mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-11-11 11:10:13 +01:00
dependabot/github_actions/github-actions-8732fb71db
13
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a2d7a6f0fe |
v1.93.4.0 fix(review-ledger): a finding's own Severity field sets its label, not severity words in its text (GST-976) (#3867)
* fix(review-ledger): a finding's Severity field sets its label, body severity words never raise it (GST-976) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): Severity counts only in field position, locus-first and emoji-led labels lead, an inline field floors the next (GST-976 review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): linear lead-label prefix, all-caps leads before a space, fields after a parenthesis or without a colon at the line start (GST-976 review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): a lead's file:line has no runaway backtracking and may be a range; a mid-line Severity field must close its clause (GST-976 review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): a field at the line's start needs no closing clause; mid-line fields accept : / and → after the label (GST-976 fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment and review-policy collect step for GST-976 Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): a Severity field's label chain (High/Critical) takes its strongest label; mid-line fields keep the clause-closing set (GST-976 scoped check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(review-ledger): never weaker than main invariant over pinned inputs, fixtures and generated field shapes; a multi-label Severity field counts as none, lowercase fields keep their label (GST-976) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: GST-976 re-audit, multi-label and lowercase Severity fields Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
26539fb0d9 |
v1.92.82.0 fix(ship): verify re-derives each merged finding from the reader's output (GST-541) (#3717)
* fix(ship): verify re-derives each merged row by index (GST-541) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): verify fails closed on a missing output, a forged merged copy and uncollected rows (GST-541 review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a missing recorded output file is dirty even with no findings (GST-541 fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a reply collect refused as no review keeps its NOT_REVIEWED row (Rule 25 with #3701) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): only a reply refused for its tree skips verify's count check (GST-541 fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): verify re-derives a tree refusal from the reply before it skips the count check or voids an output (GST-541 fix-check 2) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): an output with no readable recorded file is dirty even with no ids (GST-541 fix-check 3) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): verify accepts an output as a review only when its reply names the render's tree (GST-541 red team) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review-ledger): judge binding compares real paths, so a run reached through a symlink verifies clean Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
a00149e86e |
v1.92.73.0 fix(review): read printed: fingerprint lines, stop on a foreign start checkout, give Step 11 its start token (GST-776) (#3798)
* fix(review): readers start their reply with the bare REVIEWED_TREE line; a printed: label is read (GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(ship): the Capy pass program refuses a foreign start checkout and takes Step 11's adversarial-review start (GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(ship): a start directory outside any checkout still dispatches; the Capy skill's Step 11 note fits its context budget (GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(ship): the start probe stops on an unreadable start directory, runs once per stage, and logStart is validated; brief wording stays main's (GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(changelog): GST-776 review dispatch fixes
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): a wholly bold printed: REVIEWED_TREE line is read (GST-776 fix-check)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): the GBRA-218 one-line shape (echoed command, then printed: REVIEWED_TREE) is read; a wrong tree is still refused (GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(ship): the logStart STOP text no longer names gstack-review-log --start ahead of the pass call (reader-drift order test, GST-776)
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* test(budget): capy/skill/gstack ceiling 5316 after the main merge
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Revert "test(budget): capy/skill/gstack ceiling 5316 after the main merge"
This reverts commit
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
0ee985b42d |
v1.92.65.0 fix(review): every reviewer brief opens with the REVIEWED_TREE step (GST-897) (#3830)
* fix(review): open every outside-voice brief with the REVIEWED_TREE step (GST-897) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: register the review-wrong-tree fixtures as free (GST-897) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * changelog: GST-897 fragment Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
1ea86923a8 |
v1.92.37.0 fix: review briefs check template slots before pasting reviewer text (GST-797) (#3797)
* fix: check brief slots before pasting reviewer text (GST-797) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: put held reviewer text back only at its per-render token (GST-797 adversarial) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment for GST-797 Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment states the byte-identity claim without an unsourced count Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: changelog fragment scopes the byte-identity claim to briefs that quote no slot name Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: review-policy says reviewer text reaches the brief as written (GST-797) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
216493fb32 |
v1.92.36.0 fix(review): keep every severity label, so a blocker after "no CRITICAL issues except" is no longer lost (GSTA-167 S1) (#3803)
* test(review): a blocker in an exception clause after a negated severity word collects at its label (GSTA-167 S1, failing first) Adds the six exception-clause probes that collect nothing on |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
8cef24cea9 |
v1.92.29.0 fix(ship): review collector skips negated severity words and records the reviewer's stated severity (GST-766) (#3787)
