7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 89f2033004 v1.91.358.0 review: targeted read-only pass on money, gate, auth and secret code (GST-257 part 1, report-only) (#3671)
* review: targeted read-only pass on money, gate, auth and secret diffs (GST-257 part 1, report-only)

lib/review-targeted.ts classifies a diff's added and deleted lines into
money, gate, auth and secret (token-bounded, docs and tests excluded,
fails closed to all four). gstack-review-plan prints TARGETED and
dispatches one read-only targeted reader at full effort when a class
hits; review/specialists/targeted.md is its brief. The receipt records
review_targeted bound to product_patch_id, a carry keeps it, and
gstack-ship-queue ready / train build print a report-only
REVIEW_TARGETED line that refuses nothing.

No-loss evidence: the dispatch-superset test in
test/review-targeted.test.ts runs gstack-review-plan on 18 fixture diffs
and requires every reviewer main dispatched at 8be7f21, unchanged, plus
only the targeted reader. Brief identity: gstack-review-dispatch render
on this tree and origin/main 2356792 gives 13 of 13 existing reviewer
briefs byte-identical (handoffs/GSTA-160/gst257-briefcmp/SUMMARY.txt).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (targeted patch id covers tests, record binds the diff it read, role list pin)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: targeted reader reads the merge base on every pass; dirty-tree record test

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: targeted render takes --base and any spelling of the merge base; Step 11 says the merge base; docs gate-path list

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: type the fail-closed class list (typecheck:test ratchet)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 09:07:30 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 8966f3620c v1.91.350.0 feat(review): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack: blocking floor in both voices, one batched specialist, data-file classifier (#3660)
* feat(review): variant G part 4: data files no code names are docs in classifyDiff, untested state-matrix cells map below the floor per cell (GSTA-167 PR-a)

Part 4a: lib/review-depth.ts owns DATA_PATH (JSON, JSONL, NDJSON, CSV, TSV, raster
images; YAML, TOML and SVG stay code) and applies the data rule only in classifyDiff,
to candidates lib/review-collect.ts finds no non-docs consumer for (git grep of
basenames at head, merge base and, live, the working tree; data-to-data chains four
deep; over 2,000 candidates keeps all code; a grep failure fails closed). classifyPath
and every path-only caller are unchanged; the receipt gate scan decides through
gateScanNeeded (path-only), so it cannot be skipped. gstack-ship-preflight computes
RUNTIME_LINES with classifyDiff over gstack-review-plan --json (now with consumed).

Part 4b: lib/review-scope.ts mapStateMatrixOutput maps an "untested cell" finding to
INFORMATIONAL when its cell has test null in the same output's matrix and it is the
only finding on that cell; gstack-state-matrix findings prints it for Step 9.2 before
the merge. state-machines.md is byte-identical; check still reads the raw output.

Reviewer-brief pins repinned under no-loss replay PR-a (Arm 4: plan identity at the 14
cohort heads; free exact re-score of saved C, D and A' findings).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G parts 1 and 3: blocking floor in both prose voices, specialists at medium (GSTA-167)

Part 1: the native adversarial and outside-voice prompts end with the blocking
floor ("would fail a test, break production, or lose data or secrets") and ask
each finding for Severity and Blocks: yes|no. Additive rule: a finding is
CRITICAL when its label rule says so or it says Blocks: yes; Blocks: no never
lowers one (proseVoiceSeverity, BLOCKING_FLOOR in lib/review-scope.ts).
Part 3: ROLE_EFFORT puts specialists at medium; Red Team, native adversarial
and fix-check stay full; light's batched specialist (carries the Red Team
prompt) stays full; --no-tiers sends specialists to host.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay G1 (live Arm G1, not yet run):
ship/sections/review-army.md, ship/sections/adversarial.md,
review/sections/adversarial.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on G1's pass.
Review-skill parity ratio 1.3136 -> 1.3180 and the gstack-review size pins
+537 for the approved +0.3k tokens per voice.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G part 2: lean ensemble, one batched specialist at every depth (GSTA-167)

