fix(review): pass Review Army checklists by path, run research alongside dispatch, always probe the design detector; state review-log invocation and statuses in the caller fixture

- review-army-perf-n-plus-one: the parent copied full checklists into agent
  prompts and ran web research before dispatch (290 s on a 12-line diff); 212 s now.
- review-design-lite: 5 of 6 captured trials reported the detector absent
  without probing; the probe is mandatory and its first line is reported, and
  the contract credits only fake-engine rule ids the checklist never names.
- review-exploratory-small-cli: the fixture never gave review-log's direct
  invocation or status vocabulary; the model ran it through bun and wrote
  status "blocked". The prompt states both and the validator rejects
  out-of-vocabulary review statuses.
Each case passed a focused paid run after repair.

TODOS.md

@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@
   budgets. The CI image stays on 2.1.251 until those cases get faster. Effort M.
 - **Recurring reds to repair, not rerun** — `plan-design-review-plan-mode`
   (one ~250 s thinking block before its single write; times out at 300 s on
-  2.1.251 in every recent run), `review-army-perf-n-plus-one` (290-300 s on a
-  12-line diff; web search plus a conditional red-team pass), the HOLD SCOPE
+  2.1.251 in every recent run) and the HOLD SCOPE
   routing case when its next brief happens not to name the mode (see the
   handoff item below). Effort M each.
 - **`/plan-ceo-review` skips its Step 0E mode handoff** — in 4 of 4 asked-mode
@@ -20,6 +19,11 @@
   decisions: …` chat. The routing case still passes on other posture text; a
   wording change moving the handoff ahead of the question log did not change
   the behavior in two paid runs, so it was not shipped. Effort M.
+- **`/ship` design-lite probe wording** — `scripts/resolvers/design.ts` still
+  says "Probe for a design detector the user installed", the wording that let
+  `/review` skip its probe in 5 of 6 captured trials before this release made it
+  mandatory. The ship union ratio is at 1.3966 of 1.397, so the same sentence
+  needs a trim elsewhere first. Effort S.
 - **Let pass-rate history decide the rest** — every census on this branch had
   a different handful of single-trial reds. Once `eval:pass-rates` has 10 weekly
   trials per case, apply the CASE_QUARANTINE entry rule instead of chasing one