diff --git a/changelog.d/gsta259-3925-unverified-verdict.md b/changelog.d/gsta259-3925-unverified-verdict.md
index f159cbe8e..c066e3905 100644
--- a/changelog.d/gsta259-3925-unverified-verdict.md
+++ b/changelog.d/gsta259-3925-unverified-verdict.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 ### Fixed
 
-- **An outside review that says it could not verify the change is no longer read as a pass (#3925).** `lib/outside-review-result.ts` printed `VERDICT: clean` / `FINDINGS: none` for a Codex reply ending `Verdict: Can't verify (one changed file excluded and four required suites blocked)`. Now the reply's last `Verdict:` line has to approve the change (`ready`, `LGTM`, `approve`, `ship it`, `pass`, `clean`, `good to go`, or exactly `NO_FINDINGS`) or say `not ready`, which still blocks. Anything else, an approval with a question mark, or an approval that says something was excluded, blocked, skipped, not run, not executed or could not be verified, is `VERDICT: unverified` with the new `REASON: unverified_verdict` and exit 4. Which lines count as a verdict is unchanged: a `Verdict:` line, with inline code blanked, so a verdict written only in code reads as unverified. See docs/troubleshooting.md#outside-review-unverified-verdict.
+- **An outside review that says it could not verify the change is no longer read as a pass (#3925).** `lib/outside-review-result.ts` printed `VERDICT: clean` / `FINDINGS: none` for a Codex reply ending `Verdict: Can't verify (one changed file excluded and four required suites blocked)`. Now the reply's last `Verdict:` line has to approve the change (`ready`, `LGTM`, `approve`, `ship it`, `pass`, `clean`, `good to go`, or exactly `NO_FINDINGS`) or say `not ready`, which still blocks. Anything else, an approval with a question mark, or an approval that says something was excluded, blocked, skipped, not run, not executed or could not be verified, is `VERDICT: unverified` with the new `REASON: unverified_verdict` and exit 4. Which lines count as a verdict is unchanged. It is still a `Verdict:` line read with inline code blanked, so a verdict written only in code reads as unverified. See docs/troubleshooting.md#outside-review-unverified-verdict.
 - **A numbered finding without a P0-P3 tag is no longer dropped (#3925).** A reply with `1. **Nonblocking — x**`, `Verdict: ready` and `END OF REPORT: 1 findings (0 blocking)` printed `FINDINGS: none`. In a reply with a `Verdict:` line that doesn't conclude it found nothing, every numbered item is now counted as a finding, and one with no readable severity makes `FINDINGS:` print `unspecified`, in the helper and in `gstack-outside-voice run`. The verdict is unchanged (`clean` here, since the reviewer approved). A consult answer with no `Verdict:` line, and a real clean reply, still read `clean` / `none`; a consult verdict that picks an option (`Verdict: go with B`) is `unverified`, since a consult isn't a pass/fail review.