planReview dispatches one 'specialist batched' at standard and full depth (and
light, which adds the Red Team checklist): Testing and Security always on code
and gate class, plus State-machines, Data-migration, API-contract and Design
when scope asks; a forced checklist always joins. Maintainability, Performance
and Simplification are read only when forced (SKIP names them). LIGHT_FIXED is
[testing, security]; BATCH_SCOPED joins DEPTH_RULES so old receipts re-plan.
The Red Team rule and prompt are unchanged; it reads the batched reader's
merged findings. specialistsFor stays as the legacy selection the dispatch
compare script models.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay L (live Arm L, scored L∘G1 vs G1;
not yet run): ship/sections/review-army.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on
L's pass.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G on #3648's dispatch: Blocks: yes collects as CRITICAL, batched checklists by name (GSTA-167)

Integrates parts 1 and 2 with gstack-review-dispatch (#3648):
- lib/review-ledger.ts parseFindings: a prose voice's "Blocks: yes" makes its
  own line, or the finding on the line just before it, CRITICAL in
  merged.jsonl (normalizer v2, certified by round 5's G1), so judge refuses a
  lead that keeps it below the floor; with no finding before it the Blocks
  line is its own CRITICAL finding. "Blocks: no" never lowers a label.
- lib/review-brief.ts: the outside-voice brief no longer appends "Give each
  finding a severity"; the section's prompt now asks for Severity and Blocks,
  so the brief is the certified section prompt plus the branch diff.
- bin/gstack-review-dispatch render --checklists takes the plan's
  checklists= names (review/specialists/<name>.md) as well as paths and
  refuses an unknown one, since the batched reader is now every depth's
  specialist dispatch.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(changelog): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack fragment

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): consumer scan survives grep.lineNumber/grep.column; collect reads separate-line Severity/Blocks

/ship pass 1 (PR #3660): the Red Team CRITICAL at lib/review-collect.ts:120 and the
informational findings in the same batch. proseVoiceSeverity had no caller and is
removed; the normalizer v2 table now runs through parseFindings, the path collect uses.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): collect keeps every prose blocker and one id per finding

/ship pass 2 (PR #3660): an unlabeled line carrying an inline Blocks: yes collects as
CRITICAL again; Severity/Blocks continuation needs a colon, stops at a list item, heading,
bold paragraph opener or a repeated field, and never swallows a top-level bullet or its
section label; the native voice's FIXABLE collects as CRITICAL under its role with or
without a dispatch name; the consumer scan adds --no-color.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a later finding's fields never land on the one before it; explicit Severity wins its line

/ship pass 2 Red Team (PR #3660): prose after a finding's Severity/Blocks field, a
post-blank paragraph or a line in an indented block starts the next finding, and a
line's explicit Severity: label decides it over other label words on the line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): FIXABLE outranks a Severity label on its line; a blocker keeps its own id and subject

/ship fix-check (PR #3660): labels are named before the strongest is taken, so a one-line
native FIXABLE ... Severity: Medium collects as CRITICAL; a later finding starts at a
file:line after the open finding's fields, field bullets stay on their finding, a field
line may omit the colon, and continuation prose never replaces a list item's subject.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GSTA-167 fragment adds round 6 and the collect and consumer-scan fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 05:06:03 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 21277291c8 v1.91.345.0 feat(ship): compact driver plus preflight/release bins over the restored reviewers (GSTA-167) (#3648)
* feat(ship): GSTA-167 turn levers on the restored reviewers: ship preflight/release bins, own-jam meter, dispatch-pair metering, ship/DRIVER.md

Ports the non-reviewer parts of #3633 (gsta-167-pr34) and #3637 (gsta-167-pr5 @2914400)
onto main ae3d58c (v1.91.331.0). Reviewer briefs, checklists, the fix-check prompt and
the depth rules are byte-identical to main and now pinned in
test/review-packets-removed.test.ts.

