, but three of them (TokenStor...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + TokenStore + SessionMint + AuthCache + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new building blocks, but three of them (TokenStore, AuthCache, and the existing cache adapter) all sit on top of the same one cache. RequestPolicy also looks like it re-does the policy-version rule the adapter already keys on. More blocks means more places for a tenant-isolation bug to hide and more code to test. The question is whether to collapse the duplicates now, before we review the details.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-build and every auth bug has three storage layers to trace through; under-build and TokenStore may have a real distinct job we cut blind.\\nRecommendation: A because one facade over one adapter is the smallest design that still gives AuthBroker and SessionMint a clean seam, and it cuts ~4 files without changing the goal.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=8/10\\nNet: fewer moving parts vs keeping a separation whose purpose the plan never states.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-library-hooks-aq.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-eng-review of PLAN.md (background job retry framework).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so Claude knows which skill to invoke when you say things like...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-eng-review of PLAN.md (background job retry framework).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so Claude knows which skill to invoke when you say things like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship this\\\". Without them you invoke skills by name every time. This is a one-time onboarding prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means manual skill invocation; adding means a small committed edit to CLAUDE.md (in plan mode the write and commit are deferred until you exit plan mode).\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill suite discoverable with no downside beyond a dozen lines in CLAUDE.md.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: Discoverability of the skill suite versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-re...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — No design doc found: run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\"; no design doc exists in the repo or ~/.gstack for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is the \\\"why\\\" behind a plan: the problem statement, the assumptions we challenged, the alternatives we rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes and gives this review sharper input. Without it, I review the plan on its own terms, which is fine but means I can't check the plan against a stated problem. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means some \\\"is this the right thing to build\\\" questions get answered by inference instead of your stated intent; running it costs ~10 minutes before any review starts.\\nRecommendation: B because this plan is a refactor with fixed contracts already written down (PLAN.md:6-16), and the user asked for a thorough review now; the review sections below already challenge premise and scope.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: 10 minutes of upfront problem framing vs. going straight into the review with the plan as written.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D7 \\u2014 Structure: with RequestPolicy deferred and TokenStore folded, which class arrangement do we b...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D7 \\u2014 Structure: with RequestPolicy deferred and TokenStore folded, which class arrangement do we build?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FkY8wp on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: Three arrangements deliver the same features (D4-D6 held fixed, legacy flow untouched behind a flag). A) ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D7 \\u2014 Structure: with RequestPolicy deferred and TokenStore folded, which class arrangement do we build?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FkY8wp on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: Three arrangements deliver the same features (D4-D6 held fixed, legacy flow untouched behind a flag). A) three classes: AuthBroker and SessionMint as services, AuthCache as the one facade over the existing adapter. B) two classes: drop the AuthCache facade and let both services call the existing adapter directly, since it already keys by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version. C) one service: merge AuthBroker and SessionMint into a single AuthService over the adapter. The facade matters because two services write to one cache; a single seam is where you put the write discipline and the test double.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many layers and you maintain a pass-through class; too few and cache write rules get duplicated in two services or one service grows into a god object.\\nRecommendation: A because both services mutate the same cache (PLAN.md:19-20); one facade is the only place to enforce a single write path and to mock in tests, and it costs one small class. (human: A ~3 days, B ~2.5 days, C ~2 days / CC: A ~40 min, B ~35 min, C ~30 min)\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: one deliberate seam for shared-cache writes vs. fewer files with the write rules spread across callers.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Does TokenStore stay in this refactor, or is it cut/deferred?\\nProject/branch/task: main; Scope Challenge complexit...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Does TokenStore stay in this refactor, or is it cut/deferred?\\nProject/branch/task: main; Scope Challenge complexit...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Does TokenStore stay in this refactor, or is it cut/deferred?\\nProject/branch/task: main; Scope Challenge complexity gate on PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (12 files, 4 new classes + AuthBroker).\\nELI10: The plan already says the existing cache adapter stores tokens keyed by tenant, issuer, audi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D4 — Does TokenStore stay in this refactor, or is it cut/deferred?\\nProject/branch/task: main; Scope Challenge complexity gate on PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (12 files, 4 new classes + AuthBroker).\\nELI10: The plan already says the existing cache adapter stores tokens keyed by tenant, issuer, audience and policy version, evicts expired ones, and invalidates on logout/revocation/suspension (PLAN.md:7-13). Then it adds a brand-new class called TokenStore (PLAN.md:35) without saying what it stores that the adapter does not. Two places that hold tokens means two places that can disagree about whether a token is still valid. That is the exact bug class a multi-tenant auth system cannot afford.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: keep it with no defined role and you ship a second token source of truth; cut it and it turns out to hold something the adapter cannot (say, refresh tokens with a different lifetime) and SessionMint has nowhere to put them.\\nRecommendation: B (defer) because nothing in the plan names a TokenStore responsibility the retained adapter lacks; if a real one surfaces during implementation it comes back as its own scoped decision with a stated contract.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: fewer moving parts and one token source of truth vs keeping a slot open for a responsibility the plan has not written down.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D5 \\u2014 Keep TokenStore as a separate new class, or fold its role into AuthCache?\\nProject/branch/tas...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D5 \\u2014 Keep TokenStore as a separate new class, or fold its role into AuthCache?\\nProject/branch/task: Multi-tenant Auth Refactor on `main`; PLAN.md:35 introduces TokenStore alongside AuthCache, which PLAN.md:11-12 already defines as the facade over the one existing cache adapter.\\nELI10: The plan ends up with...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D5 — Keep TokenStore as a separate new class, or fold its role into AuthCache?\\nProject/branch/task: Multi-tenant Auth Refactor on `main`; PLAN.md:35 introduces TokenStore alongside AuthCache, which PLAN.md:11-12 already defines as the facade over the one existing cache adapter.\\nELI10: The plan ends up with three places that hold tokens: the existing cache adapter (keyed by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version), AuthCache (a new wrapper over that same adapter), and TokenStore (a new class the plan never describes). If TokenStore is just another wrapper for the same tokens, it is a duplicate layer that every bug fix has to be applied to twice. If it holds something genuinely different (refresh tokens? IDP signing keys?), it deserves its own home but the plan needs to say so.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Folding it when it holds a different kind of data forces it back out later; keeping it when it duplicates AuthCache means two invalidation paths that can drift (a revoked token evicted from one but not the other).\\nRecommendation: B because the plan gives TokenStore no responsibility distinct from AuthCache, and PLAN.md:12 already commits to \\\"one backing cache\\\"; a second store contradicts that contract unless it is justified.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: fewer moving parts and one invalidation path vs. a possible future re-split if TokenStore turns out to hold distinct data.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 4,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D6 \\u2014 Component arrangement: keep TokenStore as a separate class, or fold it into AuthCache?\\nProje...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D6 \\u2014 Component arrangement: keep TokenStore as a separate class, or fold it into AuthCache?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; Scope Challenge structure choice (feature choices held fixed: legacy rewrite deferred behind a flag per D4, RequestPolicy deferred per D5).\\nELI10: Wit...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D6 \\u2014 Component arrangement: keep TokenStore as a separate class, or fold it into AuthCache?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; Scope Challenge structure choice (feature choices held fixed: legacy rewrite deferred behind a flag per D4, RequestPolicy deferred per D5).\\nELI10: With RequestPolicy deferred, the plan still adds four components: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, and TokenStore. The plan says AuthCache is a facade over the existing cache adapter, which already stores tokens keyed by tenant/issuer/audience/policy and already handles eviction and invalidation (PLAN.md:7-13). That makes TokenStore a third layer doing the adapter's job. This question picks structure only: how many boxes. Whether the shared AuthCache stays a module-level global (Section 1) and how errors and IDP calls are handled are separate decisions and stay pending in every option.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many layers means three places to look when a tenant's revoked token still validates at 3am; too few means AuthBroker and SessionMint tangle if their responsibilities really are distinct.\\nRecommendation: A because it removes the one component whose job the existing adapter already does, keeps the two services whose names describe distinct work, and preserves every retained contract from PLAN.md:6-13 unchanged. (human: ~0.5 day less / CC: ~5 min less.)\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: the existing adapter is already the token store; the question is whether you want a second one.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-re...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"this is broken\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. The stakes are low: it's a few lines of markdown, easy to remove.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by hand; with it, a wrong auto-invoke costs you one interruption.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes the skills discoverable at the moment they're useful, and it's trivially reversible.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNote: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after the review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 12 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the auth refactor review.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate...). A short routing section in ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the auth refactor review.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate...). A short routing section in CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"there's a bug\\\". Without it, you have to name the skill yourself every time.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Pick A and you get one extra committed block in CLAUDE.md; pick B and skills only run when you type them explicitly. Both are easy to reverse.\\nRecommendation: A because auto-routing saves a lookup every session and the block is small and reversible.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a small committed CLAUDE.md block vs. manual skill invocation forever. Note: we are in plan mode, so the actual CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review, when edits are allowed.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D15 — Next step after this eng review?\\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\"; eng review CLEAR, 0 unresolved decisions, 0 critical gaps.\\nELI10: The engineering review is the only gate that blocks shipping, and it passed. This plan is backend-only (no UI), so a design review doesn't apply. A CEO review is for product-direction or scope-expansion changes; this is a refactor with scope reduced, so it's optional at best. Navigation only: nothing here changes the plan or its tasks.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Running an unneeded review costs time; skipping a needed one is not a risk here since no UI or product scope changed.\\nRecommendation: B (Ready to implement) because the plan has no UI surface and reduced rather than expanded scope; the tasks T1-T9 are ready to run.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: start building vs. one more optional review pass.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-native-seed-contract.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-next-handoff-ah.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-b3qdhZ on main, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-b3qdhZ on main, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship this\\\" automatically route to the right skill instead of you naming it each time. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: we are in plan mode right now, so if you pick A I will record the choice and append/commit the section only after plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, skills only fire when you name them explicitly; with routing, nothing breaks, you just get one extra section in CLAUDE.md.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill suite self-serve and cost one small commit.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a small CLAUDE.md append versus invoking skills by name forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-next-handoff-ah.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to review PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which one to reach for w...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to review PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which one to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you do not have to remember skill names. Without it, you invoke skills by hand.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Nothing breaks either way; the only cost is a few extra keystrokes per session if skipped, or a small CLAUDE.md edit plus commit if added.\\nRecommendation: A because the table is cheap, revertable, and makes the rest of the gstack skills discoverable. Note: plan mode is active, so the actual edit and commit would run after this review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-next-handoff-ah.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'Record<string, string> | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'object'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'object'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-owned-explanation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'false' is not assignable to type 'true'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-owned-seeds-av.test.ts\tTS18048\t'c.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-owned-seeds-av.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the 5-component decomposition or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Mult...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the 5-component decomposition or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + SessionMint + AuthCache + TokenStore + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan builds five new pieces, but one working cache already does the storing and inv...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Reduce the 5-component decomposition or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + SessionMint + AuthCache + TokenStore + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan builds five new pieces, but one working cache already does the storing and invalidating. AuthCache is described as a facade over that adapter with no new rules, and TokenStore is never described at all. Two wrappers around one cache means two places for tenant-key bugs to hide, and RequestPolicy has no stated job. Every extra class is another file a tired engineer has to trace at 3am when a tenant sees someone else's session.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-decomposed, the auth path becomes 5 hops to debug and tenant-isolation bugs get harder to spot; under-decomposed, AuthBroker turns into a god object.\\nRecommendation: A because it keeps the two services that carry real behavior and drops the wrappers that duplicate the existing adapter.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=9/10, C=5/10 (A and B reach the same goal with different decomposition; C defers half the goal).\\nNet: same feature, roughly 7-8 files instead of 12, and one cache boundary instead of three.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-devex-s-count.test.ts\tTS2367\tThis comparison appears to be unintentional because the types '\"Eng architecture\"' and '\"DX retry CI repair\"' have no overlap.": 2,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS18048\t'c.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS18048\t'option.description' is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/tas...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + TokenStore + SessionMint + AuthCache + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new building blocks, but three of them (TokenStor...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Reduce the class count before reviewing, or proceed with all 5 new units?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, AuthBroker + TokenStore + SessionMint + AuthCache + RequestPolicy.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new building blocks, but three of them (TokenStore, AuthCache, and the existing cache adapter) all sit on top of the same one cache. RequestPolicy also looks like it re-does the policy-version rule the adapter already keys on. More blocks means more places for a tenant-isolation bug to hide and more code to test. The question is whether to collapse the duplicates now, before we review the details.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-build and every auth bug has three storage layers to trace through; under-build and TokenStore may have a real distinct job we cut blind.\\nRecommendation: A because one facade over one adapter is the smallest design that still gives AuthBroker and SessionMint a clean seam, and it cuts ~4 files without changing the goal.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=10/10, C=8/10\\nNet: fewer moving parts vs keeping a separation whose purpose the plan never states.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-eng-review of PLAN.md (background job retry framework).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so Claude knows which skill to invoke when you say things like...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, plan-eng-review of PLAN.md (background job retry framework).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so Claude knows which skill to invoke when you say things like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship this\\\". Without them you invoke skills by name every time. This is a one-time onboarding prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means manual skill invocation; adding means a small committed edit to CLAUDE.md (in plan mode the write and commit are deferred until you exit plan mode).\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill suite discoverable with no downside beyond a dozen lines in CLAUDE.md.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: Discoverability of the skill suite versus keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Plan mode is a...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review exits plan mode.)\"?: undefined; ... 10 more ...; \"D9 \\u2014 Next steps: Eng Review is CLEAR. This is a backend auth refactor with no UI scope...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after the review exits plan mode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the auth-refactor plan fixture, one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, archite...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the auth-refactor plan fixture, one-time gstack onboarding prompt.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which skill to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, architecture \\u2192 /plan-eng-review, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by name every time. This only asks once per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Low either way. Declining means manual skill invocation; accepting adds a short section to CLAUDE.md and a commit (deferred until plan mode ends, since edits are frozen right now).