{ "signature": "3a77230a-afb1-491e-a387-22238340005c:toolu_01566fjgee5qn44WyEc63K7F", "promptSnippet": "Issue 1: Save D4 \u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action? Project/branch/task: main, Pass 1 Information Architecture, gap G1. ELI10: Today Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export look identical in the header. A user scanning the page has to", "options": [ { "index": 1, "label": "1A Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)" }, { "index": 2, "label": "1B Filled Save, outlined Export" }, { "index": 3, "label": "1C Defer, keep four equal buttons" } ], "observedAtMs": 202968, "preReview": true, "nativeCall": { "sessionId": "3a77230a-afb1-491e-a387-22238340005c", "toolUseId": "toolu_01566fjgee5qn44WyEc63K7F", "questions": [ { "header": "Issue 1: Save", "question": "D4 \u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\nProject/branch/task: main, Pass 1 Information Architecture, gap G1.\nELI10: Today Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export look identical in the header. A user scanning the page has to read all four labels to find the one that stores their work. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8 with white text) and the other three are neutral ghost buttons. This asks whether to apply that.\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at the moment they most want confidence, and the destructive Reset sits at the same visual weight as Save.\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token and closes the hierarchy gap with zero new vocabulary. Principle: every screen has a hierarchy; make the right choice the most visible choice.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=0/10\nNet: apply the approved token now versus inventing a second weight or shipping a header with no primary action.", "options": [ { "label": "1A Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)", "description": "\u2705 Save becomes the single filled primary (#1d4ed8, white text); Reset/Cancel/Export become neutral ghost buttons exactly as DESIGN.md specifies \u2705 Reuses the existing Button component variants, no new component (human: ~1h / CC: ~5 min) \u274c Export loses visual weight, but it stays a clearly labeled button and its position is unchanged" }, { "label": "1B Filled Save, outlined Export", "description": "\u2705 Save still reads as primary \u2705 Export gets a secondary emphasis for users who come mainly to download \u274c Adds a third button weight not in DESIGN.md and competes with Save (human: ~2h / CC: ~10 min)" }, { "label": "1C Defer, keep four equal buttons", "description": "\u2705 No styling change this cycle \u2705 Zero risk of regressing button behavior \u274c Ships the documented violation; Pass 1 stays at 6/10 and the gap remains open" } ] } ], "answered": true, "failed": false, "answers": { "D4 \u2014 Issue 1: Make Save the visible primary action?\nProject/branch/task: main, Pass 1 Information Architecture, gap G1.\nELI10: Today Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export look identical in the header. A user scanning the page has to read all four labels to find the one that stores their work. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled button (#1d4ed8 with white text) and the other three are neutral ghost buttons. This asks whether to apply that.\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at the moment they most want confidence, and the destructive Reset sits at the same visual weight as Save.\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token and closes the hierarchy gap with zero new vocabulary. Principle: every screen has a hierarchy; make the right choice the most visible choice.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=0/10\nNet: apply the approved token now versus inventing a second weight or shipping a header with no primary action.": "1A Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)" }, "unansweredQuestionIndices": [], "answeredAt": "2026-09-09T23:45:57.477Z" } }