chore: regenerate office-hours SKILL.md files

This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-03-22 20:50:42 -07:00
parent 91ea542323
commit 197040b6b7
2 changed files with 104 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -628,6 +628,10 @@ PREMISES:
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm. If the user disagrees with a premise, revise understanding and loop back.
---
---
## Phase 4: Alternatives Generation (MANDATORY)
@@ -656,6 +660,7 @@ Rules:
- One must be the **"minimal viable"** (fewest files, smallest diff, ships fastest).
- One must be the **"ideal architecture"** (best long-term trajectory, most elegant).
- One can be **creative/lateral** (unexpected approach, different framing of the problem).
- If Codex proposed a prototype in Phase 3.5, consider using it as a starting point for the creative/lateral approach.
**RECOMMENDATION:** Choose [X] because [one-line reason].
@@ -735,6 +740,7 @@ Track which of these signals appeared during the session:
- Has **domain expertise** — knows this space from the inside
- Showed **taste** — cared about getting the details right
- Showed **agency** — actually building, not just planning
- **Defended premise with reasoning** against cross-model challenge (kept original premise when Codex disagreed AND articulated specific reasoning for why — dismissal without reasoning does not count)
Count the signals. You'll use this count in Phase 6 to determine which tier of closing message to use.
@@ -788,6 +794,9 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Premises
{from Phase 3}
## Cross-Model Perspective
{If Codex ran in Phase 3.5: Codex's independent cold read — steelman, key insight, challenged premise, prototype suggestion. Verbatim or close paraphrase of what Codex said. If Codex did NOT run (skipped or unavailable): omit this section entirely — do not include it.}
## Approaches Considered
### Approach A: {name}
{from Phase 4}
@@ -837,6 +846,9 @@ Supersedes: {prior filename — omit this line if first design on this branch}
## Premises
{from Phase 3}
## Cross-Model Perspective
{If Codex ran in Phase 3.5: Codex's independent cold read — coolest version, key insight, existing tools, prototype suggestion. Verbatim or close paraphrase of what Codex said. If Codex did NOT run (skipped or unavailable): omit this section entirely — do not include it.}
## Approaches Considered
### Approach A: {name}
{from Phase 4}