CalvinBackup/gstack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git synced 2026-08-07 14:58:37 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: contributor mode, session awareness, recommendation format (#90)

Browse Source 
* feat: contributor mode, session awareness, universal RECOMMENDATION format

- Rename {{UPDATE_CHECK}} → {{PREAMBLE}} across all 10 skill templates
- Add session tracking (touch ~/.gstack/sessions/$PPID, count active sessions)
- ELI16 mode when 3+ concurrent sessions detected (re-ground user on context)
- Contributor mode: auto-file field reports to ~/.gstack/contributor-logs/
- Universal AskUserQuestion format: context → question → RECOMMENDATION → options
- Update plan-ceo-review and plan-eng-review to reference preamble baseline
- Add vendored symlink awareness section to CLAUDE.md
- Rewrite CONTRIBUTING.md with contributor workflow and cross-project testing
- Add tests for contributor mode and session awareness in generated output
- Add E2E eval for contributor mode report filing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add Enum & Value Completeness to /review critical checklist

New CRITICAL review category that traces new enum values, status strings,
and type constants through every consumer outside the diff. Catches the
class of bugs where a new value is added but not handled in all switch/case
chains, allowlists, or frontend-backend contracts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump v0.4.1, user-facing changelog, update qa-only template and architecture docs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CHANGELOG style guide — user-facing, sell the feature

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rewrite v0.4.1 changelog to be user-facing and sell the features

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add evals for RECOMMENDATION format, session awareness, and enum completeness

Free tests (Tier 1): RECOMMENDATION format + session awareness in all
preamble SKILL.md files, enum completeness checklist structure and CRITICAL
classification.

E2E eval: /review catches missed enum handlers when a new status value
is added but not handled in case/switch and notify methods.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add E2E eval for session awareness ELI16 mode

Stubs _SESSIONS=4, gives agent a decision point on feature/add-payments
branch, verifies the output re-grounds the user with project, branch,
context, and RECOMMENDATION — the ELI16 mode behavior for 3+ sessions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: contributor mode eval marked FAIL due to expected browse error

The test intentionally runs a nonexistent binary to trigger contributor
mode. The session runner's browse error detection catches "no such file
or directory...browse" and sets browseErrors, causing recordE2E to mark
passed=false. Override passed to check only exitReason since the browse
error is the expected scenario.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-03-16 01:45:50 -05:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6
parent f3ee0ee28a
commit 3e3843c4a9
32 changed files with 1044 additions and 130 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
ship/SKILL.md.tmpl
+5 -5
View File
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ allowed-tools:
- AskUserQuestion
---
{{UPDATE_CHECK}}
{{PREAMBLE}}
# Ship: Fully Automated Ship Workflow
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ Review the diff for structural issues that tests don't catch.
6. **If CRITICAL issues found:** For EACH critical issue, use a separate AskUserQuestion with:
- The problem (`file:line` + description)
- Your recommended fix
- Options: A) Fix it now (recommend), B) Acknowledge and ship anyway, C) It's a false positive — skip
- `RECOMMENDATION: Choose A because [one-line reason]`
- Options: A) Fix it now, B) Acknowledge and ship anyway, C) It's a false positive — skip
After resolving all critical issues: if the user chose A (fix) on any issue, apply the recommended fixes, then commit only the fixed files by name (`git add <fixed-files> && git commit -m "fix: apply pre-landing review fixes"`), then **STOP** and tell the user to run `/ship` again to re-test with the fixes applied. If the user chose only B (acknowledge) or C (false positive) on all issues, continue with Step 4.
7. **If only non-critical issues found:** Output them and continue. They will be included in the PR body at Step 8.
@@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ For each classified comment:
**VALID & ACTIONABLE:** Use AskUserQuestion with:
- The comment (file:line or [top-level] + body summary + permalink URL)
- Your recommended fix
- Options: A) Fix now (recommended), B) Acknowledge and ship anyway, C) It's a false positive
- `RECOMMENDATION: Choose A because [one-line reason]`
- Options: A) Fix now, B) Acknowledge and ship anyway, C) It's a false positive
- If user chooses A: apply the fix, commit the fixed files (`git add <fixed-files> && git commit -m "fix: address Greptile review — <brief description>"`), reply using the **Fix reply template** from greptile-triage.md (include inline diff + explanation), and save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: fix).
- If user chooses C: reply using the **False Positive reply template** from greptile-triage.md (include evidence + suggested re-rank), save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: fp).