Left out: gstack-review-packet and its libs, parallel/batched fanout, --like, collect,
the audit prompt split, the docs-audit packet, review-army/adversarial/outside-voice
edits, the gate-scan summary-only block and the review-depth scope-error change.
Packet-bytes reader pricing is dropped from gstack-ship-budget; handoff READ ranges
send each section whole; the driver runs the audit, review, adversarial and
documentation sections as written.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(context-budget): raise the capy/skill/gstack eager ceiling to its captured value after the main merge (own-jam meter, driver and reviewer-batch prose, GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship-driver): name ship/DRIVER.md.tmpl so the pregate maps the template to its test lane (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-driver): keep the skill generator off lib/ship-budget so a minimal setup checkout still renders (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(windows): keep test/ship-release.test.ts off the Windows subset; it launches the shebang bin and sh stubs directly (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant E orchestration: one program per review pass and Step 14.5 audit, the review child starts at Step 9, a metered dispatch:docs role, and the driver's record headings (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant G orchestration: one call per driver phase (9 for a clean pass, at most 12), gstack-ship-preflight --audit for single reads and deterministic audits, an observe-mode ledger with note and credits, 240 s wait pings, and small-model audit readers (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): a Capy handoff child needs no jam id: verify-handoff with no reading makes it parent-metered (METER: parent), it never delegates on an unknown charge, and reconcile charges the parent's counter delta (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a poll settles a reader only at done, failed or a final summary, never a fresh idle; return settles the child's open step reservation (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): return releases an open step reservation under the estimate meter instead of booking its projection; measured meters still settle it (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a clean fix-check after below-floor fixes is done; Step 11 and fix-check below-floor findings are notes at pass 1

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): verbatim reviewer briefs and loss-free collection (gstack-review-dispatch render/sent/collect/judge/verify)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

- verify requires each output's brief rendered and sent verbatim, reruns judge
  against the recorded judged.jsonl hash, and flags outputs collected after judge
- judge drops self-folds, fold cycles and chains
- prose findings parse a leading label or a label heading, not any severity word
- releasePaths: manifests count as release metadata only for version-only edits,
  lockfiles never; TODOS.md stays out of lane-evidence exemptions
- push stops when the sealed-output guard did not run
- ship-audit reads the test tree once instead of one git grep per file
- drop the uncalled --delegate measured mode; doc/help step-number fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (pass 2)

- collect keeps a finding wherever its label stands (headings, table rows,
  mid-line, Informational and upper-case labels); only top-level list items
  inherit a label heading, and any heading or bold-only line ends it
- judge treats a merged file missing any collected id as a drop; verify flags
  merged_ids_missing and a sent reader never collected (NOT_COLLECTED)
- finish computes release paths after --build, so a build that rewrites
  package.json is a build-input change

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): verify per render, voided superseded mismatches

- verify treats each render as one dispatch of its reader, so a two-pass
  ledger compares pass-1 sends with pass-1 briefs (later renders print as
  <reader>@2); outputs bind to the latest send of their own render
- a mismatched send re-sent byte-exact before anything was collected is void
  and counted (voided=N on the verdict line); one that produced an output
  stays MISMATCH
- an indented bold sub-line no longer ends a label section (fix-check)
- docs: a failed reader is collected from its failure text

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): only the newest render of a path checks its file; absolute ledger paths

- a later render into the same briefs directory overwrites the earlier brief by
  design, so verify checks a brief file only for the newest render of that path
- collect and judge record absolute output, merged and judged paths, so verify
  reads them from any directory
- docs: a failed reader's failure text is parsed like any output

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): the changelog_fragments fragment is release metadata

