5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 8966f3620c v1.91.350.0 feat(review): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack: blocking floor in both voices, one batched specialist, data-file classifier (#3660)
* feat(review): variant G part 4: data files no code names are docs in classifyDiff, untested state-matrix cells map below the floor per cell (GSTA-167 PR-a)

Part 4a: lib/review-depth.ts owns DATA_PATH (JSON, JSONL, NDJSON, CSV, TSV, raster
images; YAML, TOML and SVG stay code) and applies the data rule only in classifyDiff,
to candidates lib/review-collect.ts finds no non-docs consumer for (git grep of
basenames at head, merge base and, live, the working tree; data-to-data chains four
deep; over 2,000 candidates keeps all code; a grep failure fails closed). classifyPath
and every path-only caller are unchanged; the receipt gate scan decides through
gateScanNeeded (path-only), so it cannot be skipped. gstack-ship-preflight computes
RUNTIME_LINES with classifyDiff over gstack-review-plan --json (now with consumed).

Part 4b: lib/review-scope.ts mapStateMatrixOutput maps an "untested cell" finding to
INFORMATIONAL when its cell has test null in the same output's matrix and it is the
only finding on that cell; gstack-state-matrix findings prints it for Step 9.2 before
the merge. state-machines.md is byte-identical; check still reads the raw output.

Reviewer-brief pins repinned under no-loss replay PR-a (Arm 4: plan identity at the 14
cohort heads; free exact re-score of saved C, D and A' findings).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G parts 1 and 3: blocking floor in both prose voices, specialists at medium (GSTA-167)

Part 1: the native adversarial and outside-voice prompts end with the blocking
floor ("would fail a test, break production, or lose data or secrets") and ask
each finding for Severity and Blocks: yes|no. Additive rule: a finding is
CRITICAL when its label rule says so or it says Blocks: yes; Blocks: no never
lowers one (proseVoiceSeverity, BLOCKING_FLOOR in lib/review-scope.ts).
Part 3: ROLE_EFFORT puts specialists at medium; Red Team, native adversarial
and fix-check stay full; light's batched specialist (carries the Red Team
prompt) stays full; --no-tiers sends specialists to host.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay G1 (live Arm G1, not yet run):
ship/sections/review-army.md, ship/sections/adversarial.md,
review/sections/adversarial.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on G1's pass.
Review-skill parity ratio 1.3136 -> 1.3180 and the gstack-review size pins
+537 for the approved +0.3k tokens per voice.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G part 2: lean ensemble, one batched specialist at every depth (GSTA-167)

planReview dispatches one 'specialist batched' at standard and full depth (and
light, which adds the Red Team checklist): Testing and Security always on code
and gate class, plus State-machines, Data-migration, API-contract and Design
when scope asks; a forced checklist always joins. Maintainability, Performance
and Simplification are read only when forced (SKIP names them). LIGHT_FIXED is
[testing, security]; BATCH_SCOPED joins DEPTH_RULES so old receipts re-plan.
The Red Team rule and prompt are unchanged; it reads the batched reader's
merged findings. specialistsFor stays as the legacy selection the dispatch
compare script models.

Repinned reviewer briefs with no-loss replay L (live Arm L, scored L∘G1 vs G1;
not yet run): ship/sections/review-army.md, lib/review-depth.ts. Merge only on
L's pass.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): variant G on #3648's dispatch: Blocks: yes collects as CRITICAL, batched checklists by name (GSTA-167)

Integrates parts 1 and 2 with gstack-review-dispatch (#3648):
- lib/review-ledger.ts parseFindings: a prose voice's "Blocks: yes" makes its
  own line, or the finding on the line just before it, CRITICAL in
  merged.jsonl (normalizer v2, certified by round 5's G1), so judge refuses a
  lead that keeps it below the floor; with no finding before it the Blocks
  line is its own CRITICAL finding. "Blocks: no" never lowers a label.
- lib/review-brief.ts: the outside-voice brief no longer appends "Give each
  finding a severity"; the section's prompt now asks for Severity and Blocks,
  so the brief is the certified section prompt plus the branch diff.
- bin/gstack-review-dispatch render --checklists takes the plan's
  checklists= names (review/specialists/<name>.md) as well as paths and
  refuses an unknown one, since the batched reader is now every depth's
  specialist dispatch.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(changelog): GSTA-167 variant G reviewer stack fragment