\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make the skills fire when they should.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Skills auto-route from natural requests like 'review this architecture' without naming them\\n  \\u2705 Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from the committed file\\n  \\u274c Adds a section to CLAUDE.md and a commit; in plan mode this write is deferred until the review completes\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  \\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays untouched and no extra commit lands on main\\n  \\u2705 Full control over when each skill runs; nothing fires proactively\\n  \\u274c You must remember and type each skill name; the prompt never reappears for this project\\nNet: A trades one small committed file section for skills that route themselves.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not comparable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class inventory before building?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan review, Step 0 scope challenge.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes (AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, RequestPolicy), and three of them are ways of holding the same cached toke...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the class inventory before building?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan review, Step 0 scope challenge.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes (AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore, RequestPolicy), and three of them are ways of holding the same cached tokens the existing adapter already holds. Every extra class is a place for bugs to hide and a thing the next engineer must learn. The question is whether the two real services can use the existing cache adapter directly through a narrow interface.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: over-reduce and you re-add a class mid-build; under-reduce and you maintain three caches and 12 files for a change whose goal is not yet written down.\\nRecommendation: A because the AuthCache facade adds no rule or serialization (PLAN.md:11-13) and TokenStore has no stated responsibility.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: a possible re-add later versus three overlapping abstractions now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce scope or proceed as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-challenge>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D6 \\u2014 TODOS: Add IDP call timeout protection to TODOS.md? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-todo-idp-timeout>\": string; }' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Scope challenge: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we reduce scope or proceed as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-challenge>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend r...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend reducing scope, or accept the plan as-is and review it at full size? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-check>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D6 \\u2014 TODO: Should we capture a cross-tenant E2E integration test (real ID...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Scope check: 12 files + 4 new classes exceeds the complexity threshold. Should we recommend reducing scope, or accept the plan as-is and review it at full size? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-scope-check>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-hours>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 This plan introduces 4 new classes across 12 files. Recommend scope reduction before reviewing, or accept the complexity and review as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-scope-challe...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-hours>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
+    "test/eng-first-review.test.ts\tTS2532\tObject is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 16 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture repo on `main`, about to engineering-review PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Those rules tell Claude which skil...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Run /office-hours first, or go straight to the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: `main` in the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\".\\nELI10: No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes (human: ~1 hr / CC: ~10 min). The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Without it, the review judges the plan on what's written, which here is thin on the \\\"why\\\" (why two services, why a shared cache, why rewrite legacyAuthFlow).\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skipping risks reviewing the wrong premise (e.g. optimizing a shared-cache design that shouldn't exist); running it costs ~10 minutes before any findings land.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already names concrete, reviewable engineering defects (shared mutable cache, swallowed errors, no regression test, sequential IDP calls) and the request asks for a thorough review of this plan as written; the premise questions can be raised inside the review.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper premise input later vs. actionable engineering findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 17 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture repo on `main`, about to engineering-review PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Those rules tell Claude which skil...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Run /office-hours first, or go straight to the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: `main` in the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\".\\nELI10: No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes (human: ~1 hr / CC: ~10 min). The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Without it, the review judges the plan on what's written, which here is thin on the \\\"why\\\" (why two services, why a shared cache, why rewrite legacyAuthFlow).\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skipping risks reviewing the wrong premise (e.g. optimizing a shared-cache design that shouldn't exist); running it costs ~10 minutes before any findings land.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already names concrete, reviewable engineering defects (shared mutable cache, swallowed errors, no regression test, sequential IDP calls) and the request asks for a thorough review of this plan as written; the premise questions can be raised inside the review.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper premise input later vs. actionable engineering findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations s...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations skip the network entirely?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; Performance review, R5 approved (parallel calls with idpCall wrapper).\\nELI10: Parallelizing (R5) turns 5 round trips i...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D14 — TODO: capture the deferred RequestPolicy in TODOS.md?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; TODOS.md updates.\\nELI10: RequestPolicy was deferred in D5 for the same reason as TokenStore: no stated contract, and a name that overlaps the adapter's existing policy-version cache key. The proposed TODO: **What:** Define what RequestPolicy enforces and how it relates to the cache's policy version. **Why:** two notions of \\\"policy\\\" that can drift is a correctness bug (a policy bump invalidates cache entries but the enforcer keeps the old rule, or vice versa). **Pros:** forces the policy-version relationship to be written before any second policy class exists. **Cons:** may resolve to \\\"policy version already covers it\\\". **Context:** the adapter keys entries by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version (PLAN.md:7-8); R3 added a `PolicyMismatch` AuthError variant for cache-key-vs-current mismatch. Start from that variant: if RequestPolicy would only re-derive it, cut it. **Depends on:** R3 landing (PolicyMismatch variant). **Effort:** S. **Priority:** P3.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skip and the policy-drift question is never asked; build now and you ship a second policy concept without defining its relationship to the first.\\nRecommendation: A because the policy-version relationship is exactly the kind of reasoning that gets lost without a written TODO.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a backlog entry that carries the drift risk explicitly vs dropping it vs reversing D5.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations s...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations skip the network entirely?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; Performance review, R5 approved (parallel calls with idpCall wrapper).\\nELI10: Parallelizing (R5) turns 5 round trips i...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D14 — TODO: capture the deferred RequestPolicy in TODOS.md?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; TODOS.md updates.\\nELI10: RequestPolicy was deferred in D5 for the same reason as TokenStore: no stated contract, and a name that overlaps the adapter's existing policy-version cache key. The proposed TODO: **What:** Define what RequestPolicy enforces and how it relates to the cache's policy version. **Why:** two notions of \\\"policy\\\" that can drift is a correctness bug (a policy bump invalidates cache entries but the enforcer keeps the old rule, or vice versa). **Pros:** forces the policy-version relationship to be written before any second policy class exists. **Cons:** may resolve to \\\"policy version already covers it\\\". **Context:** the adapter keys entries by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version (PLAN.md:7-8); R3 added a `PolicyMismatch` AuthError variant for cache-key-vs-current mismatch. Start from that variant: if RequestPolicy would only re-derive it, cut it. **Depends on:** R3 landing (PolicyMismatch variant). **Effort:** S. **Priority:** P3.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skip and the policy-drift question is never asked; build now and you ship a second policy concept without defining its relationship to the first.\\nRecommendation: A because the policy-version relationship is exactly the kind of reasoning that gets lost without a written TODO.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a backlog entry that carries the drift risk explicitly vs dropping it vs reversing D5.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[] | ({ ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[] | undefined'. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack setup prompt before the engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /in...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Run /office-hours first, or go straight into the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\". No design doc found for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is a short write-up of the problem being solved, the constraints, and the alternatives that were considered and rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes (human: ~10 min / CC: ~3 min). Right now the plan tells me WHAT will be built (four new classes, a shared cache, a rewritten legacy flow) but not WHY, so some of my review will have to guess at intent. The design doc is per-feature: it captures the thinking behind this specific auth change, not the whole product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skip it and the review may argue with premises you already settled; run it and you spend 10 minutes before seeing any findings.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already carries five concrete, reviewable engineering claims and the CLAUDE.md request is for a thorough review of this plan as written; a design doc would sharpen intent but is not blocking.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper problem framing up front versus getting to the architecture findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-re...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — No design doc found: run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\"; no design doc exists in the repo or ~/.gstack for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is the \\\"why\\\" behind a plan: the problem statement, the assumptions we challenged, the alternatives we rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes and gives this review sharper input. Without it, I review the plan on its own terms, which is fine but means I can't check the plan against a stated problem. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means some \\\"is this the right thing to build\\\" questions get answered by inference instead of your stated intent; running it costs ~10 minutes before any review starts.\\nRecommendation: B because this plan is a refactor with fixed contracts already written down (PLAN.md:6-16), and the user asked for a thorough review now; the review sections below already challenge premise and scope.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: 10 minutes of upfront problem framing vs. going straight into the review with the plan as written.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 16 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 16 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-review fixture repo on `main`, about to engineering-review PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Those rules tell Claude which skil...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Run /office-hours first, or go straight to the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: `main` in the plan-review fixture; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\".\\nELI10: No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes (human: ~1 hr / CC: ~10 min). The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Without it, the review judges the plan on what's written, which here is thin on the \\\"why\\\" (why two services, why a shared cache, why rewrite legacyAuthFlow).\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skipping risks reviewing the wrong premise (e.g. optimizing a shared-cache design that shouldn't exist); running it costs ~10 minutes before any findings land.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already names concrete, reviewable engineering defects (shared mutable cache, swallowed errors, no regression test, sequential IDP calls) and the request asks for a thorough review of this plan as written; the premise questions can be raised inside the review.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper premise input later vs. actionable engineering findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'readonly NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations s...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D12 \\u2014 R6: Cache per-issuer IDP metadata (discovery doc, JWKS, tenant config) so most validations skip the network entirely?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; Performance review, R5 approved (parallel calls with idpCall wrapper).\\nELI10: Parallelizing (R5) turns 5 round trips i...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D14 — TODO: capture the deferred RequestPolicy in TODOS.md?\\nProject/branch/task: `main`, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor; TODOS.md updates.\\nELI10: RequestPolicy was deferred in D5 for the same reason as TokenStore: no stated contract, and a name that overlaps the adapter's existing policy-version cache key. The proposed TODO: **What:** Define what RequestPolicy enforces and how it relates to the cache's policy version. **Why:** two notions of \\\"policy\\\" that can drift is a correctness bug (a policy bump invalidates cache entries but the enforcer keeps the old rule, or vice versa). **Pros:** forces the policy-version relationship to be written before any second policy class exists. **Cons:** may resolve to \\\"policy version already covers it\\\". **Context:** the adapter keys entries by tenant/issuer/audience/policy version (PLAN.md:7-8); R3 added a `PolicyMismatch` AuthError variant for cache-key-vs-current mismatch. Start from that variant: if RequestPolicy would only re-derive it, cut it. **Depends on:** R3 landing (PolicyMismatch variant). **Effort:** S. **Priority:** P3.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skip and the policy-drift question is never asked; build now and you ship a second policy concept without defining its relationship to the first.\\nRecommendation: A because the policy-version relationship is exactly the kind of reasoning that gets lost without a written TODO.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a backlog entry that carries the drift risk explicitly vs dropping it vs reversing D5.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-re...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — No design doc found: run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\"; no design doc exists in the repo or ~/.gstack for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is the \\\"why\\\" behind a plan: the problem statement, the assumptions we challenged, the alternatives we rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes and gives this review sharper input. Without it, I review the plan on its own terms, which is fine but means I can't check the plan against a stated problem. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping means some \\\"is this the right thing to build\\\" questions get answered by inference instead of your stated intent; running it costs ~10 minutes before any review starts.\\nRecommendation: B because this plan is a refactor with fixed contracts already written down (PLAN.md:6-16), and the user asked for a thorough review now; the review sections below already challenge premise and scope.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: 10 minutes of upfront problem framing vs. going straight into the review with the plan as written.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 25 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack setup prompt before the engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /in...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Run /office-hours first, or go straight into the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\". No design doc found for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is a short write-up of the problem being solved, the constraints, and the alternatives that were considered and rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes (human: ~10 min / CC: ~3 min). Right now the plan tells me WHAT will be built (four new classes, a shared cache, a rewritten legacy flow) but not WHY, so some of my review will have to guess at intent. The design doc is per-feature: it captures the thinking behind this specific auth change, not the whole product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skip it and the review may argue with premises you already settled; run it and you spend 10 minutes before seeing any findings.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already carries five concrete, reviewable engineering claims and the CLAUDE.md request is for a thorough review of this plan as written; a design doc would sharpen intent but is not blocking.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper problem framing up front versus getting to the architecture findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it int...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to fire 5 identity-provider calls at once instead of one after another. That's a real behavior change: errors arrive in a different order, the IDP sees 5x burst traffic per login, and the nested try/catch that swallows errors today will interact with Promise.all's first-rejection-wins semantics. Mixing this into a 12-file structural refactor means if a login breaks after deploy, you can't tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a login outage with two suspects and one revert; deferred too long = users keep waiting for 5 serial round trips.\\nRecommendation: B because separating structural from behavioral change (Beck) keeps the refactor bisectable, and the follow-up is a small diff once tests exist.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Include parallelization in this refactor\\n  ✅ Users get the latency win in the same release, no second PR to shepherd\\n  ✅ Touches validateAndDispatch() once instead of twice\\n  ❌ Behavior change hides inside a \\\"no behavior change\\\" diff; a post-deploy regression has two suspects\\n  ❌ Promise.all rejection semantics collide with the three error-swallowing catch blocks before those are cleaned up\\nB) Defer to an immediate follow-up PR after the refactor lands (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays pure structure: bisectable, revertable, reviewable against \\\"same behavior\\\" tests\\n  ✅ Follow-up lands on flattened error handling with regression tests already in place (human: ~1 day / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ❌ Latency win ships one PR later; someone has to actually open the follow-up\\nC) Cut it entirely from this work\\n  ✅ Zero risk to the refactor\\n  ❌ Leaves a known 5x latency cost on every token validation with no owner\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can actually bisect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 25 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack setup prompt before the engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\\\"bugs \\u2192 /in...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Run /office-hours first, or go straight into the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\". No design doc found for this branch.\\nELI10: A design doc is a short write-up of the problem being solved, the constraints, and the alternatives that were considered and rejected. /office-hours produces one in about 10 minutes (human: ~10 min / CC: ~3 min). Right now the plan tells me WHAT will be built (four new classes, a shared cache, a rewritten legacy flow) but not WHY, so some of my review will have to guess at intent. The design doc is per-feature: it captures the thinking behind this specific auth change, not the whole product.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skip it and the review may argue with premises you already settled; run it and you spend 10 minutes before seeing any findings.