Fix-check 4 (CRITICAL) after the main merge: releasePaths omitted
<changelog_fragments.dir>/<branch-slug>.md, so finish stopped on the
fragment Step 13 writes under gstack's policy, or routed it to re-review.
version now names the fragment in its Step 13 NEXT line instead of
[Unreleased], DRIVER.md Step 13 writes and lints where NEXT says, and the
preflight POLICY line says Steps 12-16.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 01:09:31 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 0732890091 v1.91.323.0 ship: proportional (scoped) second review pass after a blocking fix (GSTA-152 PR B) (#3596)
* ship: token cap with real meters and fresh-context delegation (GSTA-152 PR A)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: scoped second review pass after a blocking fix (GSTA-152 PR B)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (stopped or lost capped run no longer blocks uncapped review starts; short child return reconciles incomplete)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: carry estimate spend across a meter epoch change; calibration docs match their evidence

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: load the committed calibration file by its repo path so pregate maps it to a lane

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: fix fence placeholders and register claude-usage fixture (GSTA-152 PR A)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: run ship-budget and review-log bins through their interpreters so Windows can launch them

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: plan the full pass 2 when the fix range touches a gate path or is empty (GSTA-152 PR B review)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: classify the fix range and the diff at the range base with their own scope and gate scan (GSTA-152 PR B pass 2)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: a full pass 1 always gets a full pass 2; drop the at-base reconstruction (GSTA-152 PR B pass 3)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-29 19:53:29 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 148d28ea81 feat(ship): /ship and /autoplan size their review to the diff (GSTA-131) (#3527)
* wip(GSTA-131): review depth, fix-check transitions, dispatch counters, carry pregate, autoplan round policy

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* wip(GSTA-131): reviewers stay at full effort; audits light

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): Step 9 dispatches what gstack-review-plan plans; fix-check after below-floor fixes; cap two full passes plus one fix-check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: review-dispatch-compare has a free lane; review-depth fixtures registered free; resumed max_rounds case off the old default

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(GSTA-131): ship review pass-1 repairs: fix-check binds under its own skill, Step 11.5 accepts a fix-check or a planned adversarial skip, delta carry with a pregate, carry --pregate pinned to the checkout, quiet-after-cap revise regates, skill-dir markdown and rule docs classed code, gate signals from tests class up, plan fails closed on git errors, per-class compare ratios

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(GSTA-131): ship review pass-2 repairs: Step 11 follows the last full-pass plan, Important Rules restored, ship goldens regenerated, true per-class medians, review-policy transitions and once-per-invocation voices, docs/** assets stay docs-class, CLI and fix-check binding tests

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GSTA-131 review depth, fix-check, delta /ship and autoplan rounds

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: ship-policy cap and counters, review-policy /review cycle cap, unattended passes (docs audit)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): 400-word findings cap fits the /review size pins (five host pins lowered by 2); CHANGELOG max_rounds wording

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): gate integrity names the size-ledger entry and the lowered /review pins

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: the round-budget case asserts the default through ROUNDS output only (pregate literals heuristic)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: curate ship-receipt-carry-pregate out of the Windows lane like its --pregate siblings

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): end the Windows curation sentence instead of a mid-sentence colon

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): one decision each for the review-loop exits, the planned adversarial skip and Step 16's TODOS rerun (screen judge repair)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): fix-check repairs: pin the renamed Step 11 heading, keep the below-floor exit at the cap, name the plan run a repeat reuses, print the native skip on outside-only plans

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-28 05:45:54 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] f27a7605d4 v1.91.270.0 feat(ship): version-less repos, docs-audit record and caps, the frozen-scope paid case, and the review-loop follow-ups (#3487)
* feat(ship): version-less repos, docs-audit record and caps, the frozen-scope paid case, and the review-loop follow-ups

