{ "attempts": [ { "attempt": 1, "source_sha256": "4f4f5954e1a306dc03d7553733d09a87fa98bac2c26aff6bfa47bde297057eab", "repo": "/q/gstack-paid-shard-4CHypA/tmp/gstack-shared-path-assume-unchanged-Mb7sHo/repo", "exit_reason": "success", "events": [ { "type": "assistant", "message": { "content": [ { "type": "tool_use", "id": "toolu_017rDS8hzWE8BnzYAxZexptL", "name": "Read", "input": { "file_path": "/q/gstack-paid-shard-4CHypA/tmp/gstack-shared-path-assume-unchanged-Mb7sHo/review-lifecycle.md" } } ] } }, { "type": "user", "message": { "content": [ { "type": "tool_result", "tool_use_id": "toolu_017rDS8hzWE8BnzYAxZexptL", "content": "1\t---\n2\tname: review\n3\tpreamble-tier: 4\n4\tversion: 1.0.0\n5\tdescription: Pre-landing PR review. (gstack)\n6\tallowed-tools:\n7\t - Bash\n8\t - Read\n9\t - Edit\n10\t - Write\n11\t - Grep\n12\t - Glob\n13\t - Agent\n14\t - AskUserQuestion\n15\t - WebSearch\n16\ttriggers:\n17\t - review this pr\n18\t - code review\n19\t - check my diff\n20\t - pre-landing review\n21\t---\n22\t\n23\t## Step 3: Get the diff\n24\t\n25\tAn invocation is this /review run; a pass reviews one candidate before any fixes.\n26\tOn first entry, initialize one invocation action list and CYCLES=0. Keep both through re-reviews.\n27\t\n28\tEach pass has one direction: collect findings in Steps 3–4.8, approve and apply\n29\tfixes in Step 5, then choose repeat or final persistence in Step 5.8.\n30\tDo not edit reviewed source until Step 5. All readers examine the same candidate.\n31\t\n32\tFetch the base branch to avoid false positives from stale local state:\n33\t\n34\t```bash\n35\tgit fetch origin --quiet\n36\t```\n37\t\n38\tCompute the merge base, then diff the working tree against that point:\n39\t\n40\t```bash\n41\tDIFF_BASE=$(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)\n42\t/workspace/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log --start review\n43\tgit diff \"$DIFF_BASE\"\n44\t```\n45\t\n46\t1. Save the printed REVIEW_START for this core candidate before reading its diff.\n47\t2. Each re-review captures a new token before reading, never at log time. Earlier\n48\t core tokens remain unused; Step 5.8 finishes only the final core token.\n49\t3. Native/outside reviewer attempts own separate PASS_START tokens, not REVIEW_START.\n50\t4. Read non-ignored untracked source too (`git ls-files --others --exclude-standard`);\n51\t the captured candidate includes it.\n52\t\n53\tKeep the review-record terms separate:\n54\t\n55\t| Value | Purpose and owner |\n56\t|---|---|\n57\t| REVIEW_START / PASS_START | Opaque start receipts from the logger: one for the core pass, one for each other reviewer attempt. |\n58\t| Finding fingerprint | Groups duplicate findings. The installed helper computes shared-code fingerprints; a matching key alone never proves a prior Skip is reusable. |\n59\t| `review_binding` | The logger's proof tying a finished review to its captured candidate, not a finding identifier. |\n60\t| `snapshot_covered_paths` | Supporting advice files the logger proved byte-identical to that candidate. Used by the prior-Skip checker, never supplied by the reviewer. |\n61\t\n62\t## Step 4: Critical pass (core review)\n63\t\n64\tSelect QA surfaces and load their methods below before static review.\n65\tStep 4 is read-only; Step 4.7 owns setup, charters and probes.\n66\t\n67\tFrom the installed /review SKILL.md's directory, choose one path:\n68\t- If the caller directory is `review`, Read `../qa/sections/scope.md` in full.\n69\t- If the caller directory is prefixed `gstack-review`, use `../gstack-qa/sections/scope.md` instead and read it in full.\n70\t- If neither layout applies, report an unresolved QA installation as a setup blocker; do not guess another path.\n71\tUse this host's installation, never the product tree. If missing or unreadable, report a QA setup blocker and its affected probes as blocked; continue other safe probes (independent functional/static checks). Missing/unreadable assets block required QA.\n72\t\n73\tUse scope's target-selection rules now to choose functional, browser or mixed\n74\tsurfaces from the request and diff. Record that selection before loading methods.\n75\tDo not execute setup or probes in this read-only step; Step 4.7 owns those actions.\n76\t\n77\tResolve later QA paths in that installed QA directory.\n78\t> **STOP.** Read `sections/exploratory.md` in that QA installation and the selected methods below before continuing.\n79\t> A plan command is a probe, not an exception to this gate.\n80\t**Functional surfaces:**\n81\tRead `sections/system-functional.md` in full.\n82\t\n83\t**Browser surfaces only:**\n84\tRead `sections/qa-patterns.md` in full.\n85\t\n86\tCaller/report templates cannot replace these method Reads.\n87\t\n88\tApply both checklist passes in order: CRITICAL, then INFORMATIONAL. Respect its suppressions.\n89\t\n90\t**Enum & Value Completeness requires reading code OUTSIDE the diff.** When the diff introduces a new enum value, status, tier, or type constant, use Grep to find all files that reference sibling values, then Read those files to check if the new value is handled. Shared-code analysis also requires reading related callers outside the diff; keep findings anchored to changed code.