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): consumer scan survives grep.lineNumber/grep.column; collect reads separate-line Severity/Blocks

/ship pass 1 (PR #3660): the Red Team CRITICAL at lib/review-collect.ts:120 and the
informational findings in the same batch. proseVoiceSeverity had no caller and is
removed; the normalizer v2 table now runs through parseFindings, the path collect uses.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): collect keeps every prose blocker and one id per finding

/ship pass 2 (PR #3660): an unlabeled line carrying an inline Blocks: yes collects as
CRITICAL again; Severity/Blocks continuation needs a colon, stops at a list item, heading,
bold paragraph opener or a repeated field, and never swallows a top-level bullet or its
section label; the native voice's FIXABLE collects as CRITICAL under its role with or
without a dispatch name; the consumer scan adds --no-color.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a later finding's fields never land on the one before it; explicit Severity wins its line

/ship pass 2 Red Team (PR #3660): prose after a finding's Severity/Blocks field, a
post-blank paragraph or a line in an indented block starts the next finding, and a
line's explicit Severity: label decides it over other label words on the line.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): FIXABLE outranks a Severity label on its line; a blocker keeps its own id and subject

/ship fix-check (PR #3660): labels are named before the strongest is taken, so a one-line
native FIXABLE ... Severity: Medium collects as CRITICAL; a later finding starts at a
file:line after the open finding's fields, field bullets stay on their finding, a field
line may omit the colon, and continuation prose never replaces a list item's subject.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GSTA-167 fragment adds round 6 and the collect and consumer-scan fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 05:06:03 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 21277291c8 v1.91.345.0 feat(ship): compact driver plus preflight/release bins over the restored reviewers (GSTA-167) (#3648)
* feat(ship): GSTA-167 turn levers on the restored reviewers: ship preflight/release bins, own-jam meter, dispatch-pair metering, ship/DRIVER.md

Ports the non-reviewer parts of #3633 (gsta-167-pr34) and #3637 (gsta-167-pr5 @2914400)
onto main ae3d58c (v1.91.331.0). Reviewer briefs, checklists, the fix-check prompt and
the depth rules are byte-identical to main and now pinned in
test/review-packets-removed.test.ts.

Left out: gstack-review-packet and its libs, parallel/batched fanout, --like, collect,
the audit prompt split, the docs-audit packet, review-army/adversarial/outside-voice
edits, the gate-scan summary-only block and the review-depth scope-error change.
Packet-bytes reader pricing is dropped from gstack-ship-budget; handoff READ ranges
send each section whole; the driver runs the audit, review, adversarial and
documentation sections as written.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(context-budget): raise the capy/skill/gstack eager ceiling to its captured value after the main merge (own-jam meter, driver and reviewer-batch prose, GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(ship-driver): name ship/DRIVER.md.tmpl so the pregate maps the template to its test lane (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-driver): keep the skill generator off lib/ship-budget so a minimal setup checkout still renders (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(windows): keep test/ship-release.test.ts off the Windows subset; it launches the shebang bin and sh stubs directly (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant E orchestration: one program per review pass and Step 14.5 audit, the review child starts at Step 9, a metered dispatch:docs role, and the driver's record headings (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): variant G orchestration: one call per driver phase (9 for a clean pass, at most 12), gstack-ship-preflight --audit for single reads and deterministic audits, an observe-mode ledger with note and credits, 240 s wait pings, and small-model audit readers (GSTA-167)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): a Capy handoff child needs no jam id: verify-handoff with no reading makes it parent-metered (METER: parent), it never delegates on an unknown charge, and reconcile charges the parent's counter delta (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): a poll settles a reader only at done, failed or a final summary, never a fresh idle; return settles the child's open step reservation (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-budget): return releases an open step reservation under the estimate meter instead of booking its projection; measured meters still settle it (GSTA-167 replay 7e)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a clean fix-check after below-floor fixes is done; Step 11 and fix-check below-floor findings are notes at pass 1