Follow-up to the review-loop convergence PR: Step 12 and the CHANGELOG step skip cleanly in a repository with no version source (receipt version "none"); the receipt records the docs audit outcome and the owner exception (DOCS_AUDIT_BLOCKED without one) and a policy may declare doc caps (gstack-ship-receipt docs-caps); docs/unattended.md names the READY evidence and the cross-family outside voice; the ship-frozen-scope-convergence behaviour case runs the generated Step 9.4 under review_scope frozen through the real binaries; carry probes git >= 2.39 (RECEIPT_GIT_TOO_OLD); defer passes the repository to gh repo view positionally and names its search limit; late defers count without being passes; reviewers diff from RANGE_BASE on pass 2+; the cap check runs before edits; --review-fanout batches specialists by free slots; read --check-prose compares quoted counters with the receipt (RECEIPT_PROSE_MISMATCH); checklist rule ids prereg-with-results and test-keyboard-count-loop; gstack-coauthor-trailers.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: repair the CI reds the retarget onto main surfaced (test-only)

Seven test files, no product change. The pull_request run at 2d73fadd
failed 5 Linux shards and 4 Windows shards:

- test/ship-frozen-scope-actor.test.ts imported only test code, so the
  test-of-test ratchet refused it; the first case now recomputes the loop
  summary with summarizeReviewLoop/reviewLoopLine from lib/review-scope and
  asserts the exact REVIEW_LOOP line. Its three cases replay the bash
  workflow through bash -c and the shebang bins, so they are POSIX-only.
- test/codex-host.test.ts: the new gate case is Claude-specific (33 -> 34).
- test/paid-retry-supervision.test.ts: the gate census fixture now carries a
  trial record for the one planned behavior-kind gate case, the way
  test/ci-paid-coordination.test.ts already does.
- test/review-fix-range.test.ts asserted the pre-#3487 DIFF_BASE sentence;
  it now asserts the ${RANGE_BASE:-merge-base} clause that carries the same
  contract (every reviewer reads the range from pass 2 on).
- test/gstack-coauthor-trailers.test.ts: the fixture sets its own git
  identity; a CI runner has none to auto-detect ("Committer identity
  unknown").
- test/review-scope-followups.test.ts and test/gstack-ship-receipt-docs.test.ts:
  the gh and old-git stand-ins are sh scripts on a colon-joined PATH, which
  CreateProcess cannot run, so those three cases skip on win32.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (pass 1)

Twelve informational findings from the /ship pass-1 review, all below the
blocking floor, fixed in place:

- docs-caps reads docs.caps from origin/<base>'s policy (--base <ref>), never
  the branch's copy; an unavailable base policy refuses with
  POLICY_SOURCE_UNAVAILABLE instead of substituting DEFAULT_POLICY
- receiptVersion returns "none" only when the stamp file is absent; other
  errors surface as undefined
- checkReceiptProse groups counters by leaf key and uses word boundaries that
  cover hyphenated names, so shared leaf keys and hyphenated words no longer
  report RECEIPT_PROSE_MISMATCH
- gstack-coauthor-trailers refuses a --range/--base starting with "-",
  prefixes origin/ when origin/<ref> resolves (slash-named branches), and
  passes --end-of-options to git log
- REVIEW_SCOPE_KEY_VERSION and DOCS_CAPS_KEY_VERSION name the releases that
  first read their keys
- the Step 11 late-defer row logs under skill review-late-defer so a tokenless
  review row never reads UNVERIFIED; summarizeReviewLoop counts both
- the "already filed" literal is one constant shared by bin and renderer
- receiptDocs (dead) removed
- Step 14.5 clears .gstack/tmp/docs-audit.json on first entry
- dispatched review prompts carry a literal diff-base sha (<diff-base>) instead
  of a shell variable the reviewer process never sees
- the coauthor-trailers tests launch the bin through runScriptSync so the
  Windows lane can run them

Tests extended for each change; SKILL.md, sections and goldens regenerated.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: cover the carry patch-id refusal (Step 7 coverage gap)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: derive the too-old review_scope minimum from the constant