\n91\t\n92\t**Search-before-recommending:** Research proposed fixes through Aside, especially\n93\tconcurrency, caching, auth and framework behavior:\n94\t- Check current best practice for the installed framework version.\n95\t- Look for a newer built-in before proposing a workaround.\n96\t- Verify API signatures against current docs.\n97\t\n98\t```bash\n99\t_EG=\"/workspace/gstack/bin/gstack-egress-lib.sh\"; [ -r \"$_EG\" ] && . \"$_EG\"; _aside_exec() { if command -v _gstack_egress_run >/dev/null 2>&1; then _gstack_egress_run open aside-agent aside.com aside-exec \"user invoked this skill\" --no-payload aside exec \"$@\"; else aside exec \"$@\"; fi; }\n100\t_aside_exec \"Search the web for {framework} {version} {pattern} current best practice and whether a built-in replaces it. Read-only: do not sign in, submit, or change anything. Reply with up to 5 bullets, each with its source URL, then stop.\"\n101\t```\n102\t\n103\tWithout Aside `READY`, use WebSearch if available; with neither, disclose the gap\n104\tand use existing knowledge.\n105\t\n106\t### Shared-code opportunities (core pass)\n107\t\n108\tRun this check on every diff, including fewer than 50 changed lines and hosts without Review Army:\n109\t1. Read the changed code and related unchanged callers using the rubric below. Do not run the standalone history/PR sweep or impose candidate quotas.\n110\t2. Require at least one verified authored location changed in this diff and at least two actual authored source locations needing the shared behavior. Added or uncommitted source qualifies; invented future callers do not.\n111\t3. Trace generated copies to authored templates/resolvers. Exclude generated and third-party copies from evidence and savings.\n112\t\n113\t### Shared-code evaluation rubric\n114\t\n115\t- **Prove the callers.** Require at least two verified, first-party authored source\n116\t locations, with functions and lines. Actual added or uncommitted source qualifies.\n117\t Only an engineering-plan review may use proposed callers; label those assumptions\n118\t and distinguish them from existing source. Similar names or formatting alone do\n119\t not establish equivalent behavior. Generated and third-party copies cannot qualify\n120\t as callers or contribute savings. Follow generated copies back to authored\n121\t templates/resolvers. Existing dependencies remain valid reuse targets.\n122\t- **Reuse before extracting.** Inspect existing libraries and helpers first. Compare\n123\t behavior, inputs, outputs, error handling, side effects, security requirements,\n124\t dependencies, and deployment/runtime boundaries. Preserve differences callers need;\n125\t do not bridge languages or isolated deployments without a practical shared contract.\n126\t- **Keep the helper small.** Name its destination and contract, the callers to migrate,\n127\t and the smallest adoption sequence. Avoid option-heavy helpers and coupling unrelated\n128\t components. Point to existing tests or established use, specify shared-contract and\n129\t caller-integration coverage, and describe the blast radius of a shared failure.\n130\t- **Account for the whole change.** Name removed blocks and their replacements. Show\n131\t estimated implementation lines removed, added, and saved separately from total lines\n132\t removed, added, and saved including tests and integration. Savings = removed - added.\n133\t Count moved code on both sides, exclude generated/vendor lines, use ranges when\n134\t uncertain, and do not count overlapping removals twice across opportunities. State\n135\t when tests or integration may make the total change grow.\n136\t- **Rank useful changes.** Favor reliability gains and total net savings, then low\n137\t adoption and testing risk. Prefer proven code used by several callers. Use recent\n138\t activity to break ties between comparable benefits, not as evidence by itself.\n139\t Explain choices centered on older code. Reject similarities with incompatible\n140\t contracts and opportunities whose benefits do not justify the abstraction.\n141\t\n142\tThe core pass owns optional extraction advice. Zero proposals is valid; prefer a compatible existing helper.\n143\t- Show the changed anchor, verified callers, smallest helper/destination, preserved differences, compatibility tests and shared-failure risk.\n144\t- Estimate implementation and total removed/added/saved lines from named blocks; deduplicate equivalent proposals and overlapping savings.\n145\t- Use `\"category\":\"shared-libs\",\"severity\":\"INFORMATIONAL\",\"advisory\":true`, `evidence_paths` (all authored supporting paths) and `helper_target:{\"path\":\"...\",\"symbol\":\"...\"}`.\n146\t- Include an existing helper's authored path in `evidence_paths` so its contract and raw bytes participate in revalidation. A not-yet-created helper belongs only in `helper_target`.