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan already carries five concrete, reviewable engineering claims and the CLAUDE.md request is for a thorough review of this plan as written; a design doc would sharpen intent but is not blocking.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper problem framing up front versus getting to the architecture findings now.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main — reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles in making 5 identity-provider calls run at once instead of one after another. That is a real behavior change: timing changes, and if one call fails the others are abandoned mid-flight, which changes which error the user sees. Mixing a rewrite with a speed-up means if something breaks after deploy, you cannot tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a login regression after ship that nobody can bisect, because the structural move and the timing change landed in the same diff.\\nRecommendation: A because Beck's rule (separate structural and behavioral changes) makes the rollback and the bisect trivial, and the perf PR is a 10-line follow-up once the refactor is green.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer Promise.all to a follow-up PR (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays provably behavior-preserving; the legacy characterization test passes unchanged\\n  ✅ Perf change gets its own review of error semantics (first-rejection, partial failure, IDP rate limits)\\n  ❌ Users wait one more release for the ~5x faster token validation (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min follow-up)\\nB) Keep Promise.all in this PR\\n  ✅ One PR, one deploy, faster validation lands immediately\\n  ✅ Avoids touching the validation path twice in two weeks\\n  ❌ Rewrite and timing change share a blast radius; a 3am incident has two suspects\\n  ❌ Error-path behavior changes silently unless the plan also specifies allSettled vs all semantics\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a clean bisect on the highest-blast-radius path in the product.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/bran...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks to the identity provider: five calls fired at once instead of one after another. That is a behavior change (different timing, five times the burst load on the IDP, different error ordering). Mixing it into a structure-only refactor means if something breaks in production you cannot tell which change caused it, and you cannot roll back one without the other.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a latency regression or IDP rate-limit outage gets blamed on the refactor and the whole thing gets reverted; split = one extra small PR.\\nRecommendation: A because structural and behavioral changes should land separately (Beck), and the Performance review will show caching issuer metadata is the real fix, so the parallelization design may change anyway.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer parallelization to a follow-up PR (recommended) (human: ~0 now / CC: ~0 now)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays a pure structural change; a bisect points at exactly one cause if auth breaks\\n  ✅ Lets the Performance review pick the right fix (cache discovery/JWKS) instead of committing to Promise.all now\\n  ❌ Users keep the 5x sequential latency for one more release cycle\\nB) Keep parallelization in this PR as a separate commit\\n  ✅ Latency win ships now, in the same review cycle (human: ~1 day incl. load test / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Separate commit still gives some bisectability within the branch\\n  ❌ Refactor branch now carries a runtime-behavior change and needs IDP load/rate-limit verification before merge\\n  ❌ If the calls are not actually independent (discovery → JWKS → verify usually chain), the \\\"trivial\\\" Promise.all is wrong and the refactor PR stalls on it\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can trust and revert in isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without ch...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without changing what users experience, but it introduces five new classes across twelve files. Two of those classes look like they do not earn a class: RequestPolicy is described by the plan itself as stateless with no side effects (that is a function), and TokenStore is never described while AuthCache already wraps the one backing cache. Every extra class is another seam a tired engineer has to trace at 3am when a tenant cannot log in.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many classes and the refactor ships with duplicated cache-like surfaces (TokenStore vs AuthCache) and a class-shaped wrapper around one pure decision; too few and a genuinely distinct responsibility (if TokenStore has one) gets crammed into AuthCache and re-split later.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan's own description of RequestPolicy (PLAN.md:12-13) is the definition of a pure function, and TokenStore has no stated responsibility distinct from AuthCache (PLAN.md:20-21, 45).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nThis chooses structure only. Contracts stay fixed (PLAN.md:16-22); the shared mutable AuthCache, the nested try/catch, the regression coverage and the Promise.all change are separate remedies asked later, not decided here.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) 3 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function; TokenStore folded into AuthCache (recommended)\\n  ✅ One cache-facing surface instead of two, so invalidation on logout/revocation/suspension has one place to be right\\n  ✅ Access decision is a pure `decideAccess(claims, ctx)` function: trivially unit-testable, no lifecycle, no mocks\\n  ❌ If TokenStore turns out to own something the adapter does not (e.g. refresh-token persistence), you rediscover it mid-implementation and re-split\\nB) 4 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function\\n  ✅ Keeps TokenStore's seam available in case it holds a responsibility the plan did not write down\\n  ✅ Still removes the class wrapper around a stateless decision, the clearest over-abstraction in the plan\\n  ❌ Two token-holding abstractions remain in one refactor with no written contract distinguishing them; DRY risk is real\\nC) Original arrangement: all 5 classes as written (AuthBroker, TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy)\\n  ✅ Matches the author's mental model exactly; no re-planning cost before implementation starts\\n  ✅ RequestPolicy as a class leaves room to grow if policy is expected to gain state or dependencies later\\n  ❌ Five new seams for a refactor whose stated goal is no behavior change; two of them are unjustified by the plan text\\nNet: trading a small chance of re-splitting TokenStore against carrying two undescribed or unnecessary abstractions into a security-sensitive codepath.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.":Line truncated
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it int...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to fire 5 identity-provider calls at once instead of one after another. That's a real behavior change: errors arrive in a different order, the IDP sees 5x burst traffic per login, and the nested try/catch that swallows errors today will interact with Promise.all's first-rejection-wins semantics. Mixing this into a 12-file structural refactor means if a login breaks after deploy, you can't tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a login outage with two suspects and one revert; deferred too long = users keep waiting for 5 serial round trips.\\nRecommendation: B because separating structural from behavioral change (Beck) keeps the refactor bisectable, and the follow-up is a small diff once tests exist.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Include parallelization in this refactor\\n  ✅ Users get the latency win in the same release, no second PR to shepherd\\n  ✅ Touches validateAndDispatch() once instead of twice\\n  ❌ Behavior change hides inside a \\\"no behavior change\\\" diff; a post-deploy regression has two suspects\\n  ❌ Promise.all rejection semantics collide with the three error-swallowing catch blocks before those are cleaned up\\nB) Defer to an immediate follow-up PR after the refactor lands (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays pure structure: bisectable, revertable, reviewable against \\\"same behavior\\\" tests\\n  ✅ Follow-up lands on flattened error handling with regression tests already in place (human: ~1 day / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ❌ Latency win ships one PR later; someone has to actually open the follow-up\\nC) Cut it entirely from this work\\n  ✅ Zero risk to the refactor\\n  ❌ Leaves a known 5x latency cost on every token validation with no owner\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can actually bisect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main — reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles in making 5 identity-provider calls run at once instead of one after another. That is a real behavior change: timing changes, and if one call fails the others are abandoned mid-flight, which changes which error the user sees. Mixing a rewrite with a speed-up means if something breaks after deploy, you cannot tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a login regression after ship that nobody can bisect, because the structural move and the timing change landed in the same diff.\\nRecommendation: A because Beck's rule (separate structural and behavioral changes) makes the rollback and the bisect trivial, and the perf PR is a 10-line follow-up once the refactor is green.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer Promise.all to a follow-up PR (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays provably behavior-preserving; the legacy characterization test passes unchanged\\n  ✅ Perf change gets its own review of error semantics (first-rejection, partial failure, IDP rate limits)\\n  ❌ Users wait one more release for the ~5x faster token validation (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min follow-up)\\nB) Keep Promise.all in this PR\\n  ✅ One PR, one deploy, faster validation lands immediately\\n  ✅ Avoids touching the validation path twice in two weeks\\n  ❌ Rewrite and timing change share a blast radius; a 3am incident has two suspects\\n  ❌ Error-path behavior changes silently unless the plan also specifies allSettled vs all semantics\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a clean bisect on the highest-blast-radius path in the product.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/bran...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all IDP parallelization inside this refactor, or split it out?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge deferral gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"reorganize without changing product behavior\\\", then also changes how token validation talks to the identity provider: five calls fired at once instead of one after another. That is a behavior change (different timing, five times the burst load on the IDP, different error ordering). Mixing it into a structure-only refactor means if something breaks in production you cannot tell which change caused it, and you cannot roll back one without the other.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a latency regression or IDP rate-limit outage gets blamed on the refactor and the whole thing gets reverted; split = one extra small PR.\\nRecommendation: A because structural and behavioral changes should land separately (Beck), and the Performance review will show caching issuer metadata is the real fix, so the parallelization design may change anyway.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer parallelization to a follow-up PR (recommended) (human: ~0 now / CC: ~0 now)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays a pure structural change; a bisect points at exactly one cause if auth breaks\\n  ✅ Lets the Performance review pick the right fix (cache discovery/JWKS) instead of committing to Promise.all now\\n  ❌ Users keep the 5x sequential latency for one more release cycle\\nB) Keep parallelization in this PR as a separate commit\\n  ✅ Latency win ships now, in the same review cycle (human: ~1 day incl. load test / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Separate commit still gives some bisectability within the branch\\n  ❌ Refactor branch now carries a runtime-behavior change and needs IDP load/rate-limit verification before merge\\n  ❌ If the calls are not actually independent (discovery → JWKS → verify usually chain), the \\\"trivial\\\" Promise.all is wrong and the refactor PR stalls on it\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can trust and revert in isolation.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without ch...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Complexity gate: 5 new classes for a behavior-preserving refactor, or fewer?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration with no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan says its goal is to move existing auth code around without changing what users experience, but it introduces five new classes across twelve files. Two of those classes look like they do not earn a class: RequestPolicy is described by the plan itself as stateless with no side effects (that is a function), and TokenStore is never described while AuthCache already wraps the one backing cache. Every extra class is another seam a tired engineer has to trace at 3am when a tenant cannot log in.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: too many classes and the refactor ships with duplicated cache-like surfaces (TokenStore vs AuthCache) and a class-shaped wrapper around one pure decision; too few and a genuinely distinct responsibility (if TokenStore has one) gets crammed into AuthCache and re-split later.\\nRecommendation: A because the plan's own description of RequestPolicy (PLAN.md:12-13) is the definition of a pure function, and TokenStore has no stated responsibility distinct from AuthCache (PLAN.md:20-21, 45).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nThis chooses structure only. Contracts stay fixed (PLAN.md:16-22); the shared mutable AuthCache, the nested try/catch, the regression coverage and the Promise.all change are separate remedies asked later, not decided here.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) 3 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function; TokenStore folded into AuthCache (recommended)\\n  ✅ One cache-facing surface instead of two, so invalidation on logout/revocation/suspension has one place to be right\\n  ✅ Access decision is a pure `decideAccess(claims, ctx)` function: trivially unit-testable, no lifecycle, no mocks\\n  ❌ If TokenStore turns out to own something the adapter does not (e.g. refresh-token persistence), you rediscover it mid-implementation and re-split\\nB) 4 units: AuthBroker, SessionMint, AuthCache, TokenStore; RequestPolicy becomes a pure function\\n  ✅ Keeps TokenStore's seam available in case it holds a responsibility the plan did not write down\\n  ✅ Still removes the class wrapper around a stateless decision, the clearest over-abstraction in the plan\\n  ❌ Two token-holding abstractions remain in one refactor with no written contract distinguishing them; DRY risk is real\\nC) Original arrangement: all 5 classes as written (AuthBroker, TokenStore, SessionMint, AuthCache, RequestPolicy)\\n  ✅ Matches the author's mental model exactly; no re-planning cost before implementation starts\\n  ✅ RequestPolicy as a class leaves room to grow if policy is expected to gain state or dependencies later\\n  ❌ Five new seams for a refactor whose stated goal is no behavior change; two of them are unjustified by the plan text\\nNet: trading a small chance of re-splitting TokenStore against carrying two undescribed or unnecessary abstractions into a security-sensitive codepath.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-published-navigation.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 mor...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main br...' is not comparable to type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review f...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack setup before the review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of skills (/investigate, /ship, /plan-eng-review...). A short routing section in CLAUDE.md tells Claud...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack setup before the review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of skills (/investigate, /ship, /plan-eng-review...). A short routing section in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which one to reach for when you say things like \\\"this is broken\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember the names. Without it, you invoke skills by hand.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: none of this is irreversible; skipping just means more manual skill invocation, adding means a ~15-line append to CLAUDE.md (deferred until we leave plan mode, since plan mode forbids edits and commits).\\nRecommendation: A because auto-routing is the whole point of installing gstack and the cost is one small committed section.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-regression-pinning-ag.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st o...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that saying \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" automatical...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-X1N3st on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that saying \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\" automatically invokes the right skill. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Plan mode is active, so the CLAUDE.md edit and commit would happen after this review exits plan mode.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, you invoke skills by name manually; with it, an unwanted auto-invoke could surprise you.\\nRecommendation: A because routing removes friction and is trivially reversible (delete the section).\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md minimal.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-resolution-block-position.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { ...; }[]; ... 4 more ...; answeredAt: string; }; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. Type '{ signature: string; promptSnippet: string; options: { index: number; label: string; }[]; observedAtMs: number; preReview: boolean; nativeCall: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; ... 4 m...' is not assignable to type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'. The types of 'nativeCall.answers' are incompatible between these types. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding step before the plan review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. These tell Claude which /skill to reach for when y...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Run /office-hours first, or go straight to the engineering review?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch; reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Add background job retry framework\\\".\\nELI10: No design doc exists for this change. /office-hours is a ~10 minute structured session that produces a problem statement, challenges the premise, and lists alternatives considered. It gives this review sharper input, because right now the plan says what it will build but not why retries are needed, what the failure modes are, or what \\\"at-most-once\\\" currently protects.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: skipping means I review the plan's mechanics without a stated problem; running it costs ~10 minutes before any review output.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan is short and its four sections already expose the key architecture and test risks; I can flag the missing problem statement inside the review instead.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: sharper problem framing now vs faster feedback on a plan whose issues are already visible.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-resolution-block-position.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"investigate this bug\\\" automatically routes to the right skill. This is a one-time question per project. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by name manually; with it, a CLAUDE.md commit lands in a fixture repo that may not want it.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap, reversible, and remove a recurring manual step.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-resolution-block-position.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 13 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-re...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to re...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the plan review starts.\\nELI10: gstack has many skills (/investigate, /ship, /qa...). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"this is broken\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. The stakes are low: it's a few lines of markdown, easy to remove.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by hand; with it, a wrong auto-invoke costs you one interruption.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes the skills discoverable at the moment they're useful, and it's trivially reversible.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNote: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after the review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs. keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-retry-contract-am.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D4 \\u2014 Scope: reduce to 2 new classes with injected cache, or proceed with 4 classes / 12 files?\\nPr...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D4 \\u2014 Scope: reduce to 2 new classes with injected cache, or proceed with 4 classes / 12 files?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FTw0nf on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes but only explains what two of them do. AuthCache wraps a cache adapter that already...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D5 — Issue 1: Who is allowed to write to the shared cache?