/** * autoplan AskUserQuestion-blocked regression (gate, paid, real-PTY). * * v1.21+ regression: Conductor launches Claude Code with * `--disallowedTools AskUserQuestion --permission-mode default` (verified * by inspecting the parent claude process via `ps`). The native * AskUserQuestion tool is removed from the model's tool registry; without * fallback guidance the model can't ask the user and silently proceeds. * * Autoplan auto-decides INTERMEDIATE questions BY DESIGN * (autoplan/SKILL.md.tmpl:45), but Phase 1's premise confirmation gate is * one of the few non-auto-decided AskUserQuestions and MUST surface to the * user. This test asserts that gate still surfaces when AskUserQuestion is * disallowed at the tool-registry level — the fix must route the question * through a Conductor-side variant (mcp__conductor__AskUserQuestion) or * through the plan-file + ExitPlanMode flow. * * Filename keeps `auto-mode` for branch-history continuity. Auto-mode (the * AUTO_DECIDE preamble path when QUESTION_TUNING=true) is a related but * distinct silencing mechanism; both share the same fix surface. * * Note on report-at-bottom contract: the GSTACK REVIEW REPORT delete-then- * append flow lives in `scripts/resolvers/review.ts` and is exercised when * reviews actually run. The PTY harness can't drive autoplan through its * review phases without auto-progression of AUQs (see runPlanSkillCounting), * and `--disallowedTools AskUserQuestion` makes autoplan bail at the * premise gate via the plan-file fallback before any review runs. The * report-at-bottom prompt change is verified statically in * `test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts` instead — that's the load-bearing * verification for the contradictory-prompt fix. */ import { describe, test, expect } from 'bun:test'; import { runPlanSkillObservation, planFileHasDecisionsSection } from './helpers/claude-pty-runner'; const shouldRun = !!process.env.EVALS && process.env.EVALS_TIER === 'gate'; const describeE2E = shouldRun ? describe : describe.skip; describeE2E('autoplan AskUserQuestion-blocked smoke (gate)', () => { // Pass envelope is ['asked', 'plan_ready']: model either renders the // first non-auto-decided gate (Phase 1 premise confirmation) as numbered // prose or surfaces it through the plan file + ExitPlanMode flow. // Autoplan auto-decides intermediate questions BY DESIGN; the failure // signal we care about is the AUTO_DECIDE preamble firing on a gate it // shouldn't (caught explicitly via the 'auto_decided' outcome). test('a non-auto-decided gate surfaces when AskUserQuestion is --disallowedTools', async () => { const obs = await runPlanSkillObservation({ skillName: 'autoplan', inPlanMode: true, extraArgs: ['--disallowedTools', 'AskUserQuestion'], timeoutMs: 300_000, }); if ( obs.outcome === 'auto_decided' || obs.outcome === 'silent_write' || obs.outcome === 'exited' || obs.outcome === 'timeout' ) { throw new Error( `autoplan AskUserQuestion-blocked regression: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` + `summary: ${obs.summary}\n` + `elapsed: ${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` + `--- evidence (last 2KB visible) ---\n${obs.evidence}`, ); } if (obs.outcome === 'plan_ready') { if (!obs.planFile || !planFileHasDecisionsSection(obs.planFile)) { throw new Error( `autoplan AskUserQuestion-blocked regression: plan_ready without a "## Decisions" section in ${obs.planFile ?? ''} — Phase 1 premise gate was silently skipped.\n` + `--- evidence (last 2KB visible) ---\n${obs.evidence}`, ); } } expect(['asked', 'plan_ready']).toContain(obs.outcome); }, 360_000); });