\n147\t\n148\t**Identity before merge or suppression:** Use installed `sharedLibsFingerprint`, never model-generated hashes. Send literal JSON on stdin (actual paths/symbol; keep the quoted delimiter), not interpolated shell code:\n149\t\n150\t```bash\n151\tGSTACK_SHARED_LIB=/workspace/gstack/lib/review-evidence.ts\n152\tbun -e 'const { sharedLibsFingerprint } = await import(process.argv[1]); const value = sharedLibsFingerprint(JSON.parse(await Bun.stdin.text())); if (!value) process.exit(1); console.log(value);' \"$GSTACK_SHARED_LIB\" <<'GSTACK_SHARED_LIBS_JSON'\n153\t{\"evidence_paths\":[\"src/caller-a.ts\",\"src/caller-b.ts\"],\"helper_target\":{\"path\":\"src/shared.ts\",\"symbol\":\"sharedHelper\"}}\n154\tGSTACK_SHARED_LIBS_JSON\n155\t```\n156\t\n157\tUse the returned fingerprint; malformed/missing metadata requires revalidation. Real defects follow Fix-First independently: advice or a prior Skip cannot suppress, downgrade or replace them, even with a shared supplied fingerprint.\n158\t\n159\tCore findings use the confidence gates below; Step 4.6 applies its specialist gates.\n160\tUse CRITICAL/INFORMATIONAL labels in the finding format.\n161\tStep 5.8 combines these finding lines with the checklist's action groups.\n162\t\n163\t### Step 4.6: Collect and merge findings\n164\t\n165\tFollow these stages in order. Validate core and specialist findings alike, but keep\n166\ttheir source labels: specialist scoring is not the final review's defect count.\n167\t\n168\t#### 1. Parse outputs\n169\t\n170\tAfter specialist attempts settle, collect their outputs, tagged by actual source.\n171\tSuccessful `NO FINDINGS` is a completed empty result. Otherwise parse each JSON line and\n172\tskip invalid lines. Missing or unusable output is incomplete coverage, not an\n173\tempty success. Retain each specialist's returned findings for activity stats.\n174\t\n175\t#### 2. Validate severity\n176\t\n177\tFor core and specialist findings with `\"severity\":\"CRITICAL\"` and `\"advisory\":true`,\n178\tremove `advisory` and retain its `CRITICAL` severity. Treat these as defects before\n179\tidentity, merging, counting, scoring or Fix-First. Never downgrade severity to make\n180\tadvisory metadata consistent. Valid INFORMATIONAL advisories remain advisory in\n181\tevery category, including simplification.\n182\t\n183\t#### 3. Identify and merge\n184\t\n185\tPartition defects and advisories BEFORE grouping by fingerprint. Never merge a\n186\tdefect with advice, even on a supplied-hash collision. Neither higher-confidence\n187\tadvice nor a prior skipped extraction may replace, downgrade or suppress a defect.\n188\t\n189\tCompute identities for both core and specialist findings:\n190\t- Shared-code advice (category `shared-libs` or fingerprint prefix `shared-libs:`):\n191\t call installed `sharedLibsFingerprint` from `/workspace/gstack/lib/review-evidence.ts`\n192\t with `evidence_paths` and `helper_target` as literal JSON on stdin, as in the core pass;\n193\t never trust a supplied hash or generate one yourself. Missing/malformed metadata\n194\t cannot deduplicate or reuse a saved decision.\n195\t- Other findings: use supplied `fingerprint`, else `{path}:{line}:{category}`\n196\t or `{path}:{category}` when no line exists.\n197\t\n198\tWithin the specialist list, merge matching identities in the same partition: keep\n199\tthe highest confidence and all source names. Confirmation by distinct specialists\n200\tadds +1 (cap at 10) and `MULTI-SPECIALIST CONFIRMED ({specialist1} + {specialist2})`.\n201\tCore findings never earn a specialist confidence boost. Preserve `advisory`,\n202\t`evidence_paths` and `helper_target` through every merge.\n203\t\n204\t#### 4. Apply specialist confidence gates\n205\t\n206\t- Confidence 7+: show normally in the findings output\n207\t- Confidence 5-6: show with caveat \"Medium confidence — verify this is actually an issue\"\n208\t- Confidence 3-4: move to appendix (suppress from main findings)\n209\t- Confidence 1-2: suppress entirely\n210\t\n211\tCore findings keep the core Confidence Calibration gates.\n212\t\n213\t#### 5. Score and present specialists\n214\t\n215\tOnly specialist findings enter this header and `quality_score`; core findings do not.\n216\tUse the merged NON-advisory specialist findings for both counts and score:\n217\t`quality_score = max(0, 10 - (critical_count * 2 + informational_count * 0.5))`\n218\tCap at 10 and retain for the review-log entry in Step 5.8. These are not final unresolved-defect totals.\n219\tValidated `\"advisory\": true` findings from any source are excluded from score,\n220\theader, unresolved-defect totals and clean-status blockers. Show them separately;\n221\tthey remain ASK-only, never auto-applied. Real defects follow normal Fix-First.\n222\t\n223\t```\n224\tSPECIALIST REVIEW: N findings (X critical, Y informational) from Z specialists\n225\t\n226\t[For each finding, in order: CRITICAL first, then INFORMATIONAL, sorted by confidence descending;\n227\t advisory findings last, each rendered with an [ADVISORY] label in place of the severity]\n228\t[SEVERITY] (confidence: N/10, specialist: name) path:line — summary\n229\t Fix: recommended fix\n230\t [If MULTI-SPECIALIST CONFIRMED: show confirmation note]\n231\t\n232\tPR Quality Score: X/10\n233\t```\n234\t\n235\t**Simplification footer (after the score line):**\n236\t- If the simplification specialist was dispatched and returned findings, sum\n237\t their `lines_removable` values and print: `net: -N lines possible` (omit\n238\t findings without the field from the sum).\n239\t- If it was dispatched and returned NO FINDINGS, print:\n240\t `Simplification: lean already — nothing to cut.`\n241\t- If it was not dispatched, print neither line.