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FTw0nf on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (scope reduced per D4).\\nELI10: Even with the adapter injected instead of global, AuthBroker and SessionMint both write to the same tenant-keyed cache and nothing orders those writes (PLAN.md:10 'they do not serialize mutations'; PLAN.md:20 'Both services mutate it'). Picture a user logging out: the adapter's logout hook deletes their token entry, and a SessionMint write that started a moment earlier lands right after and puts the token back. The user thinks they're logged out; the token still validates from cache. Nobody sees an error.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: A revoked or suspended tenant's token keeps working until natural expiry. That's a silent auth bypass, the worst kind of bug to find in production.\\nRecommendation: A because a single-writer rule is explicit over clever, needs no new locking primitive, and makes the race impossible rather than unlikely.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=8/10, C=3/10\\nNet: an ownership rule enforced by types vs. a version check on every write vs. hoping the window is small.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-retry-coverage-as.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the new-class count before we review the rest?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Reduce the new-class count before we review the rest?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, 4-5 new classes.\\nELI10: The plan invents a new cache wrapper (AuthCache) and a new token store on top of a cache adapter that already does tenant keying, expiry, ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Reduce the new-class count before we review the rest?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), 12 files, 4-5 new classes.\\nELI10: The plan invents a new cache wrapper (AuthCache) and a new token store on top of a cache adapter that already does tenant keying, expiry, and invalidation. Every extra class is another place a bug can hide in the code that decides who is logged in. Fewer moving parts means fewer places for a revoked token to slip through.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too many layers and the auth path becomes hard to reason about and test; too few and we cram policy logic into services that should stay thin.\\nRecommendation: 1A because the adapter already enforces every cache rule the plan lists, so AuthCache and TokenStore add indirection without behavior. Maps to your 'engineered enough' and right-sized-diff preferences.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\n1A) Reduce: keep AuthBroker + SessionMint, inject the existing adapter, RequestPolicy as a pure function/config, drop AuthCache and TokenStore as classes (human: ~1 day less / CC: ~10 min less) (recommended)\\n  ✅ Two new types instead of five; roughly 7-8 files touched instead of 12, smaller review surface\\n  ✅ No new global; each service is unit-testable with a fake adapter passed in\\n  ❌ If a real service-facing narrowing of the adapter API is needed later, you add the facade then\\n1B) Keep all four classes but replace the module-level global with constructor injection (human: ~2 days / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ Preserves the plan's intended layering if AuthCache is meant to narrow the adapter API\\n  ✅ Still removes the shared-mutable-global hazard, so tests stay isolated\\n  ❌ Facade and TokenStore still duplicate what the adapter already guarantees\\n1C) Proceed exactly as written (human: ~2 days / CC: ~20 min)\\n  ✅ No re-planning; the author's structure stands untouched\\n  ✅ Fastest path to starting implementation today\\n  ❌ Keeps a mutable global shared by two writers in the auth path, the riskiest shape available\\nNet: You are trading a thinner, more testable auth path against preserving layering the plan has not yet justified.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-retry-coverage-at.test.ts\tTS18048\t'c.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-retry-coverage-at.test.ts\tTS18048\t'copy.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-scope-y.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-hours>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 This plan introduces 4 new classes across 12 files. Recommend scope reduction before reviewing, or accept the complexity and review as-is? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-scope-challe...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Run /office-hours before the review, or proceed directly? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-review-office-hours>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/eng-scope-y.test.ts\tTS2532\tObject is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-seeded-completion-ai.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"investigate this bug\\\" automatically routes to the right skill. This is a one-time question per project. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by name manually; with it, a CLAUDE.md commit lands in a fixture repo that may not want it.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap, reversible, and remove a recurring manual step.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/eng-seeded-completion-ai.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'isUnknownSlashCommandVisible' does not exist on type 'typeof import(\"/workspace/gstack/test/helpers/claude-pty-runner\")'.": 1,
     "test/eng-seeded-completion-ai.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '0' is not assignable to parameter of type 'null'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2300\tDuplicate identifier 'isEngSeedDecisionAUQ'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 3,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'toolUseId' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"investigate this bug\\\" automatically routes to the right skill. This is a one-time question per project. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by name manually; with it, a CLAUDE.md commit lands in a fixture repo that may not want it.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap, reversible, and remove a recurring manual step.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Should the Promise.all IDP parallelization ship in this refactor PR, or as its own follow-up?...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Should the Promise.all IDP parallelization ship in this refactor PR, or as its own follow-up?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" (PLAN.md:8-9), then also proposes turning 5 sequ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Should the Promise.all IDP parallelization ship in this refactor PR, or as its own follow-up?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" (PLAN.md:8-9), then also proposes turning 5 sequential calls to the identity provider into 5 parallel ones (PLAN.md:39-41). Parallel calls change which error the user sees when one fails, stop waiting for the others on first failure, and hit the IDP 5x harder at once. That is real behavior, not reorganization. If something breaks after the merge, you will not know whether the refactor or the parallelization did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundle them and a regression in login is un-bisectable; cut it and users keep waiting ~5x longer on token validation than they need to.\\nRecommendation: A because the speedup is real and cheap, but it deserves its own PR with its own error-semantics tests so the refactor stays a pure structural change.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer to an immediate follow-up PR (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor PR stays honest to \\\"no behavior change\\\"; any login regression bisects cleanly to one PR\\n  ✅ Follow-up PR can carry its own tests for fail-fast ordering, partial-failure and IDP rate limits\\n  ❌ Users wait one more release cycle for the latency win (human: ~1 day / CC: ~10 min of extra PR overhead)\\nB) Include in this PR as planned\\n  ✅ One review, one merge, latency win lands with the refactor\\n  ✅ AuthBroker is written parallel-first instead of retrofitted later\\n  ❌ Refactor is no longer behavior-preserving; a 3am login incident has two suspects instead of one\\nC) Cut parallelization entirely\\n  ✅ Zero new risk surface in the auth path\\n  ✅ Nothing to test beyond the refactor itself\\n  ❌ Leaves a known, trivially fixable ~5x latency on every token validation on the table indefinitely\\nNet: you are trading one release cycle of latency for a refactor you can actually trust and bisect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\"?: undefined; ... 10 more ...; \"...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 How many moving parts should this refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 How many moving parts should this refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), a reorganization that promises no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes across twelve files to move code around without changing what users can do....' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — How many moving parts should this refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor plan (PLAN.md), a reorganization that promises no product behavior change.\\nELI10: The plan adds five new classes across twelve files to move code around without changing what users can do. Two of the five look like they do nothing on their own: AuthCache is described as a pass-through over the existing cache adapter (PLAN.md:20-22), and RequestPolicy is a stateless allow/deny function wearing a class (PLAN.md:9-13). A third, TokenStore, is named only in the scope list (PLAN.md:44-45) and has no description anywhere in the plan. Every extra layer is one more place a 3am bug can hide and one more file the next engineer has to read before touching auth.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too many layers and the 'refactor' ships more surface area than it removes, with a wrapper class nobody can explain in six months; too few and two services share cache plumbing with no seam for tests.\\nRecommendation: B because a behavior-preserving refactor should net out simpler than what it replaces, and the two services plus one pure function are the only parts the plan actually describes doing work.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Keep all 5 classes as planned (human: ~3 days / CC: ~45 min)\\n  ✅ Matches the author's mental model; every named concept gets its own file and test suite\\n  ✅ AuthCache gives one place to later add service-facing behavior if it ever grows\\n  ❌ Two of five classes add no logic today; TokenStore is undefined, so its scope is unbounded\\n  ❌ 12 files for a no-behavior-change refactor is the largest diff for the least user-visible gain\\nB) 3 units: AuthBroker + SessionMint classes, RequestPolicy as a pure function, no AuthCache facade, TokenStore dropped unless defined (recommended) (human: ~1.5 days / CC: ~25 min)\\n  ✅ Both services depend on the existing tested adapter directly; the facade's 'unchanged rules' promise becomes true by construction\\n  ✅ decideAccess(claims, ctx) as an exported function is trivially unit-testable and cannot accumulate hidden state\\n  ✅ Roughly 7-8 files instead of 12; the adapter, its hooks and its tests stay untouched as the plan already requires\\n  ❌ If TokenStore had a real job (e.g. refresh-token persistence), the author must write it down before it can come back\\n  ❌ Services touch the adapter interface directly, so an adapter signature change later touches two callers instead of one\\nC) 4 units: as B but keep AuthCache as a thin facade (human: ~2 days / CC: ~30 min)\\n  ✅ One narrow interface for both services; the adapter can change behind it without touching AuthBroker or SessionMint\\n  ✅ RequestPolicy still collapses to a function and TokenStore still needs a definition before it exists\\n  ❌ The facade is pass-through today, so its tests would only prove it forwards calls; premature abstraction until a second backing cache exists\\n  ❌ Adds a layer whose invalidation semantics must be re-documented even though the plan says they are unchanged\\nNet: You are trading a seam you might need later (AuthCache) against a smaller, more explLine truncated
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it int...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to fire 5 identity-provider calls at once instead of one after another. That's a real behavior change: errors arrive in a different order, the IDP sees 5x burst traffic per login, and the nested try/catch that swallows errors today will interact with Promise.all's first-rejection-wins semantics. Mixing this into a 12-file structural refactor means if a login breaks after deploy, you can't tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a login outage with two suspects and one revert; deferred too long = users keep waiting for 5 serial round trips.\\nRecommendation: B because separating structural from behavioral change (Beck) keeps the refactor bisectable, and the follow-up is a small diff once tests exist.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Include parallelization in this refactor\\n  ✅ Users get the latency win in the same release, no second PR to shepherd\\n  ✅ Touches validateAndDispatch() once instead of twice\\n  ❌ Behavior change hides inside a \\\"no behavior change\\\" diff; a post-deploy regression has two suspects\\n  ❌ Promise.all rejection semantics collide with the three error-swallowing catch blocks before those are cleaned up\\nB) Defer to an immediate follow-up PR after the refactor lands (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays pure structure: bisectable, revertable, reviewable against \\\"same behavior\\\" tests\\n  ✅ Follow-up lands on flattened error handling with regression tests already in place (human: ~1 day / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ❌ Latency win ships one PR later; someone has to actually open the follow-up\\nC) Cut it entirely from this work\\n  ✅ Zero risk to the refactor\\n  ❌ Leaves a known 5x latency cost on every token validation with no owner\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can actually bisect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 8 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Defer the Promise.all IDP parallelization out of this refactor?\\nProject/branch/task: main — reviewing PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\", a stated no-behavior-change reorg of tenant auth.\\nELI10: The plan promises to move code around without changing what users experience, but it also bundles in making 5 identity-provider calls run at once instead of one after another. That is a real behavior change: timing changes, and if one call fails the others are abandoned mid-flight, which changes which error the user sees. Mixing a rewrite with a speed-up means if something breaks after deploy, you cannot tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: a login regression after ship that nobody can bisect, because the structural move and the timing change landed in the same diff.\\nRecommendation: A because Beck's rule (separate structural and behavioral changes) makes the rollback and the bisect trivial, and the perf PR is a 10-line follow-up once the refactor is green.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Defer Promise.all to a follow-up PR (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays provably behavior-preserving; the legacy characterization test passes unchanged\\n  ✅ Perf change gets its own review of error semantics (first-rejection, partial failure, IDP rate limits)\\n  ❌ Users wait one more release for the ~5x faster token validation (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min follow-up)\\nB) Keep Promise.all in this PR\\n  ✅ One PR, one deploy, faster validation lands immediately\\n  ✅ Avoids touching the validation path twice in two weeks\\n  ❌ Rewrite and timing change share a blast radius; a 3am incident has two suspects\\n  ❌ Error-path behavior changes silently unless the plan also specifies allSettled vs all semantics\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a clean bisect on the highest-blast-radius path in the product.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D9 \\u2014 How does AuthBroker replace legacyAuthFlow() in production?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D9 \\u2014 How does AuthBroker replace legacyAuthFlow() in production?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (Architecture review, incremental change).\\nELI10: The plan rewrites the existing login flow in place (PLAN.md:36), so the day it deploys, every tenan...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D9 — How does AuthBroker replace legacyAuthFlow() in production?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (Architecture review, incremental change).\\nELI10: The plan rewrites the existing login flow in place (PLAN.md:36), so the day it deploys, every tenant is on the new code and the only way back is another deploy. The alternative is to keep the old flow alive for a short bake, put a switch in front of both, and move tenants over gradually. If something is wrong for one tenant, you flip the switch back in seconds instead of paging the on-call to redeploy.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: A multi-tenant auth outage with a redeploy-length rollback, or, on the other side, a flag and two code paths that someone forgets to delete.\\nRecommendation: A because auth is the highest blast-radius path in the product, a flag makes the wrong choice cheap to undo (reversibility), and the delete-legacy step is a named task with a date, not an afterthought.\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Flag-routed strangler: keep legacy, route by flag, delete after bake (recommended)\\n  ✅ Rollback is a flag flip; canary a single internal tenant before anyone else sees the new broker\\n  ✅ Parity can be checked live: same request through both paths in shadow mode during bake\\n  ❌ Two auth paths coexist for the bake window and the flag plus deletion task must be tracked (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min)\\nB) Parity tests green, then a single cutover commit (no flag)\\n  ✅ No flag plumbing; the parity suite is the gate\\n  ✅ Legacy deleted in the same cutover commit, no lingering duplication\\n  ❌ All tenants move at once; rollback is a redeploy\\nC) Rewrite legacyAuthFlow() in place, as planned\\n  ✅ Smallest diff and no temporary duplication\\n  ✅ Nothing to clean up afterwards\\n  ❌ No regression baseline to compare against once the old code is gone; rollback is a redeploy\\nNet: a flag and a scheduled deletion vs. betting the whole tenant base on one deploy of the auth path.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D7 \\u2014 Who is allowed to write to the cache adapter?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, /plan-eng-re...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D7 \\u2014 Who is allowed to write to the cache adapter?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (Architecture review).\\nELI10: Two services both write into the same cache (PLAN.md:29), and the adapter's own rules say writes are not serialized (PLAN.md:19). Pic...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D7 — Who is allowed to write to the cache adapter?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch, /plan-eng-review of PLAN.md \\\"Multi-tenant Auth Refactor\\\" (Architecture review).\\nELI10: Two services both write into the same cache (PLAN.md:29), and the adapter's own rules say writes are not serialized (PLAN.md:19). Picture SessionMint waiting on the identity provider while, in that gap, the tenant gets suspended and the invalidation hook wipes their entries. The mint finishes and writes a fresh entry for a tenant who should now be locked out. Two writers make that race easy; one writer that re-checks tenant status right before storing makes it hard.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: A suspended or logged-out tenant keeps a live cached session until expiry, which is exactly the class of bug the invalidation hooks exist to prevent.\\nRecommendation: A because a single writer is the simplest explicit structure, needs no change to the adapter or its tests, and puts the one write site next to the one policy check in AuthBroker.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=8/10, D=3/10; C is an investigation step, unscored\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Single writer: only AuthBroker writes (recommended)\\n  ✅ One write site to audit; SessionMint becomes side-effect free and trivially testable\\n  ✅ Adapter and its existing tests stay unchanged; broker re-checks tenant status before the write\\n  ❌ SessionMint must return the minted session instead of storing it, a small API change (human: ~3h / CC: ~10 min)\\nB) Both write, through one guarded adapter write path\\n  ✅ Closes the race for every present and future writer at the adapter boundary\\n  ✅ Services keep their proposed write calls\\n  ❌ Changes the adapter contract the plan promised to leave unchanged (PLAN.md:21-22); its tests must grow (human: ~1 day / CC: ~20 min)\\nC) Investigate before choosing\\n  ✅ A bounded read of the adapter's hooks and mint write sites confirms or dismisses the race\\n  ✅ No structural commitment on an inferred risk\\n  ❌ Leaves a P1 open into implementation; the probe still ends in this same choice\\nD) Both services write directly, as planned\\n  ✅ No API change to SessionMint or the adapter\\n  ✅ Matches the plan as written\\n  ❌ Leaves the mint-after-invalidate race open with no mitigation\\nNet: one write site with a tenant re-check vs. two writers racing the invalidation hooks.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"investigate this bug\\\" automatically routes to the right skill. This is a one-time question per project. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by name manually; with it, a CLAUDE.md commit lands in a fixture repo that may not want it.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap, reversible, and remove a recurring manual step.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 3,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it int...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Keep the Promise.all parallelization of the 5 IDP calls inside this refactor, or split it into its own follow-up change?