mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-20 20:00:45 +02:00
feat(review): carve adversarial, plan-completion, and review-army into sections
The three resolver macros ship already carves as siblings now load on demand for /review too: skeleton 100.2KB -> 55.0KB (-45%), union 93.4KB. Resolvers stay the single source of truth (sections wrap the macros). Step 0/1, scope drift, critical pass, confidence calibration, and fix-first stay always-loaded. Fixtures and pins follow the moved content (codex-hardening wrapped-sites, review-army E2E fixture builds skeleton+sections with an empty-fixture guard). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5
parent
c7488f7e38
commit
3a78bf7c1d
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://gstack.dev/schemas/section-manifest.json",
|
||||
"skill": "review",
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"note": "PASSIVE registry (v2 plan T9 / CM2). Fields are IDs, file paths, human titles, and human-readable trigger text ONLY. The skeleton's decision-tree prose is the ONLY place that decides WHEN to read a section; required-reads live in the E2E fixtures. No machine predicate here — see docs/designs/v2_PLAN.md:663.",
|
||||
"sections": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "plan-completion",
|
||||
"file": "plan-completion.md",
|
||||
"title": "Plan completion audit (deep pass of scope drift)",
|
||||
"trigger": "auditing plan completion — plan file discovery, item extraction, verification-mode classification, and cross-reference against the diff (the deep pass that follows Step 1.5's scope-drift check)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "review-army",
|
||||
"file": "review-army.md",
|
||||
"title": "Review Army — specialist dispatch and findings merge",
|
||||
"trigger": "dispatching the Review Army specialists and merging their findings after the critical pass (Step 4.5)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "adversarial",
|
||||
"file": "adversarial.md",
|
||||
"title": "Adversarial review (always-on)",
|
||||
"trigger": "running the always-on adversarial review — Claude subagent plus Codex passes — after the staleness checks and before persisting the Eng Review result (Step 5.7)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user