\n242\t\n243\tDo not add core shared-code savings to this specialist footer. Explain any overlap once in the core proposal instead of presenting duplicate savings.\n244\t\n245\t#### 6. Save specialist activity\n246\t\n247\tCompile a `specialists` object for the review-log entry in Step 5.8.\n248\tFor DIFF_LINES < 50, keep `specialists: {}`; do not manufacture per-specialist scope records. Otherwise record each considered specialist (testing, maintainability, security, performance, data-migration, api-contract, design, simplification, red-team):\n249\t- If dispatched: `{\"dispatched\": true, \"findings\": N, \"critical\": N, \"informational\": N}`\n250\t- If skipped by scope: `{\"dispatched\": false, \"reason\": \"scope\"}`\n251\t- If skipped by gating: `{\"dispatched\": false, \"reason\": \"gated\"}`\n252\t- If not applicable (e.g., red-team not activated): omit from the object\n253\t\n254\tCount only findings that specialist actually returned, before deduplication.\n255\tAdvisory findings COUNT in the stats `findings` field, not its defect counts.\n256\tInclude Design despite its different checklist. Preserve dispatch/failure status:\n257\tzero returned findings from a failed attempt is not a clean review.\n258\t\n259\t#### 7. Hand off to Fix-First\n260\t\n261\tSend these findings to Step 5 Fix-First alongside the CRITICAL pass findings from Step 4.\n262\tConsolidate equivalent shared-code advice under the core proposal, retaining all\n263\tsources and counting overlapping savings once. Keep actual specialist stats;\n264\tcore-only advice must not create a specialist dispatch or finding.\n265\tNormal AUTO-FIX/ASK rules apply, with advice ASK-only. Missing coverage still blocks\n266\tcompletion. Advice never permits edits while readers are active or replaces a required review.\n267\t\n268\t---\n269\t\n270\t\n271\t\n272\t## Step 5: Fix-First Review\n273\t\n274\tBefore edits, confirm every dispatched reader has returned or is confirmed stopped.\n275\tFor an active or unknown reader/writer, wait or confirm it is stopped. If settlement\n276\tcannot be confirmed, persist incomplete at Step 5.8 and STOP without edits.\n277\tTerminal failure does not block fixes from independent evidence. Missing required\n278\toutput still makes the pass incomplete, even after the reader is stopped.\n279\t\n280\tCombine core, specialist, Step 4.7 QA, Step 4.8 adversarial and VALID & ACTIONABLE Greptile findings.\n281\tFor QA findings, assign confidence (1–10) from replay/code evidence using Confidence\n282\tCalibration; retain Step 4.7's severity, not a severity inferred from confidence.\n283\tRun Step 5.0 severity/prior-skip dedup on all\n284\tfindings before Step 5a classification. Then action every remaining finding.\n285\tStructured approval does not waive advisory/test_stub ASK gates.\n286\t\n287\t### Step 5.0: Cross-review finding dedup\n288\t\n289\t**Validate advisory severity first.** If a current finding has `\"severity\":\"CRITICAL\"` and `\"advisory\":true`, remove `advisory` and retain its `CRITICAL` severity. Handle it as a normal defect before suppression, classification, counting, scoring, and persistence. Never downgrade severity to make advisory metadata consistent. Valid INFORMATIONAL advisories remain advisory in every category, including simplification. A prior saved finding with contradictory CRITICAL/advisory metadata cannot establish a skipped defect or advisory decision: exclude it from reuse and revalidate the current finding.\n290\t\n291\tBefore classifying findings, check this branch's prior user skips.\n292\t\n293\t```bash\n294\t/workspace/gstack/bin/gstack-review-read\n295\t```\n296\t\n297\tParse only lines BEFORE `---CONFIG---` as JSONL; ignore the non-JSONL footer sections.\n298\t\n299\tIf no prior reviews exist or none have a `findings` array, skip history matching silently; still classify current findings.\n300\t\n301\t**Shared-code advisory decisions use the stricter rule below.** Do not send a\n302\tfinding through the ordinary primary-file rule if its category is `shared-libs`,\n303\tits fingerprint starts `shared-libs:`, or it has `evidence_paths` / `helper_target`.\n304\tMissing legacy metadata requires revalidation, not fallback to a line fingerprint.\n305\t\n306\tFor each JSONL entry that has a `findings` array, for ordinary findings only:\n307\t1. Collect all fingerprints where `action: \"skipped\"`\n308\t2. Note the `commit` field from that entry\n309\t\n310\tIf skipped fingerprints exist, get the list of files changed since that review:\n311\t\n312\t```bash\n313\tgit diff --name-only HEAD\n314\t```\n315\t\n316\tFor each finding from Step 4 critical pass, Step 4.5-4.6 specialists and exploratory QA, check:\n317\t- Does its fingerprint match a previously skipped finding?\n318\t- Is the finding's file path NOT in the changed-files set?\n319\t- Is it the same advisory/defect kind? Never use a skipped advisory to suppress a real defect, including a defect with a colliding supplied fingerprint.\n320\t\n321\tSuppress only when all conditions hold: the user skipped the same unchanged finding.\n322\t\n323\tMatching explicitly skipped shared-code advice requires the complete procedure below.\n324\tFailed/unknown eligibility requires fresh source review, never ordinary suppression.