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor, PLAN.md \\\"Performance\\\" section (lines 39-41).\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" but also wants to fire 5 identity-provider calls at once instead of one after another. That's a real behavior change: errors arrive in a different order, the IDP sees 5x burst traffic per login, and the nested try/catch that swallows errors today will interact with Promise.all's first-rejection-wins semantics. Mixing this into a 12-file structural refactor means if a login breaks after deploy, you can't tell which change did it.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: bundled = a login outage with two suspects and one revert; deferred too long = users keep waiting for 5 serial round trips.\\nRecommendation: B because separating structural from behavioral change (Beck) keeps the refactor bisectable, and the follow-up is a small diff once tests exist.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Include parallelization in this refactor\\n  ✅ Users get the latency win in the same release, no second PR to shepherd\\n  ✅ Touches validateAndDispatch() once instead of twice\\n  ❌ Behavior change hides inside a \\\"no behavior change\\\" diff; a post-deploy regression has two suspects\\n  ❌ Promise.all rejection semantics collide with the three error-swallowing catch blocks before those are cleaned up\\nB) Defer to an immediate follow-up PR after the refactor lands (recommended)\\n  ✅ Refactor stays pure structure: bisectable, revertable, reviewable against \\\"same behavior\\\" tests\\n  ✅ Follow-up lands on flattened error handling with regression tests already in place (human: ~1 day / CC: ~10 min)\\n  ❌ Latency win ships one PR later; someone has to actually open the follow-up\\nC) Cut it entirely from this work\\n  ✅ Zero risk to the refactor\\n  ❌ Leaves a known 5x latency cost on every token validation with no owner\\nNet: trading one release of latency for a refactor you can actually bisect.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo; one-time gstack onboarding prompt before the PLAN.md engineering review.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that asking for \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"investigate this bug\\\" automatically routes to the right skill. This is a one-time question per project. Plan mode is active, so if you say yes the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing you invoke skills by name manually; with it, a CLAUDE.md commit lands in a fixture repo that may not want it.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap, reversible, and remove a recurring manual step.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture's CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D8 \\u2014 Class arrangement: keep the AuthCache facade, or have services use the existing adapter directly?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wB30y0 on `main`, Scope Challenge structure gate for PLAN.md (TokenStore cut per D6, RequestPolicy kept per D7).\\nELI10: After D6/D7 the plan has four new classes: AuthBroker, SessionMint, RequestPolicy and AuthCache. The plan describes AuthCache (PLAN.md:10-13) as a facade over the existing adapter that keeps every rule unchanged and adds no serialization: a pass-through. This question is structure only: same features either way. Whether the shared cache stays a module-level mutable export or becomes an injected dependency is Section 1's decision and stays pending in both options.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Keep a pass-through facade and you maintain a class that forwards calls forever; drop it and, if the adapter's API is wide or awkward for services, both services grow their own adapter-wrangling code.\\nRecommendation: B because the plan itself says the facade changes nothing; three classes over an already-tested adapter is enough engineering. If the adapter's API is genuinely hostile for services, say so and A becomes right.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: fewer moving parts now vs a seam you might want later (and can add later when a real need shows up).\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D8 \\u2014 Class arrangement: keep the AuthCache facade, or have services use the existing adapter directly?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wB30y0 on `main`, Scope Challenge structure gate for PLAN.md (TokenStore cut per D6, RequestPolicy kept per D7).\\nELI10: After D6/D7 the plan has four new classes: Au...'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'index' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'q' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/eng-seeded-coverage.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D8 \\u2014 Class arrangement: keep the AuthCache facade, or have services use the existing adapter directly?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wB30y0 on `main`, Scope Challenge structure gate for PLAN.md (TokenStore cut per D6, RequestPolicy kept per D7).\\nELI10: After D6/D7 the plan has four new classes: Au...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D8 \\u2014 Class arrangement: keep the AuthCache facade, or have services use the existing adapter directly?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-wB30y0 on `main`, Scope Challenge structure gate for PLAN.md (TokenStore cut per D6, RequestPolicy kept per D7).\\nELI10: After D6/D7 the plan has four new classes: Au...'.": 1,
     "test/eng-semantic-terminal.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 10 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Should the Promise.all IDP parallelization ship in this refactor PR, or as its own follow-up?...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Should the Promise.all IDP parallelization ship in this refactor PR, or as its own follow-up?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge complexity gate.\\nELI10: The plan promises \\\"no product behavior change\\\" (PLAN.md:8-9), then also proposes turning 5 sequ...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Should legacyAuthFlow() be deleted in this PR, or kept alive behind a flag until the new path proves parity?\\nProject/branch/task: main — Multi-tenant Auth Refactor (PLAN.md), Scope Challenge complexity gate (D1 answered: parallelization deferred).\\nELI10: The plan rewrites legacyAuthFlow() and removes the old code in the same change (PLAN.md:36-37). If the new AuthBroker path gets one tenant edge case wrong, the only way back is a revert of a 12-file PR. A strangler approach lands AuthBroker next to the old flow, routes traffic with a flag (per tenant or percentage), and deletes legacyAuthFlow() in a small follow-up once nobody has been paged. This question is about sequencing only. Whether and how the old behavior gets regression tests is a separate mandatory question in the Tests section; it stays pending here regardless of your answer.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: big-bang and a bad tenant edge case means a full revert under incident pressure; strangler and you carry two auth paths for a short window and must remember to delete the old one.\\nRecommendation: A because auth is the wrong place to make a wrong choice expensive to undo, and the flag costs minutes.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Strangler: flag-routed, legacy deleted in follow-up (recommended)\\n  ✅ One-line rollback (flip the flag) instead of a 12-file revert during an incident\\n  ✅ Can canary one internal tenant first and compare allow/deny decisions side by side\\n  ❌ Two live auth paths for a sprint or so; someone must own the deletion follow-up (human: ~2h / CC: ~10 min)\\nB) Rewrite and delete legacyAuthFlow() in this PR as planned\\n  ✅ No dual-path window, no flag to clean up, smaller total diff\\n  ✅ Forces the team to fully understand the legacy behavior now rather than later\\n  ❌ Rollback is a full revert; any missed tenant-specific quirk hits production with no soft landing\\nNet: a flag and a follow-up deletion buy you a cheap undo on the one code path where undo matters most.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-snapshot-adapter-aj.test.ts\tTS18048\t'c.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-snapshot-adapter-aj.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope: reduce 4 new classes / 12 files to the minimal versio...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope: reduce 4 new classes / 12 files to the minimal version, or proceed as-is?\\nProj...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Step 0 scope: reduce 4 new classes / 12 files to the minimal version, or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-NOHUUz on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes, but the cache adapter you already have does the storage and invalidation job (PLAN.m...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D3 — Step 0 scope: reduce 4 new classes / 12 files to the minimal version, or proceed as-is?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-NOHUUz on main, PLAN.md Multi-tenant Auth Refactor.\\nELI10: The plan adds four new classes, but the cache adapter you already have does the storage and invalidation job (PLAN.md:7-13). TokenStore has no stated job the adapter does not already do. AuthCache is a thin wrapper over that same adapter and is shared as a global that two services write to (PLAN.md:19-20). RequestPolicy has no named caller. Fewer moving parts means fewer places a tenant-isolation bug can hide.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: overbuilt means three cache-shaped layers to keep consistent and a global-state bug class in auth code; underbuilt means we later discover a real reason for TokenStore or RequestPolicy and bolt it on.\\nRecommendation: A because the two services that carry the goal (AuthBroker, SessionMint) can take the existing adapter by constructor injection, which also kills the shared-global smell in one move. Explicit over clever, smallest diff that expresses the change.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: 2 injected classes vs 3 vs 4; every option ships multi-tenant auth, they differ in how many layers sit between a service and the cache.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-task-pause-navigation-f359.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-task-pause-navigation-f359.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/eng-task-pause-navigation-f359.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/eng-test-plan-edit-approval.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'isError' does not exist on type '{ kind: string; sessionId: any; toolUseId: any; name: any; input: any; timestamp: string; messageId: string; requestId: string; } | { kind: string; sessionId: any; toolUseId: any; timestamp: string; isError: any; content: any; }'. Property 'isError' does not exist on type '{ kind: string; sessionId: any; toolUseId: any; name: any; input: any; timestamp: string; messageId: string; requestId: string; }'.": 1,
     "test/fixtures/devex-peer-comparison-classification.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'toolUseId' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
     "test/fixtures/devex-peer-comparison-classification.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'toolUseId' does not exist in type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 1,
@@ -470,7 +197,6 @@
     "test/gbrain-read-capability.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'repo' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 4,
     "test/gbrain-sources.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ autopilotProbe: { readonly lockPaths: readonly []; readonly processRunning: () => boolean; }; removeDecision: { readonly keepStorage: false; }; env: NodeJS.ProcessEnv; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'EnsureOptions'. The types of 'autopilotProbe.lockPaths' are incompatible between these types. The type 'readonly []' is 'readonly' and cannot be assigned to the mutable type 'string[]'.": 1,
     "test/gbrain-sources.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ autopilotProbe: { readonly lockPaths: readonly []; readonly processRunning: () => boolean; }; removeDecision: { readonly keepStorage: false; }; federated: true; env: NodeJS.ProcessEnv; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'EnsureOptions'. The types of 'autopilotProbe.lockPaths' are incompatible between these types. The type 'readonly []' is 'readonly' and cannot be assigned to the mutable type 'string[]'.": 2,
-    "test/gemini-e2e.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"e2e-gemini\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
     "test/gen-skill-docs-checks.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ relativePath: string; kind: string; host: string; }[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'GeneratedArtifact[]'. Type '{ relativePath: string; kind: string; host: string; }' is not assignable to type 'GeneratedArtifact'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"asset\" | \"digest\" | \"index\" | \"metadata\" | \"openclaw\" | \"section\" | \"skill\"'.": 1,
     "test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'text' does not exist on type 'Token'. Property 'text' does not exist on type 'Br'.": 2,
     "test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'l' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
@@ -483,29 +209,9 @@
     "test/health-eval-fixture.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ exitReason: string; duration: number; output: string; transcript: never[]; costEstimate: { estimatedCost: number; turnsUsed: number; estimatedTokens: number; }; model: string; }' to type 'SkillTestResult' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ exitReason: string; duration: number; output: string; transcript: never[]; costEstimate: { estimatedCost: number; turnsUsed: number; estimatedTokens: number; }; model: string; }' is missing the following properties from type 'SkillTestResult': toolCalls, browseErrors, firstResponseMs, maxInterTurnMs": 1,
     "test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts\tTS18046\t'input.questions' is of type 'unknown'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/auq-sdk-capture.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string | null' is not assignable to type 'string | undefined'. Type 'null' is not assignable to type 'string | undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/autoplan-artifact-permission.ts\tTS18048\t'mutation.input' is possibly 'undefined'.": 7,
-    "test/helpers/autoplan-phase-order.ts\tTS2344\tType '\"mark\" | \"resizeQuestionViewport\"' does not satisfy the constraint 'keyof ClaudePtySession'. Type '\"resizeQuestionViewport\"' is not assignable to type 'keyof ClaudePtySession'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/autoplan-phase-order.ts\tTS2349\tThis expression is not callable. Type '{}' has no call signatures.": 2,
     "test/helpers/ceo-hold-posture-review.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/ceo-hold-posture-review.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'toolUseId' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
     "test/helpers/ceo-mode-option.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"defer\" | \"include\" | \"pause\" | \"skip\" | null'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS18048\t'call.answers' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'Token[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'TokensList'. Property 'links' is missing in type 'Token[]' but required in type '{ links: Links; }'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter '_' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'c' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'cell' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 10,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'column' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'h' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 8,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'header' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 4,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'i' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 15,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'id' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'index' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 3,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'item' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 5,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'label' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'line' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'part' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 4,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 14,
-    "test/helpers/ceo-payment-findings.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'v' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/helpers/ceo-split-question-policy.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 3,
     "test/helpers/ceo-split-question-policy.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"cut\" | \"defer\" | \"hold\" | \"include\" | null'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ [x: string]: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\": string; \"D2 \\u2014 Should gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"D10 \\u2014 TODO: Add p99 latency metric for IDP calls before/after...'. Property '\"D10 — TODO: Add p99 latency metric for IDP calls before/after Promise.all parallelization. Add to TODOS.md? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-todo-idp-metrics>\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Should gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"D10 \\u2014 TODO: Add p99 latency metric for IDP calls before/a...'.": 3,
@@ -515,26 +221,19 @@
     "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; }[]; } | { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; }[]; } | { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { ...; }[]; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }'. Type '{ question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to type '{ question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]; }'. Types of property '\"options\"' are incompatible. Type '{ label: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ label: string; description: string; preview: string; }[]'. Type '{ label: string; }' is missing the following properties from type '{ label: string; description: string; preview: string; }': \"description\", \"preview\"": 1,
     "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 The plan's scope (12 files, 4 new classes) triggers the complexity smell check. Proceed as-is...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 The plan's scope (12 files, 4 new classes) triggers the complexity smell check. Proceed as-is or reduce scope first? <gstack-qid:plan-eng-complexity-check>\": string; ... 7 more ...; \"D9 \\u2014 TODOS: the plan has no mention of IDP circuit breaker or timeout per call. With 5 calls now running in parallel...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Architecture: shared global mutable AuthCache between AuthBroker and SessionMint, with no serialization, in a multi-tenant system. <gstack-qid:plan-eng-arch-shared-cache>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 2,
     "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\": string; ... 8 more ...; \"D10 \\u2014 ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\": string; ... 8 more ...; \"D10 \\u2014 ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\": string; \"D2 \\u2014 Should gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"?: undefined; ... 7 more ...; \"D10 \\u2014 TODO: Add p99 latency metric for IDP calls before/after...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 — Should gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine? <gstack-qid:cross-project-learnings>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 4,
+    "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2724\t'\"./claude-pty-runner\"' has no exported member named 'designStep0Boundary'. Did you mean 'engStep0Boundary'?": 1,
+    "test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.unit.test.ts\tTS2724\t'\"./claude-pty-runner\"' has no exported member named 'devexStep0Boundary'. Did you mean 'ceoStep0Boundary'?": 1,
     "test/helpers/coverage-audit-evidence.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type '1' can't be used to index type 'false | RegExpExecArray'. Property '1' does not exist on type 'false | RegExpExecArray'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/coverage-audit-evidence.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type '2' can't be used to index type 'false | RegExpExecArray'. Property '2' does not exist on type 'false | RegExpExecArray'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/design-count-review.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"DESIGN.md\"' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/devex-seed-coverage.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"docs/current-contracts.md\" | \"docs/package-contents.txt\"' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'. Type '\"docs/current-contracts.md\"' is not assignable to type 'never'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/devex-seed-coverage.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ [k: string]: never[]; }' to type 'Record<\"breaking-upgrade\" | \"local-ci-gate\" | \"missing-quickstart\" | \"opaque-auth-error\" | \"reversed-arguments\", string[]>' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ [k: string]: never[]; }' is missing the following properties from type 'Record<\"breaking-upgrade\" | \"local-ci-gate\" | \"missing-quickstart\" | \"opaque-auth-error\" | \"reversed-arguments\", string[]>': \"breaking-upgrade\", \"local-ci-gate\", \"missing-quickstart\", \"opaque-auth-error\", \"reversed-arguments\"": 1,
     "test/helpers/docsync-fault-eval.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/e2e-helpers.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/eng-completion-handoff.ts\tTS18047\t'maintenance' is possibly 'null'.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/eng-completion-handoff.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'.": 2,
-    "test/helpers/eng-count-question-policy.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'Generic | Heading' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ depth: number; text: string; }'. Type 'Generic' is missing the following properties from type '{ depth: number; text: string; }': depth, text": 1,
