o TODO/FIXME comments. … +442 lines (ctrl+o to expand) ● Now I have a clear picture of the plan's critical issues. Following the skill workflow, I need to start the question chain. First: no design doc was found, so I must offer /office-hours before proceeding. ● User answered Claude's questions: ⎿  · D1 — No design doc found for this branch. Run /office-hours first or proceed directly with the review? → Skip — proceed with standard review (Recommended) ● Skipping /office-hours — proceeding with standard review. Now the key decision: which implementation approach to use. ● User answered Claude's questions: ⎿  · D2 — Which implementation approach should this plan use? The current plan (Approach A) has a documented SQL injection vulnerability and zero tests. → Approach B: Fix security + tests, keep inline email (Recommended) ● Approach B selected — fix security + tests within the existing scope. Now selecting the review mode. ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ☐ Review mode │ D3 — Which review mode should we use for this plan? The plan adds a new payment webhook handler (a concrete, scoped │ feature). We've selected Approach B (fix security within existing scope). ❯ 1. HOLD SCOPE — make it ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ bulletproof (Recommended) │ Mode: HOLD SCOPE │ 2. SELECTIVE EXPANSION — │ Scope baseline: StripePaymentWebhookHandler │ hold scope + surface │ Goal: Parameterized SQL, explicit email rescue, │ extras │ handler tests, N+1 fix │ 3. SCOPE REDUCTION — strip │ No new features surfaced │ to minimum └─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ 4. SCOPE EXPANSION — dream bigger Notes: press n to add notes ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Chat about this Enter to select · ↑/↓ to navigate · n to add notes · Esc to cancel