mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-31 15:29:39 +02:00
a6fb31726cece1d1bba401fde593db7cb96bc738
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Garry Tan
|
a6fb31726c |
v1.48.0.0 feat: AskUserQuestion split rule + runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out (#1740)
* feat(preamble): add "Handling 5+ options — split, never drop" rule Agents repeatedly hit Conductor's 4-option AskUserQuestion cap and silently drop one option to fit, shrinking the user's decision space. This rule names the bug and gives two compliant shapes: batch into ≤4-groups (for coherent alternatives) or split into N sequential per-option calls (for independent scope items, default). Inline preamble subsection is ~15 lines (rule + buckets + pointer). Full reference with worked examples, Hold/dependency semantics, and final-summary validation lives in docs/askuserquestion-split.md. The agent loads the docs file on demand when N>4. Per-option call shape: D<N>.k header, ELI10, Recommendation, kind-note (no completeness score — decision actions, not coverage), Include / Defer / Cut / Hold buckets. Hold stops the chain immediately; the final D<N>.final call validates dependencies and confirms the assembled scope. question_ids: <skill>-split-<option-slug> (kebab-case ASCII, ≤64 chars). Also fixes orphan "12. " prefix on the existing CJK rule. Tier-2+ skills inherit via the existing resolver. SKILL.md regenerated for all 41 affected skills + 3 golden fixtures. Net diff per SKILL.md: ~34 lines (vs ~110 for the full inline version). 6 tests pin the inline contract (4-option cap, buckets, D-numbering, docs pointer, runtime AUTO_DECIDE gate reference, orphan 12 regression). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(question-pref): runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out for *-split-* ids Split chains (per-option AskUserQuestion calls emitted by the new "Handling 5+ options" rule) must never be silently auto-approved via /plan-tune preferences. The user's option set is sacred. Layer 1 (mechanism): unique <skill>-split-<option-slug> ids prevent cross-option preference leakage. Layer 2 (this commit): the runtime checker `gstack-question-preference --check` detects any id matching *-split-* and forces ASK_NORMALLY even when never-ask or ask-only-for-one-way preferences exist for that exact id. An explanatory note tells the user their preference was bypassed and why. 7 tests pin the carve-out: no-pref baseline, never-ask override, explanatory note text, ask-only-for-one-way override, always-ask (no note), non-split id containing "split" word (negative case for regex specificity), multi-skill split id formats. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(e2e): split-overflow regression for /plan-ceo-review Periodic-tier E2E test that catches the original failure mode the user complained about: 5+ options for ONE decision must split into N sequential AskUserQuestion calls, not drop one to fit Conductor's 4-option cap. Fixture: 5 independent chat-platform integration candidates (Slack/Discord/Teams/Telegram/Mattermost), each carrying its own include/defer/cut decision. Floor = 4 review-phase AUQs (standard [N-1] tolerance band). Pre-fix "drop to 4 + 1 dropped" fails this floor. Wired into test/helpers/touchfiles.ts: tier periodic, depends on plan-ceo-review/**, the new preamble subsection, the question-pref binary (for the carve-out), and the runner helper. touchfiles.test.ts expected count bumped 21 → 22 to account for the new entry. Cost: ~$0.30/run when EVALS_TIER=periodic. Skips silently otherwise. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: post-merge regen + rebase size-budget baseline to v1.47.0.0 After merging origin/main (v1.45 → v1.47), three things needed cleanup: 1. spec/SKILL.md (main's new skill) regenerated to include our split-vs-drop preamble subsection — same mechanical regen as the other 41 tier-2+ skills. 2. Three golden ship fixtures refreshed to capture main's GSTACK_PLAN_MODE block + /spec routing entry + jargon-list.json refactor. 3. docs/skills.md — added /spec table row that main's PR (#1698/#1733) shipped without. Pre-existing failure on main; this PR catches and fixes. Also rebased test/skill-size-budget.test.ts from v1.44.1 → v1.47.0.0 baseline. Main's v1.46 (catalog tokens trim) + v1.47 (/spec skill) pushed the v1.44.1 anchor past the 5% ratchet to ×1.059 — pre-existing failure on main. This PR captures a fresh parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json and re-anchors the test there. Historical v1.44.1.json and v1.46.0.0.json retained in test/fixtures/ for reference. Our subsection contributes ~0.1% of the post-rebase corpus. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.48.0.0) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Garry Tan
|
a81be53621 |
v1.10.0.0: fix AskUserQuestion cadence + Pros/Cons format upgrade (#1178)
* fix(preamble): reorder AskUserQuestion Format above model overlay + rewrite Opus 4.7 pacing directive
Root cause of plan-review regression (v1.6.4.0): model overlays rendered
ABOVE the pacing rule in every SKILL.md, so Opus 4.7 read "Batch your
questions" first and absorbed it as the ambient default. The overlay's
claimed subordination ("skill wins on pacing, always") didn't stick —
literal-interpretation mode reads physical order, not claimed hierarchy.
