diff --git a/test/review-planner-misreads.test.ts b/test/review-planner-misreads.test.ts
index 40be1d1ae..42059f822 100644
--- a/test/review-planner-misreads.test.ts
+++ b/test/review-planner-misreads.test.ts
@@ -159,11 +159,19 @@ describe('GST-911 misread 1: a chart SVG is data, an SVG that can run code is se
['a character-reference comment in a style element', ' '],
['CSS after an HTML empty comment in a style element', ' '],
['CSS after an HTML --!> comment end in a style element', ' '],
+ ['a inside a quoted style attribute', ' '],
+ ['an escaped ampersand in a style element', ' '],
])('%s keeps the SVG code', (_name, line) => {
const fx = fixture();
expect(plan(fx, fx.commit({ 'results/chart.svg': chart(5, line) })).class).toBe('code');
}, 60_000);
+ // Value: protects=the GST-940 style walker still reads a plain chart style as a drawing: a comment, CDATA and a quoted attribute
+ // without markup; fails_when=the walker over-refuses them, so chart SVGs lose the light review; seam=svgDrawing
+ test('a style comment, CDATA and quoted attribute keep a chart a drawing (GST-940)', () => {
+ expect(svgDrawing(chart(5, ' '))).toBe(true);
+ });
+
// Value: protects=a passive edit to an SVG that already carries a script is still code, because the whole file decides, not the
// changed lines; and an SVG code names stays code like any consumed data file; fails_when=either plans as docs; seam=collectCommit
test('an edit inside a scripted SVG, and an SVG code names, stay code', () => {