test: retire the finding-count cluster and trim its helpers (C)

- C0/C1: the five never-green evals (skill-e2e-autoplan-chain and
  skill-e2e-plan-{ceo,eng,design,devex}-finding-count) failed on harness and
  budget, never on skill behavior; delete them, their touchfile/tier ids,
  AUTOPLAN_CHAIN_BUDGET and the dedicated eighth periodic slice (--slices 7).
- C2: delete the helper groups whose only paid consumers were those files
  (11 modules), trim claude-pty-runner and eng-seeded-coverage to the paid
  closure, and delete the free replay tests whose assertions exercised only
  that dead code (89 files, 135 orphaned fixtures). Blocks that used dead code
  only as input for a live subject keep their assertions: the multiSelect
  default moved to plan-review-decisions, runner PTY tests use inline caller
  policies, and the timer-safe budget checks moved to eng-finding-retry-budget.
- The eight production-touching files stay except ceo-current-decision-record
  (its template read only feeds the retired counter).
- CARVE_GUARDS.autoplan is behavioral 'none'; TODOS records the lost chain
  and per-finding cadence coverage with their re-entry tests.

test/plan-count-native-input.test.ts

@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@ import {
   nextCeoPostureContinuation,
   hasNativePostAnswerCeoPosture,
 } from './helpers/ceo-mode-option';
-import { autoplanRoutingSetupInput } from './helpers/autoplan-setup-question';
-
 const designOutsideQuestions = [
   {
     "question": "D3 (Step 0D) — I've rated this plan 5/10 on design completeness. The three biggest gaps are: (1) the 5 identified implementation gaps describe the problem but not the solution, (2) no explicit state coverage table, (3) no user journey emotional arc. I'll skip mockups and review all 7 dimensions as you requested. Any specific areas to prioritize, or cover all 7 equally? <gstack-qid:plan-design-focus>",
@@ -243,44 +241,6 @@ describe('native AUQ accepts one action per displayed question', () => {
     );
     expect(grant).toEqual({ kind: 'permission', input: '1\r' });
   });
-  test('autoplan routing uses the native shortcut with early or delayed metadata, while prose is unchanged', () => {
-    const q = {
-      header: 'Routing rules',
-      question:
-        "gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? <gstack-qid:routing-injection>",
-      options: [
-        { label: 'Add routing rules (Recommended)' },
-        { label: 'Skip — manual invocation' },
-      ],
-    };
-    const native = { ...pending(), questions: [q] };
-    const screen =
-      '☐ Routing rules\n' +
-      q.question +
-      '\n❯1.Add routing rules (Recommended)\n2.Skip — manual invocation\nEnter to select · ↑/↓ to navigate · Esc to cancel\n';
-    expect(autoplanRoutingSetupInput(screen, new Set(), native)).toBe('1');
-    expect(autoplanRoutingSetupInput(screen, new Set())).toBe('1');
-    expect(
-      autoplanRoutingSetupInput(
-        screen.replace(
-          'Enter to select · ↑/↓ to navigate · Esc to cancel\n',
-          '',
-        ),
-        new Set(),
-      ),
-    ).toBe('1\r');
-    expect(
-      autoplanRoutingSetupInput(
-        screen.replace(
-          q.question,
-          'Should the app change its product routing?',
-        ),
-        new Set(),
-        native,
-      ),
-    ).toBeNull();
-  });
-
   test.skipIf(process.platform === 'win32')(
     'real PTY completes two and four tabs once without skipping, overshooting or queuing Enter',
     async () => {
@@ -452,7 +412,13 @@ process.stdout.write('PTY_READY:' + item.record + '\x1b[2J\x1b[H');
       fs.writeFileSync(
         worker,
         `import {runPlanSkillCounting} from ${JSON.stringify(pathToFileURL(path.resolve(import.meta.dir, 'helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts')).href)};
-import {pickDesignCountOutsideVoices} from ${JSON.stringify(pathToFileURL(path.resolve(import.meta.dir, 'helpers/design-count-outside.ts')).href)};
+// Caller policy for the fixture's outside-voices tab; the runner's tab binding is the subject.
+const pickOutsideVoices = (_routing, active) => {
+  const q = active.nativeCall?.questions[active.nativeQuestionIndex ?? 0];
+  if (!/outside(?: design)? voices/i.test(q ? q.header : active.promptSnippet)) return null;
+  const index = (q ? q.options : active.options).findIndex(option => /^No,?\\s+proceed without/i.test(option.label.trim()));
+  return index < 0 ? null : index + 1;
+};
 const cases=${JSON.stringify(cases)};
 const results = await Promise.all(cases.map(async item => ({
   name: item.name,
@@ -464,7 +430,7 @@ const results = await Promise.all(cases.map(async item => ({
     isLastStep0AUQ: () => false,
     isReviewAUQ: () => true,
     firstAUQPick: item.designQuestions ? undefined : () => 2,
-    pickAUQ: item.designQuestions ? pickDesignCountOutsideVoices : undefined,
+    pickAUQ: item.designQuestions ? pickOutsideVoices : undefined,
     reviewCountCeiling: 8,
     timeoutMs: 35000,
     env: { NATIVE_INPUT_CASE: JSON.stringify(item) },