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): verbatim reviewer briefs and loss-free collection (gstack-review-dispatch render/sent/collect/judge/verify)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

- verify requires each output's brief rendered and sent verbatim, reruns judge
  against the recorded judged.jsonl hash, and flags outputs collected after judge
- judge drops self-folds, fold cycles and chains
- prose findings parse a leading label or a label heading, not any severity word
- releasePaths: manifests count as release metadata only for version-only edits,
  lockfiles never; TODOS.md stays out of lane-evidence exemptions
- push stops when the sealed-output guard did not run
- ship-audit reads the test tree once instead of one git grep per file
- drop the uncalled --delegate measured mode; doc/help step-number fixes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (pass 2)

- collect keeps a finding wherever its label stands (headings, table rows,
  mid-line, Informational and upper-case labels); only top-level list items
  inherit a label heading, and any heading or bold-only line ends it
- judge treats a merged file missing any collected id as a drop; verify flags
  merged_ids_missing and a sent reader never collected (NOT_COLLECTED)
- finish computes release paths after --build, so a build that rewrites
  package.json is a build-input change

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): verify per render, voided superseded mismatches

- verify treats each render as one dispatch of its reader, so a two-pass
  ledger compares pass-1 sends with pass-1 briefs (later renders print as
  <reader>@2); outputs bind to the latest send of their own render
- a mismatched send re-sent byte-exact before anything was collected is void
  and counted (voided=N on the verdict line); one that produced an output
  stays MISMATCH
- an indented bold sub-line no longer ends a label section (fix-check)
- docs: a failed reader is collected from its failure text

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-dispatch): only the newest render of a path checks its file; absolute ledger paths

- a later render into the same briefs directory overwrites the earlier brief by
  design, so verify checks a brief file only for the newest render of that path
- collect and judge record absolute output, merged and judged paths, so verify
  reads them from any directory
- docs: a failed reader's failure text is parsed like any output

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-release): the changelog_fragments fragment is release metadata

Fix-check 4 (CRITICAL) after the main merge: releasePaths omitted
<changelog_fragments.dir>/<branch-slug>.md, so finish stopped on the
fragment Step 13 writes under gstack's policy, or routed it to re-review.
version now names the fragment in its Step 13 NEXT line instead of
[Unreleased], DRIVER.md Step 13 writes and lints where NEXT says, and the
preflight POLICY line says Steps 12-16.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog and TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 01:09:31 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 0732890091 v1.91.323.0 ship: proportional (scoped) second review pass after a blocking fix (GSTA-152 PR B) (#3596)
* ship: token cap with real meters and fresh-context delegation (GSTA-152 PR A)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: scoped second review pass after a blocking fix (GSTA-152 PR B)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (stopped or lost capped run no longer blocks uncapped review starts; short child return reconciles incomplete)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: carry estimate spend across a meter epoch change; calibration docs match their evidence

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: load the committed calibration file by its repo path so pregate maps it to a lane

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: fix fence placeholders and register claude-usage fixture (GSTA-152 PR A)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: run ship-budget and review-log bins through their interpreters so Windows can launch them

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: plan the full pass 2 when the fix range touches a gate path or is empty (GSTA-152 PR B review)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: classify the fix range and the diff at the range base with their own scope and gate scan (GSTA-152 PR B pass 2)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: a full pass 1 always gets a full pass 2; drop the at-base reconstruction (GSTA-152 PR B pass 3)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-29 19:53:29 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] edf4c2e581 v1.91.307.0 ship: proportional review depth (light, standard, full) with depth-checked receipts (#3567)
* feat(ship-receipt): carry across regenerated outputs and onto a reviewed tree after a rebase

A base merge whose only product-side change is a registered output the
pregate regen check proved fresh now carries the receipt. A rebased head
carries when its tree is one the receipt covers and its product patch-id
against the current base matches (RECEIPT_CARRY_TREE_MISMATCH otherwise).
Docs: merge main into a reviewed branch, never rebase it.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: regenerate doctor anchors; type the head_tree assert

