{
  "provenance": {
    "kind": "owned-public-native-question-and-terminal-viewport",
    "source": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/delta-autoplan-final-question-public-eng-ceo-v1.json",
    "sourceSha256": "e51d719b8117913fc38e38c0686e0e93680974bab20b0464c8d17f9c20ac8ced",
    "diagnosisSha256": "48d40555b06f833e4fae4936d6593d52a1419cfe11aec918ddfb8810ea92544f",
    "viewportSha256": "e0434a99f1f51d64b3ee583af6a3f1f6c3b5569f4b71c55dcfd8d985afebe29c",
    "originalOutcome": "Operator cancelled the unanswered run; no approval or missing phase credit.",
    "cutoffQualification": "Exact caller commandStartedAt was not retained. Master start precedes this public use; diagnostic replay only."
  },
  "commandStartedAt": 1789080723000,
  "viewportCapturedAt": 1789084200773,
  "call": {
    "sessionId": "8f4daed9-5261-4c04-bcf1-56749f33a76e",
    "toolUseId": "toolu_0193Xbf9FVxo9AoeZvPj5x2Q",
    "questions": [
      {
        "question": "D1 — Final Approval Gate: approve the reviewed plan?\nProject/branch/task: main · /autoplan on \"Plan: User Dashboard Page\" (all four review phases complete, plan amended on disk).\nELI10: Four reviews ran and made 117 routine calls for you; four are matters of taste (T1 aggregate endpoint, T2 keep the confirmation modal, T3 build the dashboard rather than a cheaper spike first, T4 row caps). Approving locks the amended plan and writes the review logs so /ship recognizes it. Overriding lets you flip any taste call before implementation starts.\nStakes if we pick wrong: approving a taste call you disagree with means rework mid-implementation; rejecting throws away 121 logged decisions and four reviews.\nRecommendation: A because every blocking finding is resolved, no premise was clearly wrong, and the four taste calls follow your stated direction where you gave one.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Approve as-is (recommended)\n  ✅ Plan is fully amended with accepted obligations for all four phases and 34 build-ready tasks\n  ✅ Review logs get written now so /ship's dashboard shows CEO, Design, DX, and Eng as reviewed\n  ❌ The modal (T2) stays even though two independent subagents recommend cutting it\nB) Approve with overrides on taste decisions\n  ✅ You pick T1-T4 explicitly; I apply the changes to the plan and re-run Eng on the amended plan\n  ✅ Keeps every other decision and artifact intact\n  ❌ Costs one more Eng pass (~2 min of pipeline time) before the gate re-presents\nC) Interrogate a decision first\n  ✅ Ask about any of the 121 decisions, tasks, or superseded items before committing\n  ✅ No plan changes until you say so\n  ❌ Adds a round trip before approval\nD) Revise the plan or start over\n  ✅ Change scope or architecture and re-run the affected phases (max 3 cycles), or reject and restart\n  ✅ The restore point holds the original plan bytes for a clean re-run\n  ❌ Re-running phases repeats the subagent passes and their wall-clock time\nNet: A ships the reviewed plan now; B is the right pick if you want the modal cut or three fetches instead of the aggregate.",
        "header": "Final gate",
        "multiSelect": false,
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "Approve as-is (recommended)",
            "description": "Accept all 117 auto-decisions and the 4 taste recommendations; write review logs; suggest /ship."
          },
          {
            "label": "Approve with overrides",
            "description": "Tell me which of T1-T4 to flip; I amend the plan, re-run Eng on it, and re-present the gate."
          },
          {
            "label": "Interrogate",
            "description": "Ask about any specific decision, task, or superseded item before deciding."
