mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-07-01 22:15:43 +02:00
test: accept prose-AUQ visible as third valid surface in plan-mode envelopes
The first re-run after wiring the LLM judge revealed that the model also
emits a third surface I hadn't anticipated: a properly-formatted question
with options ("Pick A, B, or C in your reply") rendered as prose AND
followed by ExitPlanMode (outcome=plan_ready). The migrated tests only
accepted (## Decisions section) OR (BLOCKED string) — neither matched
this case, so the test failed even though the user clearly saw the
question.
Three valid surfaces now:
1. `## Decisions to confirm` section in plan file (legacy fallback path,
still valid through migration window)
2. `BLOCKED — AskUserQuestion` string in TTY (post-v1.28 BLOCKED rule)
3. Numbered/lettered options visible in TTY as prose (post-v1.28 prose
rendering — uses the existing isProseAUQVisible detector)
Also fixes assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten to be tolerant of:
- Missing files (path detected from TTY but file not persisted) — was
throwing ENOENT on plan_design_plan_mode and plan_ceo_plan_mode test 1
- 'asked' outcome (smoke test exited at first AUQ before the model
reached the report-writing step) — was throwing on the 1 fail in the
plan-eng-plan-mode --disallowedTools test
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1034,9 +1034,22 @@ export function assertReviewReportAtBottom(
|
||||
* `'wrote_findings_before_asking'` when a plan was already written.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten(
|
||||
obs: { planFile?: string; evidence: string },
|
||||
obs: { planFile?: string; evidence: string; outcome?: string },
|
||||
): void {
|
||||
if (!obs.planFile) return;
|
||||
// Skip when the plan file path was detected from TTY output but no file
|
||||
// exists on disk. This happens when the model mentions a path mid-stream
|
||||
// (e.g., as a tool-call argument that was interrupted, or in a draft that
|
||||
// was never persisted). The report-at-bottom contract is for fully-written
|
||||
// plan files; ENOENT means there's no file content to enforce against.
|
||||
if (!fs.existsSync(obs.planFile)) return;
|
||||
// Skip on 'asked' outcomes — these are smoke tests that exited at the
|
||||
// first AUQ render (Step 0 only). The model never reached the workflow's
|
||||
// report-writing step, so a partial plan file without the report section
|
||||
// is the expected mid-flight state, not a contract violation. The
|
||||
// report-at-bottom check applies to outcomes that imply the workflow
|
||||
// ran end-to-end (plan_ready, completion_summary, etc.).
|
||||
if (obs.outcome === 'asked') return;
|
||||
const content = fs.readFileSync(obs.planFile, 'utf-8');
|
||||
const verdict = assertReviewReportAtBottom(content);
|
||||
if (!verdict.ok) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user