{ "source": "8525fd4abad1e54de1aaaa9a5692202d4b13bd25", "artifact": ".context/sep15-ship-consolidation/remaining-paid-periodic-repairs/executions/8525fd4abad1e54de1aaaa9a5692202d4b13bd25/all/run/phases/periodic-independent/shards/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing/pty-count/ship-all-8525fd4a-f2f6397b-728c-4530-9c5b-e5ccb679aff9/plan-ceo-review-mode-1789467209822-Dc878o", "targetMode": "SCOPE EXPANSION", "selectionStartedAt": 1789467366397, "native": { "status": "ready", "calls": [ { "sessionId": "9047e993-a80a-4add-980d-7518ff40a8e2", "toolUseId": "toolu_01P2JRsCTTnhnvC71eGrLvST", "questions": [ { "header": "Routing", "question": "D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: fixture repo on main; one-time gstack onboarding, unrelated to the plan itself.\nELI10: gstack works best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\"bugs \u2192 /investigate\", \"scope \u2192 /plan-ceo-review\"). Without it you invoke skills by hand. This is a small appended section plus a commit.\nStakes if we pick wrong: none for this review; only affects how automatically skills get suggested later. Note: plan mode blocks file edits and commits right now, so if you pick A the append + commit happens after this review exits plan mode.\nRecommendation: A because it is a two-way door and costs one small commit.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: convenience later vs. one extra commit in a fixture repo.", "options": [ { "label": "Add routing rules (recommended)", "description": "\u2705 Skills get suggested automatically when a request matches (bugs, scope, ship, review). \u2705 One appended section, one commit, fully reversible by deleting it. \u274c Adds ~20 lines to CLAUDE.md in what is currently a small fixture repo." }, { "label": "No thanks, manual invocation", "description": "\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as seeded; nothing else changes in the repo. \u2705 You can re-enable later with gstack-config set routing_declined false. \u274c Skills only run when you type them; no proactive routing suggestions." } ], "multiSelect": false }, { "header": "Review mode", "question": "D2 \u2014 Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\nProject/branch/task: main; reviewing PLAN.md \"Add saved project views\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a project task list).\nELI10: The mode sets my posture. It does not approve any scope or approach change; every addition or cut still gets its own yes/no. This is an enhancement to an existing task list, estimated ~10\u201314 changed files (estimate; no code in this checkout), which under the skill's rules points to SELECTIVE EXPANSION: make the current scope bulletproof, then offer a short list of adjacent additions (shared views, URL-addressable filter state, default view, handling deleted filter targets) one at a time for you to take, defer, or skip.\nStakes if we pick wrong: too ambitious and a small feature turns into a views platform; too narrow and you ship a table whose schema can't grow into shared views without a migration.\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is clear and small, and the real leverage is in a few cheap adjacent decisions (schema shape, URL state) that are painful to retrofit.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: rigor on the core plus a neutral menu of expansions, versus dreaming big, holding the line, or cutting.", "options": [ { "label": "SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)", "description": "\u2705 Full rigor on the submitted scope (errors, edge cases, tests, observability) plus a neutral cherry-pick menu of adjacent additions. \u2705 Accepted items become scope; rejected ones are recorded as NOT in scope so nothing creeps back. \u274c More questions than HOLD SCOPE; each expansion is its own decision." }, { "label": "SCOPE EXPANSION", "description": "\u2705 Dream-big pass: 10x vision, platonic ideal, delight scan, then opt-in per proposal. \u2705 Best if you suspect saved views should become a views platform (shared, default, subscriptions). \u274c Risks turning a two-week pilot feature into a multi-sprint initiative." }, { "label": "HOLD SCOPE", "description": "\u2705 Maximum rigor on exactly the four bullets in the plan; no expansion menu. \u2705 Fastest path to an approved plan. \u274c Schema-shaping choices (owner/visibility column, URL state) only surface if I flag them as failure modes, not as offers." }, { "label": "SCOPE REDUCTION", "description": "\u2705 Strip to the minimum that removes the pain (possibly bookmarkable filter URLs with no table). \u2705 Smallest diff, least to maintain. \u274c Probably loses the in-app picker the goal asks for; only fits if the file count or timeline is under real pressure." } ], "multiSelect": false } ], "answered": false, "failed": false } ], "assistantMessages": [ { "sessionId": "9047e993-a80a-4add-980d-7518ff40a8e2", "text": "I'll start with the skill preamble.", "timestamp": "2026-09-15T10:13:30.167Z" } ] }, "screen": "\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n\u2190 \u2612 Routing \u2612 Review mode \u2714 Submit \u2192\n \nReview your answers\n\n \u2502 \u25cf D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\n \u2502 Project/branch/task: fixture repo on main; one-time gstack onboarding, unrelated to the plan itself.\n \u2502 ELI10: gstack works best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (\"bugs \u2192 /investigate\", \"scope \u2192\n \u2502 /plan-ceo-review\"). Without it you invoke skills by hand. This is a small appended section plus a commit.\n \u2502 Stakes if we pick wrong: none for this review; only affects how automatically skills get suggested later. Note:\n \u2502 plan mode blocks file edits and commits right now, so if you pick A the append + commit happens after this review\n \u2502 exits plan mode.\n \u2502 Recommendation: A because it is a two-way door and costs one small commit.\n \u2502 Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n \u2502 Net: convenience later vs. one extra commit in a fixture repo.\n \u2192 Add routing rules (recommended)\n \u2502 \u25cf D2 \u2014 Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\n \u2502 Project/branch/task: main; reviewing PLAN.md \"Add saved project views\" (per-member named filter+sort presets on a\n \u2502 project task list).\n \u2502 ELI10: The mode sets my posture. It does not approve any scope or approach change; every addition or cut still gets\n \u2502 its own yes/no. This is an enhancement to an existing task list, estimated ~10\u201314 changed files (estimate; no code\n \u2502 in this checkout), which under the skill's rules points to SELECTIVE EXPANSION: make the current scope\n \u2502 bulletproof, then offer a short list of adjacent additions (shared views, URL-addressable filter state, default\n \u2502 view, handling deleted filter targets) one at a time for you to take, defer, or skip.\n \u2502 Stakes if we pick wrong: too ambitious and a small feature turns into a views platform; too narrow and you ship a\n \u2502 table whose schema can't grow into shared views without a migration.\n \u2502 Recommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is clear and small, and the real leverage is in a few cheap\n \u2502 adjacent decisions (schema shape, URL state) that are painful to retrofit.\n \u2502 Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n \u2502 Net: rigor on the core plus a neutral menu of expansions, versus dreaming big, holding the line, or cutting.\n \u2192 SCOPE EXPANSION\n \nReady to submit your answers?\n \n\u276f 1. Submit answers\n 2. Cancel\n \n\n", "observationSha256": "e6f620088cea8b00037e2c4eb764c406c6160319d291f8dd0049f868128d61ce" }