12 tests pinning the gate behavior:
- Resolver emits the gate header + #1539 reference
- Gate requires quoting file:line + verbatim text
- Unverified findings forced to confidence 4-5 (auto-suppress via
existing <7-rule, no new mechanism)
- Framework-meta nudge names Django, Rails, SQLAlchemy, TypeORM,
Sequelize, Prisma
- Deferred design doc reference present (1539-framework-aware-review.md)
- Four named FP classes from #1539 enumerated:
* field doesn't exist on model
* dict.get() might be None
* save() might lose fields
* update_fields might miss X
- All four downstream SKILL.md consumers (review, cso, plan-eng-review,
ship) carry the gate text after gen:skill-docs
- Existing confidence 9-10 'Show normally' + 3-4 'Suppress' rows
unchanged (regression on existing behavior)
Failing build if the gate is removed, the suppression mechanism is
re-invented separately, the framework-meta nudge drops a framework, or
gen:skill-docs stops propagating the gate to consumers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Garry Tan