Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] 962747fdc8 fix(issue-links): derive this PR's author when gh runs as an app, so handoff and pr-body exclude the owner's own PRs (Lane D fix 1)
The handoff ran gstack-issue-links without --author, and the pr-body step only
asked the agent to pass one, so under Capy's app identity (viewer
`capy-ai[bot]`) the owner's own open PRs were listed as `Related:`. The bin now
derives the author itself: --author, else the gh viewer, else (for a `…[bot]`
viewer) the HEAD commit's GitHub user, else the owner of a user-owned
repository; with none it keeps every PR and reports ISSUE_LOOKUP_FAILED.
`--json` gains `author: {login, source}`; the stderr preview names it. Both ship
steps work unchanged, so the pr-body `--author` clause is dropped (union
309,487 -> 309,435 bytes, under the unchanged 1.6488 cap; skeleton 80,998).

Files: bin/gstack-issue-links, lib/result-codes.ts (ISSUE_LOOKUP_FAILED row),
docs/troubleshooting.md (#issue-lookup-failed), docs/pregate.md,
ship/sections/pr-body.md.tmpl, ship/sections/pr-body.md,
test/helpers/pregate-fixture.ts (gh stub: PR-author query),
test/ship-issue-intent.test.ts.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-15 01:17:34 +00:00
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] abae03714e fix(issue-links): --author for the Related lookup when gh runs as an app (Lane D: D2)
On a Capy machine the gh viewer is `capy-ai[bot]`, not the owner (checked live
against garrytan/gbrain #6252), so "other authors" needs the PR author named:
`--author <login>` overrides the viewer; the pr-body Issue links step says to
pass it when gh runs as an app.

Files: bin/gstack-issue-links, docs/pregate.md, ship/sections/pr-body.md.tmpl,
ship/sections/pr-body.md, test/ship-issue-intent.test.ts,
test/helpers/carve-guards.ts (ship maxSizeRatio re-measured: 309,483 / 187,706 = 1.6488).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-15 00:16:42 +00:00
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] cd62fb662c fix(ship): link issues by intent at publish and handoff; Fixes: trailer at commit (Lane D: D1, D2, D-a)
- Step 15: a commit fixing a user-named issue carries a `Fixes: #<n>` trailer
  (offset by tightening Step 15 so the skeleton stays at 80,998 <= 81,000).
- pr-body: an explicit "Issue links" step runs gstack-issue-links before the
  body is composed (previously only a placeholder inside the body template);
  interactive runs ask once about `(promote: fix #N)` references and add
  `--supersedes`/`--credit` only on the owner's confirmation; unattended runs
  keep Refs and list unpromoted candidates, Related lines and lookup failures
  in the completion message; `ISSUE_LINKS_MISSING` from the receipt write.
- handoff (no-PR lanes): runs gstack-issue-links and passes --issues to the
  receipt; the completion message gains an `issues:` line.
- Regenerated ship/SKILL.md and sections; refreshed the four ship goldens.
- Parity: union 309,431 / 187,706 = 1.6485 (> 1.6450 by 655 bytes); maxSizeRatio
  raised to the measured 1.6485 with its justification, as previous waves did.

Files: ship/SKILL.md.tmpl, ship/SKILL.md, ship/sections/pr-body.md.tmpl,
ship/sections/pr-body.md, ship/sections/handoff.md.tmpl, ship/sections/handoff.md,
test/fixtures/golden/{claude,codex,factory,agy}-ship-SKILL.md,
test/helpers/carve-guards.ts (ship maxSizeRatio).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-15 00:11:32 +00:00
garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] 12b1af80d9 fix(issue-links): promotion candidates, Related PRs, validated flake issues, body/receipt consistency (Lane D: D1-D3)
D1: the GBRA-40 fix wave's gbrain #6279 body had no `## Issues` section and no
receipt (it was not composed by /ship, so gstack-issue-links never ran), and
#6252 appeared only as a subject parenthetical `(#6252)`, which the closure
rule correctly treats as Refs. The rule is kept. Same-repo references are now
printed as promotion candidates (`(promote: fix #N)`, `candidates` in --json),
and `gstack-ship-receipt write --issues ... --body` refuses a body that lacks a
line its issues object records (ISSUE_LINKS_MISSING), so a /ship body can no
longer drop its closing lines.

D2: open PRs by other authors whose closing set overlaps this PR's Fixes are
`Related: #N (@author)` (paged GraphQL closedByPullRequestsReferences; viewer
and this branch excluded; cross-repo PRs keep owner/repo#N). `Supersedes` and
`Contributed by` only with --supersedes/--credit; --no-auto-links skips the
lookup; the stderr preview names each added line's source. A failed lookup is
ISSUE_LOOKUP_FAILED (installer form with docs anchor) and keeps the other lines.

D3: a --ci-run match becomes a Flake line only for a bot-opened issue of this
repository that names that run (flake:json first_seen.run_id or this repo's
actions/runs URL) and a test; duplicates of one test keep the lowest number;
every refused match prints its reason.

Files: bin/gstack-issue-links, bin/gstack-ship-receipt, lib/issue-links.ts,
lib/ship-receipt.ts, lib/headless-artifacts.ts (ship-receipt issues.related),
lib/result-codes.ts (ISSUE_LOOKUP_FAILED, ISSUE_LINKS_MISSING,
resultLineWithDocs), bin/gstack-doctor-components.sh (regenerated),
docs/pregate.md, docs/troubleshooting.md, test/ship-issue-intent.test.ts,
test/helpers/pregate-fixture.ts (gh shim: repo view, api graphql, full issue rows).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-15 00:01:32 +00:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 8584d6ff49 v1.91.77.0 feat(ship): two-stage gstack-pregate, gstack-regen generated-file registry, intent-based issue links (multi-agent wave C-pregate) (#3121)
* v1.91.77.0 feat(ship): two-stage gstack-pregate, gstack-regen registry, intent-based issue links (multi-agent wave C-pregate)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(pregate): keep the bin-driving pregate tests off the Windows subset; pin files are free-only for eval selection

The three C-pregate tests that spawn bin/gstack-regen, bin/gstack-pregate,
bin/gstack-issue-links and bin/gstack-ship-receipt do so through
test/helpers/pregate-fixture.ts runBin, so the Windows curation's source
scan of the test file never saw a bin/ spawn and shipped them to
windows-latest, where CreateProcess cannot exec a shebang (14 failures in
windows-free-shard 2 and 5). Each is now a KNOWN_WINDOWS_INCOMPATIBLE entry
with the precise reason. .gstack/generated.json and .gstack/pregate.json
join FREE_ONLY_PR_FILES: no paid case reads gstack's own pin files (the
tools read origin/<base> of the repo they run in, and paid cases run in
fixture repos), so touching them no longer restores every gate case.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(harness-version): record the FREE_ONLY_PR_FILES pin-file entries as non-behavioral

scripts/test-pr-profile.ts is a pinned shared-harness file; the two
.gstack pin-file entries change selection only, never a case verdict.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-11 01:57:16 +00:00