\n325\t\n326\t> **STOP.** Before reusing explicitly skipped shared-code advice (Step 5.0), Read `/workspace/gstack/review/sections/shared-code-reuse.md` and execute it\n327\t> in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.\n328\t\n329\tIf N > 0, print once: \"Suppressed N findings from prior reviews (previously skipped by user)\"; do not repeat the items. Otherwise skip the summary.\n330\t\n331\t**Only suppress `skipped` findings — never `fixed` or `auto-fixed`** (those might regress and should be re-checked).\n332\t\n333\tCount only non-advisory defects in the final summary; list optional advice separately\n334\twith `[ADVISORY]`. Preserve advisory records and explicit decisions for\n335\tpersistence, but exclude advisories from score penalties, unresolved-defect\n336\ttotals, and clean-status blockers. This does not relax completion, convergence,\n337\tor missing-reviewer rules.\n338\t\n339\t**Keep decisions through fix cycles:**\n340\t1. Immediately save completed AUTO-FIX/fix and explicit Skip actions in the Step 3\n341\t action list, keeping defects separate from advice. For advice retain the helper's\n342\t fingerprint, `advisory`, `evidence_paths` and `helper_target`.\n343\t2. Before reusing a decision, re-read every supporting caller and helper destination,\n344\t including secondary callers and transformed/indirect paths. Compare their raw\n345\t source with the decision evidence.\n346\t3. Unrelated auto-fixes do not reopen unchanged identity, contract and tradeoffs.\n347\t Material proposal, behavior, migration or risk changes require a new question.\n348\t Carrying this invocation's decisions cannot suppress new/recurring defects or\n349\t replace Step 5.0's prior-review checker.\n350\t\n351\t### Step 5a: Classify each finding\n352\t\n353\tFor each finding, classify as AUTO-FIX or ASK per the Fix-First Heuristic in\n354\tchecklist.md. Critical findings lean toward ASK; informational findings lean\n355\ttoward AUTO-FIX.\n356\t\n357\t**Advisory override:** After severity validation, `advisory:true` is ASK-only. Never auto-apply an optional extraction, even when mechanical. Show `[ADVISORY]`, helper, caller migration, tests and estimated total savings for approval or Skip. Handle real defects independently.\n358\t\n359\t**Test stub override:** Any finding that has a `test_stub` field, from a specialist or exploratory QA,\n360\tis reclassified as ASK regardless of its original classification. When presenting the ASK\n361\titem, show the proposed test file path and the test code. The user approves or skips the\n362\ttest creation. If approved, follow Step 5d's regression-before-repair order. Derive the test file path from\n363\tthe finding's `path` using project conventions (`spec/` for RSpec, `__tests__/` for\n364\tJest/Vitest, `test_` prefix for pytest, `_test.go` suffix for Go). If the test file\n365\talready exists, append the new test.\n366\t\n367\t### Step 5b: Auto-fix all AUTO-FIX items\n368\t\n369\tApply each fix directly. For each one, output a one-line summary:\n370\t`[AUTO-FIXED] [file:line] Problem → what you did`\n371\tRetain the completed action in the invocation action list before starting any re-review.\n372\t\n373\t### Step 5c: Batch-ask about ASK items\n374\t\n375\tIf there are ASK items remaining, present them in ONE AskUserQuestion:\n376\t\n377\t- List each item with a number, the severity label (or `[ADVISORY]` for optional advice), the problem, and a recommended fix\n378\t- For each item, provide options: A) Fix as recommended, B) Skip\n379\t- Include an overall RECOMMENDATION\n380\t\n381\tIf 3 or fewer ASK items, you may use individual AskUserQuestion calls instead of batching.\n382\tRetain each explicit Skip choice and its finding metadata in the invocation action list. Do not record an unanswered question as skipped or ask again about a decision already revalidated in this invocation.\n383\t\n384\t### Step 5d: Apply user-approved fixes\n385\t\n386\tApply fixes where the user chose \"Fix,\" including Step 1.5's approved TODO changes.\n387\tOutput what was fixed.\n388\tFor an approved defect regression, write the test and prove it fails for the original\n389\tdefect before changing product code. Then require the regression, original probe and\n390\tadjacent happy path to pass. If that proof cannot run, report the coverage gap and do\n391\tnot claim a verified repair. Healthy uncovered contracts need no invented failing bug.\n392\tAfter applying the approved fix, retain its `fixed` action and the original finding metadata in the invocation action list, even if the changed blocks or helper callers are subsequently removed. Approval alone is not a completed fix.\n393\tAfter verifying an approved regression and repair, output:\n394\t`[FIXED + TEST] [file:line] Problem -> fix + test at [test_path]`\n395\t\n396\tIf no ASK items exist (everything was AUTO-FIX), skip the question entirely.\n397\t\n398\t### Verification of claims\n399\t\n400\tBefore final output, cite the line proving a safety claim, read and cite any\n401\thandling code you rely on, and name the test file and method for coverage claims.\n402\tVerify claims or flag them as unknown; \"this looks fine\" is not evidence.