{
  "sourceProof": ".context/ship-source-t-full-paid-20260909-0639/ceo-paired-retry-permission-v1/proof.json",
  "sourceProofSha256": "fa392098355d32257cec72a54626a32676be0b8a11cd189d6f0a74aac01a2ee9",
  "screen": "\n     \n\u25cf Section 1: No issues. Section 3: No issues. Section 2 has a HIGH finding:\n\n\u25cf\u00a0User answered Claude's questions:\n  \u23bf \u00a0\u00b7 D1 \u2014 Section 2 finding: the 502 test asserts 'fails clean' but the plan doesn't specify WHAT the failure looks\n     like. Without a concrete assertion, the test could pass even if processPayment() silently swallows the error \u2014 the\n     worst payment-code failure mode. What should the test assert after retries are exhausted?\n     <gstack-qid:ceo-review-s2-fails-clean> \u2192 A: Assert a named exception is raised (recommended)\n     \n\u25cf Approved: the 502 test must assert a named exception is raised. Updating the plan and continuing to Sections 4\u20135:\n\n\u25cf Update(/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-SxF6xq/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-paired-2Rv5Bi/gstack-test-plan-ceo-paired.md)\n     \n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n Edit file\n ../gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-paired-2Rv5Bi/gstack-test-plan-ceo-paired.md\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n 107  \n 108  Per Prime Directive 1 (\"Zero silent failures\") and the engineering preference (\"thoughtfulness > speed\"), this nee\n      ds a concrete assertion. The test must assert not just that 2 calls were made, but that the failure propagates in \n      a specified, observable way.\n 109  \n 110 -**Pending resolution \u2192 AskUserQuestion below.**                                                                   \n 110 +**Decision S2-1 (D1 \u2192 A):** Test must assert that processPayment() raises a named exception after retries are exha\n     +usted. Implementer must inspect the Stripe adapter suite to determine the exact exception class raised on exhauste\n     +d retries, then use that class in the test assertion (e.g., `assertRaises(PaymentGatewayError)`). This prevents si\n     +lent-swallow failure.                                                                                             \n 111  \n 112  Error/Rescue Table:\n 113  \n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n Do you want to make this edit to gstack-test-plan-ceo-paired.md?\n \u276f 1. Yes\n   2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session; Yes, and\n      always allow access to /tmp/gstack-paid-shard-SxF6xq/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-paired-2Rv5Bi for this session\n      (shift+tab)\n   3. No\n\n Esc to cancel \u00b7 Tab to amend",
  "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-SxF6xq/tmp/gstack-plan-count-VvwnHq",
  "expectedPath": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-SxF6xq/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-paired-2Rv5Bi/gstack-test-plan-ceo-paired.md",
  "sessionId": "5f4d02aa-f77a-4a29-9127-74808f56f61e",
  "completedEditId": "toolu_01Jc6PWpRS9kbSJSxBcduykq",
  "pendingEditId": null,
  "limitation": "Pending second Edit never flushed; lifecycle test uses explicitly synthetic second hook identity."
}