* test(review): a negated severity word in a reader's prose is not a finding (GST-766, failing first) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(review): collect skips a severity word a negation governs, so closing prose like 'found nothing CRITICAL' is no finding (GST-766) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): GST-766 collector skips negated severity words Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (GST-766: no negation carry over a comma or slash; quantifiers and Markdown between negation and label; a field label or a located line is kept) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: Step 11 review fixes (GST-766: a located line keeps every label; a negated label must end the clause or name a kind of finding; bounded windows) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: fix-check fixes (GST-766: drop the located-line and tail-word rules that brought phantoms back; carry negation over a comma or slash; numeric zero is no negation) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test: a finding keeps its reviewer's stated severity and Blocks (GST-766 part a, failing first) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: record the reviewer's stated severity and Blocks beside the collected label (GST-766 part a) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pass 2 review fix (GST-766: a line whose labels are all negated closes the open finding, so the next finding's Severity field no longer attaches to the previous one) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: Step 11 pass 2 fix (GST-766: a line whose labels are all negated always heads the next finding, indented or not) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: review-policy describes negated labels and the stated record (GST-766) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * revert: keep the pinned Step 9.4 brief unchanged (GST-766); stated stays in merged.jsonl and the deferred renderer Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: review-policy notes that Step 9.4 does not copy stated yet (GST-766) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
5b7b0950b8 |
v1.92.7.0 fix: /ship's review pass works on large diffs again (GST-507) (#3736)
* fix(review): gstack-review-plan and review-dispatch let stdout drain before exit, so a large plan JSON reaches pass whole (GST-507) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (gstack-review-dispatch: a BriefError no longer falls through to the rethrow, GST-507) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
2d1b55d762 |
v1.91.379.0 fix: review readers work in the checkout /ship ships (GST-482) (#3701)
* fix: review readers work in the checkout /ship ships (GST-482) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (REVIEWED_TREE parsing, outside-voice findings kept, unreadable checkout refused) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: outside-voice tree failure wording (fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
41a67b996d |
v1.91.367.0 fix(ship): collect never counts a non-review as clean, and a severity word used as a word is no finding (GST-434, GST-435) (#3677)
* fix(ship): collect counts a reply with no finding and no clean marker as a non-review, never clean (GSTA-167) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a label word used as a word is no finding, and a paragraph finding keeps its detail bullets (GST-435) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a negation counts only when it applies to the label; compact table rows keep their label; register the review-ledger fixtures (pre-landing review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): negation stops at a conjunction, a summary line with a blocker stays, detail bullets need no gap and no locus; a re-sent review voids a refusal and the outside voice can be collected unavailable (pre-landing review) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): bold and code marks keep a negated label a word, a subject phrase with and/or stays negated, table negation counts, --unavailable refuses an output with findings, VOIDED needs a re-send (fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a quoted label counts at the end of its line and in table cells, which ends a negated subject, and a negated subject never cancels a label on a file:line line (fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(ship): a line naming a file:line or a table row always keeps a finding; "of which" stays inside a negated subject (fix-check) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(ship): the review-pass fake outside voice ends with its Recommendation: line, the marker its brief prescribes (#3665 integration) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * revert(ship): parseFindings labels and negation back to main; GST-435 moves to its own PR (seed branch gsta-435-seed). Keeps the non-review rule and the detail-bullet merge (split) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
b6cb70aea1 |
v1.91.355.0 ship: poll readers in-program, 32 KB returns, gated fix program, unattended push defers the guard offer, calls meter (GSTA-167 calls PR 1) (#3662)
* ship: poll readers in-program, never wait on wakes; 32 KB returns; gated fix program; unattended push defers the guard offer; calls meter (GSTA-167 calls PR 1) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: pre-landing review fixes (inventory lib/ship-release.ts as a GSTACK_SESSION_KIND reader) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(ship-budget): document calls and dotted --step notes Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * ship: judge treats a missing severity as invalid; Capy passes rendered briefs via cat (replay C1-34 breaks) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: keep the Capy skill under its context budget after the main merge Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
8966f3620c |
v1.91.350.0 feat(review): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack: blocking floor in both voices, one batched specialist, data-file classifier (#3660)
* feat(review): variant G part 4: data files no code names are docs in classifyDiff, untested state-matrix cells map below the floor per cell (GSTA-167 PR-a)
Part 4a: lib/review-depth.ts owns DATA_PATH (JSON, JSONL, NDJSON, CSV, TSV, raster
images; YAML, TOML and SVG stay code) and applies the data rule only in classifyDiff,
to candidates lib/review-collect.ts finds no non-docs consumer for (git grep of
basenames at head, merge base and, live, the working tree; data-to-data chains four
deep; over 2,000 candidates keeps all code; a grep failure fails closed). classifyPath
and every path-only caller are unchanged; the receipt gate scan decides through
gateScanNeeded (path-only), so it cannot be skipped. gstack-ship-preflight computes
RUNTIME_LINES with classifyDiff over gstack-review-plan --json (now with consumed).
Part 4b: lib/review-scope.ts mapStateMatrixOutput maps an "untested cell" finding to
INFORMATIONAL when its cell has test null in the same output's matrix and it is the
only finding on that cell; gstack-state-matrix findings prints it for Step 9.2 before
the merge. state-machines.md is byte-identical; check still reads the raw output.
