{
 "source": "local rerun smoke-2.1.284-1790709409 (Claude Code 2.1.284) of plan-eng-multi-finding-batching: the Create pane stayed unanswered for 1,372 s because its title row was cropped above the file row",
 "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-plan-count-Z3cntL",
 "screen": " ../gstack-e2e-plan-eng-batching-DINQ9m/gstack-test-plan-eng-batching.md\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n   1 # Eng Review \u2014 Plan: Add background job retry framework\n   2\n   3 Review target (fixed): `/tmp/gstack-plan-count-Z3cntL/PLAN.md` on branch `main` (commit 844c6ae)\n   4 Reviewer: /plan-eng-review (Claude, session 196868-1790709430-09cebc2c), 2026-09-29\n   5 Report file: this file (user-requested destination)\n   6\n   7 ## Original plan (unchanged copy)\n   8\n   9 # Plan: Add background job retry framework\n  10\n  11 ## Architecture\n  12 We'll roll a custom exponential-backoff scheduler inline in each worker\n  13 rather than use the existing job library's built-in retry hooks. Same\n  14 shape as the library version, but we want full control over the curve.\n  15\n  16 ## Code quality\n  17 The retry envelope (compute delay, log attempt, dispatch) is duplicated\n  18 across 5 worker files with copy-pasted bodies. We will leave the\n  19 duplication for now and refactor \"later.\"\n  20\n  21 ## Tests\n  22 The existing `processWebhookJob()` flow gets rewritten as part of this\n  23 change. No regression test for the prior at-most-once delivery guarantee\n  24 is planned.\n  25\n  26 ## Performance\n  27 On every retry we re-fetch the full job payload from the database, then\n  28 iterate the payload to recompute the dependency graph. Could cache the\n  29 graph on the first attempt; not planned.\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n Do you want to create gstack-test-plan-eng-batching.md?\n \u276f 1. Yes\n   2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session; Yes, and\n      always allow access to /tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-eng-batching-DINQ9m for this session (shift+tab)\n   3. No\n\n Esc to cancel \u00b7 Tab to amend\n",
 "event": {
  "sessionId": "16914623-f7a4-49ca-bea5-fb4b56274cb1",
  "toolUseId": "toolu_01BaNDAjTWTr5bf2sdwWC4DA",
  "input": {
   "file_path": "/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-eng-batching-DINQ9m/gstack-test-plan-eng-batching.md",
   "content": "# Eng Review \u2014 Plan: Add background job retry framework\n\nReview target (fixed): `/tmp/gstack-plan-count-Z3cntL/PLAN.md` on branch `main` (commit 844c6ae)\nReviewer: /plan-eng-review (Claude, session 196868-1790709430-09cebc2c), 2026-09-29\nReport file: this file (user-requested destination)\n\n## Original plan (unchanged copy)\n\n# Plan: Add background job retry framework\n\n## Architecture\nWe'll roll a custom exponential-backoff scheduler inline in each worker\nrather than use the existing job library's built-in retry hooks. Same\nshape as the library version, but we want full control over the curve.\n\n## Code quality\nThe retry envelope (compute delay, log attempt, dispatch) is duplicated\nacross 5 worker files with copy-pasted bodies. We will leave the\nduplication for now and refactor \"later.\"\n\n## Tests\nThe existing `processWebhookJob()` flow gets rewritten as part of this\nchange. No regression test for the prior at-most-once delivery guarantee\nis planned.\n\n## Performance\nOn every retry we re-fetch the full job payload from the database, then\niterate the payload to recompute the dependency graph. Could cache the\ngraph on the first attempt; not planned.\n"
  }
 }
}