Part 1 of 4 (plan: ~/.claude/plans/system-instruction-you-are-working-polymorphic-twilight.md):
scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts
- Move generateAskUserFormat above generateModelOverlay in section array
- Comment explains why — prevents future refactors from silently reverting
model-overlays/opus-4-7.md
- Replace "Batch your questions" block with "Pace questions to the skill"
- New wording makes one-question-per-turn the default when the skill
contains STOP directives; batching becomes the explicit exception
Regenerated 30 SKILL.md files via bun run gen:skill-docs.
Verified:
- With --model opus-4-7: Format renders at line 359, Model-Specific
Patch at 373, "Pace questions" at 419 (Format comes first, overlay
second, pacing directive intact).
- bun test passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(plan-reviews): tighten STOP/escape-hatch directives across 4 templates
Part 2 of 4 (plan: ~/.claude/plans/system-instruction-you-are-working-polymorphic-twilight.md).
Codex caught that v1.6.3.0's reasoning collapsed on Opus 4.7: the old
escape-hatch wording ("If no issues or fix is obvious, state what
you'll do and move on — don't waste a question") let the literal
interpreter classify every finding as having an "obvious fix" and skip
AskUserQuestion entirely. Reviews became reports.
Per-template hardening (16 sites total, verified by rg):
plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md.tmpl (13 sites):
- 12 inline STOP directives: replace the full escape-hatch clause with
"zero findings → say so and proceed; findings → MUST call AskUserQuestion
as a tool_use, including for obvious fixes."
- 1 Escape hatch bullet in CRITICAL RULE section: tightened.
plan-eng-review, plan-design-review, plan-devex-review (1 site each):
- Each template's Escape hatch bullet tightened to match the new CEO wording,
adapted for each review's domain (issue/gap, decision/design/DX alternatives).
After regeneration: rg "don't waste a question" returns 0 across all
*SKILL.md.tmpl and *SKILL.md files. "zero findings, state" wording
present 16 times (matches prior count of escape-hatch sites).
bun test passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(preamble): upgrade AskUserQuestion format to Pros/Cons decision brief
Part 4 of 4 (plan: ~/.claude/plans/system-instruction-you-are-working-polymorphic-twilight.md).
Every AskUserQuestion now renders as a decision brief, not a bullet list:
D-numbered header, ELI10, Stakes-if-we-pick-wrong, Recommendation, Pros/Cons
with ✅/❌ markers per option, closing Net: tradeoff synthesis.
scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts
- Full rewrite. Preserves prior rules (Re-ground, ELI10, Recommend,
Completeness, Options) and adds:
- D-numbering per skill invocation (model-level, not runtime state)
- Stakes line (pain avoided / capability unlocked / consequence named)
- Pros/Cons block with min 2 ✅ + 1 ❌ per option, min 40 chars/bullet
- Hard-stop escape: "✅ No cons — this is a hard-stop choice" for
genuine one-sided choices (destructive-action confirmations)
- Neutral-posture handling (CT1-compliant): (recommended) label
STAYS on default option to preserve AUTO_DECIDE contract; neutrality
expressed as prose in Recommendation line only
- Net line closes the decision with a one-sentence tradeoff frame
- Rule 11: tool_use mandate (prose "Question:" blocks don't count)
- Self-check list before emitting
test/skill-validation.test.ts
- Update format assertions to check for new Pros/Cons tokens
(Pros / cons:, Recommendation: <choice>, Net:, ELI10, Stakes if we
pick wrong:, ✅, ❌) across all tier-2+ skills
- Old "RECOMMENDATION: Choose" expectation removed (the new format uses
mixed-case "Recommendation:" with no literal "Choose")
test/skill-e2e-plan-format.test.ts
- Add v1.7.0.0 format token regexes (PROS_CONS_HEADER_RE, PRO_BULLET_RE,
CON_BULLET_RE, NET_LINE_RE, D_NUMBER_RE, STAKES_RE)
- Existing RECOMMENDATION_RE loosened to accept mixed-case "Recommendation:"
(canonical v1.7.0.0 form) alongside all-caps (legacy). Tests are
additive — the strict new-format gate is the upcoming cadence eval.
