{ "provenance": { "source": "September 21 bounded plan-design-finding-count confirmation", "runId": "shared-libs-design-count-sep21", "observedReviewCount": 0, "observedStep0Count": 6, "sourceCallSha256": "e56b9c057b1a69193d2a932eafac5ca81c8dbe8ed21009d147adc59c881b2052" }, "calls": [ { "sessionId": "1a7d5895-da78-46d8-9fa9-e8b681038344", "toolUseId": "toolu_01Fes64xV7Kq6QiS9HH49Drc", "questions": [ { "question": "D1 — Issue 1: Save is visually identical to Reset, Cancel, and Export. How should the primary action be distinguished?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-PXjOyl on main, design review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\nELI10: Four buttons in a row all look the same, so the person has to read every label to find the one they came for. Making Save the only filled button turns a reading task into a glance. The stakes: mis-taps on Reset or Cancel open a discard dialog, and the page reads as unfinished.\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at the action row or hit a secondary action, and the redesign ships looking like the old form.\nRecommendation: 1A because DESIGN.md already names the token (filled #1d4ed8 with white text, ghosts for the rest) and the existing Button component supports it. Principle: hierarchy as service. \nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nNet: 1A applies the approved system; 1B and 1C invent something DESIGN.md does not sanction.", "header": "Save primary", "multiSelect": false, "options": [ { "label": "1A: Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)", "description": "✅ Matches DESIGN.md exactly: Save filled #1d4ed8 with white text, Reset/Cancel/Export neutral ghost buttons. ✅ Uses existing Button variants; no new styles, 44px geometry and focus ring unchanged. ❌ Ghost buttons rely on the existing Button component's neutral text color meeting AA; verify in QA. (human: ~1h / CC: ~5min)" }, { "label": "1B: Filled Save plus visual divider before Export", "description": "✅ Also separates the non-destructive Export from the two discard actions. ✅ Keeps DOM and tab order intact. ❌ Adds a divider element DESIGN.md does not define, so it needs its own token and responsive rule at 640px. ❌ More chrome on an already busy header row. (human: ~2h / CC: ~10min)" }, { "label": "1C: Keep four equal buttons, bold the Save label only", "description": "✅ Smallest change to the existing markup and stylesheet. ✅ No color work, so no contrast verification needed. ❌ Weight alone is a weak signal at a glance and violates DESIGN.md, which names Save the only filled action. ❌ Leaves the primary action undiscoverable for scanning users. (human: ~20min / CC: ~2min)" } ] } ], "answered": true, "failed": false, "answers": { "D1 — Issue 1: Save is visually identical to Reset, Cancel, and Export. How should the primary action be distinguished?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-PXjOyl on main, design review of PLAN.md (Settings Page UI redesign).\nELI10: Four buttons in a row all look the same, so the person has to read every label to find the one they came for. Making Save the only filled button turns a reading task into a glance. The stakes: mis-taps on Reset or Cancel open a discard dialog, and the page reads as unfinished.\nStakes if we pick wrong: users hesitate at the action row or hit a secondary action, and the redesign ships looking like the old form.\nRecommendation: 1A because DESIGN.md already names the token (filled #1d4ed8 with white text, ghosts for the rest) and the existing Button component supports it. Principle: hierarchy as service. \nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nNet: 1A applies the approved system; 1B and 1C invent something DESIGN.md does not sanction.": "1A: Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)" }, "unansweredQuestionIndices": [], "answeredAt": "2026-09-21T17:11:29.350Z" } ] }