merge: integrate origin/main (v0.18.1.0) into open-agents-learnings

Main moved forward 6 commits while this branch was local. Integrated
both sides preserving all functionality:

From main (v0.16.4.0 → v0.18.1.0):
- v0.17.0.0 — UX behavioral foundations + ux-audit (generateUXPrinciples,
  {{UX_PRINCIPLES}} placeholder, triggers frontmatter on skills)
- v0.18.0.0 — Confusion Protocol, Hermes + GBrain hosts, brain-first
  resolver (generateBrainHealthInstruction, generateConfusionProtocol,
  generateGBrainContextLoad, generateGBrainSaveResults, hosts/gbrain.ts,
  hosts/hermes.ts, scripts/resolvers/gbrain.ts, GBrain bash health check)
- v0.18.0.1 — ngrok Windows build fix
- 0cc830b6 — tilde-in-assignment permission fix
- cc42f14a — gstack compact design doc (tabled)
- 822e843a — headed browser auto-shutdown + disconnect cleanup (v0.18.1.0)

Integration approach: keep this branch's preamble.ts submodule refactor
as the structure of record. Extracted main's two new generators into
their own submodules:
- scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-brain-health-instruction.ts
- scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-confusion-protocol.ts

Updated scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts to absorb
main's GBrain health check (host-conditional on gbrain/hermes).

scripts/resolvers/index.ts now imports BOTH:
- This branch's adds: MODEL_OVERLAY, TASTE_PROFILE, BIN_DIR resolvers
- Main's adds: UX_PRINCIPLES, GBRAIN_CONTEXT_LOAD, GBRAIN_SAVE_RESULTS
  resolvers

scripts/resolvers/design.ts keeps both generateTasteProfile (this
branch) and generateUXPrinciples (main). Sibling exports, no overlap.

scripts/gen-skill-docs.ts keeps both this branch's --model flag wiring
and main's edits.

Templates auto-merged where possible. The 35 generated SKILL.md /
golden conflicts auto-resolved via `bun run gen:skill-docs --host all`
followed by re-snapshotting the ship goldens for claude/codex/factory.

Verification:
- bun run gen:skill-docs --host all completes cleanly
- bun test: 1 pre-existing failure (gstack-community-dashboard Supabase
  network test, 235s timeout). NOT related to merge — unchanged Supabase
  test infra times out without live network. Flagged in PR body.

Token-ceiling warnings on plan-ceo-review (29K), office-hours (26K),
and ship (34K). These existed on origin/main before the merge — the
preamble grew substantially from main's GBrain + UX additions plus this
branch's continuous-checkpoint, context-health, model-overlay, taste-profile,
and feature-discovery additions. Worth a follow-up reduction pass but
doesn't block this merge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

plan-eng-review/SKILL.md

@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ allowed-tools:
   - AskUserQuestion
   - Bash
   - WebSearch
+triggers:
+  - review architecture
+  - eng plan review
+  - check the implementation plan
 ---
 <!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly -->
 <!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->
@@ -435,6 +439,19 @@ AI makes completeness near-free. Always recommend the complete option over short
 
 Include `Completeness: X/10` for each option (10=all edge cases, 7=happy path, 3=shortcut).
 
+## Confusion Protocol
+
+When you encounter high-stakes ambiguity during coding:
+- Two plausible architectures or data models for the same requirement
+- A request that contradicts existing patterns and you're unsure which to follow
+- A destructive operation where the scope is unclear
+- Missing context that would change your approach significantly
+
+STOP. Name the ambiguity in one sentence. Present 2-3 options with tradeoffs.
+Ask the user. Do not guess on architectural or data model decisions.
+
+This does NOT apply to routine coding, small features, or obvious changes.
+
 ## Continuous Checkpoint Mode
 
 If `CHECKPOINT_MODE` is `"continuous"` (from preamble output): auto-commit work as
@@ -669,6 +686,8 @@ Then write a `## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT` section to the end of the plan file:
 file you are allowed to edit in plan mode. The plan file review report is part of the
 plan's living status.
 
+
+
 # Plan Review Mode
 
 Review this plan thoroughly before making any code changes. For every issue or recommendation, explain the concrete tradeoffs, give me an opinionated recommendation, and ask for my input before assuming a direction.
@@ -1524,6 +1543,8 @@ staleness detection: if those files are later deleted, the learning can be flagg
 **Only log genuine discoveries.** Don't log obvious things. Don't log things the user
 already knows. A good test: would this insight save time in a future session? If yes, log it.
 
+
+
 ## Next Steps — Review Chaining
 
 After displaying the Review Readiness Dashboard, check if additional reviews would be valuable. Read the dashboard output to see which reviews have already been run and whether they are stale.

plan-eng-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -22,10 +22,16 @@ allowed-tools:
   - AskUserQuestion
   - Bash
   - WebSearch
+triggers:
+  - review architecture
+  - eng plan review
+  - check the implementation plan
 ---
 
 {{PREAMBLE}}
 
+{{GBRAIN_CONTEXT_LOAD}}
+
 # Plan Review Mode
 
 Review this plan thoroughly before making any code changes. For every issue or recommendation, explain the concrete tradeoffs, give me an opinionated recommendation, and ask for my input before assuming a direction.
@@ -295,6 +301,8 @@ Substitute values from the Completion Summary:
 
 {{LEARNINGS_LOG}}
 
+{{GBRAIN_SAVE_RESULTS}}
+
 ## Next Steps — Review Chaining
 
 After displaying the Review Readiness Dashboard, check if additional reviews would be valuable. Read the dashboard output to see which reviews have already been run and whether they are stale.