     "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'c' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'cell' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 5,
-    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'cells' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
+    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'cell' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'child' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 2,
-    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'header' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 5,
-    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'index' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 3,
+    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'header' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'item' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 8,
-    "test/helpers/gemini-session-runner.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type 'ReadableStream<any>' to type 'ReadableStream<Uint8Array<ArrayBufferLike>>' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'getReader' are incompatible. Type '{ (options: { mode: \"byob\"; }): ReadableStreamBYOBReader; (): ReadableStreamDefaultReader<any>; (options?: ReadableStreamGetReaderOptions | undefined): ReadableStreamReader<...>; }' is not comparable to type '{ (options: { mode: \"byob\"; }): ReadableStreamBYOBReader; (): ReadableStreamDefaultReader<Uint8Array<ArrayBufferLike>>; (options?: ReadableStreamGetReaderOptions | undefined): ReadableStreamReader<...>; }'. Target signature provides too few arguments. Expected 1 or more, but got 0.": 2,
+    "test/helpers/eng-seeded-coverage.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 5,
     "test/helpers/hermetic-env.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'ANTHROPIC_API_KEY' does not exist on type '{ NODE_ENV?: string | undefined; TZ?: string | undefined; GITHUB_TOKEN: string; GEMINI_API_KEY: string; }'.": 1,
     "test/helpers/hermetic-env.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 3,
     "test/helpers/hermetic-env.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ NODE_ENV?: string | undefined; TZ?: string | undefined; GITHUB_TOKEN: string; GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN: string; GITHUB_APP_PRIVATE_KEY: string; GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET: string; GITHUB_PAT: string; ... 6 more ...; EVALS_SELECTION_JSON: string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ NODE_ENV?: string | undefined; TZ?: string | undefined; GITHUB_TOKEN: string; GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN: string; GITHUB_APP_PRIVATE_KEY: string; GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET: string; GITHUB_PAT: string; ... 6 more ...; EVALS_SELECTION_JSON: string; }'.": 1,
@@ -569,11 +268,9 @@
     "test/llm-judge-frontier.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ score: number; reason: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'undefined'.": 1,
     "test/llm-judge-frontier.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ score: number; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'undefined'.": 3,
     "test/llm-judge-stream.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ clarity: number; completeness: number; actionability: number; reasoning: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/model-overlay-fable-5.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/model-overlay-opus-4-7.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/model-overlay-opus-4-8.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 1,
-    "test/model-overlay-sonnet-5.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 1,
+    "test/model-overlays.test.ts\tTS2322\tType 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 4,
     "test/native-auto-decide-pty.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/native-auto-decide.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ status: string; calls: never[]; assistantMessages: { sessionId: string; text: string; timestamp: string; }[]; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"error\" | \"missing\" | \"ready\"'.": 1,
     "test/office-hours-completion.test.ts\tTS18046\t'reordered.findings' is of type 'unknown'.": 1,
     "test/office-hours-review.test.ts\tTS18048\t'check.stderr' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
     "test/office-hours-review.test.ts\tTS18048\t'check.stdout' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
@@ -600,15 +297,25 @@
     "test/paid-shards.test.ts\tTS2739\tType '{ shard: number; files: [string]; status: \"never-started\"; exitCode: null; elapsedMs: number; groupPid: null; }' is missing the following properties from type 'ShardOutcome': executedTests, skippedTests": 3,
     "test/paid-shards.test.ts\tTS2739\tType '{ shard: number; files: [string]; status: \"passed\"; exitCode: number; elapsedMs: number; groupPid: number; }' is missing the following properties from type 'ShardOutcome': executedTests, skippedTests": 3,
     "test/paid-shards.test.ts\tTS2739\tType '{ shard: number; files: [string]; status: \"skipped-by-diff\"; exitCode: null; elapsedMs: number; groupPid: null; }' is missing the following properties from type 'ShardOutcome': executedTests, skippedTests": 4,
-    "test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{}' is not assignable to type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: When Stripe keeps returning 502 and the retry budget runs out (max_retries=1 means 2 total attempts), processPayment() has to signal failure to its caller. The 502 exhaustion tes...'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: Whe...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: Whe...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: When Stripe keeps returning 502 and the retry budget runs out (max_retries=1 means 2 total attempts), processPayment() has to signal failure to its caller. The 502 exhaustion tes...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 What must the happy path test assert about the receipt? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-receipt-spec>\\n\\nELI10: The plan says \\\"assert correct receipt is generated\\\" but doesn't define what \\\"correct\\\" means. A receipt struct has multiple fields (amount, currency, customer_id, stripe_charge_id, etc.). The test could assert: (A) all key business fields by value, (B) only the Stripe-linked field (charge ID) to confirm the right charge was recorded, or (C) just that a receipt exists (smoke test only). Option A is a correctness test; C is a smoke test that would pass even with a half-populated receipt.\\n\\nStakes: A test that only checks receipt presence could pass while critical fields (amount, customer_id) are wrong \\u2014 a payment is charged correctly in Stripe but the internal record is broken.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because correctness means verifying the business-critical fields, not just existence. CC writes this in seconds.\\n\\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=7/10, C=3/10\\n\\nNet: A vs C is the difference between a correctness test and a smoke test.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 5,
-    "test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3\\u2013D6 \\u2014 Which of these test quality additions should be added to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-test-quality>\\n\\nELI10: The plan's two tests are scoped correctly but leave 4 test quality gaps unspecified. Each is a one-liner to add to the plan and a few lines of test code. All are recommended \\u2014 they separate a correctness test suite from a smoke test suite. With CC, implementation cost is negligible.\\n\\nRecommendation: All four \\u2014 each closes a real gap in what the test proves. Completeness: each is 10/10 with all selected, 7/10 without any.\\n\\nNet: Selecting all turns the plan into a complete test specification; selecting none leaves implementation details to the developer's discretion.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: any; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: When Stripe keeps returning 502 and the retry budget runs out (max_retries=1 means 2 total attempts), processPayment() has to signal failure to its caller. The 502 exhaustion tes...'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-ceo-body-finding.test.ts\tTS2741\tProperty '\"D3\\u2013D6 \\u2014 Which of these test quality additions should be added to the plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-test-quality>\\n\\nELI10: The plan's two tests are scoped correctly but leave 4 test quality gaps unspecified. Each is a one-liner to add to the plan and a few lines of test code. All are recommended \\u2014 they separate a correctness test suite from a smoke test suite. With CC, implementation cost is negligible.\\n\\nRecommendation: All four \\u2014 each closes a real gap in what the test proves. Completeness: each is 10/10 with all selected, 7/10 without any.\\n\\nNet: Selecting all turns the plan into a complete test specification; selecting none leaves implementation details to the developer's discretion.\"' is missing in type '{ [x: string]: string; }' but required in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 What does processPayment() return or raise when 502 retries are exhausted? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-failure-sig>\\n\\nELI10: When Stripe keeps returning 502 and the retry budget runs out (max_retries=1 means 2 total attempts), processPayment() has to signal failure to its caller. The 502 exhaustion tes...'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-count-clipped-elision.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 4,
     "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { header: string; question: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Review all 7 design dimensions, or focus on specific ones?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 design review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign) against DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: I've rated the plan 6/10 on design completeness. Its accepted behavior is thorough, but it lists five places where the proposed for...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Issue 1 (G1): How should Save be distinguished from Reset, Cancel and Export?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 PLAN.md header action group, Pass 1 Information Architecture.\\nELI10: Right now the four header buttons look identical, so a user scanning the page can't tell which one commits their edits. DESIGN.md already decides this: Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8 with white text, 6.7:1 contrast), and Reset, Cancel and Export are neutral ghost buttons. Nothing else about the buttons changes: same 44px height, same order, same disabled and pending looks.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate over four equal buttons, or hit Export or Reset when they meant Save; the dirty-state confirmation dialogs then do extra work covering for a hierarchy the header should have carried.\\nRecommendation: 1A because DESIGN.md already names the tokens and it reuses the existing Button variants with zero new components (human: ~1h / CC: ~5min).\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=2/10\\nPros / cons:\\n1A) Apply DESIGN.md: Save filled #1d4ed8/white, the other three neutral ghost buttons (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 One primary action visible in the 3-second scan, matching every other form in the app\\n  \\u2705 Reuses the existing Button primary and ghost variants; only the header wiring changes\\n  \\u274c Adds a verification step: contrast and pending/disabled looks of the filled variant must be checked\\n1B) Filled Save, and demote Reset/Cancel/Export to text-style links instead of ghost buttons\\n  \\u2705 Stronger contrast between primary and secondary actions than ghost buttons give\\n  \\u2705 Still keeps Save first and full-width at 640px and below\\n  \\u274c Deviates from DESIGN.md's ghost-button vocabulary and risks link-shaped controls losing their 44px target look\\n1C) Leave all four buttons identical; rely on Save being first in order\\n  \\u2705 No visual change to ship, so nothing new to verify\\n  \\u274c Keeps the hierarchy violation PLAN.md itself flags; Pass 1 stays at 6/10\\nNet: 1A is the approved system applied as written; 1B trades consistency for extra contrast; 1C leaves the primary action invisible.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ status: string; calls: { sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D7 — Performance: 5 sequential IDP calls that could be Promise.all'd\\nProjec...' is not assignable to type 'PlanCountTranscript'. Types of property 'status' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"error\" | \"missing\" | \"ready\"'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the ...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the ...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match what your ML engineer developer would actually experience today? I traced the literal README path: install succeeds, but running `python examples/first_eval.py` immediately fails with FileNotFoundError because that file is absent from the package. The demo fallback then...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"DX review is complete. Five issues found and resolved (7 implementation tasks, all P1). TTHW drops from 6 min to ~1 min (champion tier). What next?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 4 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Want to run it first? <gstack-qid:ceo-review-prereq-office-hours>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qi...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the test coverage? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach-selection>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"Review complete...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-prereq>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-ap...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode should we apply to Approach A (Minimal Viable)? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 - Next step: run /plan-eng-review? <gstack-q...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the payment webhook handler? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan mode, the CLAUDE.md edit + commit will happen after ExitPlanMode.)\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"D8 \\u2014 What's next after this CEO review?\\nProject: Payment Processing \\u2014 Test Coverage (main)\\nELI10: CEO...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? (Note: in plan mode, the CLAUDE.md edit + commit will happen after ExitPlanMode.)\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"?: undefined...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed directly to the plan review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-prereq-office-hours>\"?: undefined; ... 6 more ...; \"D9 \\u2014 What's the ne...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-a...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-approach-0cbis>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Which review mode? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-mode-0f>\"?: undefined; ... 4 more ...; \"D7 \\u2014 CEO Review complete. Eng Review is the required shipping gate and hasn't run yet....' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach for the two processPayment() unit tests? <gstack-qid:ceo-plan-approach-0cbis>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: \"ready\"; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias ...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the 2.0 changelog. Track it?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish, branch main, TODOS.md pass after the eight review passes.\\nELI10: D7 keeps `Client.evaluate()` as a warning alias so v1 scripts don't brea...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D12 \\u2014 TODO candidate: remove the Client.evaluate() compatibility alias at the version named in the 2.0 changelog. Track it?\\nProject/branch/task: EvalKit SDK beta polish, branch main, TODOS.md pass after the eight review passes.\\nELI10: D7 keeps `Client.evaluate()` as a warning alias so v1 scripts don't break on 2.0. Aliases are only kind if they eventually go away; otherwise the API carries two names forever and the deprecation warning becomes noise. What: delete the alias and its warning at the stated version (2.1 or 3.0). Why: one public name per action. Pros: clean surface, warning stays meaningful. Cons: any straggler still on the old name breaks then, which is the point of the notice period. Context: alias lives in evalkit/client.py; migration guide and codemod from D7 are the remediation path. Depends on: D7 landing in 2.0.0b1 and the changelog naming the removal version.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without a tracked item, the alias quietly becomes permanent and the deprecation warning lies.\\nRecommendation: A because the removal is a promise made in the 2.0 changelog, and a TODO is how the promise survives three months.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: record the follow-through now, or rely on someone remembering at 2.1.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the ass...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to run /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling the assistant which /skill to run when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md append and commit happen after plan mode ends, not now.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and you get an extra ~15-line section in CLAUDE.md; pick B and you invoke skills by name manually.\\nRecommendation: A because routing makes the skills discoverable with zero ongoing cost.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of automatic skill routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md exactly as it is.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 6 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, starting the /plan-design-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack ships a dozen skills (/investigate, /ship, /plan-*-review\\u2026). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells future sessions which ski...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on `main`, starting the /plan-design-review of PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack ships a dozen skills (/investigate, /ship, /plan-*-review…). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells future sessions which skill to reach for when you say things like \\\"this is broken\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you don't have to remember slash names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skip it and skills only fire when you type them explicitly; add it and CLAUDE.md gains ~15 lines and one commit.\\nRecommendation: B for this session because we're in plan mode (no edits/commits allowed outside the plan file) and this repo is a review fixture; you can re-enable any time.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md\\n  ✅ Future sessions auto-route requests to the right gstack skill without slash names\\n  ✅ One-time setup; the table is short and easy to edit later\\n  ❌ Requires editing and committing CLAUDE.md, which plan mode blocks right now, so it would have to wait until after this review\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually (recommended)\\n  ✅ Zero changes to the repo during a plan-mode review of a fixture\\n  ✅ Re-enable later with one gstack-config command\\n  ❌ Skills won't fire from natural-language requests in this project\\nNet: Convenience for future sessions vs. keeping this plan-mode review edit-free.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-b3qdhZ on main, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship ...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-b3qdhZ on main, about to run /plan-eng-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so that requests like \\\"review the architecture\\\" or \\\"ship this\\\" automatically route to the right skill instead of you naming it each time. This is a one-time setup prompt per project. Note: we are in plan mode right now, so if you pick A I will record the choice and append/commit the section only after plan mode exits.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without routing, skills only fire when you name them explicitly; with routing, nothing breaks, you just get one extra section in CLAUDE.md.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules make the skill suite self-serve and cost one small commit.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: a small CLAUDE.md append versus invoking skills by name forever.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to review PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which one to reach for w...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: main branch of the plan-review fixture repo, about to review PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack has a bunch of slash-command skills (review, ship, investigate). A short routing table in CLAUDE.md tells Claude which one to reach for when you say things like \\\"review this\\\" or \\\"ship it\\\", so you do not have to remember skill names. Without it, you invoke skills by hand.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Nothing breaks either way; the only cost is a few extra keystrokes per session if skipped, or a small CLAUDE.md edit plus commit if added.\\nRecommendation: A because the table is cheap, revertable, and makes the rest of the gstack skills discoverable. Note: plan mode is active, so the actual edit and commit would run after this review finishes and plan mode exits.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping CLAUDE.md untouched.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits the...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\\nProject/branch/task: Account settings form on main, aligning the proposed form with DESIGN.md.\\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel and Export look identical, so a user scanning the header has to read all four labels before they know which one commits their edits. Users scan, they don't read; the button they want should be the one their eye lands on. DESIGN.md already names the treatment: Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8, white text, ~6.7:1 contrast), the other three are neutral ghosts.