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(review): proportional /ship review depth (light, standard, full)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: carry sets aside only outputs the regen check proved it recreates

The regen check deletes each touched output in its scratch worktree before
the command runs and records the ones recreated byte-identically as proven.
gstack-ship-receipt carry exempts only those paths, and only when the check
ran origin/<base>'s registry at the commit the carry reads. A file under an
output glob that the generator never writes stays product (pre-landing
review, #3564 pass 1).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship-receipt): record review depth, check it in the queue, structured review-loop exception (#3559)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: prove generated outputs in a second regen run; literal names only

The regen verdict comes from the unmodified run again, so a generator that
reads its own registered output (gen-skill-docs and
qa/templates/functional-report-template.md) passes as before; the proof is a
second run with the touched outputs deleted, and its failure only means not
proven. The carry ignores a proven path with glob syntax, since it uses the
paths as pathspec globs (pre-landing review, #3564 pass 2).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: receipt evidence keys and carry record fields; carry refusal fix line

Documentation audit for #3564 (/document-release, audit ship3564-docs-1).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (depth scan binding, queue scope, carry checks)

- carry refuses a --head other than the checked-out HEAD, a receipt with
  gstack_version but no review_depth, and an owner exception that no longer
  stands; a dirty or foreign checkout makes the write-time gate scan
  unavailable (full)
- the queue binds a gate scan only to the full bound commit and recomputes
  the scope signals with gstack-diff-scope <base> --head <sha>, the same
  range the writer uses
- the queue checks the review-loop exception's fix-check ancestry
- a package.json version line counts as stamp-only only when it is a bare
  version key
- docs and help name what review_depth is and which registry the queue reads

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: CHANGELOG for the review fixes; defer two plan items to TODOS

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: queue and carry refusal lists name the depth and exception codes

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: approval-classes summary-line regexes allow the receipt's depth field

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship-receipt): summary line prints depth before approval

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Revert "test: approval-classes summary-line regexes allow the receipt's depth field"

This reverts commit e9ec264358.

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-29 04:55:01 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 148d28ea81 feat(ship): /ship and /autoplan size their review to the diff (GSTA-131) (#3527)
* wip(GSTA-131): review depth, fix-check transitions, dispatch counters, carry pregate, autoplan round policy

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* wip(GSTA-131): reviewers stay at full effort; audits light

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): Step 9 dispatches what gstack-review-plan plans; fix-check after below-floor fixes; cap two full passes plus one fix-check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: review-dispatch-compare has a free lane; review-depth fixtures registered free; resumed max_rounds case off the old default

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(GSTA-131): ship review pass-1 repairs: fix-check binds under its own skill, Step 11.5 accepts a fix-check or a planned adversarial skip, delta carry with a pregate, carry --pregate pinned to the checkout, quiet-after-cap revise regates, skill-dir markdown and rule docs classed code, gate signals from tests class up, plan fails closed on git errors, per-class compare ratios

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(GSTA-131): ship review pass-2 repairs: Step 11 follows the last full-pass plan, Important Rules restored, ship goldens regenerated, true per-class medians, review-policy transitions and once-per-invocation voices, docs/** assets stay docs-class, CLI and fix-check binding tests

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): GSTA-131 review depth, fix-check, delta /ship and autoplan rounds

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: ship-policy cap and counters, review-policy /review cycle cap, unattended passes (docs audit)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): 400-word findings cap fits the /review size pins (five host pins lowered by 2); CHANGELOG max_rounds wording

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): gate integrity names the size-ledger entry and the lowered /review pins

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: the round-budget case asserts the default through ROUNDS output only (pregate literals heuristic)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: curate ship-receipt-carry-pregate out of the Windows lane like its --pregate siblings

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(changelog): end the Windows curation sentence instead of a mid-sentence colon

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): one decision each for the review-loop exits, the planned adversarial skip and Step 16's TODOS rerun (screen judge repair)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): fix-check repairs: pin the renamed Step 11 heading, keep the below-floor exit at the cap, name the plan run a repeat reuses, print the native skip on outside-only plans

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-28 05:45:54 +00:00