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: keep co-author trailers in one trailer block

gstack-coauthor-trailers --message appended the new Co-authored-by lines as a
separate paragraph after existing trailers, so git interpret-trailers (and
GitHub attribution) read only the last paragraph and the existing co-author
lost credit. The new lines now join the existing trailer block; the test
checks the result with git interpret-trailers --parse.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: let git place co-author trailers; name the docs key release

gstack-coauthor-trailers --message now runs git interpret-trailers --in-place,
so the appended lines join the existing trailer block whatever its shape
(CRLF, comment lines, folded continuations) and the existing co-author keeps
attribution; the interpret-trailers check in the test carries a timeout for
the spawnSync tripwire. DOCS_CAPS_KEY_VERSION names the release after the
newest CHANGELOG heading on main (1.91.258.0), and a test ties every
unreleased policy key to that next release so a stamp elsewhere fails loudly.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: hold unreleased policy keys newer than any visible heading; pin trailer placement

The CHANGELOG-heading test asked for the exact next release after the newest
heading, which a depth-1 CI clone (no origin/main) computes from the branch
alone, so it went red there. It now requires an unreleased key's version to be
newer than every heading the checkout can see, which holds at depth 1, on the
stamped train tree and on main; the ship-policy comment says who moves the
constant when the stamp lands under another number.

gstack-coauthor-trailers pins git interpret-trailers' placement on the command
line (--no-divider so a --- body line is not a divider, --where end,
--if-exists addIfDifferentNeighbor, trailer.separators=:, -- before the path)
so a user's trailer.* config cannot replace or drop the existing co-author.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: describe the shipped contracts (Step 13 and 14.5)

CHANGELOG [Unreleased]: docs-caps --base <base> reading origin/<base>'s
policy, the review-late-defer row, the literal <diff-base> prompt rule, the
coauthor-trailers placement and refusals, the policy key versions (review_scope
1.91.256.0 re-pin, docs.caps at the stamping release), the version-less
conditions split between Step 12 and the receipt, and the carry refusal wording.
docs/ship-policy.md, docs/review-policy.md and docs/unattended.md follow the
code: docs-caps --base, the literal diff-base sha, the trailer block, the
gstack-outside-voice run binding and the Step 11 row fields.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: scope the literal diff-base claim to the review-army prompts; name where the outside-voice cause lives

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(docsync): declare Step 14.5's own-tree commands to the fixture; exclude .gstack/tmp at the Entry

The ship-docsync-completion and ship-docsync-current paid cases failed twice at
775d9804: Step 14.5's continue path now runs gstack-ship-receipt docs-caps and
writes .gstack/tmp/docs-audit.json, and the docsync fixture's closed interface
declared neither, while its repository had no origin/main for docs-caps to read.
The actor stopped correctly (blocked, no exception) and never reached the
publication stand-in.

- test/helpers/docsync-interface.ts: the three housekeeping commands (the shared
  exclude line, rm -f of the record, docs-caps --base main) and the record write
  are declared, byte for byte with the generated section; DOCS_AUDIT_RECORD_PATHS
  names what the kernel observer may see.
- test/helpers/docsync-observer.ts: accepts exactly those commands and the record
  write; every neighbour (another base, --json, write --docs, another .gstack file)
  stays outside the interface.
- test/helpers/docsync-fixture.ts: every scenario pushes main to the fixture
  remote, as Steps 0-14 would have.
- ship/sections/documentation.md.tmpl: the Entry runs the shared .gstack/tmp
  exclude line before rm -f, so the record never surfaces as an untracked file
  when no earlier step added it; the caps paragraph tightened to hold the ship
  parity ratio at 1.7400.
- test/docsync-command-grammar.test.ts: pins the literals against the generated
  section and the refusals around them.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(docsync): the receipt record is housekeeping for read-only audits and the fault cases too

Pass 9's outside voice found two gaps in the fixture change (2524ec4): a
read-only audit (ship-docsync-current) must still write .gstack/tmp/docs-audit.json,
but docsToolFailures flagged every product write under readOnly before the
record allowance; and the unseeded fault cases (missing-asset, legacy-completion)
run the Entry too, so their kernel-write check saw .git/info/exclude as a
forbidden write because only the lifecycle test named the housekeeping paths.

