diff --git a/.agents/skills/gstack-retro/SKILL.md b/.agents/skills/gstack-retro/SKILL.md index c65ae264..908d779b 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/gstack-retro/SKILL.md +++ b/.agents/skills/gstack-retro/SKILL.md @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ From commit diffs, estimate PR sizes and bucket them: - **Small** (<100 LOC) - **Medium** (100-500 LOC) - **Large** (500-1500 LOC) -- **XL** (1500+ LOC) — flag these with file counts +- **XL** (1500+ LOC) ### Step 8: Focus Score + Ship of the Week @@ -634,14 +634,13 @@ Narrative interpreting what the team-wide patterns mean: Narrative covering: - Commit type mix and what it reveals -- PR size discipline (are PRs staying small?) +- PR size distribution and what it reveals about shipping cadence - Fix-chain detection (sequences of fix commits on the same subsystem) - Version bump discipline ### Code Quality Signals - Test LOC ratio trend - Hotspot analysis (are the same files churning?) -- Any XL PRs that should have been split - Greptile signal ratio and trend (if history exists): "Greptile: X% signal (Y valid catches, Z false positives)" ### Test Health @@ -680,7 +679,7 @@ For each teammate (sorted by commits descending), write a section: - "Fixed the N+1 query that was causing 2s load times on the dashboard" - **Opportunity for growth**: 1 specific, constructive suggestion. Frame as investment, not criticism. Examples: - "Test coverage on the payment module is at 8% — worth investing in before the next feature lands on top of it" - - "3 of the 5 PRs were 800+ LOC — breaking these up would catch issues earlier and make review easier" + - "Most commits land in a single burst — spacing work across the day could reduce context-switching fatigue" - "All commits land between 1-4am — sustainable pace matters for code quality long-term" **AI collaboration note:** If many commits have `Co-Authored-By` AI trailers (e.g., Claude, Copilot), note the AI-assisted commit percentage as a team metric. Frame it neutrally — "N% of commits were AI-assisted" — without judgment.