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: users mis-tap Reset or Cancel next to Save and get a discard dialog instead of a save; on mobile the full-width Save row loses its meaning if it isn't visually primary.\\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token and reuses the existing Button primary variant with no new styling.\\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=6/10, 1C=3/10\\nPrinciple: Hierarchy as service — what the user sees first should be what they came to do.\\nNet: 1A costs nothing and fixes the header's only hierarchy problem; 1B and 1C keep the ambiguity in some form.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProjec...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 9 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /s...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-aL5jl6 on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Routing rules are a short list telling Claude which /skill to run for which kind of request (bugs → /investigate, ship → /ship, and so on), so you don't have to remember skill names. This is a one-time setup prompt per project and has nothing to do with the auth plan itself.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without rules you invoke skills by hand; with them, CLAUDE.md grows by ~15 lines. Either way the plan review is unaffected.\\nRecommendation: A because it makes the rest of gstack discoverable at near-zero cost, and this is a setup step, not an engineering remedy.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)\\n  ✅ Future requests auto-route to the right skill without remembering names\\n  ✅ Teammates who clone the repo get the same routing behavior from day one\\n  ❌ Adds a ~15-line section to CLAUDE.md; in plan mode the edit and commit wait until plan mode exits\\nB) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\\n  ✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; nothing to commit\\n  ✅ You keep full manual control over when skills run\\n  ❌ You have to remember and type skill names yourself; this prompt is suppressed for the project afterward\\nNet: a discoverability convenience versus a slightly longer CLAUDE.md; the review itself is unchanged either way.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured pr...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehicle are all pre-decided.\\n\\nShould I run /office-hours first, or proceed with the existing docs as context?\\n\\n<gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-prereq-skill>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-completion.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'r' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-cross-cwd-ancestry.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '({ sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; kind: \"result\" | \"use\"; name?: string | undefined; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; input?: Record<...> | undefined; content?: unknown; file?: unknown; isError?: boolean | undefined; } | { ...; } | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativePublicToolEvent[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; kind: \"result\" | \"use\"; name?: string | undefined; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; input?: Record<...> | undefined; content?: unknown; file?: unknown; isError?: boolean | undefined; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'NativePublicToolEvent'. Property 'toolUseId' is missing in type '{ kind: \"message\"; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; text: string; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }' but required in type 'NativePublicToolEvent'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-cross-cwd-ancestry.test.ts\tTS7023\t''agent attachment'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
@@ -626,22 +333,17 @@
     "test/plan-count-cross-cwd-ancestry.test.ts\tTS7023\t''sidechain attachment'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-cross-cwd-ancestry.test.ts\tTS7023\t''sidechain root'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-cross-cwd-ancestry.test.ts\tTS7023\t''sidechain target'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-dx-handoff-o.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ status: string; calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured pr...' to type 'PlanCountTranscript' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Types of property 'calls' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 11 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input. That said, EvalKit's README + docs/ are unusually complete: persona, TTHW target, competitive benchmark, and demo delivery vehicle are all pre-decided.\\n\\nShould I run /office-hours first, or proceed with the existing docs as context?\\n\\n<gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-prereq-skill>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No valida...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No valida...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 The 5-minute mandatory CI wait structurally blocks your < 2 min TTHW target. How should the plan resolve this?\\n\\nContext: docs/current-contracts.md states every first evaluation blocks for 5 minutes on a mandatory remote CI check, with no skip flag and no offline path. Your approved TTHW target is < 2 minutes (docs/benchmarks.md). These two contracts are directly contradictory. The plan currently retains the CI gate unchanged.\\n\\nYour ML engineer persona runs `python -m evalkit.demo` expecting a quick local result, hangs for 5 minutes with no output, and hits the 6-minute mark before seeing anything. Competitor A reaches the same result in 2 minutes.\\n\\nDX Principle at stake: 'Zero friction at T0' and 'Opinionated defaults with escape hatches.'\\n\\nRecommendation: A \\u2014 add a skip flag for the demo command. It\\u2019s the smallest targeted change that unblocks the TTHW target without touching normal evaluation behavior.\\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=8/10, C=3/10, D=4/10\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }[]' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source: string; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; timestamp: string; failed: boolean; source?: \"pre_tool_use\" | undefined; }'. Types of property 'source' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"pre_tool_use\"'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No valida...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Does this first-person developer trace match reality?\\n\\nI traced your ML engineer persona's actual getting-started path from the README. Here's what I found they experience:\\n\\nT+0:00  Opens README. Sees install command. Runs pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1. Clean.\\nT+1:00  Sets EVALKIT_API_KEY. No validation feedback \\u2014 unclear if key is correct.\\nT+1:15  Runs `python examples/first_eval.py` per README. Gets: FileNotFoundError.\\nT+1:30  Searches package contents. No examples/ directory. README was wrong.\\nT+2:00  Eventually finds `python -m evalkit.demo` (not in primary README quickstart).\\nT+2:15  Runs demo. Hangs. No output, no progress, no ETA.\\nT+7:15  Five minutes later: first score prints. 6 minutes total.\\nT+7:20  Tries run_eval() then run_batch(). Notices reversed arg order.\\n\\nFinal state: Got a result, filed 3 mental complaints, not recommending to teammates yet.\\n\\nDoes this match the actual experience?\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 5 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I trac...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I traced from README.md and the docs. The persona: Python ML engineer who just heard about EvalKit and wants to verify it works locally before integrating it into their team's CI pipeline.\\n\\n> T+0:00 \\u2014 I open th...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Empathy narrative: does this match the EvalKit getting-started reality?\\n\\nHere's what I traced from README.md and the docs. The persona: Python ML engineer who just heard about EvalKit and wants to verify it works locally before integrating it into their team's CI pipeline.\\n\\n> T+0:00 — I open the README. \\\"Install with python -m pip install evalkit==2.0.0b1, set EVALKIT_API_KEY, then follow the quickstart's command: python examples/first_eval.py.\\\" Three steps. Looks easy.\\n>\\n> T+1:00 — pip install succeeds. I set the key. I run the README's quickstart command: python examples/first_eval.py. I get an error. The file doesn't exist — it's not in the installed package and there's no examples/ directory anywhere.\\n>\\n> T+2:00 — I dig into the README more carefully and find python -m evalkit.demo mentioned as an alternative. I try that.\\n>\\n> T+2:30 — The demo starts. It prints: \\\"Waiting for CI check: 0s elapsed of 300s\\\". 300 seconds. Five minutes. I'm on my laptop doing a local trial. No one told me a remote CI check was part of the deal.\\n>\\n> T+7:30 — The CI check finishes. I see the demo scores. The output looks good. But I've just spent seven and a half minutes on a \\\"quick start\\\" that started with a missing-file error and a five-minute surprise wait.\\n\\nDoes this match reality? Where am I wrong? <gstack-qid:devex-review-empathy-narrative>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona:...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit==2.0.0b1, set EVALKIT_API_KEY. The README says to run\\n> `python examples/first_eval.py`. I try it:\\n>\\n> ```\\n> python: can't open file 'examples/first_eval.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory\\n> ```\\n>\\n> The file is not in the published package (confirmed: docs/package-contents.txt).\\n> After some confusion I find the demo command. I run `python -m evalkit.demo`.\\n> For five minutes I watch: \\\"Waiting for CI check: 90s elapsed of 300s...\\\".\\n> No explanation of why this check runs locally. Then: scores appear.\\n> Total time: 6-7 min. First command failed. I'm not confident in this tool.\\n\\nI found 5 friction points. Settled decisions (persona, DX POLISH mode, terminal demo, benchmark) are not re-litigated \\u2014 I'll go straight to the issues. <gstack-qid:plan-devex-review-empathy-confirm>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-dx-handoff.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Does this empathy narrative match your ML engineer developer's actual experience?\\n\\nPersona: ML engineer, Python daily, terminal-oriented, target TTHW < 2 min\\nMode: DX POLISH (pre-settled)\\n\\nI traced the actual path from README.md. Here's what your developer experiences today:\\n\\n> I install evalkit=...'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-file-permission.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ binding: { file: string; expected: string; }; epoch: FilePermissionEpoch; } | null | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'FilePermissionEpoch | null | undefined'. Type '{ binding: { file: string; expected: string; }; epoch: FilePermissionEpoch; }' is missing the following properties from type 'FilePermissionEpoch': pendingId, completedId": 2,
     "test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'fp' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-fixture.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'result' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'r' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-approach-selection>\\n\\nELI10: The plan introduces a new Stripe webhook handler that reads a user ID from Stripe event metadata into a raw SQL query \\u2014 and the plan itself explicitly says this is unsafe SQL. There are also no te...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-approach-selection>\\n\\nELI10: The plan introduces a new Stripe webhook handler that reads a user ID from Stripe event metadata into a raw SQL query \\u2014 and the plan itself explicitly says this is unsafe SQL. There are also no te...'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-prereq-office-hours>\\n\\nELI10: /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this DX review sharper input to work wi...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-prereq-office-hours>\\n\\nELI10: /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this DX review sharper input to work wi...'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-navigation-r.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"Which implementation approach should this plan follow? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\": string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"Which implementation approach should this plan follow? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-approach>\": string; }'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-permission-ac.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ binding: { file: string; expected: string; }; epoch: FilePermissionEpoch; } | null | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'FilePermissionEpoch | null | undefined'. Type '{ binding: { file: string; expected: string; }; epoch: FilePermissionEpoch; }' is missing the following properties from type 'FilePermissionEpoch': pendingId, completedId": 2,
-    "test/plan-count-prerequisite-n.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Q69F4e on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: A design doc is a per-feature write-up of the problem, the constraints, and the alternatives that were consid...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D2 \\u2014 No design doc found. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with the standard review?\\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Q69F4e on main, reviewing PLAN.md (Multi-tenant Auth Refactor).\\nELI10: A design doc is a per-feature write-up of the problem, the constraints, and the alternatives that were consid...'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-count-preview-footer.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-approach-selection>\": string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan use? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-approach-selection>\": string; }'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-count-prerequisite.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-prereq-office-hours>\\n\\nELI10: /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this DX review sharper input to work wi...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first, or proceed with standard review? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-prereq-office-hours>\\n\\nELI10: /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this DX review sharper input to work wi...'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-session-cwd.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'autoplan' does not exist on type 'ClaudeParentPublicEvent'. Property 'autoplan' does not exist on type 'NativePublicToolEvent & { order: number; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-session-cwd.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'toolUseId' does not exist on type 'ClaudeParentPublicEvent'. Property 'toolUseId' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"message\"; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; text: string; } & { order: number; messageId?: string | undefined; requestId?: string | undefined; }'.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-session-cwd.test.ts\tTS7023\t''agent attachment'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
@@ -681,8 +383,6 @@
     "test/plan-count-session-cwd.test.ts\tTS7023\t''wrong boundary type'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-session-cwd.test.ts\tTS7023\t''wrong result id'' implicitly has return type 'any' because it does not have a return type annotation and is referenced directly or indirectly in one of its return expressions.": 1,
     "test/plan-count-timeout.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'number | ReadableStream<Uint8Array<ArrayBuffer>> | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'BodyInit | null | undefined'. Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'BodyInit | null | undefined'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-count-truncated-border.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'NativePlanQuestion' is not assignable to parameter of type 'NativeQuestion'. Types of property 'multiSelect' are incompatible. Type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'boolean'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-count-truncated-question.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan follow?\\nProject/branch: gstack-plan-count-kMoX7Y / main \\u2014 new StripePaymentWebhookHandler\\nELI10: The plan has a SQL injection bug baked in \\u2014 it explicitly says an external string goes raw into a SQL query. That\\u2019s a hard blocker regardless o...'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ \"D3 \\u2014 Which implementation approach should this plan follow?\\nProject/branch: gstack-plan-count-kMoX7Y / main \\u2014 new StripePaymentWebhookHandler\\nELI10: The plan has a SQL injection bug baked in \\u2014 it explicitly says an external string goes raw into a SQL query. That\\u2019s a hard blocker regardless o...'.": 1,
     "test/plan-floor-review.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'text' does not exist in type '{ transport: \"native\"; identity: string; question: NativePlanQuestion; }'.": 1,
     "test/plan-floor-review.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ kind: string; seedQuote: string; questionQuote: string; optionIndex: null; optionQuote: string; reason: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanFloorAssessment'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"finding\" | \"setup\" | \"uncertain\" | \"unrelated\"'.": 1,
     "test/plan-floor-review.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ kind: string; seedQuote: string; questionQuote: string; optionIndex: number; optionQuote: string; reason: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'PlanFloorAssessment'. Types of property 'kind' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"finding\" | \"setup\" | \"uncertain\" | \"unrelated\"'.": 1,
@@ -704,21 +404,19 @@
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS18048\t'options' is possibly 'undefined'.": 1,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS18048\t'request.output_config' is possibly 'undefined'.": 2,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS18049\t'request.output_config.format' is possibly 'null' or 'undefined'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 26,
-    "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 18,
+    "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 29,
+    "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 19,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'toolUseId' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 10,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '(request: any) => Promise<never>' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ (body: MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming, options?: RequestOptions | undefined): APIPromise<Message>; (body: MessageCreateParamsStreaming, options?: RequestOptions | undefined): APIPromise<...>; (body: MessageCreateParamsBase, options?: RequestOptions | undefined): APIPromise<...>; }'. Type 'Promise<never>' is missing the following properties from type 'APIPromise<Message>': #private, responsePromise, parseResponse, parsedPromise, and 4 more.": 2,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string | ContentBlockParam[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'ContentBlockParam[]' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'toolUseId' does not exist in type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 1,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'unknown' is not assignable to parameter of type 'object'.": 1,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'args' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
+    "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'q' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/plan-review-decisions.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'row' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
-    "test/plan-review-native-default.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: how many moving parts should the tenant-auth refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u201...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: how many moving parts should the tenant-auth refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: how many moving parts should the tenant-auth refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014...' is not assignable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Complexity gate: how many moving parts should the tenant-auth refactor introduce?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 reorganizing tenant-auth orchestration (PLAN.md) without changing product behavior.\\nELI10: The plan swaps one auth flow for five new classes across 12 files. Every class is a new place a ...' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D2 \\u2014 Should AuthCache be injected into the services or imported as a module-level global?\\nProject/branch/task: main \\u2014 tenant-auth refactor; AuthBroker and SessionMint both need the single AuthCache (PLAN.md:28-29).\\nELI10: Right now the plan has one cache object that lives at the top of a module and every service grabs it by import. That is a hidden global: any test that touches AuthBroker also touches the same cache SessionMint uses, so tests leak state into each other, and in production nobody can tell from a constructor signature that a service writes to the shared auth cache. Passing the cache in through the constructor makes the dependency visible and lets each test build its own cache.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Flaky auth tests that pass alone and fail together, and a production incident where one service's cache write surprises the other with no import graph pointing at the culprit.\\nRecommendation: A because constructor injection is the boring, proven fix for a shared mutable dependency and costs about ten lines at the composition root.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nPros / cons:\\nA) Constructor injection from one composition root (recommended)\\n  \\u2705 Dependency is explicit in each service's signature; the import graph shows who can write to the cache\\n  \\u2705 Each unit test constructs its own AuthCache, so no cross-test state leakage and no reset hooks\\n  \\u274c Needs a composition root (or wiring in the existing bootstrap) and threads the instance through call sites (human: ~half day / CC: ~10 min)\\nB) Keep the singleton, add a factory and a test-reset hook\\n  \\u2705 Smaller diff than A; existing import sites stay as written\\n  \\u2705 Tests can reset shared state between cases via the hook\\n  \\u274c Test-only hooks in production modules are a smell, and the global coupling the finding describes remains\\nC) Keep the module-level export as proposed\\n  \\u2705 Zero extra work; matches the plan verbatim\\n  \\u2705 Simplest possible import for both services\\n  \\u274c Shared mutable global in a multi-tenant auth path; tests share state and production writers are invisible\\nNet: A costs a small amount of wiring to make the shared cache explicit and testable; B and C keep the hidden global that the finding is about.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/plan-review-native-default.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'questions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-review-native-default.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'selectedOptions' does not exist on type 'AskUserQuestionFingerprint'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-review-native-default.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'question' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