- docsToolFailures: the record write is permitted under readOnly; the document
  and every other product file stay refused.
- docsWriteFailures: DOCS_AUDIT_RECORD_PATHS are permitted for every caller, so
  the fault evaluator needs no per-scenario list; anything else under .git or
  .gstack stays forbidden.
- test/docsync-command-grammar.test.ts pins both: the record under readOnly, the
  document refused there, the observed housekeeping paths accepted with an empty
  allowance and two neighbours refused.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(docsync): accept the cap gate's ~/.claude/skills/gstack form the section prints (pass 9 Red Team note)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(docsync): name the admitted composed line precisely (pass 9 maintainability note)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(docsync): install lib/ beside bin/ in the fixture so the declared cap gate can load (2524ec4 rerun: module error, not a verdict)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(docsync): admit the Write tool's temp sibling of the receipt record (0230fc2 rerun: both lifecycle cases red on it)

The paid rerun at 0230fc2 cleared every earlier refusal and both cases then
failed on one path: forbidden docs write: .gstack/tmp/docs-audit.json.tmp.<pid>.<12 hex>.
Claude Code's Write and Edit tools land every file, new ones included, through
that sibling plus fsync and rename, and the fixture's kernel observer proved
such a landing for the document only (atomicTargets: [DOC_PATH]).

The observer now treats the record's sibling as a transient file too, and
docsWriteFailures admits it only as the cookie-paired MOVED_FROM source of a
MOVED_TO on the record whose other events are create/modify/attrib/close_write
and which is left in neither snapshot nor in changed. A lingering sibling, an
unpaired move, a move onto another path or a sibling of the document moved onto
the record stay forbidden (grammar test). A live check on this machine saw the
second landing's create/modify/close_write/moved_from events admitted and a
stray sibling refused.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-27 08:16:11 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 576839cb8c v1.91.256.0 feat(ship): review loop converges (frozen scope, 3-pass cap, NO FINDINGS) and receipts carry across conflict-only merges (#3481)
* feat(ship): review loop converges (frozen finding scope, 3-pass cap, NO FINDINGS first-class) and receipts carry across conflict-only merges

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship): keep the Step 9 first-entry and Fix-First phrasing the skip/requeue contract asserts; fill the review record's pass, review_scope and range_base placeholders in the caller template test; narrow a test type

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (pass 1) and the review-loop budget wording

Two blocking findings from /ship's own pass 1, both reproduced in the QA smoke before the fix:
gstack-ship-receipt carry hashed the product diff with git patch-id --stable, which strips
whitespace, so a space moved in a reviewed shell line carried as "no product change"; and it
classed package.json and every lockfile as release metadata, so a dependency swap carried too.
The patch-id is now --verbatim, package.json and VERSION are metadata only while the change is a
version stamp (lib/pregate/stamp-only.ts), lockfiles are product unless the policy names them,
the test globs name code extensions, a dirty working tree refuses before anything is compared,
and a receipt carried twice keeps the reviewed head as carry.from.

gstack-review-scope: an unresolvable base is POLICY_SOURCE_UNAVAILABLE instead of a silent
working-tree read; --range-base is validated; git runs with core.quotePath=false; range_base is
null on pass 1; a blocking finding with no path is fix; category "testing" is a test finding
below the floor; defer searches once, files nothing on a failed search and exits 0 unfiled;
summary refuses zero matching passes and the receipt write is chained to it with &&; a finding
the diff causes elsewhere names the changed line in `cause` and classify follows it.