\n403\t\n404\t### Greptile comment resolution\n405\t\n406\tAfter outputting your own findings, if Greptile comments were classified in Step 2.5:\n407\t\n408\t**Include a Greptile summary in your output header:** `+ N Greptile comments (X valid, Y fixed, Z FP)`\n409\t\n410\tBefore replying to any comment, run the **Escalation Detection** algorithm from greptile-triage.md to determine whether to use Tier 1 (friendly) or Tier 2 (firm) reply templates.\n411\t\n412\t1. **VALID & ACTIONABLE comments:** Use their Step 5a–5d disposition; do not ask a second fix question. Step 5c alone supplies A) Fix / B) Skip for ASK items. After a completed fix, use the **Fix reply template** with diff and explanation; cite the current diff if uncommitted, never invent a commit SHA. A Skip leaves the defect unresolved and grants no new fix permission. If evidence disproves the finding, reclassify it below.\n413\t\n414\t2. **FALSE POSITIVE comments:** These are reply decisions, not code approval. Show file:line (or [top-level]), summary, permalink and evidence, then ask:\n415\t - A) Reply explaining why this is incorrect (recommended if clearly wrong)\n416\t - B) Propose a code change\n417\t - C) Ignore — don't reply, don't fix\n418\t\n419\t For A, use the **False Positive reply template** with evidence + suggested re-rank; save to both histories. For B, return to Steps 5c–5d with an ASK proposal. Show the exact change and any `test_stub`; wait for approval before editing. Retain the comment decision so re-entry does not repeat its question.\n420\t\n421\t3. **VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED comments:** Reply using the **Already Fixed reply template** from greptile-triage.md — no AskUserQuestion needed:\n422\t - Include what was done and the fixing commit SHA\n423\t - Save to both per-project and global greptile-history\n424\t\n425\t4. **SUPPRESSED comments:** Skip silently — these are known false positives from previous triage.\n426\t\n427\t---\n428\t\n429\t## Step 5.8: Persist Eng Review result\n430\t\n431\t### 1. Re-review after edits\n432\t\n433\t1. A pass covers Steps 3–5, including all reviewers before fixes. Allow at most 3 fix cycles:\n434\t - Edited: increment CYCLES once. Below 3, repeat Steps 3–5 with a new\n435\t REVIEW_START. At 3, persist `converged:false` and remaining findings by filling\n436\t and saving the record below. Report nonconvergence and coverage gaps, then STOP\n437\t this invocation, without a clean summary or a fourth pass.\n438\t - No edits: fill the record below.\n439\t2. On a repeat, execute Steps 3–5 in order. At Step 4.7, reuse only this invocation's\n440\t unchanged-input QA evidence; rerun affected probes after source, test, contract,\n441\t command or fixture changes. Reusing a probe never skips a review step.\n442\t A probe is affected when its entrypoint, dependencies, contract or replay inputs\n443\t change. If impact is uncertain, rerun it.\n444\t3. **Verify completed actions.** On the final zero-edit pass, reconcile this\n445\t invocation's actions with current findings. Deduplicate by structural identity\n446\t and advisory/defect kind. For a completed extraction, retain `fixed` and the\n447\t original `evidence_paths`/`helper_target`; use `sharedLibsFingerprint` on that\n448\t metadata. Verify the replacement helper, remaining callers and tests without\n449\t requiring deleted pre-extraction blocks. Current findings determine recurring\n450\t defects and unresolved counts; earlier fixes do not suppress them.\n451\t4. **Recheck skipped advice.** Re-read its final-snapshot supporting source and\n452\t reconfirm the decision; otherwise report its history without a reusable skip.\n453\t The logger computes `snapshot_covered_paths` from eligible paths whose raw bytes\n454\t equal the bound snapshot blobs (`[]` if none). Never carry prior-cycle, supplied\n455\t or prior-record coverage forward or build this proof yourself. Fixed advice\n456\t needs no skip coverage.\n457\t\n458\t### 2. Fill the record\n459\t\n460\t- `COMPLETED`: true only when the checklist, dispatched specialists and native\n461\t Step 4.8 adversarial pass finish, and every required Step 4.7 probe passes.\n462\t Any failed, blocked, inconclusive or not-run required probe means false, as does\n463\t a failed native review. `/ship` named-risk acceptance cannot complete `/review`.\n464\t- `CONVERGED`: true only for a completed zero-edit pass; `CYCLES` counts editing\n465\t passes, not findings or reviewer attempts.\n466\t- `STATUS`: `clean` only when completed with zero unresolved non-advisory\n467\t defects; otherwise `issues_found`. An incomplete review with no defects has\n468\t zero counts and `completed:false`; explain the gap. Advice never blocks clean\n469\t status or relaxes completion, convergence, start-token or missing-reviewer rules.\n470\t\n471\tThe required in-host adversarial result controls native completion. Optional outside\n472\tattempts keep their own incomplete records when unavailable and cannot substitute\n473\tfor the native result, or vice versa. Step 4.8's structured-review gate still applies.\n474\t\n475\t- Use Step 4.6's `specialists` object unchanged, including its empty small-diff map.\n476\t If this host omits Review Army, use `specialists: {}` without claiming specialist coverage.