v1.84.1.0 fix: default Codex and Claude to frontier models (#2835)

* fix: default cross-model workflows to frontier models

* chore: bump version and changelog (v1.82.1.0)

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: repair frontier eval budgets and workflow instructions

Preserve frontier models and quality thresholds while fixing truncated judge output, ordered section expansion, consent checks, QA scoring, and ship audit gates. Add regression coverage and refresh generated docs.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: resolve workflow gaps exposed by frontier evals

Clarify plan-review ordering and fallback modes, preserve deploy readiness gates, honor configured merge methods, correct benchmark and canary contracts, and restore vendored installs on setup failure. Cover recovery with real-shell regressions.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: use agent capture budgets for deploy evals

Multi-turn deploy and benchmark sessions were incorrectly limited to the single-call judge timeout. Use the existing capture tier and leave outer-test cleanup headroom, with a free policy regression test. Keep all behavioral assertions and frontier models unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: clarify retro workflow and evaluate compare instructions

Include compare mode in the frontier judge excerpt, define metric sources and snapshot ordering, and preserve the existing prompt-size budget.

Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: make documentation release review and publication consistent

Review before commit, clarify changelog safeguards and unavailable reviewer modes, and preserve raw PR bodies across separate shell calls. Keep title sync in one shell and add regression coverage.

Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-09-09 08:57:21 -07:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by OpenAI Codex
parent c8f0c4e368
commit 71f6048e8a
141 changed files with 2678 additions and 1750 deletions
+13
View File
@@ -1055,6 +1055,19 @@ This is my **second opinion mode**.
When `/review` catches bugs from Claude's perspective, `/codex` brings a completely different AI — OpenAI's Codex CLI — to review the same diff. Different training, different blind spots, different strengths. The overlap tells you what's definitely real. The unique findings from each are where you find the bugs neither would catch alone.
gstack-owned Codex calls default to `gpt-6-astra`, including resumed consult
sessions. Set `GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL=<model>` to change the default, or name a
model in your request to override it for that invocation. Generated commands
pass the selection through `-c model=...`, overriding the CLI's configured model.
Native review also sets `-c review_model=...` to that selection, overriding any
separate review-model pin.
On Codex hosts, the Claude outside-voice skill is `gstack-claude`. Its review,
challenge, and consult calls, including resumed sessions, use
`--model "${GSTACK_CLAUDE_MODEL:-claude-fable-5-1}"`; a model named in your
request takes precedence. Both defaults are known frontier pins maintained
in gstack releases, with no automatic model discovery.
### Three modes
**Review** — run `codex review` against the current diff. Codex reads every changed file, classifies findings by severity (P1 critical, P2 high, P3 medium), and returns a PASS/FAIL verdict. Any P1 finding = FAIL. The review is fully independent — Codex doesn't see Claude's review.