Review-loop budget wording (ideas from tstack's sol-loop and pstack's interrogate, rewritten;
NOTICE.md): the blocker / should / nit glossary and two stop rules in Step 9.4, the checklist
and docs/review-policy.md; a lead-judgment stage in the finding merge both /review and /ship
render. The core read diffs $RANGE_BASE from pass 2 on. Caps and pins re-measured with reasons.

Step 7 coverage audit: four tests added in existing files, the --review-loop case moved to its
own test (the shared test tripped bun's 5 s default).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pin the renumbered review-army stages and point the wording test at product code

CI at c3e27fc failed three free-tier tests, all this branch's own: the
workflow-required-steps fixture and shared-libs-rendering still pinned the
pre-Lead-judgment stage numbers, and test-of-test-ratchet counted
review-loop-budget-wording.test.ts as test-only code because it read only
generated markdown. The fixture and rendering test now pin stages 1-8, and the
wording test renders both armies through generateReviewArmy and reads the
authored ship template as well as the generated sections.

Pass-2 maintainability notes folded in: docs/troubleshooting.md names the two
new RECEIPT_CARRY_REFUSED causes (dirty tree, unreadable status) and the two new
REVIEW_SCOPE_INPUT causes (non-hex --range-base, summary with no matching
pass); gstack-review-scope's help states that classify reads the base branch's
policy and refuses an unresolvable base unless --policy is passed.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: date a review-log row from its binding start when it has no timestamp

The Step 9.4 template asks the writer to fill `timestamp`; the logger stamps
`review_binding.started_at` but never `timestamp`. `gstack-review-scope
summary` dropped such a row silently, so this PR's own pass 2 was missing from
REVIEW_LOOP (passes=1 for a two-pass loop). A row now dates from `timestamp`,
else from its binding start; a row with neither is still not counted.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pass-4 review fixes (carry stamp rule, deleted-file locus, scanned defer, diff prefixes, row time)

Five findings at the blocking floor from the Step 11 outside voice (gpt-6.1-sol)
and the native adversarial pass, fixed as a fourth pass approved by GStack
Minder under the three-pass policy:

- carry: a path the policy names under stamp_files, stamp_paths or
  release_outputs is metadata only while its change is a stamp (versionStampOnly
  for a manifest kind, stampOnlyText otherwise), the rule the tree receipt
  applies; a logic change in a stamped source file is product. Every
  metadata-listed path is read at both heads and a non-stamp change drops its
  globs from the product exclusion.
- review-scope: parseHunks keeps a deleted file as a whole changed location, so
  a cause anchored in a removed export is the diff's to fix, not deferred.
- defer: issues are filed through lib/gstack-post's publication scan; a HIGH
  finding in the title or body refuses and a MEDIUM one needs a human, both
  recorded as unfiled with the reason; --repo names the destination.
- classify: both diffs pin --src-prefix=a/ --dst-prefix=b/ --no-textconv, so
  diff.mnemonicPrefix cannot send every finding outside.
- summary: a row dates from review_binding.started_at before the writer-typed
  timestamp, so a date-only value cannot drop a real pass.

Docs: ship-policy.md#receipt-carry, review-policy.md, the Step 9.4 template
and the CHANGELOG gate-integrity note record the rule and the pass.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-army): assert the Red Team branch the run took in the N+1 case

Under the blocking floor the Performance specialist rates a 12-line N+1
INFORMATIONAL, so the conditional Red Team does not activate; the case
encoded the old severity (N+1 is CRITICAL, a Red Team always follows). It
now asserts the branch the run took: a Red Team that ran must follow the
Performance specialist; no Red Team is correct only when the report's own
count says 0 critical and its Red Team line names that reason. The N+1
detection assertion is unchanged. The free contract test gains the
informational-not-activated and informational-claimed controls and the
budget test's synthetic report carries the count line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* v1.91.256.0 stamp

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-26 20:48:01 +00:00