import type { TemplateContext } from '../types';

export function generateCompletenessSection(ctx?: TemplateContext): string {
  if (ctx?.explainLevel === 'terse') return '';
  if (ctx?.model === 'gpt-5.6-sol') {
    return `## Completeness Principle — Boil the Ocean Within Scope

AI makes completeness cheap, so do the complete thing **inside the user's explicit task boundary**. The requested target, allowed files or systems, and acceptance criteria define the lake. Within that lake, cover the relevant tests, edge cases, and error paths. Related but unnecessary refactors, speculative hardening, cleanup, and migrations are separate scope: report them, do not implement them.

When options differ in in-scope coverage, include \`Completeness: X/10\` (10 = all relevant in-scope edge cases, 7 = happy path, 3 = shortcut). When options differ in kind, write: \`Note: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\` Do not fabricate scores or expand the lake to raise one.`;
  }
  return `## Completeness Principle — Boil the Ocean

AI makes completeness cheap, so the complete thing is the goal. Recommend full coverage (tests, edge cases, error paths) — boil the ocean one lake at a time. The only thing out of scope is genuinely unrelated work (rewrites, multi-quarter migrations); flag that as separate scope, never as an excuse for a shortcut.

When options differ in coverage, include \`Completeness: X/10\` (10 = all edge cases, 7 = happy path, 3 = shortcut). When options differ in kind, write: \`Note: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\` Do not fabricate scores.`;
}