{
  "sessionId": "c02ae21c-af83-44ad-8f7d-316542389108",
  "toolUseId": "toolu_016rCkcBz9C9TRgJTuM5cwvt",
  "questions": [
    {
      "question": "D1 \u2014 No design doc found: run /office-hours first, or proceed with standard review?\n\nNo design doc found for this branch. `/office-hours` produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives \u2014 giving this review sharper input.\n\nELI10: Before doing a code-plan review, it helps to have a document that explains *why* this feature is being built and what alternatives were considered. Without it, the review works from the plan alone. A 10-minute /office-hours session produces that doc first.\n\nStakes if we pick wrong: Skipping /office-hours means the review proceeds without a structured problem statement. The plan has critical security issues visible from the plan text alone, so the review can proceed productively without it.\n\nRecommendation: B \u2014 the plan has well-defined content and critical issues that are reviewable without a design doc; no design-doc context would change the SQL injection or email error findings.\n\nCompleteness: A=9/10, B=7/10\n\nPros / cons:\nA) Run /office-hours first (recommended for ambiguous scope)\n  \u2705 Produces a structured problem statement and explored alternatives before review\n  \u2705 Gives the review sharper context on user outcomes and constraints\n  \u274c Adds ~10 minutes before the review starts; critical issues are already visible from the plan\nB) Skip \u2014 proceed with standard review (recommended)\n  \u2705 Critical issues (SQL injection, email error handling) are clearly visible in the plan and reviewable now\n  \u2705 No additional time cost; review begins immediately\n  \u274c Review proceeds without a structured problem statement or alternatives doc\n\nNet: The SQL injection and email error findings don't need a design doc to surface \u2014 they're in the plan text. /office-hours adds value for ambiguous scope, not for critical-bug triage. <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-office-hours-offer>",
      "header": "Prerequisite",
      "multiSelect": false,
      "options": [
        {
          "label": "Run /office-hours first",
          "description": "Run /office-hours to produce a design doc, then resume this review with sharper context."
        },
        {
          "label": "Skip \u2014 review now (Recommended)",
          "description": "Proceed with standard review. Critical issues are visible from the plan text alone."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "answered": false
}