CalvinBackup/gstack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git synced 2026-05-07 05:56:41 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor: rename qa-design-review → design-review

Browse Source 
The "qa-" prefix was confusing — this is the live-site design audit with
fix loop, not a QA-only report. Rename directory and update all references
across docs, tests, scripts, and skill templates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-03-17 20:23:05 -07:00
parent 28becb3b39
commit 56fa6d9cc2
15 changed files with 51 additions and 51 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
review/SKILL.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ eval $(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-diff-scope <base> 2>/dev/null)
4. **Apply the design checklist** against the changed files. For each item:
- **[HIGH] mechanical CSS fix** (`outline: none`, `!important`, `font-size < 16px`): classify as AUTO-FIX
- **[HIGH/MEDIUM] design judgment needed**: classify as ASK
- **[LOW] intent-based detection**: present as "Possible — verify visually or run /qa-design-review"
- **[LOW] intent-based detection**: present as "Possible — verify visually or run /design-review"
5. **Include findings** in the review output under a "Design Review" header, following the output format in the checklist. Design findings merge with code review findings into the same Fix-First flow.
review/design-checklist.md
+3 -3
View File
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Each item is tagged with a detection confidence level:
- **[HIGH]** — Reliably detectable via grep/pattern match. Definitive findings.
- **[MEDIUM]** — Detectable via pattern aggregation or heuristic. Flag as findings but expect some noise.
- **[LOW]** — Requires understanding visual intent. Present as: "Possible issue — verify visually or run /qa-design-review."
- **[LOW]** — Requires understanding visual intent. Present as: "Possible issue — verify visually or run /design-review."
---
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Each item is tagged with a detection confidence level:
**ASK** (everything else — requires design judgment):
- All AI slop findings, typography structure, spacing choices, interaction state gaps, DESIGN.md violations
**LOW confidence items** → present as "Possible: [description]. Verify visually or run /qa-design-review." Never AUTO-FIX.
**LOW confidence items** → present as "Possible: [description]. Verify visually or run /design-review." Never AUTO-FIX.
---
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Design Review: N issues (X auto-fixable, Y need input, Z possible)
Recommended fix: suggested fix
**POSSIBLE (verify visually):**
- [file:line] Possible issue — verify with /qa-design-review
- [file:line] Possible issue — verify with /design-review
```
If no issues found: `Design Review: No issues found.`