feat: composable skills — INVOKE_SKILL resolver + factoring infrastructure (v0.13.7.0) (#644)

* feat: add parameterized resolver support to gen-skill-docs

Extend the placeholder regex from {{WORD}} to {{WORD:arg1:arg2}},
enabling parameterized resolvers like {{INVOKE_SKILL:plan-ceo-review}}.

- Widen ResolverFn type to accept optional args?: string[]
- Update RESOLVERS record to use ResolverFn type
- Both replacement and unresolved-check regexes updated
- Fully backward compatible: existing {{WORD}} patterns unchanged

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: add INVOKE_SKILL resolver for composable skill loading

New composition.ts resolver module that emits prose instructing Claude
to read another skill's SKILL.md and follow it, skipping preamble
sections. Supports optional skip= parameter for additional sections.

Usage: {{INVOKE_SKILL:plan-ceo-review}} or
       {{INVOKE_SKILL:plan-ceo-review:skip=Outside Voice}}

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: use frontmatter name: for skill symlinks and Codex paths

Patch all 3 name-derivation paths to read name: from SKILL.md
frontmatter instead of relying solely on directory basenames.
This enables directory names that differ from invocation names
(e.g., run-tests/ directory with name: test).

- setup: link_claude_skill_dirs reads name: via grep, falls back to basename
- gen-skill-docs.ts: codexSkillName uses frontmatter name for Codex output paths
- gen-skill-docs.ts: moved frontmatter extraction before Codex path logic

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: extract CHANGELOG_WORKFLOW resolver from /ship

Move changelog generation logic into a reusable resolver. The resolver
is changelog-only (no version bump per Codex review recommendation).
Adds voice rules inline. /ship Step 5 now uses {{CHANGELOG_WORKFLOW}}.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor: use INVOKE_SKILL resolver for plan-ceo-review office-hours fallback

Replace inline skill loading prose (read file, skip sections) with
{{INVOKE_SKILL:office-hours}} in the mid-session detection path.
The BENEFITS_FROM prerequisite offer is unchanged (separate use case).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor: BENEFITS_FROM resolver delegates to INVOKE_SKILL

Eliminate duplicated skip-list logic by having generateBenefitsFrom
call generateInvokeSkill internally. The wrapper (AskUserQuestion,
design doc re-check) stays in BENEFITS_FROM. The loading instructions
(read file, skip sections, error handling) come from INVOKE_SKILL.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add resolver tests for INVOKE_SKILL, CHANGELOG_WORKFLOW, parameterized args

12 new tests covering:
- INVOKE_SKILL: template placeholder, default skip list, error handling,
  BENEFITS_FROM delegation
- CHANGELOG_WORKFLOW: content, cross-check, voice guidance, format
- Parameterized resolver infra: colon-separated args processing,
  no unresolved placeholders across all generated SKILL.md files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.13.7.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: journey routing tests — CLAUDE.md routing rules + stronger descriptions

Three journey E2E tests (ideation, ship, debug) were failing because
Claude answered directly instead of invoking the Skill tool. Root cause:
skill descriptions in system-reminder are too weak to override Claude's
default behavior for tasks it can handle natively.

Fix has two parts:
1. CLAUDE.md routing rules in test workdir — Claude weighs project-level
   instructions higher than skill description metadata
2. "Proactively invoke" (not "suggest") in office-hours, investigate,
   ship descriptions — reinforces the routing signal

10/10 journey tests now pass (was 7/10).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: one-time CLAUDE.md routing injection prompt

Add a preamble section that checks if the project's CLAUDE.md has
skill routing rules. If not (and user hasn't declined), asks once
via AskUserQuestion to inject a "## Skill routing" section.

Root cause: skill descriptions in system-reminder metadata are too
weak to reliably trigger proactive Skill tool invocation. CLAUDE.md
project instructions carry higher weight in Claude's decision making.

