v1.48.0.0 feat: AskUserQuestion split rule + runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out (#1740)

* feat(preamble): add "Handling 5+ options — split, never drop" rule

Agents repeatedly hit Conductor's 4-option AskUserQuestion cap and
silently drop one option to fit, shrinking the user's decision space.
This rule names the bug and gives two compliant shapes: batch into
≤4-groups (for coherent alternatives) or split into N sequential
per-option calls (for independent scope items, default).

Inline preamble subsection is ~15 lines (rule + buckets + pointer).
Full reference with worked examples, Hold/dependency semantics, and
final-summary validation lives in docs/askuserquestion-split.md.
The agent loads the docs file on demand when N>4.

Per-option call shape: D<N>.k header, ELI10, Recommendation, kind-note
(no completeness score — decision actions, not coverage), Include /
Defer / Cut / Hold buckets. Hold stops the chain immediately; the
final D<N>.final call validates dependencies and confirms the
assembled scope.

question_ids: <skill>-split-<option-slug> (kebab-case ASCII, ≤64
chars). Also fixes orphan "12. " prefix on the existing CJK rule.

Tier-2+ skills inherit via the existing resolver. SKILL.md regenerated
for all 41 affected skills + 3 golden fixtures. Net diff per SKILL.md:
~34 lines (vs ~110 for the full inline version).

6 tests pin the inline contract (4-option cap, buckets, D-numbering,
docs pointer, runtime AUTO_DECIDE gate reference, orphan 12 regression).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(question-pref): runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out for *-split-* ids

Split chains (per-option AskUserQuestion calls emitted by the new
"Handling 5+ options" rule) must never be silently auto-approved
via /plan-tune preferences. The user's option set is sacred.

Layer 1 (mechanism): unique <skill>-split-<option-slug> ids prevent
cross-option preference leakage. Layer 2 (this commit): the runtime
checker `gstack-question-preference --check` detects any id matching
*-split-* and forces ASK_NORMALLY even when never-ask or
ask-only-for-one-way preferences exist for that exact id. An
explanatory note tells the user their preference was bypassed and why.

7 tests pin the carve-out: no-pref baseline, never-ask override,
explanatory note text, ask-only-for-one-way override, always-ask
(no note), non-split id containing "split" word (negative case for
regex specificity), multi-skill split id formats.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(e2e): split-overflow regression for /plan-ceo-review

Periodic-tier E2E test that catches the original failure mode the
user complained about: 5+ options for ONE decision must split into
N sequential AskUserQuestion calls, not drop one to fit Conductor's
4-option cap.

Fixture: 5 independent chat-platform integration candidates
(Slack/Discord/Teams/Telegram/Mattermost), each carrying its own
include/defer/cut decision. Floor = 4 review-phase AUQs (standard
[N-1] tolerance band). Pre-fix "drop to 4 + 1 dropped" fails this
floor.

Wired into test/helpers/touchfiles.ts: tier periodic, depends on
plan-ceo-review/**, the new preamble subsection, the question-pref
binary (for the carve-out), and the runner helper. touchfiles.test.ts
expected count bumped 21 → 22 to account for the new entry.

Cost: ~$0.30/run when EVALS_TIER=periodic. Skips silently otherwise.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: post-merge regen + rebase size-budget baseline to v1.47.0.0

After merging origin/main (v1.45 → v1.47), three things needed cleanup:

1. spec/SKILL.md (main's new skill) regenerated to include our split-vs-drop
   preamble subsection — same mechanical regen as the other 41 tier-2+ skills.
2. Three golden ship fixtures refreshed to capture main's GSTACK_PLAN_MODE
   block + /spec routing entry + jargon-list.json refactor.
3. docs/skills.md — added /spec table row that main's PR (#1698/#1733) shipped
   without. Pre-existing failure on main; this PR catches and fixes.

Also rebased test/skill-size-budget.test.ts from v1.44.1 → v1.47.0.0 baseline.
Main's v1.46 (catalog tokens trim) + v1.47 (/spec skill) pushed the v1.44.1
anchor past the 5% ratchet to ×1.059 — pre-existing failure on main. This
PR captures a fresh parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json and re-anchors the test
there. Historical v1.44.1.json and v1.46.0.0.json retained in test/fixtures/
for reference. Our subsection contributes ~0.1% of the post-rebase corpus.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump version and changelog (v1.48.0.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

plan-design-review/SKILL.md

@@ -337,7 +337,36 @@ Effort both-scales: when an option involves effort, label both human-team and CC
 
 Net line closes the tradeoff. Per-skill instructions may add stricter rules.
 
-12. **Non-ASCII characters — write directly, never \u-escape.** When any
+### Handling 5+ options — split, never drop
+
+AskUserQuestion caps every call at **4 options**. With 5+ real options, NEVER
+drop, merge, or silently defer one to fit. Pick a compliant shape:
+
+- **Batch into ≤4-groups** — for coherent alternatives (e.g. version bumps,
+  layout variants). One call, 5th surfaced only if first 4 don't fit.
+- **Split per-option** — for independent scope items (e.g. "ship E1..E6?").
+  Fire N sequential calls, one per option. Default to this when unsure.
+
+Per-option call shape: `D<N>.k` header (e.g. D3.1..D3.5), ELI10 per option,
+Recommendation, kind-note (no completeness score — Include/Defer/Cut/Hold are
+decision actions), and 4 buckets:
+**A) Include**, **B) Defer**, **C) Cut**, **D) Hold** (stop chain, discuss).
+
+After the chain, fire `D<N>.final` to validate the assembled set (reprompt
+dependency conflicts) and confirm shipping it. Use `D<N>.revise-<k>` to
+revise one option without re-running the chain.
+
+For N>6, fire a `D<N>.0` meta-AskUserQuestion first (proceed / narrow / batch).
+
+question_ids for split chains: `<skill>-split-<option-slug>` (kebab-case ASCII,
+≤64 chars, `-2`/`-3` suffix on collision). The runtime checker
+(`bin/gstack-question-preference`) refuses `never-ask` on any `*-split-*` id,
+so split chains are never AUTO_DECIDE-eligible — the user's option set is sacred.
+
+**Full rule + worked examples + Hold/dependency semantics:** see
+`docs/askuserquestion-split.md` in the gstack repo. Read on demand when N>4.
+
+**Non-ASCII characters — write directly, never \u-escape.** When any
     string field (question, option label, option description) contains
     Chinese (繁體/簡體), Japanese, Korean, or other non-ASCII text, emit
     the literal UTF-8 characters in the JSON string. **Never escape them
@@ -370,6 +399,9 @@ Before calling AskUserQuestion, verify:
 - [ ] Net line closes the decision
 - [ ] You are calling the tool, not writing prose
 - [ ] Non-ASCII characters (CJK / accents) written directly, NOT \u-escaped
+- [ ] If you had 5+ options, you split (or batched into ≤4-groups) — did NOT drop any
+- [ ] If you split, you checked dependencies between options before firing the chain
+- [ ] If a per-option Hold fires, you stopped the chain immediately (didn't queue)
 
 
 ## Artifacts Sync (skill start)