\n477\t- Build `findings` from final-pass core, specialist, verified exploratory QA\n478\t findings and invocation actions. Retain `fingerprint`, `severity`\n479\t (`CRITICAL|INFORMATIONAL`), `action`, and any `advisory`, `evidence_paths`,\n480\t `helper_target`. Recheck source after fixes. The logger uses `sharedLibsFingerprint`,\n481\t never supplied/model hashes.\n482\t Actions: `auto-fixed` (Step 5b), `fixed` (approved **and completed** in Step 5d),\n483\t `skipped` (explicit Skip in Step 5c). Advice is never `auto-fixed`; pending\n484\t advice stays in the response, not the record. Exclude prior Step 5.0\n485\t suppressions; include this invocation's revalidated decisions.\n486\t\n487\t```bash\n488\t/workspace/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{\"skill\":\"review\",\"timestamp\":\"TIMESTAMP\",\"status\":\"STATUS\",\"issues_found\":N,\"critical\":N,\"informational\":N,\"quality_score\":SCORE,\"specialists\":SPECIALISTS_JSON,\"findings\":FINDINGS_JSON,\"commit\":\"COMMIT\",\"completed\":COMPLETED,\"converged\":CONVERGED,\"cycles\":CYCLES}' --finish REVIEW_START\n489\t```\n490\t\n491\tUse ISO 8601 `TIMESTAMP` and `git rev-parse --short HEAD` for `COMMIT`.\n492\t`quality_score` is Step 4.6's specialist score (`10.0` when small-diff specialists\n493\twere skipped or this host omits Review Army). This default is not completion evidence;\n494\tunresolved non-advisory core defects still count in `issues_found`,\n495\t`critical`, `informational`. The logger builds trusted `review_binding` from the\n496\tvalidated captured branch digest, discarding caller bindings. Never invent a binding\n497\tor replace REVIEW_START at log time; finish only the final core token.\n498\t\n499\t### Report the final review\n500\t\n501\tEmit one final report, merging all reviewers rather than concatenating their reports:\n502\t1. `Pre-Landing Review: N issues (X critical, Y informational)` counts final unresolved\n503\t non-advisory defects. State INCOMPLETE if `COMPLETED` is false, even when N=0.\n504\t2. Use the checklist's action groups with confidence-tagged finding lines. Keep fixed,\n505\t skipped and advisory items separate from unresolved defects; retain their dispositions.\n506\t3. Append Step 4.7's single `## Exploratory QA and Verification Results` section with\n507\t current evidence and coverage gaps. Neither coverage gaps nor advice are defects.\n508\t" } ] } }, { "type": "assistant", "message": { "content": [ { "type": "tool_use", "id": "toolu_012i2tzkYyUhWvGZxSb42p8P", "name": "Read", "input": { "file_path": "/workspace/gstack/review/checklist.md" } } ] } }, { "type": "user", "message": { "content": [ { "type": "tool_result", "tool_use_id": "toolu_012i2tzkYyUhWvGZxSb42p8P", "content": "1\t# Pre-Landing Review Checklist\n2\t\n3\t## Instructions\n4\t\n5\tReview the merge-base diff from the caller, including its selected uncommitted and new source. Use the caller's detected base, not a hardcoded branch. Cite `file:line` and suggest fixes. Only flag real problems.\n6\t\n7\t**Two-pass review:**\n8\t- **Pass 1 (CRITICAL):** Run SQL & Data Safety, Race Conditions, LLM Output Trust Boundary, Shell Injection, and Enum Completeness first. Highest severity.\n9\t- **Pass 2 (INFORMATIONAL):** Run remaining categories below. Lower severity but still actioned.\n10\t- **Specialist categories (handled by parallel subagents, NOT this checklist):** Test Gaps, Dead Code, Magic Numbers, Conditional Side Effects, Performance & Bundle Impact, Crypto & Entropy, Simplification (unrequested structure). See `review/specialists/` for these.\n11\t\n12\tCompleteness Gaps and Simplification are orthogonal, not contradictory: Completeness pushes coverage UP (tests, edge cases, error paths), Simplification pushes unrequested structure DOWN (one-implementation abstractions, hand-rolled stdlib, dead flexibility). The same diff can legitimately receive both.\n13\t\n14\tAll findings get action via Fix-First Review: obvious mechanical fixes are applied automatically,\n15\tgenuinely ambiguous issues are batched into a single user question.\n16\t\n17\t**Output format:**\n18\t\n19\t```\n20\tPre-Landing Review: N issues (X critical, Y informational)\n21\t\n22\t**AUTO-FIXED:**\n23\t- [file:line] Problem → fix applied\n24\t\n25\t**NEEDS INPUT:**\n26\t- [file:line] Problem description\n27\t Recommended fix: suggested fix\n28\t```\n29\t\n30\tIf no issues found: `Pre-Landing Review: No issues found.`\n31\t\n32\tBe terse. For each issue: one line describing the problem, one line with the fix. No preamble, no summaries, no \"looks good overall.\"\n33\t\n34\t---\n35\t\n36\t## Review Categories\n37\t\n38\t### Pass 1 — CRITICAL\n39\t\n40\t#### SQL & Data Safety\n41\t- String interpolation in SQL (even if values are `.to_i`/`.to_f` — use parameterized queries (Rails: sanitize_sql_array/Arel; Node: prepared statements; Python: parameterized queries))\n42\t- TOCTOU races: check-then-set patterns that should be atomic `WHERE` + `update_all`\n43\t- Bypassing model validations for direct DB writes (Rails: update_column; Django: QuerySet.update(); Prisma: raw queries)\n44\t- N+1 queries: Missing eager loading (Rails: .includes(); SQLAlchemy: joinedload(); Prisma: include) for associations used in loops/views\n45\t\n46\t#### Race Conditions & Concurrency\n47\t- Read-check-write without uniqueness constraint or catch duplicate key error and retry (e.g., `where(hash:).first` then `save!