Reviewer-brief pins repinned under no-loss replay PR-a (Arm 4: plan identity at the 14
cohort heads; free exact re-score of saved C, D and A' findings).
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(review): variant G parts 1 and 3: blocking floor in both prose voices, specialists at medium (GSTA-167)
Part 1: the native adversarial and outside-voice prompts end with the blocking
floor ("would fail a test, break production, or lose data or secrets") and ask
each finding for Severity and Blocks: yes|no. Additive rule: a finding is
CRITICAL when its label rule says so or it says Blocks: yes; Blocks: no never
lowers one (proseVoiceSeverity, BLOCKING_FLOOR in lib/review-scope.ts).
Part 3: ROLE_EFFORT puts specialists at medium; Red Team, native adversarial
and fix-check stay full; light's batched specialist (carries the Red Team
prompt) stays full; --no-tiers sends specialists to host.
Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay G1 (live Arm G1, not yet run):
ship/sections/review-army.md, ship/sections/adversarial.md,
review/sections/adversarial.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on G1's pass.
Review-skill parity ratio 1.3136 -> 1.3180 and the gstack-review size pins
+537 for the approved +0.3k tokens per voice.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(review): variant G part 2: lean ensemble, one batched specialist at every depth (GSTA-167)
planReview dispatches one 'specialist batched' at standard and full depth (and
light, which adds the Red Team checklist): Testing and Security always on code
and gate class, plus State-machines, Data-migration, API-contract and Design
when scope asks; a forced checklist always joins. Maintainability, Performance
and Simplification are read only when forced (SKIP names them). LIGHT_FIXED is
[testing, security]; BATCH_SCOPED joins DEPTH_RULES so old receipts re-plan.
The Red Team rule and prompt are unchanged; it reads the batched reader's
merged findings. specialistsFor stays as the legacy selection the dispatch
compare script models.
Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay L (live Arm L, scored L∘G1 vs G1;
not yet run): ship/sections/review-army.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on
L's pass.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(review): variant G on #3648's dispatch: Blocks: yes collects as CRITICAL, batched checklists by name (GSTA-167)
Integrates parts 1 and 2 with gstack-review-dispatch (#3648):
- lib/review-ledger.ts parseFindings: a prose voice's "Blocks: yes" makes its
own line, or the finding on the line just before it, CRITICAL in
merged.jsonl (normalizer v2, certified by round 5's G1), so judge refuses a
lead that keeps it below the floor; with no finding before it the Blocks
line is its own CRITICAL finding. "Blocks: no" never lowers a label.
- lib/review-brief.ts: the outside-voice brief no longer appends "Give each
finding a severity"; the section's prompt now asks for Severity and Blocks,
so the brief is the certified section prompt plus the branch diff.
- bin/gstack-review-dispatch render --checklists takes the plan's
checklists= names (review/specialists/<name>.md) as well as paths and
refuses an unknown one, since the batched reader is now every depth's
specialist dispatch.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore(changelog): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack fragment
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): consumer scan survives grep.lineNumber/grep.column; collect reads separate-line Severity/Blocks
/ship pass 1 (PR #3660): the Red Team CRITICAL at lib/review-collect.ts:120 and the
informational findings in the same batch. proseVoiceSeverity had no caller and is
removed; the normalizer v2 table now runs through parseFindings, the path collect uses.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): collect keeps every prose blocker and one id per finding
/ship pass 2 (PR #3660): an unlabeled line carrying an inline Blocks: yes collects as
CRITICAL again; Severity/Blocks continuation needs a colon, stops at a list item, heading,
bold paragraph opener or a repeated field, and never swallows a top-level bullet or its
section label; the native voice's FIXABLE collects as CRITICAL under its role with or
without a dispatch name; the consumer scan adds --no-color.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): a later finding's fields never land on the one before it; explicit Severity wins its line
/ship pass 2 Red Team (PR #3660): prose after a finding's Severity/Blocks field, a
post-blank paragraph or a line in an indented block starts the next finding, and a
line's explicit Severity: label decides it over other label words on the line.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(review): FIXABLE outranks a Severity label on its line; a blocker keeps its own id and subject
/ship fix-check (PR #3660): labels are named before the strongest is taken, so a one-line
native FIXABLE ... Severity: Medium collects as CRITICAL; a later finding starts at a
file:line after the open finding's fields, field bullets stay on their finding, a field
line may omit the colon, and continuation prose never replaces a list item's subject.
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(changelog): GSTA-167 fragment adds round 6 and the collect and consumer-scan fixes
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
|
21277291c8 |
v1.91.345.0 feat(ship): compact driver plus preflight/release bins over the restored reviewers (GSTA-167) (#3648)
* feat(ship): GSTA-167 turn levers on the restored reviewers: ship preflight/release bins, own-jam meter, dispatch-pair metering, ship/DRIVER.md
Ports the non-reviewer parts of #3633 (gsta-167-pr34) and #3637 (gsta-167-pr5 @2914400)
onto main
|