Regenerated 30 SKILL.md files via bun run gen:skill-docs.
Verified:
- bun test: 319 pass (1 pre-existing security-bench fixture oversize
failure on main, unrelated — confirmed via git stash test on main HEAD)
- New format tokens render in all tier-2+ skills (plan-ceo-review,
plan-eng-review, ship, office-hours verified)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: gate-tier units + periodic Pros/Cons evals for AskUserQuestion format
Part 3 of 4 (plan: ~/.claude/plans/system-instruction-you-are-working-polymorphic-twilight.md).
Gate-tier (E1, free, runs on every `bun test`):
test/preamble-compose.test.ts — pins the composition order
Asserts AskUserQuestion Format section renders BEFORE Model-Specific
Behavioral Patch in tier-≥2 preamble output. Covers claude default,
opus-4-7 overlay, tier 2/3, and codex host. Catches any future edit
to scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts that silently reverts the order.
test/resolver-ask-user-format.test.ts — pins the Pros/Cons contract
14 assertions against generateAskUserFormat output: D<N>, ELI10,
Stakes if we pick wrong:, Recommendation: <choice>, Pros / cons:,
✅/❌ markers, min 2 pros + 1 con rules, hard-stop escape exact
phrase, neutral-posture CT1 rule ((recommended) label preserved for
AUTO_DECIDE), Completeness coverage-vs-kind, tool_use mandate
(rule 11), self-check list, D-numbering model-level caveat.
test/model-overlay-opus-4-7.test.ts — pins the pacing directive
Asserts raw overlay file + resolved overlay output contain "Pace
questions to the skill" and NOT "Batch your questions". Verifies
INHERIT:claude chain still works (Todo-list, subordination wrapper),
Fan out / Effort-match / Literal interpretation nudges preserved.
Also asserts claude base overlay does NOT carry the Opus-specific
pacing directive (no cross-contamination).
Periodic-tier (E2, Opus-dependent, ~$1-2/run):
test/skill-e2e-plan-prosons.test.ts — 4 cases extending v1.6.3.0 harness
1. Format positive — every token present when plan has real tradeoff
2. Hard-stop NEGATIVE — plan with genuine tradeoff must NOT dodge to
"No cons — hard-stop choice" escape
3. Neutral-posture NEGATIVE — plan where one option dominates must emit
(recommended) label + "because <reason>", must NOT dodge to
"taste call" / "no preference"
4. Hard-stop POSITIVE — destructive-action plan may legitimately use
the hard-stop escape
test/helpers/touchfiles.ts — entries for all new eval cases
Dependencies: overlay, preamble.ts, generate-ask-user-format.ts, and
the 4 plan-review templates. Diff-based selection triggers the evals
whenever those files change. Also added entries for 7 expanded-coverage
cases (ship, office-hours, investigate, qa, review, design-review,
document-release) — test cases will land in follow-up PRs per skill.
Follow-ups noted in test file header:
- True multi-turn cadence eval (3 findings → 3 distinct asks) — current
harness captures one $OUT_FILE per session; multi-turn capture needs
new harness support.
- Expanded-coverage test cases for the 7 non-plan-review skills.
Verified:
- bun test: 349 pass (30 new + 319 baseline), 1 pre-existing security-bench
oversize failure on main (unrelated, unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: regenerate golden fixtures + update ELI10 phrase check for v1.7.0.0
Pros/Cons format rewrite (
|