          },
          {
            "label": "Revise or reject",
            "description": "Change the plan itself and re-run affected phases, or reject and start over from the restore point."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "answered": false,
    "failed": false
  },
  "publicUse": {
    "sessionId": "8f4daed9-5261-4c04-bcf1-56749f33a76e",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:43:57.783Z",
    "toolUseId": "toolu_0193Xbf9FVxo9AoeZvPj5x2Q",
    "kind": "use",
    "name": "AskUserQuestion",
    "input": {
      "questions": [
        {
          "question": "D1 — Final Approval Gate: approve the reviewed plan?\nProject/branch/task: main · /autoplan on \"Plan: User Dashboard Page\" (all four review phases complete, plan amended on disk).\nELI10: Four reviews ran and made 117 routine calls for you; four are matters of taste (T1 aggregate endpoint, T2 keep the confirmation modal, T3 build the dashboard rather than a cheaper spike first, T4 row caps). Approving locks the amended plan and writes the review logs so /ship recognizes it. Overriding lets you flip any taste call before implementation starts.\nStakes if we pick wrong: approving a taste call you disagree with means rework mid-implementation; rejecting throws away 121 logged decisions and four reviews.\nRecommendation: A because every blocking finding is resolved, no premise was clearly wrong, and the four taste calls follow your stated direction where you gave one.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Approve as-is (recommended)\n  ✅ Plan is fully amended with accepted obligations for all four phases and 34 build-ready tasks\n  ✅ Review logs get written now so /ship's dashboard shows CEO, Design, DX, and Eng as reviewed\n  ❌ The modal (T2) stays even though two independent subagents recommend cutting it\nB) Approve with overrides on taste decisions\n  ✅ You pick T1-T4 explicitly; I apply the changes to the plan and re-run Eng on the amended plan\n  ✅ Keeps every other decision and artifact intact\n  ❌ Costs one more Eng pass (~2 min of pipeline time) before the gate re-presents\nC) Interrogate a decision first\n  ✅ Ask about any of the 121 decisions, tasks, or superseded items before committing\n  ✅ No plan changes until you say so\n  ❌ Adds a round trip before approval\nD) Revise the plan or start over\n  ✅ Change scope or architecture and re-run the affected phases (max 3 cycles), or reject and restart\n  ✅ The restore point holds the original plan bytes for a clean re-run\n  ❌ Re-running phases repeats the subagent passes and their wall-clock time\nNet: A ships the reviewed plan now; B is the right pick if you want the modal cut or three fetches instead of the aggregate.",
          "header": "Final gate",
          "multiSelect": false,
          "options": [
            {
              "label": "Approve as-is (recommended)",
              "description": "Accept all 117 auto-decisions and the 4 taste recommendations; write review logs; suggest /ship."
            },
            {
              "label": "Approve with overrides",
              "description": "Tell me which of T1-T4 to flip; I amend the plan, re-run Eng on it, and re-present the gate."
            },
            {
              "label": "Interrogate",
              "description": "Ask about any specific decision, task, or superseded item before deciding."
            },
            {
              "label": "Revise or reject",
              "description": "Change the plan itself and re-run affected phases, or reject and start over from the restore point."
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    "messageId": "msg_011CeveQSuYFusQWkhtwoDZJ",
    "requestId": "req_011CeveQS1D1dB5SQkXVTVYe"
  },
  "screen": "│ the confirmation modal, T3 build the dashboard rather than a cheaper spike first, T4 row caps). Approving locks the\n│ amended plan and writes the review logs so /ship recognizes it. Overriding lets you flip any taste call before\n│ implementation starts.\n│ Stakes if we pick wrong: approving a taste call you disagree with means rework mid-implementation; rejecting throws\n│ away 121 logged decisions and four reviews.\n│ Recommendation: A because every blocking finding is resolved, no premise was clearly wrong, and the four taste calls\n│ follow your stated direction where you gave one.\n│ Note: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\n│ Pros / cons:\n│ A) Approve as-is (recommended)\n│   ✅ Plan is fully amended with accepted obligations for all four phases and 34 build-ready tasks\n│   ✅ Review logs get written now so /ship's dashboard shows CEO, Design, DX, and Eng as reviewed\n│   ❌ The modal (T2) stays even though two independent subagents recommend cutting it\n│ B) Approve with overrides on taste decisions\n│   ✅ You pick T1-T4 explicitly; I apply the changes to the plan and re-run Eng on the amended plan\n│   ✅ Keeps every other decision and artifact intact\n│   ❌ Costs one more Eng pass (~2 min of pipeline time) before the gate re-presents\n│ C) Interrogate a decision first\n│   ✅ Ask about any of the 121 decisions, tasks, or superseded items before committing\n│   ✅ No plan changes until you say so\n│   ❌ Adds a round trip before approval\n│ D) Revise the plan or start over\n│   ✅ Change scope or architecture and re-run the affected phases (max 3 cycles), or reject and restart\n│   ✅ The restore point holds the original plan bytes for a clean re-run\n│   ❌ Re-running phases repeats the subagent passes and their wall…\n\n❯ 1. Approve as-is (recommended)\n     Accept all 117 auto-decisions and the 4 taste recommendations; write review logs; suggest /ship.\n  2. Approve with overrides\n     Tell me which of T1-T4 to flip; I amend the plan, re-run Eng on it, and re-present the gate.\n  3. Interrogate\n     Ask about any specific decision, task, or superseded item before deciding.\n  4. Revise or reject\n     Change the plan itself and re-run affected phases, or reject and start over from the restore point.\n  5. Type something.\n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  6. Chat about this\n\nEnter to select · ↑/↓ to navigate · Esc to cancel\n"
}