+    "test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; args: string; } | { skill: string; }'. Property 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; }'.": 3,
     "test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; } | { skill: string; args: string; }'. Property 'args' does not exist on type '{ skill: string; }'.": 4,
-    "test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { input?: undefined; isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ input?: undefined; isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; }'. Types of property '\"input\"' are incompatible. Type '{ skill: string; }' is not assignable to type 'undefined'.": 1,
+    "test/plan-scope-selection.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { name?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; toolUseId: string; isError: boolean; } | { ...; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; args: string; }; } | { isError?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; }'. Type '{ isError?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; input: { skill: string; }; }' is not assignable to type '{ isError?: undefined; input?: undefined; kind: string; sessionId: string; timestamp: string; name: string; toolUseId: string; }'. Types of property '\"input\"' are incompatible. Type '{ skill: string; }' is not assignable to type 'undefined'.": 1,
     "test/plan-seed-submission.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ GSTACK_PLAN_MODE?: undefined; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; } | { GSTACK_PLAN_MODE: string; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; } | { GSTACK_PLAN_MODE?: undefined; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ GSTACK_PLAN_MODE?: undefined; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property 'GSTACK_PLAN_MODE' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-seed-submission.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ TERM: string; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; } | { CI: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; FORCE_COLOR?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ CI: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; FORCE_COLOR?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR: string; SEED_CASE: string; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property 'TERM' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-seed-submission.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '(text: string, reviver?: ((this: any, key: string, value: any) => any) | undefined) => any' is not assignable to parameter of type '(value: string, index: number, array: string[]) => any'. Types of parameters 'reviver' and 'index' are incompatible. Type 'number' is not assignable to type '(this: any, key: string, value: any) => any'.": 4,
@@ -726,7 +424,6 @@
     "test/plan-seed-submission.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ TERM: string; } | { CI: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; FORCE_COLOR?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; } | { CI: string; FORCE_COLOR: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ TERM: string; } | { CI: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; FORCE_COLOR?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; } | { CI: string; FORCE_COLOR: string; TERM?: undefined; COLORTERM?: undefined; NO_COLOR?: undefined; } | { ...; } | { ...; }'.": 1,
     "test/plan-skill-question-events.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type '{ id: string; toolName: string; input: { questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; }; cwd: string; }[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'QuestionEventCall[]'. Type '{ id: string; toolName: string; input: { questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; }; cwd: string; }' is not assignable to type 'QuestionEventCall'. Types of property 'toolName' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"AskUserQuestion\"'.": 3,
     "test/plan-skill-questions.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ permissionTools: { id: string; name: string; cwd: string; input: { file_path: string; old_string: string; new_string: string; } | { file_path: string; content: string; }; }[]; permissionResults: never[]; permissionRequests: { requestId: string; ... 5 more ...; result: 'pending'; }[]; permissionRequestCapture: bool...' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Pick<{ calls: NativeQuestionCall[]; ready: boolean; pendingExitPlanModeIds: string[]; permissionTools: NativePermissionTool[]; permissionResults: { ...; }[]; permissionRequests: NativeFilePermissionRequest[]; permissionRequestCapture: boolean; pendingBytes: number; }, \"permissionRequestCapture\" | ... 2 more ... | \"p...'. Types of property 'permissionRequests' are incompatible. Type '{ requestId: string; nativeToolId: string; name: string; cwd: string; input: { file_path: string; old_string: string; new_string: string; } | { file_path: string; content: string; }; capturedAtMs: number; result: \"pending\"; }[]' is not assignable to type 'NativeFilePermissionRequest[]'. Type '{ requestId: string; nativeToolId: string; name: string; cwd: string; input: { file_path: string; old_string: string; new_string: string; } | { file_path: string; content: string; }; capturedAtMs: number; result: 'pending'; }' is not assignable to type 'NativeFilePermissionRequest'. Types of property 'name' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"Edit\" | \"Write\"'.": 2,
-    "test/plan-tune-cathedral-fixture.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ CONDUCTOR_WORKSPACE_PATH: string; CONDUCTOR_PORT?: undefined; GSTACK_SESSION_KIND?: undefined; OPENCLAW_SESSION?: undefined; } | { CONDUCTOR_WORKSPACE_PATH?: undefined; CONDUCTOR_PORT: string; GSTACK_SESSION_KIND: string; OPENCLAW_SESSION: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Record<string, string> | undefined'. Type '{ CONDUCTOR_WORKSPACE_PATH: string; CONDUCTOR_PORT?: undefined; GSTACK_SESSION_KIND?: undefined; OPENCLAW_SESSION?: undefined; }' is not assignable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property 'CONDUCTOR_PORT' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/plan-tune.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ skillName: string; tmplPath: string; host: 'claude'; paths: { skillRoot: string; localSkillRoot: string; binDir: string; browseDir: string; designDir: string; }; preambleTier: number; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'TemplateContext'. Types of property 'paths' are incompatible. Property 'makePdfDir' is missing in type '{ skillRoot: string; localSkillRoot: string; binDir: string; browseDir: string; designDir: string; }' but required in type 'HostPaths'.": 2,
     "test/plan-tune.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ skillName: string; tmplPath: string; host: 'codex'; paths: { skillRoot: string; localSkillRoot: string; binDir: string; browseDir: string; designDir: string; }; }' is not assignable to parameter of type 'TemplateContext'. Types of property 'paths' are incompatible. Property 'makePdfDir' is missing in type '{ skillRoot: string; localSkillRoot: string; binDir: string; browseDir: string; designDir: string; }' but required in type 'HostPaths'.": 1,
     "test/preamble-compose.test.ts\tTS2322\tType '{ skillName: string; tmplPath: string; host: \"claude\" | \"codex\"; paths: HostPaths; preambleTier: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4; model?: string | undefined; }' is not assignable to type 'TemplateContext'. Types of property 'model' are incompatible. Type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\"claude\" | \"fable-5\" | \"gemini\" | \"gpt\" | \"gpt-5.4\" | \"gpt-5.6-sol\" | \"gpt-6-astra\" | \"o-series\" | \"opus-4-7\" | \"opus-4-8\" | \"sonnet-5\" | undefined'.": 1,
@@ -747,11 +444,6 @@
     "test/qa-probe-gates.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'event' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/relink.test.ts\tTS1117\tAn object literal cannot have multiple properties with the same name.": 2,
     "test/review-count-markdown.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; multiSelect: boolean; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count ...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, running /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which slash command to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, design plan \\...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 \\u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\\nProject/branch/task: plan-count fixture on main, running /plan-design-review on PLAN.md.\\nELI10: gstack skills work best when the project's CLAUDE.md tells the assistant which slash command to reach for (bugs \\u2192 /investigate, design plan \\u2192 /plan-design-review, and so on). Without it you invoke skills by hand each time. This is a one-time prompt per project.\\nStakes if we pick wrong: pick A and CLAUDE.md gains a short section you may not want in a fixture repo; pick B and skills are never suggested automatically here.\\nRecommendation: A because routing rules cost one short section and save repeated manual invocations.\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \\u2014 no completeness score.\\nNet: convenience of auto-routing vs keeping the fixture CLAUDE.md untouched. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the CLAUDE.md edit and commit happen after we leave plan mode.\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these m...' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement,...'. Types of property '\"calls\"' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reali...' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reali...' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...'. Types of property '\"answers\"' are incompatible. Property '\"D4 — What’s next after this CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-next-step>\\n\\nELI10: The CEO review is done and the plan is CLEARED. But Eng Review is the required shipping gate — it covers architecture, test plan rigor, and implementation correctness in more depth. Running it next locks in the plan before implementation starts.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping eng review means the plan goes to implementation without a required gate check — leaving architecture and test-correctness gaps unverified.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because the dashboard shows Eng Review at 0 runs — required gate, not yet cleared.\\n\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\"' is missing in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reality? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-persona-confirm>\": string; \"D2 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: Here's what your ML engineer developer experiences today when following the documented path:\\n\\n\\\"I open the README. The first ...' but required in type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...'.": 3,
-    "test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { .....' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement,...'. Type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these m...' is not assignable to type '{ calls: ({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement,...'. Types of property '\"calls\"' are incompatible. Type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; })[]' is not assignable to type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reali...' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reali...' is not assignable to type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...'. Types of property '\"answers\"' are incompatible. Property '\"D4 — What’s next after this CEO review? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-next-step>\\n\\nELI10: The CEO review is done and the plan is CLEARED. But Eng Review is the required shipping gate — it covers architecture, test plan rigor, and implementation correctness in more depth. Running it next locks in the plan before implementation starts.\\n\\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping eng review means the plan goes to implementation without a required gate check — leaving architecture and test-correctness gaps unverified.\\n\\nRecommendation: A because the dashboard shows Eng Review at 0 runs — required gate, not yet cleared.\\n\\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\"' is missing in type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona anLine truncated
-    "test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '({ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall[]' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives — it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product — it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Want to run it first? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | ... 7 more ... | { ...; }' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reali...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"D1 \\u2014 Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reality? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-persona-confirm>\"?: undefined; \"D2 \\u2014 Empathy narrative: Here's what your ML engineer developer experiences today when following the documented path:\\n\\n\\\"I open the README. The fi...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"D1 — Developer persona and review setup: The plan pre-decides several things. Do these match reality? <gstack-qid:plan-devex-persona-confirm>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/review-handoffs-aa.test.ts\tTS2352\tConversion of type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { ...; }; unansweredQuestionIndices: never[]; answeredAt: string; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ...; } | { ....' to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall' may be a mistake because neither type sufficiently overlaps with the other. If this was intentional, convert the expression to 'unknown' first. Type '{ sessionId: string; toolUseId: string; questions: { question: string; header: string; multiSelect: boolean; options: { label: string; description: string; }[]; }[]; answered: boolean; failed: boolean; answers: { \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise c...' is not comparable to type 'NativePlanQuestionCall'. Types of property 'answers' are incompatible. Type '{ \"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \\u2014 it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product \\u2014 it captures the thinking behind this...' is not comparable to type 'Record<string, string>'. Property '\"No design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives — it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product — it captures the thinking behind this specific change. Want to run it first? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>\"' is incompatible with index signature. Type 'undefined' is not comparable to type 'string'.": 2,
     "test/salience-allowlist.test.ts\tTS2307\tCannot find module '../bin/gstack-brain-cache' or its corresponding type declarations.": 3,
     "test/schema-version-migration.test.ts\tTS2307\tCannot find module '../bin/gstack-brain-cache' or its corresponding type declarations.": 3,
     "test/schema-version-migration.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'timeout' does not exist in type '(done: (err?: unknown) => void) => void | Promise<unknown>'.": 3,
@@ -787,7 +479,6 @@
     "test/ship-document-release-dispatch.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"blocked\" | \"current\" | \"updated\"'.": 1,
     "test/ship-skip-actor.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'any[]' is not assignable to parameter of type '[] | [any]'. Type 'any[]' is not assignable to type '[any]'. Target requires 1 element(s) but source may have fewer.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-design.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.": 1,
-    "test/skill-e2e-opus-47.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"e2e-opus-47\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-outside-plan-disabled.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"e2e-outside-plan-disabled\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-outside-voice.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"e2e-outside-voice\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'index' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"permission\" | \"submission\"; input: string; } | { kind: \"question\"; index: number; question: AskUserQuestionFingerprint; }'. Property 'index' does not exist on type '{ kind: \"permission\" | \"submission\"; input: string; }'.": 2,
@@ -795,18 +486,14 @@
     "test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts\tTS7006\tParameter 'o' implicitly has an 'any' type.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-review-section-loading.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'requiredSections' does not exist in type '{ planDir: string; skillName: string; artifactCommands?: string | undefined; scenario: string; decisionPolicy?: string | undefined; reportFile?: string | undefined; reportMarker?: RegExp | undefined; ... 5 more ...; nativeReviewOnly?: boolean | undefined; }'.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-plan-decision-classification.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'number | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'number'. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'number'.": 1,
-    "test/skill-e2e-plan-tune-cathedral.test.ts\tTS2554\tExpected 3-4 arguments, but got 2.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-shared-libs-paths.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'unknown' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-ship-docsync.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'EvalCollector | null' is not assignable to parameter of type 'EvalCollector'. Type 'null' is not assignable to type 'EvalCollector'.": 9,
-    "test/skill-e2e-spec-execute.test.ts\tTS2554\tExpected 2-3 arguments, but got 1.": 1,
     "test/skill-e2e-third-party-actions.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '{ maxTurns: 8; allowedTools: readonly ['Read', 'Bash']; timeout: 240000; runId: string; env: { PATH: string; }; prompt: string; workingDirectory: string; testName: string; }' is not assignable to parameter of type '{ prompt: string; workingDirectory: string; maxTurns?: number | undefined; appendSystemPrompt?: string | undefined; completionReserveMs?: number | undefined; allowedTools?: string[] | undefined; ... 9 more ...; nativeLifecycle?: { ...; } | undefined; }'. Types of property 'allowedTools' are incompatible. The type 'readonly [\"Read\", \"Bash\"]' is 'readonly' and cannot be assigned to the mutable type 'string[]'.": 5,
     "test/skill-e2e-triage.test.ts\tTS2353\tObject literal may only specify known properties, and 'has_in_branch_classification' does not exist in type 'Partial<EvalTestEntry>'.": 1,
-    "test/skill-llm-eval-spec.test.ts\tTS2554\tExpected 2-3 arguments, but got 1.": 1,
     "test/skill-routing-e2e.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type '\"e2e-routing\"' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"e2e\" | \"llm-judge\"'.": 1,
     "test/strict-output.test.ts\tTS2739\tType '{ failedTests: number; unhandledBetweenTests: number; terminalFileCounts: number[]; }' is missing the following properties from type 'BunTestOutputSummary': terminalTestCounts, skippedTests, passedTests": 5,
     "test/test-free-shards.test.ts\tTS2345\tArgument of type 'number | ReadableStream<Uint8Array<ArrayBuffer>> | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'BodyInit | null | undefined'. Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'BodyInit | null | undefined'.": 2,
     "test/third-party-actions-recording.test.ts\tTS7053\tElement implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type '{ NODE_ENV?: string | undefined; TZ?: string | undefined; EVALS: string; EVALS_ALL: string; EVALS_PREFLIGHT_OK: string; GSTACK_CLAUDE_CLI_VERSION: string; HOME: string; TMPDIR: string; TMP: string; TEMP: string; GSTACK_EVAL_DIR: string; }'. No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type '{ NODE_ENV?: string | undefined; TZ?: string | undefined; EVALS: string; EVALS_ALL: string; EVALS_PREFLIGHT_OK: string; GSTACK_CLAUDE_CLI_VERSION: string; HOME: string; TMPDIR: string; TMP: string; TEMP: string; GSTACK_EVAL_DIR: string; }'.": 1,
-    "test/touchfiles.test.ts\tTS2769\tNo overload matches this call. The last overload gave the following error. Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type '\"gate\" | \"periodic\"'.": 1,
     "test/workflow-excerpt.test.ts\tTS2339\tProperty 'text' does not exist on type 'Token'. Property 'text' does not exist on type 'Br'.": 1
   }
 }