chore: bump version and changelog (v0.19.0.0) — /plan-tune v1

Ships /plan-tune as observational substrate: typed question registry, dual-track
developer profile (declared + inferred), explicit per-question preferences with
user-origin gate, inline tune: feedback across every tier >= 2 skill, unified
developer-profile.json with migration from builder-profile.jsonl.

Scope rolled back from initial CEO EXPANSION plan after outside-voice review
(Codex). 6 deferrals tracked as P0 TODOs with explicit acceptance criteria:
E1 substrate wiring, E3 narrative/vibe, E4 blind-spot coach, E5 LANDED
celebration, E6 auto-adjustment, E7 psychographic auto-decide.

See docs/designs/PLAN_TUNING_V0.md for the full design record.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Garry Tan
2026-04-17 13:38:44 +08:00
parent da190c2ccd
commit bd44c27a18
3 changed files with 189 additions and 1 deletions
+20
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,25 @@
# Changelog
## [0.19.0.0] - 2026-04-17
### Added
- **`/plan-tune` skill — gstack can now learn which of its prompts you find valuable vs noisy.** If you keep answering the same AskUserQuestion the same way every time, this is the skill that teaches gstack to stop asking. Say "stop asking me about changelog polish" — gstack writes it down, respects it from that point forward, and one-way doors (destructive ops, architecture forks, security choices) still always ask regardless, because safety wins over preference. Plain English everywhere. No CLI subcommand syntax to memorize.
- **Dual-track developer profile.** Tell gstack who you are as a builder (5 dimensions: scope appetite, risk tolerance, detail preference, autonomy, architecture care). gstack also silently tracks what your behavior suggests. `/plan-tune` shows both side by side plus the gap, so you can see when your actions don't match your self-description. v1 is observational — no skills change their behavior based on your profile yet. That comes in v2, once the profile has proven itself.
- **Builder archetypes.** Run `/plan-tune vibe` (v2) or let the skill infer it from your dimensions. Eight named archetypes (Cathedral Builder, Ship-It Pragmatist, Deep Craft, Taste Maker, Solo Operator, Consultant, Wedge Hunter, Builder-Coach) plus a Polymath fallback when your dimensions don't fit a standard pattern. Codebase and model ship now; the user-facing commands are v2.
- **Inline `tune:` feedback across every gstack skill.** When a skill asks you something, you can reply `tune: never-ask` or `tune: always-ask` or free-form English and gstack normalizes it into a preference. Only runs when you've opted in via `gstack-config set question_tuning true` — zero impact until then.
- **Profile-poisoning defense.** Inline `tune:` writes only get accepted when the prefix came from your own chat message — never from tool output, file content, PR descriptions, or anywhere else a malicious repo might inject instructions. The binary enforces this with exit code 2 for rejected writes. This was an outside-voice catch from Codex review; it's baked in from day one.
- **Typed question registry with CI enforcement.** 53 recurring AskUserQuestion categories across 15 skills are now declared in `scripts/question-registry.ts` with stable IDs, categories, door types (one-way vs two-way), and options. A CI test asserts the schema stays valid. Safety-critical questions (destructive ops, architecture forks) are classified `one-way` at the declaration site — never inferred from prose summaries.
- **Unified developer profile.** The `/office-hours` skill's existing builder-profile.jsonl (sessions, signals, resources, topics) is folded into a single `~/.gstack/developer-profile.json` on first use. Migration is atomic, idempotent, and archives the source file — rerun it safely. Legacy `gstack-builder-profile` is a thin shim that delegates to the new binary.
### For contributors
- New `docs/designs/PLAN_TUNING_V0.md` captures the full design journey: every decision with pros/cons, what was deferred to v2 with explicit acceptance criteria, what was rejected after Codex review (substrate-as-prompt-convention, ±0.2 clamp, preamble LANDED detection, single event-schema), and how the final shape came together. Read this before working on v2 to understand why the constraints exist.
- Three new binaries: `bin/gstack-question-log` (validated append to question-log.jsonl), `bin/gstack-question-preference` (explicit preference store with user-origin gate), `bin/gstack-developer-profile` (supersedes gstack-builder-profile; supports --read, --migrate, --derive, --profile, --gap, --trace, --check-mismatch, --vibe).
- Three new preamble resolvers in `scripts/resolvers/question-tuning.ts`: question preference check (before each AskUserQuestion), question log (after), inline tune feedback with user-origin gate instructions. Consolidated into one compact `generateQuestionTuning` section for tier >= 2 skills to minimize token overhead.
- Hand-crafted psychographic signal map (`scripts/psychographic-signals.ts`) with version hash so cached profiles recompute automatically when the map changes between gstack versions. 9 signal keys covering scope-appetite, architecture-care, test-discipline, code-quality-care, detail-preference, design-care, devex-care, distribution-care, session-mode.
- Keyword-fallback one-way-door classifier (`scripts/one-way-doors.ts`) — secondary safety layer for ad-hoc question IDs that don't appear in the registry. Primary safety is the registry declaration.
- 118 new tests across 4 test files: `test/plan-tune.test.ts` (47 tests — schema, helpers, safety, classifier, signal map, archetypes, preamble injection, end-to-end pipeline), `test/gstack-question-log.test.ts` (21 tests — valid payloads, rejected payloads, injection defense), `test/gstack-question-preference.test.ts` (31 tests — check/write/read/clear/stats + user-origin gate + schema validation), `test/gstack-developer-profile.test.ts` (25 tests — read/migrate/derive/trace/gap/vibe/check-mismatch). Gate-tier E2E test `skill-e2e-plan-tune.test.ts` registered (runs on `bun run test:evals`).
- Scope rollback driven by outside-voice review. The initial CEO EXPANSION plan bundled psychographic auto-decide + blind-spot coach + LANDED celebration + full substrate wiring. Codex's 20-point critique caught that without a typed question registry, "substrate" was marketing; E1/E4/E6 formed a logical contradiction; profile poisoning was unaddressed; LANDED in the preamble injected side effects into every skill's hot path. Accepted the rollback: v1 ships the schema + observation layer, v2 adds behavior adaptation only after the foundation proves durable. All six expansions are tracked as P0 TODOs with explicit acceptance criteria.
## [0.18.1.0] - 2026-04-16
### Fixed