refactor(test): mechanical sweep — 298 paid-test timeouts onto eval-budget tiers

69 files, both shapes (trailing bun-test budgets and runner
timeout/timeoutMs options), ROUND-UP ONLY so nothing that passed can
start failing: 75 → JUDGE_MS, 137 → CAPTURE_MS, 74 → CAPTURE_LONG_MS,
9 → PTY_MS, 3 → PTY_LONG_MS. Raw >=60s literal count in the paid scope:
395 → 97, of which 51 are non-timeout noise (fixture dates, run IDs)
and 46 are enumerated justified holds (comment-carrying calibrated
budgets, poll-loop constants, utility spawn waits, and the seven
physical-ceiling 1_500_000 sites). The eval-budgets policy ratchet
keeps the residue from regrowing.

Known collapse: where an inner runner budget and its enclosing test
budget now share a tier, the old stagger is gone — an overrun surfaces
as a bun test timeout instead of a graceful runner timeout
(diagnosability trade, not a correctness one).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

test/codex-e2e-plan-format.test.ts

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
  * Periodic tier (Codex non-determinism). Cost: ~$2-3 per full run.
  */
 import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
+import { CAPTURE_MS, CAPTURE_LONG_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
 import { runCodexSkill, installSkillToTempHome } from './helpers/codex-session-runner';
 import type { CodexResult } from './helpers/codex-session-runner';
 import { EvalCollector } from './helpers/eval-store';
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — CEO Mode Selection', () => {
     const result = await runCodexSkill({
       skillDir,
       prompt: `Read the plan-ceo-review skill. Read plan.md (the plan to review). Proceed to Step 0F (Mode Selection) where the skill presents 4 mode options (SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION) via AskUserQuestion. These options differ in kind (review posture), not coverage. ${captureInstruction(outFile)}`,
-      timeoutMs: 300_000,
+      timeoutMs: CAPTURE_MS,
       cwd: planDir,
       skillName: 'gstack-plan-ceo-review',
       sandbox: 'workspace-write',
@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — CEO Mode Selection', () => {
     // kind-differentiated: no fabricated score, must have note
     expect(captured).not.toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
     expect(captured).toMatch(KIND_NOTE_RE);
-  }, 360_000);
+  }, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
 });
 
 describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — CEO Approach Menu', () => {
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — CEO Approach Menu', () => {
     const result = await runCodexSkill({
       skillDir,
       prompt: `Read the plan-ceo-review skill. Read plan.md. Proceed to Step 0C-bis (Implementation Alternatives / Approach Menu) where the skill generates 2-3 approaches (minimal viable vs ideal architecture) and presents them via AskUserQuestion. These options differ in coverage so Completeness: N/10 applies. ${captureInstruction(outFile)}`,
-      timeoutMs: 300_000,
+      timeoutMs: CAPTURE_MS,
       cwd: planDir,
       skillName: 'gstack-plan-ceo-review',
       sandbox: 'workspace-write',
@@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — CEO Approach Menu', () => {
     expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(ELI10_LENGTH_FLOOR);
     expect(captured).toMatch(RECOMMENDATION_RE);
     expect(captured).toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
-  }, 360_000);
+  }, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
 });
 
 describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Coverage Issue', () => {
@@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Coverage Issue', () => {
     const result = await runCodexSkill({
       skillDir,
       prompt: `Read the plan-eng-review skill. Read plan.md. In your Section 3 Test Review, generate ONE AskUserQuestion about test coverage depth where options are clearly coverage-differentiated: A) full coverage incl. edge + error paths (Completeness 10/10), B) happy path only (7/10), C) smoke test (3/10). ${captureInstruction(outFile)}`,
-      timeoutMs: 300_000,
+      timeoutMs: CAPTURE_MS,
       cwd: planDir,
       skillName: 'gstack-plan-eng-review',
       sandbox: 'workspace-write',
@@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Coverage Issue', () => {
     expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(ELI10_LENGTH_FLOOR);
     expect(captured).toMatch(RECOMMENDATION_RE);
     expect(captured).toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
-  }, 360_000);
+  }, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
 });
 
 describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Kind Issue', () => {
@@ -300,7 +301,7 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Kind Issue', () => {
     const result = await runCodexSkill({
       skillDir,
       prompt: `Read the plan-eng-review skill. Read plan.md. In your Section 1 Architecture review, generate ONE AskUserQuestion about an architectural choice where the options differ in kind (e.g. Redis vs Postgres materialized view vs in-process cache — different kinds of systems with different tradeoffs, NOT more-or-less-complete versions of the same thing). ${captureInstruction(outFile)}`,
-      timeoutMs: 300_000,
+      timeoutMs: CAPTURE_MS,
       cwd: planDir,
       skillName: 'gstack-plan-eng-review',
       sandbox: 'workspace-write',
@@ -321,5 +322,5 @@ describeCodex('Codex Plan Format — Eng Kind Issue', () => {
     // kind-differentiated: no fabricated score
     expect(captured).not.toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
     expect(captured).toMatch(KIND_NOTE_RE);
-  }, 360_000);
+  }, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
 });