- Preamble bash checks for "## Skill routing" in CLAUDE.md
- Stores decline in gstack-config (routing_declined=true)
- Only asks once per project (HAS_ROUTING check + config check)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: annotated config file + routing injection tests

gstack-config now writes a documented header on first config creation
with every supported key explained (proactive, telemetry, auto_upgrade,
skill_prefix, routing_declined, codex_reviews, skip_eng_review, etc.).
Users can edit ~/.gstack/config.yaml directly, anytime.

Also fixes grep to use ^KEY: anchoring so commented header lines don't
shadow real config values.

Tests added:
- 7 new gstack-config tests (annotated header, no duplication, comment
  safety, routing_declined get/set/reset)
- 6 new gen-skill-docs tests (preamble routing injection: bash checks,
  config reads, AskUserQuestion, decline persistence, routing rules)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump to v0.13.9.0, separate CHANGELOG from main's releases

Split our branch's changes into a new 0.13.9.0 entry instead of
jamming them into 0.13.7.0 which already landed on main as
"Community Wave."

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify branch-scoped VERSION/CHANGELOG after merging main

Add explicit rules: merging main doesn't mean adopting main's version.
Branch always gets its own entry on top with a higher version number.
Three-point checklist after every merge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: put our 0.13.9.0 entry on top of CHANGELOG

Newest version goes on top. Our branch lands next, so our entry
must be above main's 0.13.8.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: restore missing 0.13.7.0 Community Wave entry

Accidentally dropped the 0.13.7.0 entry when reordering.
All entries now present: 0.13.9.0 > 0.13.8.0 > 0.13.7.0 > 0.13.6.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CHANGELOG integrity check rule

After any edit that moves/adds/removes entries, grep for version
headers and verify no gaps or duplicates before committing.
Prevents accidentally dropping entries during reordering.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

scripts/resolvers/utility.ts

@@ -375,3 +375,47 @@ export function generateCoAuthorTrailer(ctx: TemplateContext): string {
   }
   return 'Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>';
 }
+
+export function generateChangelogWorkflow(_ctx: TemplateContext): string {
+  return `## CHANGELOG (auto-generate)
+
+1. Read \`CHANGELOG.md\` header to know the format.
+
+2. **First, enumerate every commit on the branch:**
+   \`\`\`bash
+   git log <base>..HEAD --oneline
+   \`\`\`
+   Copy the full list. Count the commits. You will use this as a checklist.
+
+3. **Read the full diff** to understand what each commit actually changed:
+   \`\`\`bash
+   git diff <base>...HEAD
+   \`\`\`
+
+4. **Group commits by theme** before writing anything. Common themes:
+   - New features / capabilities
+   - Performance improvements
+   - Bug fixes
+   - Dead code removal / cleanup
+   - Infrastructure / tooling / tests
+   - Refactoring
+
+5. **Write the CHANGELOG entry** covering ALL groups:
+   - If existing CHANGELOG entries on the branch already cover some commits, replace them with one unified entry for the new version
+   - Categorize changes into applicable sections:
+     - \`### Added\` — new features
+     - \`### Changed\` — changes to existing functionality
+     - \`### Fixed\` — bug fixes
+     - \`### Removed\` — removed features
+   - Write concise, descriptive bullet points
+   - Insert after the file header (line 5), dated today
+   - Format: \`## [X.Y.Z.W] - YYYY-MM-DD\`
+   - **Voice:** Lead with what the user can now **do** that they couldn't before. Use plain language, not implementation details. Never mention TODOS.md, internal tracking, or contributor-facing details.
+
+6. **Cross-check:** Compare your CHANGELOG entry against the commit list from step 2.
+   Every commit must map to at least one bullet point. If any commit is unrepresented,
+   add it now. If the branch has N commits spanning K themes, the CHANGELOG must
+   reflect all K themes.
+
+**Do NOT ask the user to describe changes.** Infer from the diff and commit history.`;
+}