mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-06-10 20:07:49 +02:00
v1.57.7.0 feat: GSTACK REVIEW REPORT always declares unresolved decisions (#1916)
* fix(plan-devex-review): add missing gstack-review-log step plan-devex-review carried the EXIT PLAN MODE GATE but never wrote a review-log entry, so the gate's 'review log was called' check was structurally unsatisfiable and the Review Readiness Dashboard / GSTACK REVIEW REPORT had no plan-devex-review data to read. Add a Review Log section before the dashboard read, logging the devex fields the report parser already expects (status, scores, product_type, tthw, persona, competitive_tier, unresolved, commit). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(review): make unresolved-decisions status mandatory in GSTACK REVIEW REPORT The report's UNRESOLVED line was optional ('omit if empty') and the EXIT PLAN MODE GATE only checked it 'if applicable', so a plan could ship with no statement about open decisions at all — a missed ambiguity read identically to a clean plan. Now every report ends with a mandatory unresolved-decisions status as its final line: either the exact unbolded sentinel 'NO UNRESOLVED DECISIONS', or a '**UNRESOLVED DECISIONS:**' block of bullets. The gate blocks ExitPlanMode unless that final line is present. generatePlanFileReviewReport: current-review items are listed from context; prior reviews contribute an aggregate count computed as latest-fresh-row- per-skill minus the current run (no double-count, dashboard 7-day window). generateExitPlanModeGate: check #3 is now blocking with no 'if applicable' escape; bolded sentinel does not satisfy it. Tests: static guard in gen-skill-docs.test.ts asserts the mandatory status across all six report consumers and the gate across gate-bearing skills; skill-e2e-plan.test.ts asserts the written report's final line is the status (and fixes a stale 'four review rows' -> five-row prompt). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor(review): compress unresolved-status prose to fit parity budget After merging origin/main (v1.57.3.0), plan-devex-review exceeded the 1.05x parity ratio vs the v1.53.0.0 baseline. Rather than rebase the baseline, compressed the new prose to stay under the cap honestly: the report's unresolved-status block (~32 -> ~9 lines) and the EXIT PLAN MODE GATE's final-line check (~7 -> ~5 lines), plus the plan-devex-review review-log step. All load-bearing rules and the exact gate-checkable tokens are preserved; the static guards in gen-skill-docs.test.ts still pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: regenerate stale ship golden fixtures (#1909 follow-up) #1909 (v1.57.3.0) added the always-loaded PR-title-version rule to ship's template and committed the regenerated ship/SKILL.md, but did not refresh the three ship golden fixtures, leaving the golden-file regression test red on main. Regenerate them from current output. The diff is purely #1909 content: the PR-title invariant line plus a previously-unresolved ${ctx.paths.binDir} placeholder that current generation correctly resolves. No feature content from this branch leaks into ship (ship does not consume the review report resolvers). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(plan-devex-review): restore TIMESTAMP fill instruction in review-log Adversarial review caught that compressing the devex review-log block dropped the TIMESTAMP substitution guidance the three sibling plan-review skills carry. A literal "timestamp":"TIMESTAMP" parses as JSON but is an unparseable date, so the Review Readiness Dashboard's 7-day freshness window silently drops the plan-devex-review row (and the report's prior-review aggregation loses it). Restore the one-line instruction. Also: the plan-review-report E2E now derives its last-line check from the report slice, not the whole file, so a mis-placed report surfaces the real trailing content in the failure message. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(parity): rebase parity baseline v1.53.0.0 -> v1.57.7.0 The v1.53 anchor is four minor versions stale. v1.54-v1.57 (ship/plan carving, carve-guards, AUQ prose fallback, the cross-session decision-log preamble) plus this branch's mandatory unresolved-decisions status line pushed the three plan-review skills past the 5% ratchet even after exhaustive compression. The new baseline captures current UNION sizes (skeleton + sections/*.md, matching what parity-harness measures) so the per-skill 1.05 ratio keeps catching future bloat. The frozen v1.44.1 integrity anchor and the v1.47 size-budget baseline are untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.57.7.0) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3239,3 +3239,62 @@ describe('EXIT PLAN MODE GATE placement', () => {
|
||||
expect(codex).toContain('Failing this gate and calling ExitPlanMode anyway is a contract violation');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('GSTACK REVIEW REPORT mandatory unresolved-decisions status', () => {
|
||||
// Report text rides in PLAN_FILE_REVIEW_REPORT → every report consumer gets it.
|
||||
// devex-review is a report consumer but NOT a gate consumer, so the two target
|
||||
// sets differ (CP5/CX5). Regression guard: a future token-cut that drops the
|
||||
// unresolved-status line again fails here. See plan-flag-unresolved-issues.
|
||||
const REPORT_CONSUMERS = [
|
||||
'plan-ceo-review',
|
||||
'plan-eng-review',
|
||||
'plan-design-review',
|
||||
'plan-devex-review',
|
||||
'codex',
|
||||
'devex-review',
|
||||
];
|
||||
// Gate text rides in EXIT_PLAN_MODE_GATE (lives in SKILL.md, not sections).
|
||||
const GATE_SKILLS = [
|
||||
'plan-ceo-review',
|
||||
'plan-eng-review',
|
||||
'plan-design-review',
|
||||
'plan-devex-review',
|
||||
'codex',
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const skill of REPORT_CONSUMERS) {
|
||||
test(`${skill}: report mandates the unresolved-decisions status as final content`, () => {
|
||||
const content = readSkillUnion(skill);
|
||||
expect(content).toContain('NO UNRESOLVED DECISIONS');
|
||||
// The "never omit / always final" contract must be present, not just the phrase.
|
||||
expect(content).toContain('Unresolved-decisions status (MANDATORY');
|
||||
expect(content).toMatch(/never omitted/);
|
||||
// \s+ tolerates prose line-wraps within "final non-whitespace line".
|
||||
expect(content).toMatch(/final\s+non-whitespace\s+line/);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (const skill of GATE_SKILLS) {
|
||||
test(`${skill}: exit gate blocks unless the unresolved status is the final line`, () => {
|
||||
const md = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, skill, 'SKILL.md'), 'utf-8');
|
||||
// Gate check #4 — present, sentinel named, and explicitly blocking (no escape).
|
||||
expect(md).toContain('NO UNRESOLVED DECISIONS');
|
||||
expect(md).toContain('FINAL non-whitespace line is the unresolved-decisions');
|
||||
expect(md).toContain('FAILS the gate');
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test('scripts/resolvers/review.ts source carries the mandatory block + blocking gate', () => {
|
||||
const src = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'scripts', 'resolvers', 'review.ts'), 'utf-8');
|
||||
// Report resolver: mandatory, never-omitted, exact sentinel, anti-double-count algorithm.
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('Unresolved-decisions status (MANDATORY');
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('NO UNRESOLVED DECISIONS');
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('avoids double-counting');
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('DROP the current skill');
|
||||
// Gate resolver: the blocking final-line check with no "if applicable" escape.
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('FINAL non-whitespace line is the unresolved-decisions');
|
||||
expect(src).toContain('FAILS the gate');
|
||||
// The old soft wording must be gone from the gate.
|
||||
expect(src).not.toContain('absorbs CODEX / CROSS-MODEL / UNRESOLVED lines if applicable');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user