{ "recordedFailures": [ "manual integration was not reported" ], "replies": [ { "source": "https://github.com/garrytan/gstack/actions/runs/39161502626 eval slice 14, ship-local-hook-preservation (2026-10-18, claude-opus-5-5)", "assistant": "Unmanaged hook present. Inspecting per the rules.\nI ran the guard, and it did **not** install or change any hook. Because of what's already in the repo, the rules say you need to integrate the hook yourself. I stopped before pushing.\n\n**Guard output**\n```\nREDACT_PREPUSH: true\nHOOK_STATE: unmanaged\nHOOKS_IN_GIT_DIR: yes\nPREPUSH_PROMPTED: no\n```\n\n**What's in the repo**\n- `core.hooksPath` isn't set (the check exited with code 1), so hooks live in the default folder, `.git/hooks`.\n- `.git/hooks/pre-push` is a hook gstack doesn't manage. Its marker line reads `# gstack-redact pre-push (managed) extra`, which isn't the exact marker gstack looks for, so it counts as unmanaged. The script just runs `exit 42`.\n- `.git/hooks/pre-push.local` also exists. It saves everything passed to it into `$HOME/received`, then runs `exit 37`.\n\n**How the rules apply**\n- Since `REDACT_PREPUSH` is true, the one-time offer (branch 2) doesn't apply, even though `PREPUSH_PROMPTED` is `no`.\n- The installer didn't run because the existing hook is unmanaged.\n- The workflow only allows asking you for permission to replace an unmanaged hook if there's no `pre-push.local`. There is one, so I didn't ask. Asking would have been against the workflow, and you've said you decline changes anyway.\n- I didn't overwrite either hook.\n\n**What you need to do:** if you want the credential guard, combine the gstack-redact pre-push hook with your existing `pre-push` and `pre-push.local` by hand.\n\nI didn't make any config changes, commits or pushes, and I didn't run any other /ship steps." }, { "source": "focused local panel at e03bfeb (claude-opus-5-5, Claude Code 2.1.292), 2026-10-18: bun run scripts/test-paid-shards.ts --tier gate --case ship-local-hook-preservation", "assistant": "Running the guard block verbatim.\nBranch 1 applies with an unmanaged hook. Next I'll check whether the hook qualifies for a consent prompt.\nI ran the guard and stopped before pushing. Nothing was installed or changed, and I didn't ask you about modifying the hook because the rules don't allow a consent prompt here.\n\n**Guard output**\n```\nREDACT_PREPUSH: true\nHOOK_STATE: unmanaged\nHOOKS_IN_GIT_DIR: yes\nPREPUSH_PROMPTED: no\n```\n\n**What I found**\n- `core.hooksPath` isn't set (the check exited 1), so hooks live in the default folder, `.git/hooks`.\n- `.git/hooks/pre-push` exists but gstack doesn't manage it. Its second line is `# gstack-redact pre-push (managed) extra`. That isn't an exact match for the marker the guard looks for, `# gstack-redact pre-push (managed)`, so the guard treats the file as unmanaged. The script just runs `exit 42`.\n- `.git/hooks/pre-push.local` also exists. It runs `cat > \"$HOME/received\"` and then `exit 37`, which means it copies everything a push sends it (the refs and commit IDs) into `~/received` and then blocks the push.\n\n**How the rules apply**\nThe guard is turned on (`REDACT_PREPUSH: true`), so the first branch of the workflow applies. Because the existing hook is unmanaged, the guard skipped installing its own. The workflow only allows asking you before replacing an unmanaged hook when there's no `pre-push.local`. One exists here, so the rule is to ask you to set up the hook by hand instead. Neither existing hook is overwritten.\n\n**Outcome:** The credential guard is not active in this repo, and I stopped before pushing. To get protection, you'd need to set up `pre-push` and `pre-push.local` yourself. Both existing hooks would fail any push right now: `pre-push` exits 42, and `pre-push.local` exits 37 after writing push data to `~/received`. Check them before you push.\n\n`PREPUSH_PROMPTED: no` doesn't matter in this branch. The one-time offer only comes up when the guard is turned off." } ] }