mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-14 17:05:28 +02:00
feat(skills): claimed limitations now require evidence, everywhere + wave follow-ups filed
Every tier-2+ skill's preamble gains one directive distilled from nine live
release failures in two days on the fork: a claimed limitation or
requirement ('the API can't do this', 'X requires a credential',
'impossible on this platform') is a material claim, stated only with the
verbatim error, the documented statement, or a live probe in hand —
pattern-matching a failure to a familiar story is not evidence, and a cheap
probe runs BEFORE asking the user or declaring a step blocked. ONE directive
adapted into the preamble resolver; the fork's full judgment contract is
deliberately not imported. Full regen (46 files), ship goldens refreshed,
parity guards bumped with the measured ~0.45KB/skill (investigate, autoplan,
plan-design-review, office-hours), Step 0.9 registered as an intentional
sub-step.
Approved deferrals filed: persona-fleet hostile-user harness + answer-key
methodology in TODOS; the fork's question-budget ACCOUNTING judgment (never
its 5/8/12 constants) folded into the V1.1 pacing design doc; the Apple
adapter added to #1882's coverage note.
Ported from time-attack/gstack (GStack 2).
Co-authored-by: Sina Matian <sina@time-attack.dev>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Sina Matian
Claude Fable 5
parent
15d1144fea
commit
81a2d48592
@@ -669,6 +669,10 @@ When options differ in coverage, include `Completeness: X/10` (10 = all edge cas
|
||||
|
||||
For high-stakes ambiguity (architecture, data model, destructive scope, missing context), STOP. Name it in one sentence, present 2-3 options with tradeoffs, and ask. Do not use for routine coding or obvious changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Claimed Limitations Need Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
A claimed limitation or requirement ("the API can't do this", "X requires a credential", "that's impossible on this platform") is a material claim. State one only with the verbatim error, the documented statement, or a live probe in hand — pattern-matching a failure to a familiar story is not evidence. When a cheap probe settles the question, run it BEFORE asking the user anything or declaring a step blocked.
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuous Checkpoint Mode
|
||||
|
||||
If `CHECKPOINT_MODE` is `"continuous"`: auto-commit completed logical units with `WIP:` prefix.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user