` without handling concurrent insert)\n48\t- find-or-create without unique DB index — concurrent calls can create duplicates\n49\t- Status transitions that don't use atomic `WHERE old_status = ? UPDATE SET new_status` — concurrent updates can skip or double-apply transitions\n50\t- Unsafe HTML rendering (Rails: .html_safe/raw(); React: dangerouslySetInnerHTML; Vue: v-html; Django: |safe/mark_safe) on user-controlled data (XSS)\n51\t\n52\t#### LLM Output Trust Boundary\n53\t- LLM-generated values (emails, URLs, names) written to DB or passed to mailers without format validation. Add lightweight guards (`EMAIL_REGEXP`, `URI.parse`, `.strip`) before persisting.\n54\t- Structured tool output (arrays, hashes) accepted without type/shape checks before database writes.\n55\t- LLM-generated URLs fetched without allowlist — SSRF risk if URL points to internal network (Python: `urllib.parse.urlparse` → check hostname against blocklist before `requests.get`/`httpx.get`)\n56\t- LLM output stored in knowledge bases or vector DBs without sanitization — stored prompt injection risk\n57\t\n58\t#### Shell Injection (Python-specific)\n59\t- `subprocess.run()` / `subprocess.call()` / `subprocess.Popen()` with `shell=True` AND f-string/`.format()` interpolation in the command string — use argument arrays instead\n60\t- `os.system()` with variable interpolation — replace with `subprocess.run()` using argument arrays\n61\t- `eval()` / `exec()` on LLM-generated code without sandboxing\n62\t\n63\t#### Enum & Value Completeness\n64\tWhen the diff introduces a new enum value, status string, tier name, or type constant:\n65\t- **Trace it through every consumer.** Read (don't just grep — READ) each file that switches on, filters by, or displays that value. If any consumer doesn't handle the new value, flag it. Common miss: adding a value to the frontend dropdown but the backend model/compute method doesn't persist it.\n66\t- **Check allowlists/filter arrays.** Search for arrays or `%w[]` lists containing sibling values (e.g., if adding \"revise\" to tiers, find every `%w[quick lfg mega]` and verify \"revise\" is included where needed).\n67\t- **Check `case`/`if-elsif` chains.** If existing code branches on the enum, does the new value fall through to a wrong default?\n68\tTo do this: use Grep to find all references to the sibling values (e.g., grep for \"lfg\" or \"mega\" to find all tier consumers). Read each match. This step requires reading code OUTSIDE the diff.\n69\t\n70\t### Pass 2 — INFORMATIONAL\n71\t\n72\t#### Async/Sync Mixing (Python-specific)\n73\t- Synchronous `subprocess.run()`, `open()`, `requests.get()` inside `async def` endpoints — blocks the event loop. Use `asyncio.to_thread()`, `aiofiles`, or `httpx.AsyncClient` instead.\n74\t- `time.sleep()` inside async functions — use `asyncio.sleep()`\n75\t- Sync DB calls in async context without `run_in_executor()` wrapping\n76\t\n77\t#### Column/Field Name Safety\n78\t- Verify column names in ORM queries (`.select()`, `.eq()`, `.gte()`, `.order()`) against actual DB schema — wrong column names silently return empty results or throw swallowed errors\n79\t- Check `.get()` calls on query results use the column name that was actually selected\n80\t- Cross-reference with schema documentation when available\n81\t\n82\t#### Dead Code & Consistency (version/changelog only — other items handled by maintainability specialist)\n83\t- Version mismatch between PR title and VERSION/CHANGELOG files\n84\t- CHANGELOG entries that describe changes inaccurately (e.g., \"changed from X to Y\" when X never existed)\n85\t\n86\t#### LLM Prompt Issues\n87\t- 0-indexed lists in prompts (LLMs reliably return 1-indexed)\n88\t- Prompt text listing available tools/capabilities that don't match what's actually wired up in the `tool_classes`/`tools` array\n89\t- Word/token limits stated in multiple places that could drift\n90\t\n91\t#### Completeness Gaps\n92\t- Shortcut implementations where the complete version would cost <30 minutes CC time (e.g., partial enum handling, incomplete error paths, missing edge cases that are straightforward to add)\n93\t- Options presented with only human-team effort estimates — should show both human and CC+gstack time\n94\t- Test coverage gaps where adding the missing tests is a \"lake\" not an \"ocean\" (e.g., missing negative-path tests, missing edge case tests that mirror happy-path structure)\n95\t- Features implemented at 80-90% when 100% is achievable with modest additional code\n96\t\n97\t#### Time Window Safety\n98\t- Date-key lookups that assume \"today\" covers 24h — report at 8am PT only sees midnight→8am under today's key\n99\t- Mismatched time windows between related features — one uses hourly buckets, another uses daily keys for the same data\n100\t\n101\t#### Type Coercion at Boundaries\n102\t- Values crossing Ruby→JSON→JS boundaries where type could change (numeric vs string) — hash/digest inputs must normalize types\n103\t- Hash/digest inputs that don't call `.to_s` or equivalent before serialization — `{ cores: 8 }` vs `{ cores: \"8\" }` produce different hashes\n104\t\n105\t#### View/Frontend\n106\t- Inline `