fix(qa): number the qa value-bar questions from 1 and say reproduced bugs already answer the first two

qa-only/SKILL.md

@@ -554,10 +554,10 @@ Preserve the initial charters under **Charters** after that metadata, before fin
 
 Each proposed test carries a value card; propose it only when it passes this bar:
 
-**Test value bar.** Before writing the test (the reproduced bug answers what it protects and what makes it fail):
+**Test value bar.** Before writing or proposing a test, the reproduced bug already answers what it protects and what makes it fail; also answer:
 
-3. Why does existing coverage not already catch that? Prefer adding a row to an existing table-driven test or shared fixture over a near-duplicate.
-4. Does it need a production seam (export, flag, wrapper, injection hook) that no production caller needs? If yes, test at the real boundary instead.
+1. Why does existing coverage not already catch that? Prefer adding a row to an existing table-driven test or shared fixture over a near-duplicate.
+2. Does it need a production seam (export, flag, wrapper, injection hook) that no production caller needs? If yes, test at the real boundary instead.
 
 Value card: `Value: protects=<...>; fails_when=<...>; why_new=<...>; seam=none` (seam: `none` or its name); each field at most 160 UTF-8 bytes here (clamp to 157 plus `...`; JSON keeps full values). Put it in the 8e.5 record (/qa) or under each proposed test (/qa-only). A missing upstream card never blocks: derive it; ignore unknown fields.