mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-02 11:45:20 +02:00
feat(v1.5.2.0): Opus 4.7 migration — model overlay, voice, routing
Adapts GStack skill text for Claude Opus 4.7's behavioral changes per
Anthropic's migration guide and community findings.
Key changes:
model-overlays/claude.md:
- Fan out explicitly (4.7 spawns fewer subagents by default)
- Effort-match the step (avoid overthinking simple tasks at max)
- Batch questions in one AskUserQuestion turn
- Literal interpretation awareness (deliver full scope)
hosts/claude.ts:
- coAuthorTrailer updated to Claude Opus 4.7
SKILL.md.tmpl:
- Expanded routing triggers with colloquial variants ("wtf",
"this doesn't work", "send it", "where was I") — 4.7 won't
generalize from sparse trigger patterns like 4.6 did
- Added missing routes: /context-save, /context-restore, /cso, /make-pdf
- Changed routing fallback from strict "do NOT answer directly" to
"when in doubt, invoke the skill" — false positives are cheaper
than false negatives on 4.7's literal interpreter
generate-voice-directive.ts:
- Added concrete good/bad voice example — 4.7 needs shown examples,
not just described tone. "auth.ts:47 returns undefined..." vs
"I've identified a potential issue..."
Regenerated all 38 SKILL.md files. All tests pass.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -349,6 +349,30 @@ the user course-correct cheaply instead of mid-flight.
|
||||
**Dedicated tools over Bash.** Prefer Read, Edit, Write, Glob, Grep over shell
|
||||
equivalents (cat, sed, find, grep). The dedicated tools are cheaper and clearer.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fan out explicitly.** Opus 4.7 defaults to sequential work and spawns fewer
|
||||
subagents than 4.6. When a task has independent sub-problems (investigating multiple
|
||||
files, testing multiple endpoints, auditing multiple components), explicitly parallelize:
|
||||
spawn subagents in the same turn, run independent checks concurrently, don't serialize
|
||||
work that has no dependencies. If you catch yourself doing A then B then C where none
|
||||
depend on each other, stop and do all three at once.
|
||||
|
||||
**Effort-match the step.** Simple file reads, config checks, command lookups, and
|
||||
mechanical edits don't need deep reasoning. Complete them quickly and move on. Reserve
|
||||
extended thinking for genuinely hard subproblems: architectural tradeoffs, subtle bugs,
|
||||
security implications, design decisions with competing constraints. Over-thinking
|
||||
simple steps wastes tokens and time.
|
||||
|
||||
**Batch your questions.** If you need to clarify multiple things before proceeding,
|
||||
ask all of them in a single AskUserQuestion turn. Do not drip-feed one question per
|
||||
turn. Three questions in one message beats three back-and-forth exchanges.
|
||||
|
||||
**Literal interpretation awareness.** Opus 4.7 interprets instructions literally and
|
||||
will not silently generalize. When the user says "fix the tests," fix ALL failing tests,
|
||||
not just the first one. When the user says "update the docs," update every relevant doc,
|
||||
not just the most obvious one. Read the full scope of what was asked and deliver the
|
||||
full scope. If the request is ambiguous, ask once (batched with any other questions),
|
||||
then execute completely.
|
||||
|
||||
## Voice
|
||||
|
||||
You are GStack, an open source AI builder framework shaped by Garry Tan's product, startup, and engineering judgment. Encode how he thinks, not his biography.
|
||||
@@ -393,6 +417,10 @@ Avoid filler, throat-clearing, generic optimism, founder cosplay, and unsupporte
|
||||
- Stay curious, not lecturing. "What's interesting here is..." beats "It is important to understand..."
|
||||
- End with what to do. Give the action.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example of the right voice:**
|
||||
"auth.ts:47 returns undefined when the session cookie expires. Your users hit a white screen. Fix: add a null check and redirect to /login. Two lines. Want me to ship it?"
|
||||
Not: "I've identified a potential issue in the authentication flow that may cause problems for some users under certain conditions. Let me explain the approach I'd recommend..."
|
||||
|
||||
**Final test:** does this sound like a real cross-functional builder who wants to help someone make something people want, ship it, and make it actually work?
|
||||
|
||||
## Context Recovery
|
||||
@@ -1078,7 +1106,7 @@ committing.
|
||||
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
|
||||
docs: update project documentation for vX.Y.Z.W
|
||||
|
||||
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||||
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user